Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID) Follow-Up Educational Resources for Parents Methodology As states continue to recognize.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) ~ Challenges and Opportunities ~
Advertisements

EHDI Systems and the Medical Home Carlos Quezada-Gomez, PsyD National Center of Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs American Academy.
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
DSHS Texas Newborn Screening Program Processes Susan Tanksley, PhD David Martinez April 10, 2008.
SPAIIN Where are we now?. Key concepts in clinical networks Equitable Efficient High quality Locally delivered Patient/Carer involvement ‘designed to.
Day 2 You receive 2 reports on your desk –The first describes the possibility of expanding the states newborn screening panel to include Severe Combined.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
SCID Review Discussion. Decision Matrix Key Questions 1.This is the overarching question for the evidence review: Is there direct evidence that screening.
KANSAS STATE GENETICS PLAN - AN OVERVIEW Presented by Linda Williams MT(ASCP) Newborn Screening Follow-up Coordinator Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners May 2012 Developing High Quality IEPs Ensuring each student has access to their least.
“ Linking Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Health” Welcome We invite you to explore what a membership in the American Society of Hypertension, Inc. (ASH)
Decision Criteria and Process Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children February 26-27, 2009.
AMCHP 2005 Conference Newborn Screening in Maryland The Maryland Program Informed Consent Informational Materials Linkage to Services Challenges of Working.
Birth Defects Tracking and Prevention: Too Many States Are Not Making the Grade Presentation by The Trust for America’s Health February 20, 2002.
Severe combined immune deficiency in Nablus Omar Abuzaitoun, MD.
Peds PLACE Changes effected CAR Effects in the SubC Survival across sites Support Intervention Current and planned telemedicine sites Conclusions Potential.
Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics Conference Newborn Screening: The Future Revolution Beth A. Tarini, MD, MS Assistant Professor Child.
Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) ~ Challenges and Opportunities ~
Melissa Ewerth Graduate Adapted Physical Education, WCU.
John Eichwald, Team Lead Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease.
The National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic and Newborn Screening Service Collaboratives (NCC/RC System) ACTions Matter: A Candid Conversation.
Definition of a Consumer One that consumes, especially one that acquires goods or services for direct use or ownership rather than for resale or use in.
Hyperbilirubinemia: Discussion Alexis Thompson, MD Catherine Wicklund, MS, CGC.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint® Lectures Lectures by Chris Romero, Front Range Community College Whose.
Environmental Scan September 2011 Assessing Consumer Exposure to Newborn Screening.
Hospital Practices Influence Breastfeeding Rates: The Data Tell the Story Birth & Beyond California: Breastfeeding Training & QI Project With funding from.
Genetic Screening for Cystic Fibrosis A New Choice for You and Your pregnancy.
Building Canada’s National Public Cord Blood Bank.
Public Health Meeting the Needs of Fathers in Prenatal Classes The Prenatal Fathering Project.
MUTATIONS AND GENETIC DISEASES PART 4. V. GENETIC CONDITIONS 1.Genetic Abnormality – rare condition with little or no ill effects - Ex. Six fingers, albino,
Kylia Crane, RDN, LD Nutrition Coordinator Georgia Chapter- American Academy of Pediatrics WIC and Georgia Chapter of the.
CHILD HEALTH PROFILE FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL HEALTH CARE NEEDS AAP Annual Meeting Council on Clinical Information Technology-October 28,2007 Carmen B.
Stacee Lerret PhD, RN, CPNP, CCTC Medical College of Wisconsin Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin WI ITNS Annual Conference October 13, 2012 MOVING ON UP:
Big Strides for Small Patients: Developmental Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Department of Pediatrics Jerold Stirling, MD Rebecca Turk, MD Melanie.
1 National Healthy Start Association, Inc. Prepared for Secretary Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality January 2008 Historical Overview of the Healthy.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction The Respiratory Syncytial virus (RSV) was discovered in 1956 and has been since recognized as one of the most.
Maryland Oral Health Literacy Campaign Maryland Dental Action Coalition Baltimore, MD John Welby, MS, Project Director
Proposed Changes to Advisory Committee Processes Sara Copeland, MD Designated Federal Official Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in.
Gene Therapy Trials for PID:A Nursing Perspective Jin Hua Xu-Bayford Clinical Nurse Specialist Gene Therapy The child first and.
Recommendations and a Plan for Preventing Preterm Birth Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality (SACIM) August 10, 2015.
Evidence Review Group: Past to Present James M. Perrin, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy.
Potentially Exposed to Measles Infants < 12 months Pregnant patients without documented immunity (MMR, Hx of disease) or + IgGLab Immunocompromised (see.
Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency: Advocacy, Challenges, and Next Steps Marcia Boyle President and Founder Immune Deficiency Foundation.
Recommendation to ACHDNC for Newborn Screening for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy Fred Lorey, Ph.D. Don Bailey, Ph.D. Liaisons to the Condition Review Workgroup.
Update on SACHDNC Administrative Processes Sara Copeland, MD Chief, Genetics Services Branch Designated Federal Officer Secretary’s Advisory Committee.
Pompe Disease Evidence Evaluation Michael Watson, PhD, on behalf of Piero Rinaldo, MD, PhD, and the Decision-Making Workgroup October 1, 2008.
OMICS international Contact us at: OMICS International through its Open Access Initiative is committed to make genuine and.
I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturers of any commercial products and/or provider of commercial services discussed in this CME.
The National CMS Partnership for Patients Campaign: The National PFE Network.
Recommendation Methods Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases of Newborns and Children Ned Calonge, M.D., M.P.H.
SCH Journal Club Use of time from fever onset improves the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein in identifying bacterial infections Wednesday 13 th.
1 Hospital Practices Influence Breastfeeding Rates: The Data Tell the Story Birth & Beyond California: Breastfeeding Training& QI Project.
Peel Health Peel Early Identification Committee and Region of Peel Public Health Strategies to Promote the 18 Month Well Baby Assessment.
TEXAS NEWBORN SCREEN PRESENTED BY: SHAYNA BAUMAN & ROSA CARRANZA UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH AT GALVESTON ADVANCED NEONATAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT GNRS.
 Define Survivorship  Demonstrate understanding of the history of cancer survivorship  State the requirements of the Commission on Cancer of the American.
BOOKS BUILD BRAINS It Takes All Of Us: Information for Medical Assistants and Clinical Staff in Maine Presented by Colette Sabbagh, MD Clinical Advisor,
SCIDS (Severe Combined Immune Deficiency Syndrome)
Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Recommendation 1: Public Awareness and Patient Education (Updated 2008)
TREC SCREENING. Characteristics of Disorders Characteristics of Test Well characterized pathogenesis Affects a significant number of infants Undetectable.
Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease (CCHD): The Wisconsin Experience Region IV Genetics Meeting September 11, 2012 Sharon Fleischfresser.
Discussion Background Objectives Office Based Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect: Lessons Learned from the Practicing Safety QuIIN Project Diane Abatemarco,
About Newborn Screening  Newborn Screening Facts - A brief introduction to the most important information on newborn screening.
Whose Blood Is It, Anyway?
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM):
© Pennsylvania Department of Education 2006
Newborn Screening: Achieving Timeliness
Immunodeficiencies.
RISK R isk of Perinatal and Early Childhood Infection
Minority Affairs Committee Update
Patient Affairs Committee
Presentation transcript:

Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID) Follow-Up Educational Resources for Parents Methodology As states continue to recognize the importance and value of newborn screening for SCID and more states begin the process of implementation for this testing, there is a need to develop systems to educate and communicate next steps to families. This includes education on next steps for families following a positive TREC test result and next steps for families following a definitive diagnosis of SCID. The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) routinely produces ACTion Sheets to provide information to physicians regarding next steps after an abnormal newborn screening result. However, there is no such standardized and widely available resource for families. As a result of the Immune Deficiency Foundation’s (IDF) work for universal SCID newborn screening, it has become clear that there is a gap in the practical educational materials for parents and families to use after they have received a positive screen and after a diagnosis is made. Little information is available to families about these conditions, making families vulnerable to misinformation. Research from the University of Rochester published in the July 2011 edition of Pediatrics evaluated the parent experience of newborn screening. This article concluded that receiving an abnormal screening result was highly stressful for parents and that improvement in communications and services are needed to reduce parents’ distress. 2 Parents who receive a notification that their newborn has an abnormal screening result without further information are likely to be confused and scared. Especially if the screening is for a condition of which they were not previously aware or only vaguely recall in relation to stories of the “bubble boy disease,” assuming the worst for the quality of life of their newborn child. SCID is a primary immunodeficiency disease where affected infants lack T lymphocytes. Babies with SCID appear healthy at birth, but without early treatment, these infants cannot survive. Babies with SCID who receive a bone marrow transplant in the first 3.5 months of life have a survival rate of about 94 percent. The survival rate drops to less than 70 percent for infants who are transplanted later. 1 Earlier treatment, before the onset of serious infections, offers children the chance at living normal and healthy lives with fewer incidence of future serious healthcare needs. On May 21, 2010, HHS Secretary Sebelius concurred with the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children and added SCID as a core condition and related T cell lymphopenias as secondary conditions to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, endorsing both as a national standard. Currently, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, Texas, Wisconsin, the Navajo Nation and selected hospitals in Pennsylvania are screening all infants for SCID. Problems BackgroundConclusions Methods The Immune Deficiency Foundation, with experts in the field of immunology and newborn screening, developed and is distributing educational materials for (1) parents who receive an abnormal TREC result and (2) parents who receive a definitive diagnosis of SCID. These educational materials that can be utilized by all states for these parents not only assuage their fears by educating parents about the disease and next steps, but also provide resources for more detailed information on the disease. They also emphasize the importance of follow- up evaluation in order to receive a definitive diagnosis and prepare for appropriate treatment. The educational piece for families who receive a definitive diagnosis further informs parents about the specifics of their child’s condition and what to anticipate for the future. IDF intends for these materials to be the first information that families read after receiving an abnormal test result and after receiving a definitive diagnosis. IDF is working with states as they begin the process of implementation to ensure that they are aware of and have access to the materials. IDF expects that these pieces will be increasingly utilized by states as they begin SCID screening – which will likely occur in all states throughout the country in the next several years following the recommendation of the HHS Secretary – as uniform educational tools much like the ACMG ACT Sheets are for physicians. Results The materials are currently available as resources from such websites as the Newborn Screening Translation Research Network, Baby’s First Test, Save Babies through Screening Foundation, SCID Angels for Life Foundation, and SCID.net. In addition, educational materials have been sent to states that have begun screening newborns for SCID or are in the process of implementation. At this point, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, and Iowa are utilizing the materials as part of their follow-up protocols. The Guides have been widely accepted as helpful resources throughout the newborn screening community. In addition to their wider distribution to states and newborn screening specific website, they are featured prominently throughout the IDF website and social media and have been downloaded and viewed hundreds of times. The enthusiasm with which these resources have been accepted by states and the newborn screening community speaks to the true need that these resources have filled. As more states begin screening for SCID, this resource will likely continue to be utilized in larger numbers by more states and individuals. Use of these materials will effectively educate parents and inform them of next steps that will ultimately result in a more timely diagnosis, more effective treatment, and a higher quality of life for their children. Despite the availability of resources, IDF has heard anecdotally that parents are not always receiving information in a timely manner, creating additional stress and uncertainty. States need to work closely with IDF and the medical community to ensure that resources get in the hands of the families who need them. Pilots/Screening in 2013Selected PopulationsNo ScreeningScreening The IDF SCID Initiative was established as a project dedicated to address the acute need for a program for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID) education, awareness, and diagnosis 40 West Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 308, Towson, Maryland References 1. Railey MD, Lokhnygina Y, Buckley RH. Long-term Clinical Outcome of Patients with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Who Received Related Donor Bone Marrow Transplants without Pretransplant Chemotherapy or Post-transplant GVHD Prophylaxis. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2009; 155(6): DeLuca JM, Kearney MH, Norton SA, Arnold GL. Parents' experiences of expanded newborn screening evaluations. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(1):53-61.