ERIC G. RODRIGUEZ When Do I Respond to Parent’s Request for FIE?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EARLY CHILDHOOD Early Childhood Whats new? All early childhood evaluations will be completed at the local school. This includes Child.
Advertisements

Procedural Safeguards
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
RF Monitoring Training Comparable Services Participation in TAKS February 19, 2010 Event # 4987.
Medication Administration Training
CT Disability Connections, LLC Presents The Connecticut State Special Education Individual Education Plan (IEP) “A Tutorial” © 2009 CT Disabilities Connections,
10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
+ 504 Quick Start for School Nurses Presented at OASN Conference Spring 2012 Sara Reith, Ed.S. NCSP
Welcome to Room 135 and English 11 Advanced. Day One: General Expectations Hats - off once you enter my class or in assemblies Food - no food in this.
Responding to Record Requests. TYPE OF REQUEST Public Information Act (PIA) Request otherwise known as an Open Records Request Inactive Student Record.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Parental Waivers for English Learners Carlos Rivera, Administrator.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Early On System Updates Winter 2011 Early On Training and Technical Assistance (EOT&TA)
Surrogate Parent Training
 S ARAH O RMAN.  1  Discrimination based on PREGNANCY is discrimination based on SEX.  Therefore, pregnancy cannot automatically bar a student from.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Are You a “Responsible” Employee? Presented by: JIM WALSH.
1 Parent involvement is most successful when it is viewed, practice and promoted as a partnership between the home and the school. Resource: California.
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
The Bernice Bicep Case Jennifer L. Marks and Carol McMillan.
Confidentiality… important facts to know and critical things to do!
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
New York State Education Department (NYSED) Prior Written Notice (Notice of Recommendation) This presentation is presented using Power Point with an.
School Nursing Services By: Eric G. Rodriguez. Related Services 34 C.F.R. § “means transportation and such developmental, corrective, and other.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Improving Student Outcomes Through Transition Planning: From Institutional Care to Public Schools.
October 3,  Introduction of new members  Good news report.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
What are Parent’s Rights in Georgia Special Education? Parents and students over age eighteen have the right … To Participate You have the right to refer.
Confidentiality Training. Confidentiality Confidentiality is the expectation of and right to privacy afforded to student and their parents. These rights.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Cheerleading, OCR and Retaliation: Two Recent OCR Letters Presented by: Eric G. Rodriguez.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Confidentiality/FERPA (Family Education Rights and Privacy Act) and IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act)
Notice: An Overview Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS April 29,
When Does 1:1 Add-up? 1 Presented by: Elvin W. Houston.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Public Records Training Manitowoc City Attorney’s Office.
Notice of Procedural Safeguards for Parents of Students with Disabilities Parents of exceptional students are entitled to information about their rights.
Understanding the ARD Process Presented by: Daniel Garza Special Education Director.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
“I am the Master of My Domain”: The Principal’s Role in the ARD Process Cynthia S. Buechler Buechler & Associates, P.C Stoneridge Road, Suite D-101.
Secondary Attendance Clerk Appendix D Training
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PARENT REQUESTS
Local Screening Requirements
Process for Enrolling New Special Education Students
LEADERSHIP IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
TOP TEN ISSUES RE: SECTION 504
Presented by: Jim Walsh
Stanislaus SELPA Session 1
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Student Handbook and Code of Conduct Update: Verbal Requests for Special Education Evaluations Presented by Suzie McNeese, Ed.D., Director.
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Cameras in the Classroom
Presentation transcript:

ERIC G. RODRIGUEZ When Do I Respond to Parent’s Request for FIE?

Parental Consent We cannot conduct an initial evaluation without first obtaining informed parental consent. 34 CFR (a)(1); see also 34 CFR (describing informed consent) Must be completed within 60 days of receiving parental consent, or within the timeframe established by the State. 34 CFR (c)(1) In Texas, we like to do things our own way…

SB 816SB 816 –Timeline for Completion of Report of Initial Special Education Evaluation (in Texas) Summary: A written report of a full individual and initial evaluation shall be completed not later than the 45th school day following the date on which the school district receives written consent for the evaluation, signed by the student’s parent or legal guardian. See Tex. Educ. Code (a)(1) Absence Exception: If child is absent 3+ days within the 45 day window, then those days are added to the initial 45 day timeline. See Tex. Educ. Code (a)(1) The absence exception does not apply to students under 5 by Sept. 1 of the school year and not enrolled in public school and for students enrolled in private or home school setting. See Tex. Educ. Code (a)(2)

SB 816SB 816 – Continued School Break Exceptions: (1) If a school district receives written consent for a full individual and initial evaluation of a student at least 35 but less than 45 school days before the last day of instruction of the school year, the evaluation and report must be completed and provided to the parent not later than June 30. The student's ARD committee shall meet not later than the 15th school day of the following school year to consider the evaluation. See Tex. Educ. Code (a-1) (2) If written consent is received less than 35 school days before the last day of instruction of the school year or if the student is absent from school during that period on three or more days, the absence exception applies to the date the written report of the full individual and initial evaluation is required. See Tex. Educ (a-1) In other words, report must be completed within 45 school days, or 45 school days plus the days absent, which means the report will likely be completed in the beginning of the following school year.

SB 816SB 816 – Continued: Response Required! Response required: If a parent or legal guardian makes a written request to the special education director or to a district administrative employee for a full individual and initial evaluation, the district must, not later than the 15 th school day after receipt of the request: Provide the parent/guardian an opportunity to give written consent for the evaluation; or Refuse to provide the evaluation and provide the parent/guardian with notice of procedural safeguards See Tex. Educ (c)

What does this mean? Parent s a request for an initial evaluation to Director of Special Education or to an administrative employee  Timeline to respond triggered Parent s a request to the assistant principal who oversees discipline  Timeline to respond triggered Parent drops off a hand-written note requesting evaluation to the school’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources (they are close friends)  Timeline to respond triggered

You’re kidding me, right? Parent sends to the student’s general education teacher  Timeline probably not triggered. However, teacher must refer the request to the appropriate administrator as soon as possible. The real issue here is whether any delay to evaluate will result in a violation of the IDEA as a result of what the teacher and administrator do with the request. Parent comes in to assistant principal’s office after lunch and drops off request for evaluation on a cocktail napkin  Timeline probably triggered. But that seems rather tacky doesn’t it?

Waiting for Mom to Come into Your Office Parent calls the Principal on the phone and asks for an evaluation  Timeline probably not triggered at the moment based on a strict reading of Tex. Educ. Code (c) (requiring “written request”). But more important question, what does Principal do with the oral request?  Don’t sit on it. Don’t wait for parent to come in. Document the conversation and send to the appropriate special education administrator for further action.  The Principal could operate as if the timeline to respond is running and seek assistance from an appropriate special education administrator right away to determine next steps.

So Where are We? We must give meaning to the statute. It specifies “written request” by parent or legal guardian for a full individual and initial evaluation But wait! Remember what the parent is asking for – special education services for her child. So taking a verbal request and reducing it to a writing you create is reasonable. Treating that as if the timeline is triggered to give you a deadline to respond is also reasonable. You may also invite the parent to come in right away and talk about it, and she writes the request on your legal pad. If she does that, then you have a “written request” and your clock actually starts at that point. The point behind this is to be careful not to unreasonably delay a response to a parent’s request for an evaluation.

Final Thoughts Train your campus administrators Train all administrators – the statute essentially provides that a written request to trigger the timeline to respond is effective upon delivery of the request to the Director of SE or “to a district administrative employee.” Think of how many “administrative employees” you have in your District. Last parting thought: training.

Thanks! Contact: Eric G. Rodriguez Walsh, Anderson, Gallegos, Green & Treviño, P.C. 100 N.E. Loop 410, Ste. 900 San Antonio, TX (210) The information in this handout was created by Walsh, Anderson, Gallegos, Green & Treviño, P.C. It is intended to be used for general information only and is not to be considered specific legal advice. If specific legal advice is sought, consult an attorney.