Rep. Blair Thoreson - ND House of Representatives Chairman, House Appropriations Committee (Gov’t. Operations Division)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CANADIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS IN TRANSITION Ariane Siegel.
Advertisements

The role of competition authorities in utilities regulation. Co-operation with sector regulators. The role of Competition Council of Latvia Valdis Latkovskis.
2013 FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE SESSION SUMMARY Howard Glassman, Executive Director Florida MPO Advisory Council July 25, 2013.
Natural Gas Consumers Relief Act (HB 1568). The Bill Sponsored by Governor Roy Barnes. Was signed into law on April 25, Passed by the Georgia Legislature.
An Update on the Provision of Educationally-Related Mental Health Services Transition of the AB 3632 Program.
ESB This is only a brief summary that reflects our current understanding of select provisions of the law, often in the absence of regulations.
Factors Affecting Price. Lesson Objectives What are the factors that affect the selling price of a product? What are legal and ethical considerations.
Telecommunications Law CLE State Deregulation at the PUC December 2014 Pete Kirchhof Colorado Telecommunications Association.
THE NEW LIMITED SESSION Louisiana House of Representatives Regular Session, 2005 BY: House Legislative Services March, 2005.
Where Ohio is Headed: Potential Changes in Substitute Senate Bill 58 Ohio Chamber of Commerce October 18, 2013 Webinar Sam Randazzo – General Counsel,
HAWAIIAN HOMES COMMISSION ACT What Have We Forgotten ?
Montana Safe Digging Law 2014 Joint Engineers Conference Thu - Nov :00am-11:30am.
Federal Communications Commission Intergovernmental Advisory Committee
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Railroad Commission of Texas Pipeline Safety Division.
Net Neutrality – An Overview – Bob Bocher Technology Consultant, WI Dept of Public Instruction, State Division for Libraries ,
Welcome to the Energy and Technology Committee Kevin E. McCarthy, Ph.D. Lee Hansen Office of Legislative Research.
Net Neutrality Questions. What if? Customer Lamps for Less Luxurious Lumination Telephone Company Welcome to lamps [click] [dial tone] Welcome to Luxurious.
Position Paper: The Case For Universal Broadband Access By James Kim.
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
 Overview  Clean Energy Act  Canadian energy governance  Canadian (and BC) government.
Amendment 64: What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been 2013 SDA Annual Conference.
SB19 Study Committee. Montana State Fund is committed to the health and economic prosperity of Montana through superior service, leadership and caring.
2011 Legislative Summary Utah APA/ULI Luncheon April 4, 2011.
Customer Service Enforcement After AB 2987 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006 John Risk Communications Support Group, Inc. (c) 2006.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Gas Utilities In Today’s Markets Presented by: Hank Linginfelter Executive Vice President, Utility Operations.
 New Bills Passed in North Carolina affecting Health Laws  Update of Health Care Reform.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
Realigning Utility Incentives Commissioner Wayne E. Gardner Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Keystone Energy Efficiency Alliance Sept. 20, 2011.
Factors Affecting Price. Costs and expenses – break-even point.
Opening Markets and Keeping Them Open: A Contract and Antitrust Model Ray Gifford, Chairman Colorado Public Utilities Commission.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
Los Angeles October 10, 2007 Michael Morris Video Franchising & Broadband Deployment Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission DIGITAL.
Proposed Tactical Framework Telecomm Regulation Onno W. Purbo
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Special Session 2007-B Overview Presentation to the Florida Taxation and Budget Reform Commission June 26, 2007.
Spectrum authorisation under new EU package Roger Stewart Radiocommunications Agency Head of licensing policy unit.
1 Green chemistry and green economy: an economic approach. Ignazio Musu Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Chapter 1 marketing is all around us Section 1.1
2 2 nd CUTS-CIRC International Conference REVIEWING THE GLOBAL EXPERIENCE ON ECONOMIC REGULATION – A forward looking perspective Session VII - Interface.
Confidential & Proprietary Internal Kaplan Use Only. THE BUDGET PROCESS All Jurisdictions.
Cost Recovery Mechanisms MATI Tribal Telecommunications Conference June 7-9, 2004 Presented by Doug Kitch & Vince Wiemer Alexicon, Inc.
1 GREETINGS TO PARTICIPANTS AT THE NATIONAL TRAINING WORKSHOP ON COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW ACCRA, GHANA 27 – 28 APRIL
Dr. Roger Ward.  It is a source of Congressional power to regulate interstate commerce is the Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8.  According to.
Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.
79 th Texas Legislative Session 2005 – Summary of ERCOT Impacts ERCOT Board of Directors June 21, 2005 Mark Walker.
State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas.
Chapter 8 Business-Government Relations Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Differential pricing of Data Services Akhilesh Kumar Trivedi Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, India.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
2 Consumer Unity & Trust Society International The Relationship of Competition and Regulation Policy and Administration Professor Allan Fels, AO Dean.
NATASCHA VAN DER ZWAN RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 25, 2011 BUSINESS, LABOR AND CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY.
Carlos Taylor Adaptive Computer Technology Specialist.
CBIA Health Connections April 26, Presentation Overview l CBIA Health Connections – Who we are l Choice, Choice, Choice l Rating l What we do -
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
European Union Law Week 10.
Legislation for County Engineers
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
Association of Indiana Counties Annual Conference September 27th, 2017
Achieving the Internal Gas Market The view of gas suppliers
REPEAL/REPLACE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT?
Public Service Commission of West Virginia
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE April 14 – 15, 2009
Transmission Pricing & Regional Electric Markets
CBIA Health Connections
Solar Energy Commercialization Utility Scale Business:
Broadband Policy and Technology
Presentation transcript:

Rep. Blair Thoreson - ND House of Representatives Chairman, House Appropriations Committee (Gov’t. Operations Division)

 Prior to 1983, the ND Public Service Commission regulated most aspects of telecommunications on the state as “traditional” public utilities Legislative Assembly removed cooperatives and small telcos from PSC regulation.  1985 Legislative Assembly required the PSC to begin process of deregulating telecommunications.

 Bill removed PSC authority from “rate of return” regulations, unless a telecommunications company informed the commission it wanted to be regulated this way.  For any company with over 50,000 end users, the election not to be exempt from rate or rate of return regulation was a one-time, irrevocable decision

 Although the legislative assembly exempted essential telecommunications service and non- essential telecommunications service from rate- of-return regulation by the PSC, essential telecommunications service was still subject to a price cap under the essential telecommunications price factor  Included service necessary for switched access to interexchange telecommunications companies necessary for two-way switched communications within a local exchange area

 Additional reforms enacted by Legislature:  HB 1459 (1995): increased the size of a telecommunications company not requiring PSC regulation from 3,000 to 8,000 subscribers

 SB 2420 (1999): legislation rebalanced rates in an “revenue neutral” manner. A telecommunications company with over 50,000 subscribers must submit a report to the PSC prohibited certain acts to promote or regulate competition. The bill provided that a telecommunications company may not be required to construct facilities at the request or for the use of another telecommunications company except to the extent required by the federal Act. The bill clarified that if a telecommunications company is required to incur nonreoccurring costs in excess of the normal course of business and for the benefit of another company or a customer, the Public Service Commission generally must allow the burdened company to recover the cost in advance. The bill prohibited a telecommunications company from discriminating against another company by refusing to provide or delaying access to the company's services or essential facilities, providing access on terms that are less favorable than those the company provides to itself, or by degrading the quality of access or service provided to another company. The bill identified those sections of law which competitive local exchange carriers are required to meet and established the Public Service Commission's jurisdiction over those telecommunications companies regardless of size. The bill repealed the Public Service Commission's authority to exempt a company, transaction, or service from regulation if there is sufficient competition.

 More communications options for consumers:

 More consumer choice makes ND an attractive location for technology-driven businesses to grow:

 Legislature continues to review the ever- changing world of telecommunications  No regular session in 2012, but several legislators may be looking at additional reforms in 2013  Watching what other states have done, and how it affects the consumers of communications services  PSC will continue to play a significant role in helping shape our state’s communications services