Feedback on the SWE coupling Public Consultation Imeplementation Group meeting – 7th april 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft Cross-regional Roadmap for Day-Ahead Price Coupling NWE Day-ahead price coupling project meeting 15 June 2011.
Advertisements

European Federation of Energy Traders 1 Electricity Regional Initiative Central-South Europe Region 4th Stakeholder Group meeting The Central South Region.
1 Madrid, 2 nd Nov th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative VI. MIBGAS.
Florence Forum Multi Regional Day-Ahead Price Coupling Towards Implementation of the PCG Target Model December 10-11, 2009.
Deliverable I.4 Balancing (15th IG meeting, Paris, April 7th 2014)
Access to long-term capacity for electric interconnections: toward a single European set of rules 2 nd common RCC CSE-CWE regions 28 September 2010 Milan.
15 November th SG meeting Enagás and REN Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.
1 page 1 NWE Intraday - Joint TSO and PX presentation London.
1 page 1 C O U P L E D Joint TSO-PX presentation NWE Day-Ahead Price Coupling IG meeting May 9 th 2012 Copenhagen Joint Presentation from TSOs and PXs.
ERI CS REM, 11th IG meeting. Milan, 21 November 2008 Towards a single auction platform in the SW region Rafael Gómez-Elvira Deputy Director for European.
IFE-CASC long term auctions Project status Implementation Group Meeting - Lisbon,
Planning for allocation rules and the auction platform NRAs propose to follow a two-steps approach:. 2013: » Based on the wish-list and within the scope.
Adeline Lassource (CRE) Charlotte Ramsay (OFGEM) 10 th FUI SG, London, 11 th March 2011 Progress with market integration: European initiatives and impact.
SWE Day-ahead market coupling (Pre- and Post-Coupling project) Lisbon, 3 rd December th Implementation Group meeting.
1 page 1 C O U P L E D NWE TSO Day Ahead Project NRA – TSO – PX meeting, 15 June 2011 ENTSO-E Regional Group Northwest Europe C O U P L E D.
1 Priority issues for the French-UK-Irish regulators What is expected from TSOs? 30 May 2006 To increase trade between adjacent markets and therefore have.
Italy-France Cross-border Intraday: Technical feasibility study CSE SG Group meeting Rome, 15 May 2012.
Draft Framework Guidelines on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms for the European Gas Transmission Network Benoît Esnault, CRE Presentation Workshop Ljubljana,
15 November th SG meeting Enagás and TIGF Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.
Draft document – Work in progress
Update on Ofgem’s interconnector policy consultation FUI IG, London, 13 th September.
FUI Electricity region: Update on Congestion management CRE SG Meeting - 3 December 2008.
Does the Third Package provide the European TSO associations with the tools necessary to find solutions to the European energy challenge ? Pierre BORNARD.
SWE Day- Ahead market coupling 7 April 2014 Implementation Group meeting – Paris.
IFE-CASC.EU project Forum with market parties Paris – 18th June
1 29 th April 2014 Teleconference 28 th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative.
SWE Day- Ahead market coupling 25 February 2014 Implementation Group meeting – Madrid Draft.
PCR Status report AESAG, September Supported by:
Challenges for the SEM.  Day-ahead price coupling is a key feature of the final draft Framework Guidelines on congestion management issued by ERGEG in.
PROPOSAL CAM PROPOSAL FOR HARMONISATION 14 th SG meeting Madrid 11 th July 2011.
Joint IPE auction implementation and results 1 SWE IG meeting – 7 April 2014 Joint IPE auction Update on launch of long term coordinated product (CNMC.
1 The regulators’ view on the Central West REM: Emphasis on the completion of existing initiatives Presentation for the Mini-Forum 20 June 2006.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) 17 th Madrid Forum 14 January 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
3 rd Stakeholder Group Meeting 1 February 2007 France-UK-Ireland REM Workstream on Congestion Management Conclusions of the first workshop (11 January.
1 May 2012CACM Network Code Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15 th May 2012.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
2nd IMPLEMENTATION GROUP MEETING. Lisbon, 24th January 2008 Conclusions from the 3rd technical RCC.
SEM Regional Integration Decision Paper FUI Stakeholder Group Meeting 16 June 2010.
1 15 th July 2015 Teleconference 32 nd IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Draft Framework Guidelines Capacity Allocation Mechanisms BNetzA/CRE Pre-Comitology Meeting Bonn – 26 May 2011.
Electricity Regional Initiative Central Eastern European Region Convergence & Coherence Sven Kaiser E-Control CEE Stakeholder Group Meeting 7 th November.
1 24 th November 2015 Videoconference 34 th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative.
Development and Implementation of a Coordinated Model for Regional and Inter-Regional Congestion Management Development and Implementation of a Coordinated.
Interconnector Physical Notification submissions following XBID (Cross Border Intra Day) market implementation; the cross border gate closure definition.
ANRE ROMANIAN ENERGY REGULATORY AUTHORITY Regulation of operation and organization of the electricity day-ahead market with the price market coupling mechanism.
CNMC and CRE intend to formally approve IFE rules 3.1 by mid-March
29th November 2016 Teleconference
SWE Day-ahead market coupling (Pre- and Post-Coupling project) Lisbon, 3rd December th Implementation Group meeting.
Public Consultation : main conclusions (1/2)
Enagás and REN Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms 15 November th SG meeting.
Capacity allocation in natural gas transmission networks Pilot framework guideline - Public consultation results and new content of guidelines - Dr.
Supported by: PCR Status report AESAG, September
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
Enagás and TIGF Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms 15 November th SG meeting.
SWE Day- Ahead market coupling
Feedback on the SWE coupling Public Consultation
Regulators’ update on Congestion Management and Balancing
18th July 2016 Teleconference
37th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative
Leonardo meeus & Samson Yemane Hadush
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
Draft document – Work in progress
Supported by: PCR Status report AESAG, September
26th February 2015 Teleconference
37th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative
29th April 2014 Teleconference
18th July 2016 Teleconference
37th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative
29th November 2016 Teleconference
26th February 2015 Teleconference
Presentation transcript:

Feedback on the SWE coupling Public Consultation Imeplementation Group meeting – 7th april 2014

The consultation ■A public consultation on the SWE Day-Ahead Market Coupling has been carried out from the 17 th to the 31 st of March by RTE. ■The documents and materials used for the public consultation are available at the following address: ■The public consultation covered the following topics:  the main principles and functioning of the market coupling;  the timings of the normal process and of other possible coupling scenarios;  the possible fallback solutions;  the existing price and bids caps on the French and on the Iberian electricity market;  A new version of the Import-Export Rules on the French Public Power Transmission System;  Open question. ■Three market parties answered to the consultation ■The analyses of the answers will be submitted to CRE in the next days 2

Day Ahead Market Coupling Main Principles ■All participants to the consultation agrees with the main principles of the SWE day-ahead market coupling, recognizing it as an important milestone for an efficient European electricity market ■One party expects ‘’…such cooperation to yield rapid improvements in coordinated cross-border capacity calculation, the allocation of capacity rights in forward timeframes at all borders, the development of efficient cross-border intraday continuous trading markets and the compatibility of national balancing arrangements.” ■One party stressed the need to ‘’harmonize operational procedures and features of markets and to make them robust enough to prevent situations such as the decoupling of markets.’’ ■One party stressed that the congestion rent should be used to pay for the compensations to the capacity holders in case of curtailment, pay for the balancing actions within each system and, in the case of Spain, use the surplus to finance new interconnection capacity. 3

Timings and price coupling scenarios ■One party highlighted the importance of harmonized timings across Europe in order to avoid discrimination of market participants in the pan-European market. ■One party stressed the need to respect the deadline for market results publication, in order not to impact the following processes, even in cases of ‘’technical constraints” or “special market situations’’ (whose definition is not clear). The notification process time slot should be maintained at 60 minutes. ■Two parties asked for earlier results publication in Spain and Portugal (12:55 instead of 13:00). ■One party asked for a check of market results by REN. ■One Party asked to investigate fallback solutions in case OMIE is not able to provide market results for Spain and Portugal: PMB results could be used as fallback. ■One Party made some specific questions related to some timings in MIBEL market. 4

Fallback solution ■All participants to the consultation supported shadow auctions as harmonized fallback solution, provided that a testing period for adapting IT systems is given and that the notification slot in case of decoupling is maintained at 60 minutes. ■One party asked for a clear timeline for the implementation of shadow auctions. ■One party stressed that shadow auctions and the operative procedures and timings related to them should be harmonized all across Europe ■One party stated the following ‘’...Regarding the price publication in fall-back situations, we reiterate that one of the strengths of the PCR is that there will be at least two PXs (the local PX and the PMB) capable of producing the price for each zone, so that any delays or force majeure should not have an impact as long as the PMB is authorized to publish the results in that case.”” ■On Party stated ‘’The transitional solution adopted for the SWE region (intraday auctions) should be replaced by the definitive solution as soon as possible. During this transitional period, yearly and monthly PTRs that can’t be used in the daily timeframe because of decoupling should be compensated with the full day-ahead market spread without any price cap in any case.’’ ■One Party asked some specific questions/clarifications regarding the timings of fallback solutions (triggering timings, opening of order books in OMIE…). 5

Price and Bids caps ■All participants supported the convergence of price and bid caps throughout Europe. ■One party stressed ‘’… supports the process described in the last draft of the CACM network code, which requires market operators to develop a proposal on harmonised maximum and minimum bid prices to be applied in all Bidding Zones in order to prevent a distortion on cross-border flows and to do so as soon as practicably possible and within three months after the impact is identified.” ■The process described by the CACM network code was cited by a second party, who also stressed that ‘’… In this process system operators and NRAs will consider possible negative effects on each wholesale power market according to the national regulatory framework.’’ 6

Import-Export Rules ■One Party asked the following question: ■“In the proposed version of the Rules the following sentence has been deleted (and the corresponding Appendix has been deleted as well): “RTE Notifies the User its List of Transactions based on the model in APPENDIX 7 updated after each accepted request.” We would like to know the justification of this elimination.” ■No other answers were received concerning Import-Export Rules. 7

Other evolutions and improvements ■One Party listed the following points:  “Remove the need to nominate to both RTE and REE the use of long-term capacity rights.  Harmonise the trading rules: portfolio bidding, complex conditions and price cap/floor in both sides of the interconnection.  Remove the caps for compensations in the case of capacity reductions at the interconnections, paying the full market spread. At least, remove all caps except a monthly global cap for compensations equal to the net auctions income.  Merge Portugal and Spain in a single price area. In order to gain economic efficiency and increase competition in the market.  Finally, extend the continuous intraday trading platform running in France to the peninsula, so that Portuguese facilities may gain direct access to the French market in the intraday timeframe”. 8

Other evolutions and improvements ■One Party gave the following examples for further harmonization’s of practices and procedures: ‘’Balance Responsible Parties, portfolio offers and nomination of programs directly to the TSO should be introduced in SWE region’’. ■One party suggested ‘’A second consultation round would be useful after the market coupling and the shadow auctions have been implemented, ca end 2014, in order to assess how the project is working and gather views on what could be improved then.’’ 9