First must come the blinding realization that no one breed excels in all areas that lead to profitability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Curt Lacy, Ph.D Agricultural & Applied Economics UGA-Tifton ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COW CULLING VS. REPLACEMENT HEIFERS.
Advertisements

Is There Gold in Them Thar Crossbreeding Hills? Darrh Bullock University of Kentucky.
The American Brahman: Crossbreedings Common Denominator 17 th World Brahman Congress Joe C. Paschal Professor and Livestock Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife.
Heterosis: Defined and Research Experience
It’s All Bull Seminars UW Extension Livestock Focus Team March 23 rd, Elk Mound March 25 th, Almond March 26 th, Platteville.
Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Animal Breeding Systems
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Can You Breed a “Good Breeder” Kristi M. Cammack Department of Animal Science University of Wyoming.
BEEF COW CALF & SEEDSTOCK INDUSTRY By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
ROLE OF COMPOSITES IN CROSSBREEDING Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
The Future is Here Jim Gosey University of Nebraska “Show Me The Future” National Angus Conference & Tour, Sept.28, 2005 Kansas City, Mo.
Genetics in the Animal Industry A.Describe 2 types of selection B.Compare Phenotype and Genotype C.Define Common Terms used in genetics D.Describe the.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Matching Beef Genetics with Production Environment T. G. Jenkins and C. L. Ferrell USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center NE.
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Breed Differences and Taking Advantage of Complementarity Larry V. Cundiff U.S. Meat Animal Research Center ARS-USDA Clay Center, NE Brown Bagger IV Crossbreeding.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Heterosis – The Forgotten Tool? Dr. Tom Field Colorado State University Dr. Andy Herring Texas A&M University Cattlemen’s College 2005 NCBA Meeting, San.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
Basic Genetics and Selection
Breeding and Genetics 101.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Tools of the Trade Tom Field, PhD Andy Herring, PhD.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
Designing Genetics and Selection for Seedstock Breeders, Commercial Cattlemen and Show Ring Enthusiasts ASA Fall Focus 2015: Confidence Builds Success.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
Animal Genetics. Natural Selection n an organisms ability to SURVIVE and pass on its GENETIC information to its offspring.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Problems with telephone hookup? Contact the operator at the University of Illinois Contact the operator at the University of Illinois
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Characterizing Change in the Beef Industry Justin W. Waggoner, Ph.D. Beef Systems Specialist Kansas State University Garden City, KS.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Heterosis-Ignored or Forgotten? (or did we ever believe in it to start with?) D. A. Daley California State University, Chico.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
ACROSS BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2006 ADJUSTED TO THE BIRTH YEAR OF 2004 L. Dale Van Vleck and Larry V. Cundiff MARC-ARS-USDA Lincoln and Clay Center,
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Across Breed EPD and multi-breed genetic evaluation developments
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas AgriLife Extension
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

First must come the blinding realization that no one breed excels in all areas that lead to profitability

Crossbreeding Talks in 2014: Why They're Still Needed Matt Spangler, Ph.D. State Ext. Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Nebraska 402.472.6489 mspangler2@unl.edu Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Cow-calf Ext. Specialist Kansas State University 785-532-1460 bweaber@k-state.edu

Kansas Simmental Tour - Clay Center, KS Dr. Bob Weaber 07/31/2010 Why Crossbreed? Profit Headache 08/20/2011 Kansas Simmental Tour - Clay Center, KS Beefmaster Symposium-Darr Ag. Res. Center-Springfield, MO

Kansas Simmental Tour - Clay Center, KS Dr. Bob Weaber 07/31/2010 Impact on Profit Profit = Revenue - Costs Heterosis Impact 08/20/2011 Kansas Simmental Tour - Clay Center, KS Beefmaster Symposium-Darr Ag. Res. Center-Springfield, MO

Matt–What Are the Benefits of Heterosis?

Heterosis Hybrid Vigor Superiority of a crossbred animal as compared to the average of its straightbred parents More divergent parental lines = more heterosis NOT available from within breed matings

Inversely related Heritability Heterosis Trait Reproduction Low High Moderate Moderate High Low Trait Reproduction (fertility) Production (growth) Product (carcass)

Advantages of the crossbred calf Adapted from Cundiff and Gregory, 1999

Advantages of the crossbred cow Adapted from Cundiff and Gregory, 1999.

Benefits of Heterosis Heterosis increases production 20 to 25% per cow in Bos taurus x Bos taurus crosses; 50% in Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses in subtropical regions More than half of this effect is dependent on use of crossbred cows This slide summarizes results from a longterm heterosis project completed in the 1970’s comparing production of straightbreds and crosses in all combinations among the Hereford, Angus, and Shorthorn breeds. Weaning wt per cow exposed was increased 8.5 % by raising cross bred calves. However the greatest advantages of crossbreeding depended on use of crossbred cows. Weaning wt per cow exposed was increased 23 % in crossbred cows raising three way cross progeny. More than half of total heterosis effect was dependent on use of crossbred cow to take advantage of their improved reproduction rate and milk production. In addition, longevity was increased, herd life was 1.9 yr longer for F1 cows than for straightbred cows. Break even cost so production were reduced 10%, these are savings that as essential today as ever, if the beef industry is to remain competitive with other meat products. Jenkins, MARC

Bob–What Does this Mean in Terms of Economic Returns?

Relative Economic Weights for Integrated Beef Firm Robert L. Weaber, Ph.D. 6/02/2010 Relative Economic Weights for Integrated Beef Firm Reproduction:Growth:End Product 2:1:1 (Melton, 1995) Beef Production and Recording Technical Session - 37th ICAR Session - Riga, Latvia

Benefits of Heterosis Heterosis increases production 20 to 25% per cow in Bos taurus x Bos taurus crosses; 50% in Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses in subtropical regions More than half of this effect is dependent on use of crossbred cows This slide summarizes results from a longterm heterosis project completed in the 1970’s comparing production of straightbreds and crosses in all combinations among the Hereford, Angus, and Shorthorn breeds. Weaning wt per cow exposed was increased 8.5 % by raising cross bred calves. However the greatest advantages of crossbreeding depended on use of crossbred cows. Weaning wt per cow exposed was increased 23 % in crossbred cows raising three way cross progeny. More than half of total heterosis effect was dependent on use of crossbred cow to take advantage of their improved reproduction rate and milk production. In addition, longevity was increased, herd life was 1.9 yr longer for F1 cows than for straightbred cows. Break even cost so production were reduced 10%, these are savings that as essential today as ever, if the beef industry is to remain competitive with other meat products. Jenkins, MARC

Improvement of Herd Efficiency [Dam Weight*Lean Value of Dam + No. Progeny*Progeny Weight*Lean Value of Progeny] - [Dam Feed*Value of Feed for Dam + No. Progeny*Progeny Feed*Value of Feed for Progeny]. By simply increasing number of progeny per dam through either selection, heterosis from crossing, or better management, we will increase efficiency of production. Adapted from Dickerson 1970

The Dollars of Heterosis Bob Weaber, Ph.D. 02/10/2012 100 cows, 80% Weaning Rate, 575 avg. weaning weight, 10 year horizon Calf Survival to Weaning (6%) = 60 hd. Weaning wt. (4%) = +19,780 lb. Weaning wt. per cow exposed (23%) = +105,800 lb. …or the equivalent of 18 more 575 lb. calves/year Heterosis is worth ~$250/cow/year ($2.50/lb for 5-6 cwt calves) Decreases breakeven by $0.43/lb…straightbred would have to generate an additional $330 per head to be equivalent K-State - ASI - Beef Science

Crux of Straight-breeding Dr. Bob Weaber 02/10/2012 Crux of Straight-breeding Do the benefits of selection for economically important/convenience traits within breed (straight-breeding) outweigh the improvement of lowly heritable traits via heterosis (especially maternal)? Selection should be for BOTH additive and non- additive genetic merit. K-State - ASI - Beef Science

Bob–Will I sacrifice Uniformity/ Marketability of Calves By Crossbreeding?

Genetic Variation in Alternative Mating Systems Optimum Assumes that the Two F1’s Used are of Similar Genetic Merit

Variation Adapted from Gregory et al., 1999

Basic Model Phenotype Unexplained Variation Genetic Merit Dr. Bob Weaber 4/9/2017 Basic Model Phenotype Unexplained Variation Genetic Merit Contemporary Group and Other Effects 03/25/2011 Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement

Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement Dr. Bob Weaber 4/9/2017 Basic Model A = Breeding value (Additive gene effects) D = Dominance effects (pairing of genes effects) I = Epistatic (interactions among genes) 03/25/2011 Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement

Having Your Cake and Eating it Too Commercial cattlemen SHOULD care about BOTH additive and non-additive effects. Seedstock producers SHOULD focus on additive genetic merit, and putting it in a package that helps clientele exploit non-additive effects.

So, Matt–Breeds Have Changed Overtime, Does Heterosis Still Exist So, Matt–Breeds Have Changed Overtime, Does Heterosis Still Exist? What About Complementarity?

Genetic Trends for Weaning Weight, lb Adapted from Spring 2012 Genetic Trends from Breed Associations and 2012 AB-EPD factors (Kuehn and Thallman, 2012)

Genetic Trends for Yearling Weight, lb Adapted from Spring 2012 Genetic Trends from Breed Associations and 2012 AB-EPD factors (Keuhn et al., 2012)

Genetic Trends for Yearling Weight, lb Diff = 38 lb Diff = 0.4 lb Diff = 61 lb Adapted from Spring 2009 Genetic Trends from Breed Associations and 2011 AB-EPD factors

BREED GROUP MEANS (DEVIATIONS FROM HA & AH) FOR MATURE WEIGHT (ADJUSTED TO CONDITION SCORE OF 5.5) OF F1 CROSS COWS IN CYCLES I AND II (BIRTH YEARS: 1970-74) COMPARED TO CYCLE VII (BIRTH YEARS 1999-2000), lb (0) (- 6) (- 9) (- 92) (- 22) (- 43) LSD < 26 (0) (64) (75) (33) (117)

Breed Complementarity Dr. Bob Weaber 4/9/2017 Breed Complementarity Harvest the core strengths of breeds Crossing breeds to combine direct and maternal heterosis and breed effects to optimize performance levels Match cows to environment, calves to market…. 03/25/2011 Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement

What about end-product traits? Highly heritable so little effect of heterosis Some breeds compliment each other very well “Combination of quality and yield grade” Cundiff et al., 2004

Bob–How Do I Decide Which Breeding System Is Right For Me?

Systems, Benefits, Constraints

Choosing a breed Adapted from Gosey

Retained heterosis Mating of crossbred animals leaves you with 0 heterosis…WRONG Heterosis is retained in future generations Related to the probability of alleles from different breeds pairing together Note that expected and realized heterosis may differ due to the relationship of breeds Heterozygosity and heterosis are not linearly related

Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement Dr. Bob Weaber 4/9/2017 Retained Heterosis n = number of breeds in crossbreeding system pi = percentage of each breed (Ritchie et al., 1999) 03/25/2011 Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement Beef Cattle Genetic Improvement

Examples 1/2 Simmental 1/2 Angus bull mated to 1/2 Simmental 1/2 Angus cows 1-[(1/2*1/2)+(1/2*1/2)]=.5 or 50% 1/2 Limousin 1/2 Angus bull mated to Angus cows 1-[(1/2*0)+(1/2*1)]=.5 or 50%

How Do I Choose a Breeding Program Are you profit or premium focused? Why not both? Herd size Efficient bull utilization/manage variation in marketing groups How do I generate replacement heifers? How do I market calves? Constraints Environment Management

Providing Good Breeding System Consultancy to YOUR Customers Know your stuff…here’s some help! http://www.nbcec.org/producers/sire.html http://www.extension.org/pages/18946/archived-beef-cattle- webinars#Mating_Systems_to_Solve_Problems_and_Add_Value _to_Beef_Production_Systems:_Crossbreeding_and_the_Power _of_Heterosis Put your customer first What’s in your customers best interest is in your best interest Product offering that ‘solves’ problems for your customers.

Providing Good Breeding System Consultancy to YOUR Customers Know how to use Across Breed Adjustment tables Calculator to help: http://www.asi.k- state.edu/species/beef/research-and-extension/K- State_Across_Breed_EPD_Calculator_Worksheet_2014- 2015.xlsx

Points to Ponder Mature weight Weaning and yearling weight moderately to highly correlated to mature weight Increased yield comes at a cost in the cow herd Important to use terminal bulls on moderate cows Common breeds have all increased mature weight Use selection tools to moderate maternal lines Heterosis in crossbred cows should increase their culling age, reduce replacement costs, and increase chances for a profitable herd The notion that beef breeds should be all-purpose is common, but counterproductive Breeds are too similar, need to define a purpose Heterosis is important and underutilized, but it is not a “free lunch” Greater production comes at the expense of higher inputs

“missing” homozygotes

Predicting Crossbred Animals

Future of Marketing Crossbred Bulls?

“The native cattle are extinct, but the island is full of artificial breeds. The agriculturalist Bakewell created sheep and cows and horses to order, and breeds in which everything is omitted but what is economical. The cow is sacrificed to her bag; the ox to his sirloin.” Ralph Waldo Emerson

Is it worth the effort…. We think so…

Questions to Ask Your Commercial Customer What breed of cows do you have now? What’s your marketing end point? How do you sell calves? Is that likely to change anytime soon? How do you source replacement females Retained heterosis/maternal heterosis is paramount! Buy F1, produce your own Environmental/managerial/grazing resources/breeding pastures, etc.