Fate Is Fate Invincible?. The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 1. Claims A claim takes the form of a proposition. A proposition has a similar relation to a sentence as a number does to.
Advertisements

Believing Where We Cannot Prove Philip Kitcher
Anselm On the Existence of God. “Nor do I seek to understand so that I can believe, but rather I believe so that I can understand. For I believe this.
My Memoir Justin Wang.
PREDICTIONS will, may, might,
oXOGg oXOGg Animal shelter: Nszt_E
Support For Morality As A Social Contract
OBJECTIONS Fate. The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will eat.
Libertarianism A Libertarian, such as Taylor:
Change B y:Taylor Swift An d it's a sad picture The final blow hits you Somebody else gets What you wanted again You know it's all the same Another time.
The Philosophy of Exotischism The Essence of the Soul 341 You may have heard it said that it is a good thing that we all feel shame from time to time.
Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth,
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
I wish you the strength of all elements... I wish you the strength of all elements... This presentation runs automatically. Please turn on your speakers.
Time travel the grandfather paradox ii. lewis’s puzzle A. Tim can kill Grandfather. B. Tim cannot kill Grandfather.
What are the Qualities of a Critical Thinker? LSH2203 Critical Thinking.
“Be kind, because everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.” – Plato.

Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Beyond reasonable doubt? week 10 - the resurrection of the christ.
TRUTHFULNESS Truthfulness vs. deception Earning future trust by accurately reporting past facts.
Logos Formal Logic.
The Cosmological Argument. Aquinas’s Cosmological Argument Cosmological Argument is ‘a posteriori’ Attempts to prove the existence of God There are three.
Today A brief general introduction to the problem of free will
Fate The Story of Osmo.
GUIDELINES FOR GOAL SETTING. Check this out!  You can find and claim that pot of gold – a successful and happy future.  Make goals that are clearly.
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
Fate The Open Future. The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will.
Freedom and Determinism Hard Determinism. Review The Freedom Principle: Some actions are free. The Control Principle: An action is free only if it’s up.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
LESSONS Learn & Live Your Life!!!. When you lose someone, your heart breaks wide open, and the bad news is you never completely get over the loss. You.
Sets Day 1 Part II.
By Ryan Davis and Nick Houska. Fallacies  Fallacies- are defects in an argument that cause an argument to be invalid, unsound or weak  Example: Hasty.
Part 3 – REFUTING OPPOSING ARGUMENTS.  Before you start writing an argumentative essay, I strongly suggest you to prepare an outline and first, write.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Logic in School Program Creighton University Director: Dr. Jinmei Yuan Student Teachers: Mark Holmberg Andrew Trapp Jason Bodewitz.
Mathematics as a Second Language Mathematics as a Second Language Mathematics as a Second Language Developed by Herb Gross and Richard A. Medeiros © 2010.
MAKING GOOD ARGUMENTS 5 Key Ters. The Logic of Everyday Life Conversation A: I hear last semester was difficult. How do you think this term will go? B:
Copy the ENTIRE statement below and identify the CONCLUSION by highlighting or underlining it. Look, if we can’t trust international law to convict terrorists,
Making a Claim Grounds for Claim Evaluation Beyond Brainstorm.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Chapter 14: Fair Division Part 5 – Defining Fairness.
Curly Questions By Clarissa Suchanek. Do you think you can ever lie to yourself? I don’t think I could ever lie to myself because even if I was capable.
Suggestions for Young Christians “ Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. ” (1 Corinthians 10:31)
Aim: How can we persuade our audience to see our point of view? Aim: How can we persuade our audience to see our point of view? DN: Are you good at persuading.
Just war theory was developed during the Roman empire as a set of rules in which war can be deemed morally justifiable. It was developed so the Christians.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Do you think you can ever lie to yourself? Do you think you can ever lie to yourself? The answer to this is very complicated, however, we cannot lie to.
The Mercy of God.
OBJECTIONS Hard Determinism. Determinism The Universality of Causation: Everything that happens has a cause (which precedes it in time). The Sufficiency.
The Blind See John 9:1-41 Review Jesus had taught during the Feast of the Tabernacles (Jn 7) –The Jewish leaders had tried to arrest or kill Jesus, but.
Do Now  What does logos appeal to in an advertisement?  Give three examples.
NEW PASSWORD CHAPTER 6 “It Was Love, So Strong and So Real”
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Persuasive Text 8th 8.18.
COUNTER-ARGUMENTS What is it? How to write it effectively?
Time and Existence. Fatalism: Whatever happens is unavoidable. Causal Determinism: Everything that happens is causally determined by the past, together.
Conditionality What does TFF mean?. The paradox of material implication p ⊨ q ⊃ p is valid (by the definition of the truth table of ⊃ ) but trivially.
Logical Fallacies EXIT Continue… A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information.
Subjectivism. Ethical Subjectivism – the view that our moral opinions are based on our feelings and nothing more. Ethical subjectivism is a meta-ethical.
Free Will and Fixed Futures Jim Fahey Philosophy Group-Department of Cognitive Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
From research question to thesis statement. Two Parts of the Enthymeme 1. The claim. The library is the most important building on campus. This is an.
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
More Proofs. REVIEW The Rule of Assumption: A Assumption is the easiest rule to learn. It says at any stage in the derivation, we may write down any.
GGHS PHILOSOPHY 101 THE ARGUMENT FROM EVIL. FIRST VERSION (1)If God, were to exist then that being would be all-powerful, all knowing, and all loving.
ETHOS, LOGOS, & PATHOS Expos Comp.
What can you remember about Intuitionism?
Fact and Opinion: Is There Really a Difference
Introduction to Reasoning
Presentation transcript:

Fate Is Fate Invincible?

The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will eat dinner tonight, then dinner is unavoidable. 3)If it’s true that you won’t eat dinner tonight, then not eating dinner is unavoidable. 4)[So] Whatever happens – dinner or no dinner – is unavoidable.

The Logical Argument

Fatalism A fatalist, then is someone who believes that whatever happens is and always was unavoidable. Taylor, p.59 W e shall say, therefore, of whatever happens, that it was going to be that way…We shall say of him who turns out bad and mean, that he was going to; of him who turns out happy and blessed, that he was going to Taylor, p.71

The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will eat dinner tonight, then dinner is unavoidable. 3)If it’s true that you won’t eat dinner tonight, then not eating dinner is unavoidable. 4)[So] Whatever happens – dinner or no dinner – is unavoidable.

The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will eat dinner tonight, then dinner will be unavoided. 3)If it’s true that you won’t eat dinner tonight, then not eating dinner will be unavoided. 4)[So] Whatever happens – dinner or no dinner – is unavoidable.

The Logical Argument 1)It’s either true that you will eat dinner tonight or it’s true that you won’t. 2)If it’s true that you will eat dinner tonight, then dinner will be unavoided. 3)If it’s true that you won’t eat dinner tonight, then not eating dinner will be unavoided. 4)[So] Whatever happens – dinner or no dinner – will be unavoided.

Taylor’s Defense T he whole argument just conflates fact and necessity into one and the same thing, treating as unavoidable that which is merely true. The fact that a given thing is going to happen implies only that it is going to happen, not that it has to. Someone might still be able to prevent it – though of course no one will…

Taylor’s Defense …But how strong is the claim that something can be done, when in fact it never has been done in the whole history of the universe, in spite, sometimes, of the most strenuous efforts? No one has ever rendered false a statement that was true, however hard some men have tried. When an attempt, perhaps a heroic attempt, is made to avoid a given calamity, and the thing in question happens anyway, at just the moment and in just the way it was going to happen, we have reason to doubt that it could have been avoided.

Taylor’s Defense …But how strong is the claim that Bill is seeable, when in fact it never has been seen in the whole history of the universe, in spite, sometimes, of the most strenuous efforts? No one has ever seen something that is unseen, however hard some men have tried. When an attempt, perhaps a heroic attempt, is made to see a given bird, and the bird in question remains unseen, …we have reason to doubt that it could have been seen.