Victor M. Montori, MD, MSc KER UNIT, Mayo Clinic Challenging myths: Empathic decision making in usual clinical settings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Números.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
EuroCondens SGB E.
2008 ACTION Registry ® -GWTG 2 nd Quarter Results.
Team/Organization Name Background and structure Location Brief system information (type, size) Pilot population.
Shared Decision Making Were in This Together Michael J. Barry, MD President.
Engaging Patients in Guided Care
Improving Depression Treatment in Primary Care: Dissemination and Implementation Edmund Chaney, PhD Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle AcademyHealth.
Lessons from STEP-BD for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder
Taking Research and Development to the Clinic: Issues for Physicians AAAS/FDLI Colloquium I Diagnostics and Diagnoses Paths to Personalized Medicine Howard.
Chronic disease self management – a systematic review of proactive telephone applications Carly Muller Dean Schillinger Division of General Internal Medicine.
Reported improvements in the UK tracked with recent reforms Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research University of Cambridge.
Community Care of North Carolina The Honorable Verla Insko N.C. House of Representatives.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2009 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide Percent of Hospitals Submitting Data to NTDB by State and.
3/28/2017© 2009, American Heart Association. All rights reserved.
Cohort 2 Region 4 Chicago, Illinois Mary Colleran, Chief Operations Officer & Samantha Handley, Vice President
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Corporate Communications 2012 Psychiatry Specialty Survey November 2012.
The basics for simulations
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
Karen Cradock, B. Physio, MSc. Therapy Lead
Ellen Wright Clayton, MD, JD. Genome wide tests will become part of clinical care in the near future Access to this information will be difficult, if.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Advance Care Planning Lynne Jackson - RPC Project Officer GPV August 6 th 2009 Austin Health - Directorate of Strategy, Quality and Service Redesign.
Translating Evidence into Practice Danny Liew Melbourne EpiCentre Medical Unit 1.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Figure 1. Policymakers Cite an Adequate Workforce, Improving Quality, and Securing Adequate Financing as the Most Urgent Challenges.
The Chronic Care Model.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Local improvement following national clinical audit workshops Auditing heart attacks Saving lives Dr Andrew Wragg Barts Health.
Right Care for Patients The National Shared Decision Making Programme.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Let’s take a 15 minute break Please be back on time.
Improving Office Care for Chest Pain Thomas D. Sequist, MD MPH Associate Professor of Medicine and Health Care Policy Brigham and Women ’ s Hospital, Division.
©PPRNet 2014 Impact of Patient Engagement on Treatment Decisions and Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Implementation of New Guidelines for the Treatment.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
MASSC Survey – Program Leaders Mellar P. Davis M.D. FCCP FAAHPM.
HIV and Aging Kathleen K Casey, MD Director, AIDS Ambulatory Care Center Jersey Shore University Medical Center.
Patient Web Portals: What’s the Convenience Worth to Patients? Kenneth Adler, MD, MMM Medical Director of Information Technology Arizona Community Physicians.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
The Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid: a Randomized Trial ISDM Conference Maastricht, June 2011.
The First International Conference for Evidence-based Healthcare.
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
Findings from the Evaluation Dr Alison Carter, IES Associate 11 November 2014.
My Own Health Report: Case Study for Pragmatic Research Marcia Ory Texas A&M Health Science Center Presentation at: CPRRN Annual Grantee Meeting October.
My role Being part of the core MAGIC team for primary care Imbedding shared decision making into the culture of the surgery Writing patient decision aids(PDAs)
Software Engineering-Inspired Approach to Prevention Healthcare Victor Rentea, Andrei Vasilateanu, Radu Ioanitescu and Luca Dan Serbanati Faculty of Engineering.
Decision Aids Enhancing the Patient Experience Annie LeBlanc PhD Wiser Choices Program Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit.
Secondary Translation: Completing the process to Improving Health Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Vice Dean Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical.
11 August 2015 Viet Nguyen, MD Chief Medical Officer Health & Life Sciences Information Systems & Global Solutions HL7.
Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of NIH (R34DK084009). Funding source had no role in the design, execution, analyses,
Using the Electronic Health Record to Encourage Evidence-Based Practice Jonathan S. Einbinder, MD, MPH Partners HealthCare
An Overview of MAGIC Richard Thomson/Maureen Fallon On behalf of MAGIC Cardiff and Newcastle.
What is shared decision making? Richard Thomson Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health Associate Dean for Patient and Public Engagement Decision Making.
Antidepressants for Depression Care. Depression Can be improved by Lifestyle changes, self-care practices psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy But of different.
Evidence-Based Dentistry Presenter’s Name. What does EBD mean?
Creating a healthcare system to FIT the patient – Patient-centered translation of evidence into practice Nilay Shah Division of Health Care Policy and.
The ABCS Metrics the evidence, the conversation, and the decision LJ Fagnan, MD, and the H2N team April 27, 2016 This project is supported by grant number.
+ Patient Engagement Toolkit: Boosting Patient Knowledge, Skills and Self-efficacy Mary R. Talen, Ph.D. Director, Primary Care Behavioral Health Northwestern.
Involving Patients with Low Risk Chest Pain in Discharge Decisions: A Multicenter Trial Erik P. Hess MD MSc.
Shared Decision Making in Diabetes: What, Why, and How?
Statin Choice Decision Aid Share-Decision Making
Chest Pain Choice Trial design: Patients presenting to the ED with low risk chest pain were randomized to either use of a tailored decision aid or routine.
Value Understanding what it all means – MDM, SDM, ICAN and
Presentation transcript:

Victor M. Montori, MD, MSc KER UNIT, Mayo Clinic Challenging myths: Empathic decision making in usual clinical settings

Decision making models Modified from Charles C et al ApproachesParental Clinician-as-perfect agent Shared decision-makingInformed Direction and amount of information flow about options Clinician Patient Direction of information flow about values and preferences Clinician Patient DeliberationClinician Clinician, PatientPatient DeciderClinician Clinician, PatientPatient Consistent with EBM principles No when decision is not purely technical and there are options Yes

Desired clinical behavior EMPATHIC DECISION MAKING 1.Partnership 2.Dance across models

Wiser Choices Program at Mayo Clinic’s KER UNIT

Settings (bold = RCT) WorkSettingPolicyEvaluation Statin ChoicePrimary + specialty care Effective careFeasible, effective, implemented in EHR, multicenter trial DM2 Med ChoicePrimary care“Technical” careFeasible, effective, multicenter trial Aspirin ChoicePrimary care (group)Effective care (but changed)Not evaluated Depression ChoicePrimary careMarketingDesign phase Genomic ChoiceExperimentalSilentDesign phase Osteoporosis ChoicePrimary careEffective careFeasible, effective ICD ChoiceSpecialty carePreference sensitiveDesign phase Smoking choicePrimary careEffective careDesign phase Chest Pain ChoiceEmergencyEffective careFeasible, effective, multicenter trial AMI ChoiceHospital wardEffective careFeasible, effective, multicenter trial Hypertensione-primary careEffective careDesign phase RosiglitazoneGeneralEffective careNot evaluated ProstateGeneral (tablet)Preference sensitiveDesign phase

Weymiller et al. Arch Intern Med 2007 Statin Choice

Osteoporosis Choice Montori et al, AJM 2011

Mullan et al, Arch Intern Med 2009 Diabetes Medication Choice

AMI Choice

Chest Pain Choice

Participants WorkAge, mean (range) IllnessClinician satisfaction (%)* Incremental time investment, median Statin Choice65 (55-80)Chronic, asymptomatic 74%3.8 minutes (-2.9, 10.5) Diabetes Medication Choice 62 (40-92)Chronic asymptomatic 90%2.5 minutes Osteoporosis Choice 67 (51-84)Chronic asymptomatic 75%3.0 minutes (-56, 25) Chest Pain Choice 54 (32-76)Acute, symptomatic 64%1.6 minutes AMI Choice64 (40-85)Acute, symptomatic NA * Would like to use it again with other patients considering the same decision?

Success of the decision aid EthicalLegal EconomicEffectiveness Knowledge transfer Creates a conversation Fit

Implementation Understandable Doable Favorable Fit for purpose, users, setting

Statin Decision Aid

Lessons learnt User-centered design happens in the field, takes multiple iterations and expertise. Testing decision aids in usual clinical settings is tough: decision moments are unpredictable. Repeated use for chronic decisions has been difficult to study in efficacy trials.

Myths Goal and settings 1.Decision aids have no role in evidence-based care 2.Decision aids support shared decision making 3.Valid decision aids cannot be used in busy clinical settings, such as primary care Participants 1.Clinicians would not want to use decision aids – they are barriers to adoption of SDM 2.Acutely ill patients are not good targets for SDM 3.Elderly chronically ill patients cannot participate in SDM

Summary of 5 years of work 13 wiser choices decision aids Chronic and acute care Primary and specialty care Rural, urban, and academic 50+ sites 200+ clinicians 600+ patients In trials!