National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship Meeting, Washington DC November 13, 2014 Steven Clauser, PhD, MPA Program Director, Improving Healthcare Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Patient Engagement in Design, Delivery, & Discovery 8 th Annual Utah Health Services Research Conference February 25, 2013 Lucy A. Savitz, Ph.D., MBA Director,
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Restructuring the Cancer Programs and Task Force Workgroups.
SAFETY NET NETWORK LEADERSHIP AND ADVISORY GROUP MEETING Wednesday, June 19, 2013.
Who Can Use MONAHRQ? May 2014 Note: This is one of seven slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
SIM- Data Infrastructure Subcommittee January 8, 2014.
©PPRNet 2014 Impact of Patient Engagement on Treatment Decisions and Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Implementation of New Guidelines for the Treatment.
1 Day of Research and Engagement for the Community Markham, IL March 1, 2014 Aingyea Kellom, MPA Program Associate, Patient Engagement Ambassador Program.
The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI): Working Through The Maze of a New Research Opportunity David Cella, PhD Zeeshan Butt, PhD Center.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
1 Engagement at PCORI: An Overview M. Suzanne Schrandt, JD Deputy Director of Patient Engagement.
State Health Departments: Focused on the Next Level Ann Robbins Texas Department of State Health Services National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS.
1 Comprehensive Cancer Control In Action. What to expect today? Provide state-level forum for networking & sharing your org’s current survivorship initiatives.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
The Community Engagement Studio: Strengthening Research Capacity through Community Engagement Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI Executive Director, Meharry.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
1 GHS Research Lecture Series Greenville, SC June 10, 2014 Linda Crew McNamara, RN, MBA PSDTO Advisory Panel & Stakeholder Reviewer Patient-Centered Outcomes.
So You Want to Do Comparative Effectiveness Research? The Nuts and Bolts of CER.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
1 Engagement in Clinical Research: The PCORI Engagement Rubric Kim Bailey, Engagement Officer UVA Webinar October 10, 2014.
©PPRNet 2014 Impact of Patient Engagement on Treatment Decisions and Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Implementation of New Guidelines for the Treatment.
Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.
 Lowell Smith Sr. Director, Business & Communication Research Administration Moffitt Cancer Center  Jeanine Stiles Chief Administrative Officer Associate.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
Capacity Task Force Virginia Health Reform Initiative January 14, 2011
Topic Generation and Research Prioritization Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH, Executive Director Rachael Fleurence, PhD, Scientist Rick Kuntz, MD, MSc, Chair, PDC.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
Effectiveness Day : Multi-professional vision and action planning Friday 29 th November 2013 Where People Matter Most.
1 NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY Subcommittee on Quality Measures for Children's Healthcare in Medicaid and CHIP Overview.
MODULE II 1 How are UCEDDs Connected?. Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD) 2. Association of.
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
DON MARIANOS, DDS, MPH ORAL HEALTH 2014 INITIATIVE WEBINAR MAY 11, 2012 Prevention & Dental Public Health (DPH) Infrastructure: A State Oral Health Program.
BREAST HEALTH GLOBAL INITIATIVE(BHGI) SUPPORTIVE CARE GUIDELINES& THEIR ROLE IN ADVOCACY : The Uganda Experience Gertrude Nakigudde Patient Advocate Uganda.
Overview: FY12 Strategic Communications Plan Meredith Fisher Director, Administration and Communication.
Sue Huckson Program Manager National Institute of Clinical Studies Improving care for Mental Health patients in Emergency Departments.
ASSOCIATION OF STATE PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITIONISTS.
Joe Selby, MD MPH EBRI December 15, 2011 What Might Patient (Employee)- Centered Research Look Like?
Putting the Patient at the Center of Health Care Research Joe Selby, MD, MPH Executive Director, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute The Conference.
Steps for Success in EHR Planning Bill French, VP eHealth Strategies Wisconsin Office of Rural Health HIT Implementation Workshop Stevens Point, WI August.
ACCELERATING CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
The KU Wichita Center for Breast Cancer Survivorship Judy Johnston, MS, RD/LD Research Instructor Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
PCORI: Studying What Works for Whom Greg Martin Deputy Director, Stakeholder Engagement October 14, 2015.
1 MODULE II How are UCEDDs Connected?. 2 Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) 2. Association of University Centers.
Health Quality Ontario: Health System Performance New Zealand Master Class March 25, 2014.
Presentation to the SAMHSA Advisory Councils
Anne Foley Senior Advisor, Ministry of Health New Zealand Framework for Dementia Care.
NACDD Hill Day: Legislative Visits What to Expect Mari T. Brick, MA Program Consultant, NACDD
Primary Care Improvement Infrastructure: The Role of Practice Facilitation Michael L. Parchman, MD MPH MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation AHRQ Annual.
CRISP Presentation on PCT Study Design: Case Study for Patient-Centered PCTs C. Daniel Mullins, PhD Professor and Chair Pharmaceutical Health Services.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Increased # of AI/AN receiving in- home environmental assessment and trigger reduction education and asthma self-management education Increased # of tribal.
April 13, 2015 Patient Engagement and Funding Opportunities.
1 AF4Q Sue Sheridan Director of Patient Engagement Better Outcomes: Engaging Patients as Partners – From Research to Care.
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Module 3: Orientation to Research
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Moving Beyond Survival to the Patient’s Perspective Linda J Burns, MD Medical Director, NMDP/Be The Match Health.
On the CUSP: Stop CAUTI Patient and Family Engagement in the ED
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Jason Gerson, PhD Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
PCORI Research Priorities and Relevant Examples
Action Plan 1: 2017 – 2020 For Information Only.
For PUBLIC SECTOR HEALTHCARE ROUNDTABLE NOVEMBER 2, 2017
Webinar #3P: How you can contribute to research
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Data as the Passenger: The Importance of Identifying What Data Matters to the Community Courtney Clyatt Program Officer, Pipeline to Proposal Awards/Engagement.
Presentation transcript:

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship Meeting, Washington DC November 13, 2014 Steven Clauser, PhD, MPA Program Director, Improving Healthcare Systems Patient Centeredness and Engagement in Cancer Care System Improvement

About PCORI An independent research institute authorized by Congress through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Funds comparative clinical effectiveness research (CER) that engages patients and other stakeholders throughout the research process. Seeks answers to real-world questions about what works best for patients based on their circumstances and concerns.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) helps people and their caregivers communicate and make better-informed healthcare decisions. PCOR: Actively engages patients and key stakeholders throughout the research process Compares important clinical management options. Evaluates the outcomes that are the most important to patients. Addresses implementation of findings in clinical care environments. What is PCOR?

How Patient-Centeredness Compares with Patient Engagement Patient Engagement Patients are partners in research, not just “subjects” Active and meaningful engagement between scientists, patients, and other stakeholders Community, patient, and caregiver involvement already in existence or a well- thought out plan Patient-Centeredness Does the project aim to answer questions or examine outcomes that matter to patients within the context of patient preferences? Research questions and outcomes should reflect what is important to patients and caregivers

Who Are Our Stakeholders? PCORI Community Patient/ Consumer Caregiver/ Family Member of Patient Clinician Patient/ Caregiver Advocacy Org Hospital/ Health System Training Institution Policy Maker Industry Payer Purchaser

Research Should Engage Stakeholders at Every Step Planning the study Conducting the study Disseminating study results PCORI Engagement Principles PCORI Engagement Rubric A four-part rubric developed to help guide applicants, reviewers, awardees, and program officers on ways to engage patients and families in conducting research

PCORI’s National Priorities for Research Assessment of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options Improving Healthcare Systems Communication & Dissemination Research Addressing Disparities Accelerating PCOR and Methodological Research 7

Evaluating the Impact of Patient-Centered Oncology Care Sarah Scholle, MPH, DPH, National Committee for Quality Assurance Washington, DC Problem Cancer patients face complex needs during active treatment and have ongoing needs for surveillance after completion of therapy. Need Treatment and surveillance have a large impact on the well-being and functioning of patients and their families. Project goal Tests a service model to increase use of evidence-based treatments, improve communication, care planning and attention to patients’ psychosocial needs. Tests and evaluates usage of the patient-centered medical home model of care for treating oncology patients. The goal is to examine whether the model improves patient experiences and quality of care, reduces events such as emergency department visits and hospital stays, and whether its adoption varies across practices. Improving Healthcare Systems, awarded May 2013

Evaluating the Impact of Patient-Centered Oncology Care Sample: 600 patients in 5 intervention and 15 control Patient-Centered Oncology Care practices, receiving cancer care during the 3 years prior and during the intervention Study Design (mixed mode): 1.Use quality improvement and co-learning methodologies to implement model 2.Focus groups for qualitative assessment 3.Difference-in-difference analytic design evaluating CAHPS survey for cancer and claims data to estimate the intervention effect in practices Study Outcomes: Patient experience with care, selected QOPI measures, ED visits, hospital admissions,

Planning the study Study idea initiated by oncologists, but quickly engaged patients to refine concept  Study Executive Committee & Advisory Panel sought out survivors, current patients, families including measurement and policy experts with lived experience  The Executive Committee for study includes a national policy expert and patient advocate who are both multiple cancer survivors  The Multi-Stakeholder Advisory Panel includes a patient advocate and health system administrator who are also cancer survivors Cancer patients and survivors kept study focus on patient-centered outcomes, such as care experiences, reduced emergency department visits, and reduced hospitalizations for side effects of cancer treatments.

Conducting the study Study leadership:  NCQA, NCCS (Ellen Stovall), Center for Advancing Health, ASCO, several cancer survivors, Independence BCBS Intervention  Study practices directly involve patient partners in individual clinic redesign efforts Care  The intervention focuses on patient-centered communication, care coordination, and support for psychosocial needs

Disseminating the study results Patients have been involved in plans for disseminating study findings to patient, stakeholder, and research audiences  This has included arranging a presentation of the study aims and design at the Cancer Leadership Council, a patient-centered forum of national advocacy organizations addressing public policy issues in cancer Patients on the Executive Team and Advisory Panel will aid in developing key messages for patients as well as identifying and writing for outlets that connect directly with patients

PCORI engagement principles PCORI Engagement Principles Reciprocal Relationships The roles and decision making authority of all research partner are clearly stated Co-learning Application includes plans to ensure that patient partners will understand the research provides and researchers will understand patient engagement Partnership Time and contributions of patients are valued and demonstrated in fair compensation and throughout time commitment requests Trust, Transparency, Honesty Major decisions are made inclusively, communication is open and honest, and findings are communicated in a meaningful/usable way

Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Awards Provide “wrap-around” support and enhance impact of PCORI’s research initiatives Three award types: Knowledge, Training and Development Dissemination and Implementation Awards of up to $250,000 Objectives  Engage new groups not previously involved with PCORI  Develop new mechanisms for disseminating research findings  Promote “research done differently” by supporting engagement and partnering in conduct and use of CER

Conclusion Patient-centered oncology care is important to cancer patients and survivors Engaging cancer patients and their caregivers in research and practice is important to advancing this goal Patient-centered outcomes research can contribute by building an evidence base of health care options that can assist patients, caregivers, and others in the health care system make informed choices consistent with their needs and preferences 15

Have a Question? General Inquiries | (202) Research/Programmatic Questions | (202) Administrative/Financial/Technical Questions