Dissertation Models in the RSOE Ed.D. Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Academic References
Advertisements

1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
A Review of Published Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) & Recommendations for Future Scholarly Work Darius Tandon, PhD Assistant Professor,
How to Finish Your Thesis/Dissertation?. Deciding to Go to Graduate School Without a powerful drive, the full-time effort and unflagging perseverance.
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
The NIU Experience Writing Guidelines for the MPA Dr. Kurt Thurmaier Professor and Director Northern Illinois University Division of Public Administration.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
The IBCC Reflective Project
INTRODUCTION TO THE “DISSERTATION OF PRACTICE” EDUC 888 FALL, 2012.
Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®)
Chapter One of Your Thesis
American Diploma Project Network Webinar December 19, 2012.
Innovate, Educate, and Transform Linda Fischer, Ed.D., Doctoral Support Center January 2014 Navigating the Dissertation.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
Planning an Applied Research Project Chapter 1 – Reading and Analyzing Research © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Interdisciplinary Business Education: Combining the Power of Inter-professional Collaboration with the Benefits of Student Engagement Alan Belasen, Ph.D.,
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
SCHOLARSHIP IN HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION Jim Lau and Sarah Williams Surgery and Emergency Medicine Medical Education Scholars Program August
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Instructional Strategy By: Florence Tima, RN Derek Lawson, RN Kristen Taggart, RN John Rigor, RN Wilmington University.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
1 Customized Employment Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate AACTE, Atlanta, GA February 19, 2010.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
Enquiring into Entrepreneurial School Leadership Sue Robson.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
How to Frame an Ed.D. Program The following are a set of examples of how programs can be framed to make them unique and focused around the values of the.
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
STATE-WIDE COOPERATIVE EDD UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA.
PROF. DR. MOHD ADAM BAKAR HF :
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
MA Thesis/Papers-In-Lieu Overview and Process. Thesis: What is it?  A thesis is a scholarly manuscript that reports on a significant in-depth investigation.
Guiding Principles We, the members of CPED, believe "The professional doctorate in education prepares educators for the application of appropriate and.
ML evi ne CP ED Co nv en in g Ju ne  The Purpose  The People  The Process.
1 Rossier School of Education Defining Excellence in Urban Education.
From description to analysis
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
University Descriptions Of Professional Practice Doctorates: Next Steps For CPED Richard De Lisi, Ph.D. Rutgers Graduate School of Education June 28, 2012.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
AASL American Association of School Librarians Presented by M. E. Shenefiel, Dec. 3, 2007.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
Masters and Doctorate – what are these?
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
The Evolving Complexities of Inquiry as Practice
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Narrative Writing Grades 6-12
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
The IBCC Reflective Project
Self-Critical Writing:
Big Idea 4: Synthesize Ideas — Moving from AP Seminar to AP Research
Maida Finch Judith Franzak Jon-Philip Imbrenda Koomi Kim
Lib Ed Assessment and the First Year Experience
February 21-22, 2018.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Presentation transcript:

Dissertation Models in the RSOE Ed.D. Program Robert Rueda Fall 2013

Our Program Goal: What Are We Trying to Achieve? “Scholarly Practitioners blend practical wisdom with professional skills and knowledge to name, frame, and solve problems of practice. They use practical research and applied theories as tools for change because they understand the importance of equity and social justice. They disseminate their work in multiple ways, and they have an obligation to resolve problems of practice by collaborating with key stakeholders, including the university, the educational institution, the community, and individuals.” (CPED website)

Two Key Components Related to the Goal: Purposes of the EdD What are key components of the EdD that we expect students to be proficient in? Problem solving framing problems of practice that are concrete, significant, and solvable, and tied to the mission and priorities of the organization Diagnosing and verifying underlying causes Leveraging research-based solutions Inquiry Understanding and critically evaluating research & evidence Ability to investigate problems of practice, their causes, and solutions, with a variety of methods and approaches as appropriate

Inquiry: The Skills & Knowledge Needed for Problem-Solving “Inquiry as Practice is the process of posing significant questions that focus on complex problems of practice. By using various research, theories, and professional wisdom, scholarly practitioners design innovative solutions to address the problems of practice. At the center of Inquiry of Practice is the ability to use data to understand the effects of innovation. As such, Inquiry of Practice requires the ability to gather, organize, judge, aggregate, and analyze situations, literature, and data with a critical lens” (CPED website)

How Are These Competencies Expressed? Dissertations on problems of practice In the USC Program, we would expect dissertations of practice and capstones to exhibit the following characteristics Addresses an educational issue Focused on some aspect of urban education Focuses on a significant problem of practice Demonstrates proficiency in Inquiry skills and methods as appropriate to the problem

What is the Dissertation of Practice or Capstone? “Expectation is that students will prepare a scholarly project that demonstrates a synthesis of the student’s abilities, lay the groundwork for future practice scholarship, and demonstrate mastery of ability to frame and critically inquire in to a significant educational problem of practice.” (CPED website)

What is a “Problem of Practice”? A problem of practice is a problem or issue that emerges from an educational setting and whose resolution is significant to the practitioners in that setting or to those they serve or engage with. In the USC context, the focus is on urban environments, and the program admits students from K-12, higher education, and non-school organizational, agency, and other work settings where education is a focus, and thus the scope of problems of practice is wide. These problems of practice are distinguishable from problems that arise from a review of gaps in the research literature on an educational topic, or problems that are based primarily on extending current theory. This definition does not suggest that problems of practice are not of interest to theoreticians or that they are not amenable to the application of theory, nor does it suggest that theoretical problems are devoid of practical application. Rather, the distinction is based on the primary focus and emphasis.

A Range Of Inquiry Types

Some Dissertation of Practice Format Types Consultancy model Thematic Traditional 5-chapter Three article design Policy brief/analysis Evaluation Other

How Do the EdD and Phd Degrees Differ?   DNP PhD Goal Preparation of leaders in practice Preparation of nurse scientists Research focus Application of research to practice, innovations in care Discovery of new knowledge Outcome Leadership in practice Careers in academia and other research-intensive environments Hallmark of educational program Mentorship in the highest level of nursing practice Mentorship in research Final program product Practice-oriented final scholarly project Dissertation based on original research

Inquiry as Common Ground It is an oversimplification to say that the PhD is a research degree and the EdD is a practice – Inquiry is important in both Inquiry in the service of generating new generalizable knowledge and theory development is a primary focus of the PhD Inquiry in the service of addressing or solving a significant problem of practice is a primary focus of the EdD

What are the current models? In the USC program, we employ a thematic group option While a small number of students do independent work with a chair, the majority of students participate in a thematic group This format was created both for reasons of efficiency but to build on the social nature of learning and collaboration skills which will be needed in future career work Some of the current configurations are outlined below

Single Chair, Individual Study, Not Connected to Thematic Group

Thematic Group - Single Chair, Common Theme, Different Research Questions within the Theme Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Product = single author dissertation

Thematic Group - Single Chair, Problem-Solving Consultant Approach, Team Structure Member 1 Member 1 Member 1 Team Team Team Member 2 Member 3 Member 2 Member 3 Member 2 Member 3 Product = Report with single-author and joint author sections, main target is school, District, or organization, may include supplemental material such as Powerpoints

Single Chair, Single Topic, Common Questions & Methodology, Individual Studies Single Common Topic Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Individual Study 1 Product = single author dissertations

Non-negotiable Elements for Any Dissertation of Practice or Capstone The work includes a problem statement and framing of the approach, which establishes the rationale and significance of the work The current literature is used as a foundation for the work and approach at key points: framing the problem, synthesizing what is known about the problem, and informing the solutions and implications of the work The work is systematic and represents sufficient effort to serve as a capstone The product represents a contribution to urban educational practice The product and process serve as an opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply theory and research to solving or informing an educational problem The work demonstrates the ability to present ideas and arguments and evidence in a logical, systematic, and coherent fashion in both written and oral formats

Additional Notes Dissertations of Practice vs. Capstones – this is not an either/or distinction – both are focused on significant educational issues and the primary audience is a specific educational setting or settings Both can be distinguished from PhD dissertations that focus primarily on creating new generalizable new knowledge and theory development Regarding inquiry coursework and experience – if you want to train practicing physicians, don’t train them to be medical researchers

Thank You Questions For additional resources - http://dissertationedd.usc.edu/ DSC contact information – rsoedsc@rossier.usc.edu or (213)740-8099