Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Are You (Click).
Conducting Action Research in Your School. What is Action Research? “The development of powers of reflective thought, discussion, decision and action.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
The Design and Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems, Variability of Systems and the Role of a Theory of Action Rhode Island Lisa Foehr Rhode Island.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Model
What it means for New Teachers
Teacher Evaluation Update Marzano Protocol System.
RAPID CITY AREA SCHOOLS AUGUST 7, 2012 Denver ProComp Plan Summary.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Peninsula School District
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Amphitheater Career Ladder Orientation
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
“Teachers do make a difference…” - Jere Brophy, 1979.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
1 Barnes' Basic Rules For Audience Participation.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.
Denver Public Schools Teacher Compensation Design Team April 23,
Teacher Evaluation System Cincinnati Public Schools & Cincinnati Federation of Teachers.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
What it means for New Teachers
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Dissemination Training
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Designing and Implementing Local Faculty Development Programs
Teacher Evaluation Training
Five Required Elements
Presentation transcript:

Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System

Agenda Introduction Historical Perspective Overview of the System Original Compensation Plan Training and Certification Process Appeals Reflections after Implementation Link to Student Achievement Next Steps Questions

History of the CPS Teacher Evaluation System In March 1985, a Peer Evaluation System was established Contract of 1997 called for the development of a new system In December 1998, three committees were formed to develop a new system and explore a skills and knowledge compensation system The three committees formed the Committee of the Whole The system was field tested in ten schools in The system was refined and implemented District- wide in ; revisions also occurred in 2005

Revisions after Implementation Four -Year Phase In Annual Assessment and Annual Study Groups Hold Harmless Agreement

Overview of the System Four Domains Domain One- Planning for Instruction Domain Two - Creating an Environment for Learning Domain Three - Teaching for Learning Domain Four - Professionalism

The Evaluation Process Comprehensive Evaluation Teachers placed on Comprehensive Evaluation – “volunteers” and “non-volunteers” Consulting Teacher and Teacher Evaluator roles Evaluation Orientation Meeting Classroom Observations Collection of Evidence Final Summary

Teaching Categories Apprentice Novice Career Advanced Accomplished

Career Levels Apprentice New Teachers May have provisional teaching license Non-renewed at the end of year 2 if Novice status is not attained Novice Must have 2s or better in all domains Must pass Ohio’s teacher licensing test (Praxis 3) Non- renewed/terminated at end of year 5 as a Novice if Career status is not attained

Career Levels Career Must have 3s or better in all domains May remain in category throughout career Advanced Must have a 4 in Teaching for Learning Domain and a least one other domain; must have at least 3s in the other domains May remain in category throughout career

Career Levels Accomplished Must have 4s in all Domains May remain in category throughout career

Annual Evaluation Formative Process – conducted by a building administrator Professional Development/ Annual Study Groups used initially as system was rolled out One classroom observation with the exception of teachers on steps 16 and 21 - salary increment years – receive 2 annuals Intervention Process

Training of Evaluators Recognizing and controlling Personal Bias The Nature of Evidence Evaluative Criteria Evaluation of teaching performances using videotapes and “live”episodes Evaluator Certification Process Statistics Reflections and Revisions

Appeals Process Domains One, Two and Three Domains Four

Teacher Evaluation System Link to Student Achievement Hypothesis Study Results

Current Reality and Next Steps Implementation and Revisions A Compensation link will be negotiated

Questions? Contact Information: Julia Indalecio Cincinnati Public Schools – Teacher Programs Manager