Adorno Law Firm, PL Adorno Law Firm TRIAL TESTIMONY FOR EXPERTS!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis I. Wilenchik Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C North Third Street Phoenix, Arizona (602) (T) (602) (F)
Advertisements

TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Psychology of Homicide Unit III Lecture
Trial Work: The Most Fun You Will Ever Have in a Courtroom! BLST, DECEMBER 2013 MARIE C. BECHTEL, ESQ., LEGAL AID OF WEST VIRGINIA.
Expert Witness Cross Examination
Rules of Evidence and Objections
DAUBERT IN FLORIDA: ONE YEAR LATER
RECONSTRUCTION EVIDENCE Judge Lynn M. Egan Mr. Gary W. Cooper March 28, 2014.
+ The Criminal Trial Process. + The Charter Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that a person charged with an offence is to be.
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
Common Trial Procedures United States. Opening Statements.
SESSION 30: EXPLAINING TO YOUR ATTORNEY WHAT YOU DO AND WHY YOU DO IT: How Traffic Records Affect Tort Litigation.
AKA: The Last Words AAKA: Parting Gift Closing Arguments.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
Expert Testimony. What’s the expert’s role FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis P thumb numb Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured.
OPINION EVIDENCE. OPINION EVIDENCE FRE Evid. Code §§
COEN 252 Computer Forensics Writing Computer Forensics Reports.
Testifying Skills Julia Pallentino MSN, JD, ARNP.
CAREFUL, I AM AN EXPERT. Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that expert opinion evidence is admissible if: 1. the witness is sufficiently.
WITNESS CREDIBILITY DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? Presented By: Earnest S. Atkins Investigator In Charge Virginia Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation.
Forensic Science and the Law
An Attorney’s View Sara Beachy Assistant Attorney General State of Wisconsin Department of Justice June 3, 2015.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE Prof. JANICKE OPINIONS ARE GENERALLY INADMISSIBLE RULE 602 REQUIRES ACTUAL “KNOWLEDGE” FOR MOST TYPES OF EVIDENCE KNOWLEDGE.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
1. Evidence Professor Cioffi 2/22/2011 – 2/23/
Section B, Part V: Examination of Witnesses. Credibility –Most of the information upon which the jurors/judge will decide your case will come from examination.
The Trial Chapter 9 in Your Text John Massey Criminal Justice.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
Bowoto v. Chevron Corp. N.D. Cal. Jun. 12, WL Presented by Joe Siclari.
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
REFLECTIONS ON EXPERT WITNESS TRAINING ACADEMY Mona Behl, Ph.D. Texas Sea Grant College Program Texas A&M University College Station, TX.
EFFECTIVE USE OF DEMOSTRATIVE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL Robert W. Kerpsack, Esq. ROBERT W. KERPSACK CO., L.P.A. 21 East State Street, Suite 300 Columbus, OH
Tell the story better than the other side.. Opening Statements  This is like the introductory paragraph and thesis statement of an essay  This lays.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
ANATOMY OF A TRIAL Opening Statements -1 st : Plaintiff -2 nd : Defendant Examinations -1 st : Plaintiff Witnesses -2 nd : Defendant Witnesses Closing.
The Fraud Report, Litigation, and the Recovery Process McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Cross examination Is the DNA a mixture of two or more people? How did you calculate the match statistic? What is the scientific basis of that calculation?
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
Do now: To the best of your knowledge, what do you think is the purpose of the direct examination.
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
Professor Guy Wellborn
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
Crime Scene Investigations Chapter 2. Chapter 2.1 Crime Scene Evidence.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Who’s Daubert?.
Experts and Lay Witness
Laying the Foundation: Expert Witnesses
What Is Scientific Evidence?
Judicial reform and its influence on competition development
Lauren A. Warner, Counsel, CCLB Leanne Gould, CPA/ABV/CFF/ASA, Aprio
Jury Selection.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
FIDO Program: Legal Considerations
Lay vs Expert Witness.
Opinion Testimony, In General
Inn of Court: Trial Practices
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Get Started Immediately!
1-3 Functions of a Forensic Scientist
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
CHAP. 9 : OPINION EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

Adorno Law Firm, PL Adorno Law Firm TRIAL TESTIMONY FOR EXPERTS!

Adorno Law Firm, PL What type of information is Important? Every case should have a theme and that should be determined by the trial attorney, but the experts have to make all the right moves to backup the quarterback and keep that theme humming along. An expert can’t determine what information is important until the attorney tells you what her theme is and what she believes can be entered into evidence. An area that is often over looked in my opinion are the exhibits at trial and who should prepare them and how that should look. If you know that a major issue is going to be disproportionate take creating severance damages then the engineer and land planner need to work together to create exhibits that show the taking and remainder.

Adorno Law Firm, PL Condemnors v. Landowner Work DOT tends to try to keep costs down but if you are going to trial you have to spend a little time and money on the right type of exhibits. Most Condemnors are interested in keeping costs down and most landowner attorneys don’t manage costs because they believe that the condemnor will pay for them later. I am gearing this talk more to what an expert needs to know for trial testimony.

Adorno Law Firm, PL F. S Testimony by experts.—If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or in determining a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert … From FRYE to DAUBERT Florida Law Changes

Adorno Law Firm, PL by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify about it in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if: Fla. Statute Section

Adorno Law Firm, PL F.S Continued FRYE Three Part Test from 2013: (1) that the opinion evidence be helpful to the trier of fact; (2) that the witness be qualified as an expert; and, (3) that the opinion evidence can be applied to evidence offered at trial.

Adorno Law Firm, PL THIS IS THE CURRENT TEST Daubert Three Part Test from 2013 forward: (1) The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data; (2) The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (3) The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.

Adorno Law Firm, PL What Happens in a Daubert Challenge? 1. The Testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data How does an expert prove that he or she relied on sufficient facts or data? Your attorney now needs to lay a better predicate for your testimony by asking about what facts and data were used by you to form your opinion.

Adorno Law Firm, PL DAUBERT CHALLENGE Cont. 2. The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods – If you are a CPA what methodology did you use, if a stormwater engineer – what model was the factual info from surveyors placed into etc. 3. The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. How do you prove this?

Adorno Law Firm, PL A FEW POINTERS

Adorno Law Firm, PL LowTech Low Tech is BETTER THAN High Tech While some of you think that jurors love high tech – most of the time they cannot take that back into the jury room. Your exhibits for trial need to be simple, COLORFUL, and clean. Simple – just the most important facts Colorful – enough color to make it interesting keep a juror’s attention Clean – not too many layers of information

Adorno Law Firm, PL SIMPLE?

Adorno Law Firm, PL NOT AS CLUTTERED

Adorno Law Firm, PL NO COLOR - BORING

Adorno Law Firm, PL A Little Color Adds Interest

Adorno Law Firm, PL

Highlighting is sometimes better

Adorno Law Firm, PL Any Questions?

Adorno Law Firm, PL Thank You! Celeste F. Adorno, Esq Celeste F. Adorno, Esq or