TEACHER EVALUATION UPDATE 2014 - 2015 Center Grove Community School Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Advertisements

1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
PORTFOLIO.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
For Center Grove Community School Corporation Data Component for Indiana Teacher Evaluation System.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Avon Grove School District October 2009
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Welcome.
Welcome.
New Teacher Induction Model
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER EVALUATION UPDATE Center Grove Community School Corporation

GAP Revisions Teachers Can Expect New:All Goal Action Plans will be created within the new Standards for Success program. Due Date: Goals due by October 1 GAP Reflections can be voluntarily turned in after April 1 All GAP Reflections must be turned in by May 1.

Teacher Evaluation Rubric Competency 3.1 The words “outside of regular classroom instruction” were removed from Effective and Highly Effective. Changes for

Observation Revisions Score on EvaluationCWTs (5 m), 15s, and 45m Teachers New to CG Teacher Transfer to a new CG Building 6 CWTs 2, 15 min observations 1, 45 min observation Score of CWTs 2, 15 min observations 1, 45 min observation Score of CWTs 1, 15 min observation 1, 45 min observation Score of CWTs 1, 45 min observation *Principals may visit classrooms more than the above minimums.

Observation Revisions (cont.) 45 minute Observations Will be scheduled Can be done between Sept 1 and May 1 CWTs and 15 minute Observations Unannounced Should be spaced throughout the year and reflective of the different capacities or teacher job requirements All classroom observations will primarily focus on Domain 2 of the evaluation rubric but CAN include indicators from Domains 1 and 3.

Evidence Report Requirements Requirements: Artifacts are only needed when an area was not checked as seen by the evaluator during any observations Artifacts will all be on-line starting the school year If an area is not checked, a teacher will complete a bulleted statement on the Evidence Report and show 1 artifact DUE: Evidence Reports are due to the administrator 7 working days prior to your scheduled final evaluation meeting

Final Evaluation Calculation Teacher Evaluation Calculations and Ratings % 15% Purposeful DesigningEffective InstructionTeacher LeadershipProfessionalism 1.1 Utilize Assessment Data for Purposeful Planning 2.1 Student Understanding and Mastery 3.1 Contribute to School/District Culture 4.1Attendance 1.2 Set Measurable Achievement Goals 2.2Engage Students 3.2 Collaborate with Peers 4.2On-Time 1.3 Develop Standards- Based Unit Plans and Assessments 2.3 Knowledge of Content 3.3 Seek and Implement Professional Skills and Knowledge 4.3 Policies, Procedures, Expectations 1.4 Create Objective/Goal- Driven Lesson Plans and Assessments 2.4 Check for Understanding and Modify 3.4 Advocate for Student Success 4.4Respect 1.5 Track Student Data and Analyze Progress 2.5 Maximize Instructional Time 3.5 Communicate with Families 4.5 District/Building Goals 2.6 Culture of Respect and Collaboration 2.7 High Expecations for Success Below are the Domains and % of weight that will computed into a final score.

Final Evaluation Meeting Your Evidence Report is due to your administrator seven working days prior to your scheduled Final Evaluation Meeting. Final Evaluation Meetings will be scheduled after April 1 or earlier if done voluntarily. Your administrator will provide you with a “draft” for your review 24 hours in advance.

Final Score Your final score will be sent to ESB where % of increased salary will be computed. Your final score will also determine how many observations you will receive the following academic year.