Computer-Mediated Communication. What is CMC? Broadly, Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) can be defined as any form of data exchange across two or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING RANJANI KRISHNAN HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL & MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY 2008.
Advertisements

Beliefs in politics Political significance of Beliefs Values Ideology Values vs. attitudes, traits, norms, needs Origins and functions Ideology Ideological.
Communication Theory Lecture 1: Introduction to Communication Theory and Novel Technology Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Team “Japan” BA352 Section 005
Attribution theory Began by Daryl Bem.
Social Psychology David Myers 10e Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies1.
Theories of CMC.
Effects of teaching approaches on learning outcomes: the role of metacognition in developing indicators Network 10 symposium Mirror, Signal, Manoeuvre:
Communicating and Competence. Communication Competence  Integrating the model: Awareness=Intelligence=Competence.
Social Cognition AP Psychology.
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 17, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Experiments in CMC and Media Richness.
1 IUT de Montreuil Université Paris 8 Emotion in Interaction: Embodied Conversational Agents Catherine Pelachaud.
Organizations FIGURE 4 - 1: INDIVIDUAL - BEHAVIOR FRAMEWORK
Chapter 3 Nelson & Quick Personality, Perception, and Attribution Copyright ©2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, and Resilience
What does your body say?.  all messages that are not expressed as words.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2010 Modified by Jackie Kroening 2011 PEOPLE, GROUPS, AND THEIR LEADERS Chapter 8.
Perception “is” Reality Understanding Individual Differences & Perception.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
The context of the interface Ian Ruthven University of Strathclyde.
Learning to Learn This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This [publication] communication reflects the views only of the.
1 Anabel Quan-Haase Barry Wellman Feature Interaction Workshop: Panel on New Features Ottawa, June Designing vs. Using Features of Communication.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. Learning to Learn LEARNING TO LEARN (L2L) Lesson 2: Learning to learn skills, andragogy.
Social Psychology. The branch of psychology that studies how people think, feel, and behave in social situations.
Lecture 2 Team Building by Building Self Awareness Presented by: Jeffrey S. Hornsby, Ph.D., SPHR Department of Management B all State University.
 Impression management can take one of three forms:  manner,  appearance  and setting.
1 GROUP BEHAVIOR. 2 WHAT IS GROUP? 3 GROUP Group consists of several interdependent people who have emotional ties and interact on a regular basis (Kesler.
Chapter 4 Relating Online Online Communication. In this chapter, you will learn: The theoretical perspectives on online relationships; How limited nonverbal.
Child Development and Education, Fourth Edition © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Development of Self and Social Understanding Chapter.
Fundamentals of Communication.  Process of Using Messages to Exchange Meaning Define Communication.
1: Inter-Act, 13th Edition Orientation.
Chapter 5 Self-Understanding: How We Come to Understand Ourselves.
Listening (It’s just as important as speaking!). Listening v. Hearing What is hearing? The act of receiving sound What is listening? The 4-step process.
Self-Concept. Self-Concept vs. Self-Esteem Self-Concept = “The relatively stable set of perceptions you hold of yourself.” –Physical appearance –Skills.
Similarity of Target and Observer – Prosocial behaviour Positive correlations are reported for the relation between similarity of target and observer and.
Chapter 5 Self-Understanding: How We Come to Understand Ourselves.
Alice price rushmore.  Learn about your personality traits  Explore the different personalities  Discover your personal communication style.
Social Psychology  The scientific study of how people think about, influence, and relate to one another.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Chapter 7 Social Perception and Attribution An Information Processing An Information Processing Model of Perception Model of Perception Stereotypes: Perceptions.
Interpersonal Communication
Psychology: An Introduction Charles A. Morris & Albert A. Maisto © 2005 Prentice Hall Social Psychology Chapter 15.
Introduction/ Boundaries/ Expected and Unexpected Behavior Beginning Social Communication Middle School: Lesson One.
Mass Communication Theoretical Approaches. The Dominant Paradigm The Dominant Paradigm combines a view of powerful media in a mass society Characterized.
Receive-Accept-Sample Model an information-processing model GV917.
Social Psychology – Ch 18 Social Cognition. Review of Ch 17 – Key Ideas  Social Psychology – scientific study of the ways that people’s behavior and.
COMMUNICATION MEDIA, AND . PRESENTERS: CHOGO,M,D (092SIS10). :AKPADE, YAYRA EDNA (092SIS1).
Attitude and Behavior. Attitude It is a disposition to approach an idea, event, person, or an object.
Perceiving the Self and Others
Socialization. What is Socialization Enables people to learn culture and become functioning members of society Purpose 1.Establishes social identity -
INTERPERSONAL SKILL C HAPTER 3 Lecturer : Mpho Mlombo.
Social Psychology. What are group polarization and groupthink?
1 Intimacy and Distance in Relational Communication Looking Out, Looking In 12 th Edition  Chapter Summary Intimacy in Relationships Self-Disclosure in.
Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Adolescence 8th edition By Laurence Steinberg, Ph.D. Chapter Nine: Autonomy Insert.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY FILM ANALYSIS.
Social Psychology.
Personality, Perception, and Attribution
Chapter 7: Interpersonal Relationships
Social Psychology, Meet the Internet
Social Psychology AP Psychology
Personality, Perception, and Attribution
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e
Unit 12: Social Pyschology
Problem solving and Communication
2.Personality And Attitude
Computer-Mediated Communication
Oleh Ahmad Riza Faizal S.Sos; IMDLL.
Self-Understanding: How We Come to Understand Ourselves
Presentation transcript:

Computer-Mediated Communication

What is CMC? Broadly, Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) can be defined as any form of data exchange across two or more networked computers. Narrowly, it refers to human to human communication via computerized technologies (e.g., IM, ICQ, video conference, etc.). It is often pitched against what’s known as Face-to-face (FfF) communication.

CMC vs. HCI In many ways, the difference between CMC and HCI are not fundamental differences. But they focus on different characteristics of new media technologies. HCI focuses on characteristics of the technology and individual user’s psychological processes. ◦ Interactivity ◦ Presence ◦ Cognition

CMC vs. HCI CMC focuses on characteristics of the communicative environment and user interactions ◦ Anonymity (being anonymous) ◦ Synchronicity (real-time vs. delayed conversation) ◦ Relationship development ◦ Impression formation

Computer-Mediated Communication The ability of engaging in anonymous communication is believed to be a very important feature of CMC. Different levels of anonymity ◦ True anonymity ◦ Visual anonymity ◦ Perceived anonymity

Computer-Mediated Communication Earlier research suggest that anonymity would lead to impersonal (depersonalized) communication ◦ Anonymity and distance lead to a decrease in self-awareness ◦ Decrease in self-awareness lead to deindividualtion

Computer-Mediated Communication What is self-awareness? ◦ at any given moment, an individual’s attention can be directed either outward to the external environment toward things such as tasks, other people, or the social context, or directed inward to various aspects of the self (Duval & Wicklund, 1972). ◦ The different features of the self can be categorized into two major parts (Fenigstein, Scheier, & Buss, 1975):  The public self  physical appearance, table manners, and accent.  the private self  personal beliefs, hidden inner feelings, thoughts, and memories that are covert to others including religious beliefs and childhood memories

Computer-Mediated Communication Public Self-awareness ◦ Attention is directed towards to the public aspects of the self ◦ Public self-awareness has consistently been found to cause conformity towards perceived majority opinions (Duval & Wicklund, 1972; Froming, Walker, & Lopyan, 1982; Scheier & Carver, 1980; Wicklund & Duval, 1971) ◦ It can be heightened by the presence of film or video cameras

Computer-Mediated Communication Private Self-awareness ◦ Attention is directed towards to those private aspects of the self ◦ has been shown to cause individuals to be more aware of, and more responsive to, their emotions (Scheier, 1976; Scheier & Carver, 1977), and engage in more self-disclosure (Joinson, 2001).. ◦ It can be heightened by the presence of a small mirror & self-portrait.

Computer-Mediated Communication Theoretically, Many explanations of both pro- and anti- social behaviors in computer-mediated communication (CMC) appear to hinge on changes in individual self- awareness. Empirically, very few studies directly tested the effect of self-awareness on common outcomes of CMC research. ◦ although self-awareness has been found to impact self-disclosure & persuasion in CMC (Joinson, 2001; Matheson & Zanna, 1988; 1989), Three dominant perspectives on CMC: ◦ Deindividuation ◦ Social Identity Explanations of Deindividuation (SIDE) ◦ Hyperpersonal

Deindividuation Effects in CMC “computer-mediated communication seems to comprise some of the same conditions that are important for deindividuation— anonymity, reduced self-regulation, and reduced self-awareness” (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1984, p. 1126). the reduction of social cues in CMC can decrease users’ overall self-awareness, leading to a state of deindividuation, thereby fostering interactions that are more task- oriented, impersonal, and in some cases even uninhibited and anti-normative.

Deindividuation Effects in CMC Visual anonymity allows us to communicate with each other without worrying about many other social information (social identities) ◦ Appearance ◦ Skin color ◦ Gender ◦ Age As a consequence, we tend to ◦ Communicate more honestly with less bias ◦ Communicate more freely with less social constraints ◦ Focus on the tasks rather than the socio-emotional aspects of the conversation.

Deindividuation Effects in CMC Deindividuation is good for decision making and corporate environment ◦ Less influenced by power structure ◦ Speak more freely and thus encourages creativity ◦ Focusing on tasks and not bothered by social formality Deindividuation is bad for social environment ◦ Difficult to be personal ◦ Conversation may become direct and cold (impersonal)

SIDE effects in CMC The visually anonymous environment of CMC heightens one’s sensitivity to group and social identities ◦ You try to guess what other’s group identity is by looking for non-verbal clues ◦ You start to act according to your guesses how an individual acts in CMC depends on the salience of the individual’s group identity and the norms of the group in which the individual is communicating

SIDE effects in CMC According to this perspective, deindividuation may not always be impersonal. ◦ Just because a conversation is visually anonymous, it doesn’t mean that we don’t engage in self-regulation and monitoring ◦ What is important is which social identity is salient at the moment

Hyperpersonal Communication in CMC visual anonymity of CMC enables users to mask physical or behavioral cues that are undesirable, and selectively self-disclose more favorable information. Thus, communication in CMC, due to anonymity, allow a person to strategically create an “ideal self” to present to the other person.

Hyperpersonal Communication in CMC This allows communicators to carefully think about what to say, how to say it, and when to say it. It also allows individuals to use their imagination to “idealize” the person whom they are talking to. Thus, leading to intense social relationships beyond normal level (hyper- personal).

CMC (summary) Compare to FtF, CMC allows communicators to be more strategic. It may lead to impersonal communication, or hyperpersonal communication, although this may seem contradicting. People tend to form impressions about each other based on group cues, and imagination.

CMC (summary) However… CMC is becoming more sophisticated ◦ Video ◦ Audio ◦ Profile ◦ Text Previous research seems to be a bit outdated