New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December 2006 1 |1 | New WHO Air Quality Guidelines: their relevance for setting and implementing ambient AQ standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hamilton Air Quality and Health Impacts Study
Advertisements

UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
GROWING REGIONS, GROWING EUROPE Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion By Prof. Danuta Hübner Brussels, 30 May 2007.
Signatur A web-based tool to test Current and Future perspectives in Air Pollution Forward-Looking Information in Environment Assessment Copenhagen.
Purpose: Integrated assessment of options to control air pollution in Europe Model the full chain from sources to impacts Multi-effects: acidification,
1 Indoor air quality Where we are Giulio Gallo, European Commission.
Chapter 14: Global Change, Air Quality, and Human Health
AREP GURME Section 11 Case Studies of Episodes What is a Case Study? How to Conduct Case Studies Examples.
Status of Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Bob Kelly, Regional Air Modeler.
Junfeng (Jim) Zhang, PhD Professor of Environmental and Occupational Health UMDNJ- School of Public Health Presented at NJ Clean Air Council Presented.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
SIP Development Process Overview For Hickory Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
1 Report on Proposed Ozone Standards Report on Proposed Ozone Standards March 25, 2010.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
European Commission - DG Environment Clean Air for Europe EU Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution Workshop on Review and Assessment of European Air Pollution.
1 Fiscal Rules Uri Gabai National Economic Council Prime Minister Office 5 May 2009.
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Technical Guidance on Biomass Combustion John Abbott.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 1 Air Quality & CAFE AREHNA WORKSHOP Kos, 3-5 May 2003 Mrs Michèle LEPELLETIER.
Ecological Economics Lecture 10 Tiago Domingos Assistant Professor Environment and Energy Section Department of Mechanical Engineering Doctoral Program.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
Created by Susan Neal $100 Fractions Addition Fractions Subtraction Fractions Multiplication Fractions Division General $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
1 The Air Quality Health Index & 20/20 The Way to Clean Air Protecting Your Health and Reducing Air Pollution.
By: James Minyard Danny Lourence And Miss Maruna.
CLRTP PMEG Third meeting, 13 & 14 March 2006, Dessau.
Summary of relevant information in the CAFE Position paper on PM Martin Meadows UNECE PMEG Berlin, 23 & 24 May 2005.
PM NAAQS Review Update Joseph Paisie Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, EPA WESTAR Fall Business.
Workshop to Promote the Ratification of the UN-ECE CLRTAP HM Protocol May 2008, Yerevan, Armenia. 1 emissions reduction (and costs) The effectiveness.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
1 ETC/ACC Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Air Quality Reporting and Assessment RNDr. Jaroslav Fiala, CSc. Czech Hydrometeorological Istitute.
Air quality in Europe report. Air pollution impacts human health, contributes to climate change and damages ecosystems. Here are some of the pollutants.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1 Air quality management in the Netherlands PM 10 in the Rotterdam - Rijnmond Area Leo Sef vd Brussels 1/2 September.
Week 1.
The Global Village The world is a crowded place. As of today the world’s population is 6,600,000, countries have more that 50 million people. 11.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Driving Factors: Driving Factors: How Transportation Policy Affects Health Environmental Defense National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity Surface.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
11th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management, La Rochelle, October 2006 Dr. Michal Krzyzanowski Regional Adviser, Air Quality and.
THE AIR UP THERE Particulate Matter in Melbourne, Fl Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida.
1 Scripps Inst. of Oceanography University of California at San Diego Oakland, California, October 18, 2013 V. Ramanathan, University of California, San.
NERAM V, Vancouver, October 2006 Dr. Michal Krzyzanowski Regional Adviser, Air Quality and Health WHO Regional Office for Europe European Centre.
Impact Studies: Malé Declaration Achievements Ms. Adelaida B. Roman Head, Network Support Component Air and Atmospheric Pollution RRCAP, Thailand.
The Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health Fernando Holguin MD MPH Associate Professor of medicine and Pediatrics Director, Clinical and Translational.
Task Force on Health Recent results - Particulate matter Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair Head, Bonn Office European Centre for Environment and Health WHO.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Overview of health impacts of particulate matter in Europe Michal Krzyzanowski WHO ECEH Bonn Office Joint.
Ambient air pollution and waste incineration in Poland – Intereg 3 Programme National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland, 11 May 2006 Dr. hab. Michal.
Task Force on Health - a short update 19th EIONET workshop on AQ assessment Bern 1 October 2014 Frank de Leeuw, Valentin Foltescu ETC/Air Pollution and.
THE PEP Sub-regional workshop September 2013 Health effects of particulate matter: Policy implications for EECCA countries Marie-Eve Héroux Technical Officer,
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Recent WHO Findings on Health Risks Introduction Introduction Projects Projects Key findings Key findings.
Air pollution in Stuttgart ? NO 2 O3O3 PM 10. Stuttgart.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Final Meeting of the CAPACT project, 4-6 July 2007, Almaty, Kazakhstan M. Krzyzanowski and Kubanychbek Monolbaev WHO Regional Office for Europe EECCA participation.
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
The CAMS Policy products
Emerging Issues and Opportunities for Air Quality Management
Traffic Pollution and its impacts on our health?
Respiratory Health Effects of Climate Change
Updating the science on health assessment
Air Quality in Europe – 2017 report
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
Study on non-compliance of ozone target values and potential air quality improvements in relation to ozone.
Presentation transcript:

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |1 | New WHO Air Quality Guidelines: their relevance for setting and implementing ambient AQ standards in Asia M. Krzyzanowski Regional Adviser, Air Quality and Health, WHO/Euro Better Air Quality 2006, December, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |2 | The process of AQG Update, 2005 Oct – Nov 2004: Steering Group established; January 2005: Steering Group: update scope & structure; recommendation of authors of background material; July – Sept 2005: review of the 1st draft; October 2005: WG meeting, Bonn; Dec 2005 – June 2006: finalization of background materials; 5 October 2006 – formal announcement of AQG WHO editing / printing  publication In press

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |3 | Air Quality Guidelines: contents part 1 ChapterTitleAuthors Part 1. Application of AQG for policy development and risk reduction 1Sources of air pollutionR. Harrison (UK) 2Air pollution levelsB. Sivertsen (Norway) 3Human exposure to air pollutionN. Janssen (The Netherlands), S. Mehta (US) 4Health effects of air pollutionN. Gouveia (Brazil), M. Maisonet (PAHO/Chile) 5Determinants of susceptibilityM. Utell (US), M. Frampton (US) 6Environmental equityP. Kinney (US), MS O’Neill (US) 7Health impact assessmentB. Ostro (US) 8Applications of guidelines in policy formulation A. Fernandez (Mexico), M. Zuk (Mexico) 9Indoor air quality: special issues in risk assessment and management K. Balakrishnan (India), NG Bruce (UK)

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |4 | Air Quality Guidelines: contents part 2 ChapterTitleAuthors Part 2. Risk assessment of selected pollutants 10Particulate matterJ. Samet (US), M. Brauer (Canada) R.Schlesinger (US) 11OzoneP. Saldiva (Brazil), N. Künzli (US / Switzerland) 12Nitrogen dioxideF. Forastiere (Italy), A. Peters (Germany) F. Kelly (UK), ST Holgate (UK) 13Sulfur dioxideM. Lippmann (US), K. Ito (US) Scientific Advisory Group: RH Anderson (UK), B. Brunekreef (The Netherlands), B. Chen (China), A. Cohen (USA) R. Maynard (UK), I. Romieu (Mexico), KR. Smith (USA), S. Wangwongwatana (Thailand)

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |5 | WHO AQG Update 2005: Main Results Guideline values for PM, ozone, NO2 and SO2: –the possibility of adverse effects remains, even if the guideline value is achieved; –some countries might select even lower concentrations for their standards. Interim targets for each pollutant: –define steps in a progressive reduction of air pollution in more polluted areas; –promote a shift from concentrations with acute, serious health consequences to concentrations that, if achieved, would result in significant reductions in risks for acute and chronic effects.

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |6 | WHO AQG Update 2005: Main Results Guideline values for PM, ozone, NO2 and SO2: –the possibility of adverse effects remains, even if the guideline value is achieved; –some countries might select even lower concentrations for their standards. Interim targets for each pollutant: –define steps in a progressive reduction of air pollution in more polluted areas; –promote a shift from concentrations with acute, serious health consequences to concentrations that, if achieved, would result in significant reductions in risks for acute and chronic effects.

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |7 | Reduce the exposure to cut the health effect Exposure Effect AQG IT-2 IT-1

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |8 | WHO AQG for particulate matter (1 of 2) Annual mean levelPM 10 (µg/m 3 )PM 2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Basis for the selected level Interim target-1 (IT-1)7035Levels associated with about 15% higher long-term mortality than at AQG Interim target-2 (IT-2)5025Risk of premature mortality decreased by approximately 6% compared to IT1 Interim target-3 (IT-3)3015Mortality risk reduced by approximately 6% compared to IT2 levels. Air quality guideline (AQG) 2010Lowest levels at which total, CP and LCA mortality have been shown to increase (Pope et al., 2002). The use of PM 2.5 guideline is preferred.

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December |9 | PM10 IT-1: challenge to some cities in Asia WHO 2005 PM10 Interim Target – 1 = 70 µg/m 3 Source: CAI-Asia

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | PM10 IT-2: challenge to most cities in Asia WHO 2005 PM10 Interim Target – 2 = 50 µg/m 3 Source: CAI-Asia

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | PM10 IT-3: challenge to all cities in Asia WHO 2005 PM10 Interim Target – 3 = 30 µg/m 3 Source: CAI-Asia

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | PM10 AQG: the future for all cities in Asia WHO 2005 PM10 AQG = 20 µg/m 3 Source: CAI-Asia

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | WHO AQG for particulate matter (2 of 2) 24-hour mean level *)PM 10 (µg/m 3 ) PM 2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Basis for the selected level Interim target-1 (IT-1)15075Aabout 5% increase of short-term mortality over AQG Interim target-2 (IT-2)10050Aabout 2.5% increase of short-term mortality over AQG Interim target-3 (IT-3)7537.5About 1.2% increase in short-term mortality over AQG Air quality guidelines (AQG) 5025Based on relation between 24-hour and annual PM levels *) 99th percentile (3 days / year)

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | WHO AQG for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) 24-hour average SO 2 10-minute average SO 2 Interim target-1 (IT-1) 125 µg/m AQG level - Interim target-2 (IT-2) 50 µg/m 3 Intermediate goal based on controlling either (1) motor vehicle (2) industrial emissions and/or (3) power production; feasible goal to be achieved leading to significant health improvements that would justify further improvements - Air quality guidelines (AQG) 20 µg/m µg/m 3

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | WHO AQG for ozone (O 3 ) Daily maximum 8- hour mean Effects at the selected ozone level High level240 µg/m 3 Significant health effects, substantial proportion of vulnerable population affected. Interim target-1 (IT-1) 160 µg/m 3 Important health effects, an intermediate target for populations with ozone concentrations above this level. Does not provide adequate protection of public health. Air quality guideline (AQG) 100 µg/m 3 This concentration will provide adequate protection of public health, though some health effects may occur below this level.

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | WHO AQG for nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) Annual mean: 40 µg/m 3 ; 1-hour mean: 200 µg/m 3. The guideline values remain unchanged vs. AQG Rationale: Experimental data: NO2 toxic above 200 µg/m3 Epi studies: NO2 – marker of mixture of combustion related pollution Precursor of ozone and PM2.5

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | Summary of WHO AQG PollutantAveraging timeAQG value Particulate matter PM 2.5 PM 10 1 year 24 hour (99 th percentile) 1 year 24 hour (99 th percentile) 10 µg/m 3 25 µg/m 3 20 µg/m 3 50 µg/m 3 Ozone, O 3 8 hour, daily maximum100 µg/m 3 Nitrogen dioxide, NO 2 1 year 1 hour 40 µg/m µg/m 3 Sulfur dioxide, SO 2 24 hour 10 minute 20 µg/m µg/m 3

New WHO Air Quality Guidelines | 13 December | THANK YOU !