Teacher evaluation in NJ: 2013 PRESENTERS’ NAMES REBUTTAL WRITING TRAINING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson Objective The student will learn how to properly record notes and utilize both the Cornell Note Taking System and the Learning Log.
Advertisements

Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 3 Implementation and Documentation.
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
PACESetters! Alternative Teacher Evaluation
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Site Visit Review Just-in-Time Training. Pre-work and Training Judging Examiner Evaluation Process Stage 1 Independent Review Stage 2 Consensus Review.
Providing Effective Feedback
Performance Management
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 3: Effective Feedback NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Performance Management
7 Developing Employees Human Resources Management and Supervision
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Make It Happen Leadership in Teaching - March 20, 2013.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
December 3, Performance Appraisal for Experienced Teachers WCDSBandOECTA.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Know your Contractual Rights By The United School Employees of Pasco.
Teacher Evaluation Update
K-W-L  Please take just a moment to use what you KNOW about the Professionalism rubric to write down what you WANT to know before the end of our session.
Peninsula School District
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
RESETTING PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – MANAGER AS COACH Manager Briefing & Discussion Sessions Winter 2013.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Differentiated Supervision
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
9/4/15 Do Now: -Take a plagiarism Word Splash from the front of the room and begin working on it Homework: -Signed Syllabus (Due 9/9) -Signed Plagiarism.
MANAGING TEACHER EVALUATIONS EFFICIENTLY TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
HANOI INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL 3 way_conferences_2014.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.
Teacher Observations Summative or Formative? ( Glickman et. al.)
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Class Observer & Feedback Training Cass Breen & Marco Macchitella.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply LaRue County Schools Opening Day, 2017 Complete.
Teacher Evaluation Training
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
TeachNJ By Heather Perruso.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
TDES Think Tank September 25, 2018 Jill Cabe, Director of Performance Management Megan Scully, TDES Coordinator Time: 1 Minute.
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Teacher evaluation in NJ: 2013 PRESENTERS’ NAMES REBUTTAL WRITING TRAINING

Shall be used as one form of evidence for measurement of teacher performance Will be included in the determination of the annual summative evaluation rating Shall be conducted by an individual – employed in the school district in a supervisory role and capacity – possessing a school administrator certificate, principal certificate, or supervisor certificate. OBSERVATIONS

OBSERVATION TYPES ●“Long observation” o Minimum duration of 40 minutes or one class period, whichever is shorter ●“Short observation” o At least 20 minutes

OBSERVATION TYPES ●“Announced observation” – notified of the date and the class period that the observation will be conducted ●“Unannounced observation” – not notified of the date or time that the observation will be conducted. ●“Co-observation” – two or more supervisors observe simultaneously, or at alternate times, the same lesson or portion of a lesson for the purpose of training

TEACHER OBSERVATIONS VAR Y ●Long: 40 minutes, with post-conference ●Short: 20 minutes, with post-conference Teacher Categories Total # of Observations Observers Non-Tenured Years 1–2 3 (2 long, 1 short) Multiple Observers Required Years 3–4 3 (1 long, 2 short) Tenured 3 (0 long, 3 short) Multiple Observers Recommended Notes: ●Corrective Action Plans: After the first year, teachers who receive an “Ineffective”or “Partially Effective” rating are required to have one additional observation. Multiple observers are required. ●Announced vs. Unannounced: Within the minimum requirements, all teachers must have at least one unannounced and one announced observation. TEACHERS: PRACTICE PracticeSGPSGOSummative

PRE-OBSERVATION CONFERENCE Pre-conference shall occur within seven teaching days prior to the observation, not including the day of the observation. At least one observation shall be announced and preceded by a pre-conference. Proposed-N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.4

WHEN THE OBSERVER ENTERS Show Evidence of Good Practice Slow down Capture teachable moments Provide copies of handouts to Administration

WHEN THE OBSERVER ENTERS Show Evidence of Good Practice Closure – Exit Tickets – Ask questions – On a scale of 1-5-using your fingers-rate todays lesson – As you leave today, I’ll be at the door. Please share with me one word or concept you learned today.

SELF REFLECTION NJEA Resource Guide on Evaluation for Teachers Page 5-10Baseline Data Page 11-18Observation Log Issues & Actions Evaluations

POST-OBSERVATION CONFERENCE ●A meeting, either in-person or remotely between a supervisor and the teaching staff member to discuss the data collected in the observation ●Be followed by both parties to such a conference signing the written evaluation report and each retaining a copy for his or her records ●Allow the teaching staff member to submit his or her written objection(s) / (rebuttal) o within 10 teaching-staff-member working days o shall be attached to each party's copy

CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS Basic steps 1.Identify and clarify 2.Establish a mutual purpose 3.Establish respect 4.STATE your course o Share your facts: least controversial & most persuasive first o Tell your story o Ask for others facts and stories o Talk about what is fact and what is assumption o Encourage differing views 5.Actively listen

CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS Preparation  Make sure you and your supervisor have sufficient time to see the conversation through to the end.  Be realistic about what you can and cannot achieve.  Make sure the conversation is focused on facts and why the facts are important, not just opinion.

CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS Preparation  Practice your key sentence.  Understand you have a good chance to resolve an issue rather quickly with a conversation.  Take a deep breath.

CRITICAL CONVERSATIONS Building rapport  Be sincere.  Be present in the conversation.  Be confident, but not arrogant.  Be empathic.  Be honest.

Your turn to give feedback! – Acknowledge positive findings – Acknowledge challenges revealed o Ask for support – Share data – Never submit your response without showing it to your Building Rep or Association Rep WRITING A RESPONSE

WRITING A REBUTTAL  Analyze  Neutralize  Equalize analyze equalize neutralize

●What is the “tone” of the written report? ●Is the report designed to lead to professional learning? ●Is the report derogatory without being constructive? ●Are there positive facts that have been omitted? ●Is there a pattern? ●What needs correction by rebuttal? ANALYZE – Ask the right questions

●Provide evidence to support your disagreement ●Give data to neutralize what has been criticized ●Answer “labeled” items ●Use language that is not emotionally charged NEUTRALIZE all negative items

●Stress preparation ●Focus on objectives, procedures, attainment ●Be clear ●Connect performance to job description/model ●Discuss, don’t reject, recommendations ●Identify needed support for recommendations EQUALIZE the results

●Keep it short and simple ●Seek advice ●Utilize facts ●Get specifics ●Identify if assistance had been previously requested; response ●Have an appropriately trained association representative read the response before giving it to the administrator MAKE YOUR REBUTTAL EFFECTIVE

●Review Observation A & B with the attached Reflections ●Discuss your thoughts with your table. – Does the reflection paint a big picture? – What changes should be made to improve it? AT YOUR TABLES

●With a partner, pick an observation and write a reflection for it. GROUP WORK

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN ●Review corrective action plan with association representative ●Make sure CAP expectations are achievable ●Identify roles and responsibilities: – administration – teaching staff member ●Review timelines

MID-YEAR EVALUATION ●Required if have a Corrective Action Plan ●Timing for the mid-year could vary depending if a teachers gets an SGP or not.

SUMMATIVE EVALUATION ●Everyone gets an annual summative evaluation ●Can now be the same as the final evaluation.