Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
PORTFOLIO.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
The Danielson Model: What Does This Mean for Lutheran Educators?
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Differentiated Supervision
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Welcome ! Collab Meeting May 6, Things to remember  Aug 12 – First day for teachers  Aug – FAI In-service  Aug 25 – First day for students.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Comprehensive Planning
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013

Outcomes  Teachers will gain an understanding of Baltimore County Public School’s Teacher Evaluation System

Evaluation Outcomes In discussing a new evaluation system, committees focused on… 1. Creating an evaluation that is consistent, fair and equitable (all speaking the same language) 2. Creating an evaluation that allows for teacher growth 3. Creating an evaluation that enhances student achievement, while at the same time, allows for professional growth

Overview of Evaluation Model  50 % Qualitative Measures: Charlotte Danielson Framework  50 % Quantitative Measures: SLO’s and Test Data  Overall Possible Evaluation Ratings  Highly Effective (distinguished and “student led”)  Effective  Effective Developing  Ineffective *Highly Effective, Effective and Effective Developing are all seen as Satisfactory.

Evaluation Model cont…  3 year cycle (Formative, Formative, Summative)  2 Formative Years  1 Summative Year -Formal (4) and informal observation data -Professional Growth Plan evidence -Student Learning Outcome evidence *NON TENURED TEACHERS- Every year until tenure is a Summative Year

Why Danielson?  Comprehensive description of what teachers “do”  Based on a large body of educational research  There’s no “gotcha factor”  Allows for all types of teaching situations  Provides a common language among professionals  Creates a forum for discussion about teaching  Encourages teacher self-reflection and evaluation  Versatility for all levels of expertise and experience

Qualitative Measures The Danielson Model Domain 3 Domain 4 Domain 2 Domain 1 Planning and Preparation Classroom Environment Instruction Professional Responsibilities

Qualitative Measures The Framework for Teaching  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 2: Classroom Management  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

The Domains An Overview  Allows for consistent, deep and professional conversations between principals and teachers.  Domains 1 and 4 are the “behind the scenes” work (off stage)  Domains 2 and 3 are observable (on stage)  Help teachers to become more thoughtful practitioners

Domain 1 Planning and Preparation  Components:  1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy  1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students  1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes  1d: Designing Learning Activities  1e: Designing Student Assessments *This is showing what you know and what you do with that knowledge!!

Domain 1 includes…  Knowledge of Content, Students and the Learning Process  Knowledge of Students’ Interests and Cultural Heritage  Knowledge of Students’ Special Needs  Differentiation is planned  Design of Formative Assessments  Management of groups  Learning Activities  Instructional materials/resources  Instructional groups  Lesson and unit structure

Domain 2 Classroom Environment  Components:  2a: Creating and Environment of Respect and Rapport  2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning  2c: Managing Classroom Procedures  2d: Managing Student Behavior  2e: Arrangement of Physical Space

Domain 2 includes…  Teacher interaction with students  Expectations for learning and achievement  Student pride in work  Management of instructional groups/transitions  Management of materials and supplies  Monitoring student behavior  Response to student misbehavior  Safety and Accessibility

Domain 3 Instruction  Components:  3a: Communicating with Students  3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques  3c: Engaging Students in Learning  3d: Using Assessments in Instruction

Domain 3 includes…  Expectations for learning and explanations of content  Directions and procedures  Quality of questions and discussion techniques  Activities and assignments  Grouping of students  Structure and pacing  Feedback to students and monitoring of student learning  Assessment criteria  Lesson Adjustment, Flexibility and Responsiveness

Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities  Components:  4a: Reflecting on Teaching  4b: Maintaining Accurate Records  4c: Communicating with Families  4d: Participating in a Professional Community  4e: Growing and Developing Professionally  4f: Showing Professionalism *The components of Domain 4…encompass the roles assumed outside of and in addition to those in the classroom with students.

What About Domain 4???  Best demonstrated through “stuff” that you typically don’t see from observation directly  “Stuff” might include: -Class newsletters -Phone log -Letters to parents about a new program -Involvement in school programming -Documents from Professional development  Can gather evidence through interview, artifacts, and teacher’s self reflection

Let’s break for… Questions???

Quantitative Measures Percentage varies by teaching assignment State Testing Data Student Learning Outcomes

Evaluation Criteria Non-Tested Subjects 50% Qualitative Measures Charlotte Danielson Framework Domains % Quantitative Measures 50% SLOs Grade One Tested Subject 50% Qualitative Measures Charlotte Danielson Framework Domains % Quantitative Measures 30% SLOs 20% MSA Data Grade Two Tested Subjects 50% Qualitative Measures Charlotte Danielson Framework Domains % Quantitative Measures 30% SLOs 10% MSA Math Data 10% MSA Reading Data

Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s)  Measure student growth by establishing formal learning goals.  Applies to all teaching assignments.  Can be adapted to measure individual, group, or school performance.

Essential Components of SLO’s 1. Statement of Outcome 2. Rationale 3. Student Population 4. Interval of Instruction 5. Target(s) and Evidence 6. Rationale for Targets

Statement of Outcome  The statement of the outcome should represent the enduring learning and/or the most important skill development expected of the students during the course

Rationale  Explains why you chose this outcome and why it is an appropriate area of focus.  Teachers should consider federal, state and system standards as well as system expectations for students in the course.

Student Population  Identify which students the outcome addresses and from which classes.  For most outcomes it should be all students in a class but there may be times a subgroup of students is an appropriate choice.

Interval of Instruction  Typically one year or one semester  School Year can be based on a unit’s time

Targets and Evidence  Where will this population of students be at the end of the interval of instruction?  May reflect progress of mastery of the outcome in percentages or numbers.  Targets may be tiered to reflect differentiation among students.  At least one source of evidence is required, but multiple sources may be used.  If a common assessment exists, it should be considered as a primary source of evidence.  Evidence may include pre-test and post-tests, projects and portfolios or other student work samples measured across time.

Rationale for Target  Identifies how the target was chosen  How was this determined to be a rigorous target.  Pre-test or baseline information that informed the decision should also be identified.

Principal’s Role  Ensure quality of the SLOs  Review and approve teacher SLOs  Develop school wide SLOs that are included in the principal’s goals

Teacher Guidelines  Align 1 SLO to Principal’s goals  Review models of SLOs from Staff Relations Intranet site for ideas  Create SLO by grade level or content teams

Teacher Guidelines cont..  Derive measures from current curriculum resources, if appropriate  Create an appropriate assessment if none is available in the curriculum  Format SLO according to the template provided

SLO Resources  Rubrics to assess SLO rigor  Guidance documents on creating SLOs (intranet)  C & I examples of SLOs (intranet)

SLO Timeline Before November 15, 2012 Teacher reviews student data and drafts one of more SLO. Evaluator reviews and approves outcome and targets. Mid Unit Evaluator and teacher review and assess progress toward targets. End of Unit Evaluator and teacher review and assess progress toward targets. Evaluator assigns score.

SLO Rubric

Questions?