TEACHER OBSERVATION/ EVALUATION PROCESS Teacher Institute July 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Leading Australian Curriculum: Science Day 1. Australian Curriculum PURPOSE OF 4 DAY MODULES Curriculum leaders develop capacity to lead change and support.
Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Session 2: Analyzing teaching and providing feedback Leadership Series July 2012.
This We Believe: Keys to Educating Young Adolescents The position paper of the Association for Middle Level Education.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
“The GMC aims to encourage a culture where the patient and public perspective is sought and recognised across the spectrum of medical education” Paragraph.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Co-Teaching? What’s That?
Performance management guidance
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Objective Develop an understanding of Appendix B: CA ELD Standards Part II: Learning About How English Works.
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
The Road to Powerful Instructional Practice Through the 5D+™ Teacher Evaluation Rubric Alaska Staff Development Network April 10, 2013 Copyright © 2013.
LEARNING CENTERED CONFERENCING USING THE CEL FRAMEWORK NICK HEDMAN AND PATTY HOWARD.
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
NEPF a semester away… Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
RESETTING PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – MANAGER AS COACH Manager Briefing & Discussion Sessions Winter 2013.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Public Charter School Grant Program Workshop Aligning Teacher Evaluation, Professional Development, Recruitment and Retention March 3, 2014.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
© TNTP 2014 March Principal Training. / 2 Do Now Reflect on your progress from the last session: How successful were you in supporting a teacher to identify.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
Session 3: Reviewing lesson plans and providing feedback Leadership Series July 2012.
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
 When working with children, staff learns to communicate with a variety of people for different purposes:  Building relationships with colleagues 
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Instructional Leadership for Complex Instruction EBCC Symposium January 27, 2012.
21 st Century School Administrators’ Institute Building a Vision of High-Quality Teaching & Learning San Diego County Office of Education School Leadership.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Planning for and Attending an Important Meeting Advanced Social Communication High School: Lesson Seven.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Welcome! Now, get to work. What is the purpose of your employee performance management system? What would you change about your employee performance management.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
1 Instructional Framework & Teacher Evaluation. 2 Welcome Name School, Assignment, Years in Education One thing you are hoping to get out of today!
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Welcome! Opening activity: On the post-it note at your table, answer the question: “What one strategy do you implement in the classroom to manage conferences?”
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Learning Management System
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER OBSERVATION/ EVALUATION PROCESS Teacher Institute July 2012

Objectives Teachers will be able to: 1. Identify the various types of formal and informal observations. 2. Identify the various types of feedback associated with observations. 3. Analyze observation feedback based on SOTEL. 4. Review the Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Agenda Do Now Purpose for Observing Teaching and Providing Feedback Types of Observations and Feedback Key Take Aways Exploring the Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Do Now Think about the most valuable feedback you have ever received from a peer and/or supervisor. What impact did it make on your work? Why? Share with a partner. Whole group share

Why are observations and feedback important? Cognitive psychologists studied expertise across a variety of sectors--from silver-smithing to law, surgery to architecture. One trait differentiated experts from the rest: The experts were more likely to be self- critically focused on improving their skills. Bereiter, Carl, and Scardamalia, Marlene. Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise. New York: Open Court Publishing Co., 1992.

Purpose of Analyzing Teaching and Providing Feedback Analyzing teaching allows the observer to identify areas of strength and growth. Teacher  Student Feedback = Instructional Leader  Teacher Feedback DANGER: taking critical feedback personally

Types of Observations Learning walks Mini-Observations Extended Observations Full period observation

Learning Walks Learning walks are for general, school-wide feedback on culture and safety. If necessary, feedback is shared at a staff meeting.  Quick “tour” of building  Occur occasionally  Culture audit/safety

Mini-Observations Feedback Same day, face-to-face ◦ Gives an opportunity to develop a partnership between teachers and instructional leaders ◦ Creates a conversation around the observation – allowing for immediate questions and clarifications ◦ Avoids miscommunication common in notes and s from a lack of expression and tone  5 minutes  Every teacher receives one per week  Non-evaluative

SOTEL: A Framework for Communication Safety Objectives Teaching Engagement Learning Briefly at your tables, discuss what you think the following terms entail when it comes to classroom instruction:

SOTEL: A Framework for Communication Safety: The class is running smoothly and students can focus on learning. ◦ Key Question: Can these kids focus on learning? Objectives: Are the lesson objectives clear? ◦ Key Question: Where is this lesson heading? Teaching: The learning experiences are being skillful orchestrated. ◦ Key Question: Is the learning being skillfully orchestrated? Engagement: The students are paying attention and are involved in the lesson. ◦ Key Question: Who is doing the work here? Learning: What is being taught is being learned. ◦ Key Question: Are all the kids getting it? How do you know?

Extended Observations These observations will be followed up with more formal feedback and a meeting to discuss it in person.  minutes  Designed to get a bigger picture of instructional practices; to offer additional support  Non-evaluative (initially)

Example: Ms. Norwood After having an in-person debrief with Ms. Norwood about her high school history class, she shared that she was concerned her students were listening and following along, but weren’t actually learning the material. She asked for an extended observation to see what more she could do.

Feedback Form and Meeting Review the feedback form. What do you notice about it? ◦ How is this form helpful for teachers? For administrators? Now watch a role play of an instructional leader meeting with Ms. Norwood to review the observation and feedback form. ◦ Was the meeting successful? ◦ Why or why not?

Your turn Your turn HS Algebra with Kevin Part 1: Part 2: At your table, discuss: What did you put in the “+” column? The “?” column?

Full Period Observation During full-period observations, the instructional leader will focus on all aspects included on the teacher evaluation rubric in regards to instruction and delivery. These are mandatory, formal observations that will be completed twice per year. Feedback takes the form of the evaluation rubric, which is reviewed and signed by the teacher during evaluation meetings (also held twice per year).  55 minutes  Every teacher receives twice per year (or as needed)  Evaluative

Key Take Aways Observations SOTEL Feedback

In sum… As educators, we need to continuously improve our effectiveness in order to better serve our students. Observations and feedback are ways to support teacher growth and development, and most importantly – student learning. It takes two to tango. Maximum results can only be obtained when each part is doing their job: instructional leaders will be held accountable for observing and giving feedback. Teachers will be held responsible for implementing suggestions for improvement.

Teacher Evaluation Rubric 6 Domains: ◦ Planning and Preparation for Learning ◦ Classroom Management ◦ Effective Instruction ◦ Family and Community Outreach ◦ Professional Responsibilities ◦ Teacher Leadership Rating Scale for each element in the domains: 4 – Highly Effective 3 – Effective 2 – Improvement Necessary 1 – Does Not Meet Standards

Professional Growth Plan (PGP)