Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, 2013 2-5pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

Activities at the Louisiana Spatial Reference Center Roy K. Dokka, Ph.D. Center for GeoInformatics and Louisiana Spatial Reference Center Louisiana State.
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
New Datums Are Coming in 2022!  Both a new geometric and a new geopotential (vertical) datum will be released in  The realization of the new datums.
GNSS DERIVED HEIGHTS- PART 2 NOS/NGS - 59
REAL TIME POSITIONING “ IT DEPENDS” REAL TIME POSITIONING PDOP MULTIPATH SATELLITES BASE ACCURACY BASE SECURITY REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY, REDUNDANCY PPM.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
A COMPLETE SURVEY CREW CGSIC 49th Meeting-Civil GPS Service Interface Committee CORS User Forum Hilton Garden Inn Savannah, Georgia September 2009.
National Geodetic Survey NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
National Geodetic Survey NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Ronnie Taylor alternate Subcommittee Chair Deputy Director, National Geodetic Survey.
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Vertical Datums and Heights
GPS Accuracy Testing Using: “RTK” (Real Time Kinematic) & “One Step Transformations” (Site Calibrations)
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
1 Using CORS and OPUS for Positioning Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey GIS-T Charleston, West Virginia April 14, 2010.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
The RSGPS program and OPUS - RS Getting There Faster –
NGS AND REAL TIME POSITIONING
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
© 2009 Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. OPUS and VRS for QA Surveys of the PAMAP Program Eric M. Orndorff, MS, PLS Zach Lupold, BS Great Lakes Region Height.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Common Marks. Datasheet Basics The NGS Data Sheet See file dsdata.txt for more information about the datasheet. DATABASE = Sybase,PROGRAM = datasheet,
GPS and Geodetic News You Can Use David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State of Ohio National Geodetic Survey, NOAA 2008 Ohio GIS Conference September.
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar March 20, pm ET Key Considerations and Concerns When Using OPUS Projects to Position.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
IN TEN YEARS…… SATELLITES 1.5 DM AUTONOMOUS POSITIONING NEW GEOMETRICAL DATUM – ITRF ALIGNED GEOCENTER BUT PROBABLY FIXED ON NORTH AMERICAN PLATE.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
CORS. CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines.
NGS Produces New Coordinates: Is it still NAD83? Past, Present, Future Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA.
National Geodetic Survey Programs & Geodetic Tools William Stone Southwest Region Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
National Readjustment Dale Pursell Observation and Analysis Division National Geodetic Survey FGCS Workgroup Meeting February 14, 2007.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
≥107 RTN USA ≥35 DOT ACADEMIC/SCIENTIFIC SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTERS VARIOUS DOTS + MACHINE GUIDANCE COUNTY CITY GEODETICSURVEYS(NC,SC) MANUFACTURERS VENDOR.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
New Coordinates for CORS Sites & Oregon Case Study The NGS Multi-Year CORS Solution and the evolution from NAD 83(CORS96)Epoch 2002 to NAD 83(2011)Epoch.
H 88 = h 83 – N 03. THE TECHNOLOGY SWEET SPOT SBAS: 2 M H, 6 M V, 0.3 M SMOOTHED H, CHEAP COMMERCIAL DGPS: FEW DM, $$ USCG BEACON: METER+, CHEAP CORS/OPUS:
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey Real-Time Mantra Pass.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Height Modernization Western States Regional Webinar Tuesday, November 19, :00am PT - 2:00pm PT (1:00 – 5:00 pm ET) OPUS-DB Publishing with OPUS.
Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.
National Ocean Service NGS, NOS, NOAA Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate Navigation Services Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Height Modernization in the U.S.: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey, U.S.A.
Guidelines for Positioning the Oregon Real-time GPS Network Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT 31 July 2013 NGS Real-time GPS Network Webinar.
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
Towards Optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS OCTOBER 9, 2014 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S.
Height Modernization Activities at NGS Christine Gallagher National Partner Meeting April 30, 2014.
RTN Field Procedures and Best Practices New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors January 20, 2016 Dan Martin Northeast Regional Geodetic.
CORS Network > 1,865 Stations 226 federal, state, local and academic partners Growth > 231 new stations in 2012 Updated Guidelines.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting 11 January 2011 Ronnie Taylor Acting Director,
1 CORS and OPUS for GIS Applications Richard Snay NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey ESRI International User Conference San Diego, California August 5, 2008.
GPS Site Calibration Objectives  Explain the Co-ordinate systems used in GPS Surveying.  Explain what a calibration is.  Explain the 5 main process.
SC – VRS Network To Support Surveying and Machine Control.
1700+ Active sites 200+ Contributors CORS Network continued growth RTN AND NGS “FOUNDATION CORS” WILL BE THE PRIMARY ACCESS TO THE NSRS.
H 88 = h 83 – N 03. THE TECHNOLOGY SWEET SPOT SBAS: 2 M H, 6 M V, 0.3 M SMOOTHED H, CHEAP COMMERCIAL DGPS: FEW DM, $$ USCG BEACON: METER+, CHEAP CORS/OPUS:
Guidelines for Real Time GNSS Networks (RTN) Administration.
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong, PLS – Geodesist Oregon State Geodetic Advisor NOAA, National Geodetic Survey

Look up the RTK rover receiver specifications – What accuracy is the receiver (sensor) capable of? – What will it take to get the most accuracy from the receiver? First Things First Part of the benefits of using an RTN over single base RTK – Limited ppm error UNDERSTAND THE ROVER SPECIFICATIONS (RMS)

Precision vs. Accuracy measurement from RTN correctors More questions? Is there systematic bias, multipath, and atmospheric errors to overcome? Always some! How is the accepted true (accurate) position determined? Accurate - Accepted truth

GNSS Errors and bias To some degree always present and ever changing

RTN Precision Measurement Field Testing ‘PRECISION’ is a computed statistical quantity to the source of the measurement – It is a measure of the uniformity or reproducibility of the result. A rover measurement from the RTN shows precision of the observation and is normally recorded in the data collector as the average position of many 1 second measurements on a mark. [This is not to be confused with the individual precision shown on the data collector screen for each 1 second shot.] RTK point occupation time = the number of 1 sec. epochs logged over a given period of time.

RTN Measurement Precision Typical (normal) RTN precisions at the 95% confidence level: – horizontal 2-3 cm – vertical (ellipsoid height) 3-5 cm – orthometric heights 5-7 cm (typical-using the NGS hybrid geoid model) Exceptional RTN derived precisions at the 95% confidence level: At the limit of RT technology – horizontal: ≤ 1 cm – vertical (ellipsoid height) ≤ 1 cm – orthometric heights ≤ 2 cm.

RTN Precision Measurement Field Testing ‘PRECISION’ is a computed statistical quantity to the source of the measurement. More measurements averaged = improved precision of the final coordinate. RTN testing on a MARK: -10 occupations at each interval in rotation for similar #SV and GDOP. 480s horiz. RMSE = m 480s vert. RMSE = m

What is Accuracy (Truth) ‘ACCURACY’ is a computed statistical quantity to the realization of the datum - Alignment of the RTN to the NSRS shows accuracy (typically by some method of post processing static observations of the RTN stations constrained by CORS coordinates) Accuracy is a measure of how the positions are aligned to “truth” NGS wishes to encourage all RTN’s to provide users with alignment to the NSRS as the representation of truth. NAD 83 (horizontal and ellipsoid height) NAVD 88 (orthometric height) Initial NGS guidelines support this alignment to the NSRS as: within 2 cm latitude and longitude, and within 4 cm ellipsoid height (95% confidence) using the CORS network weighted as truth.

Field Test RTN Correctors Horiz. Precision vs. Accuracy 1.Meets the project survey specification guidelines - horizontal component 95% conf. accuracy guidelines. 2.Meets the receiver 95% conf. 3.Different datasets may yield different results. Some Conclusions

Field Test Vert. Precision vs. Accuracy The black horizontal line represents the 4 hour independent published OPUS solution and considered the truth (and representing the NSRS) in this case, while the blue horizontal straight line is the average of the 10 individual 8 minute RTK shots. They are about 1.6 cm apart vertically but many of the individual shots were outside the 4 cm vertical project specification.

Survey Project Standards How good is good enough? Review typical accuracy spec. Only way to know and understand the working accuracy is to test. UserGuidelines.v2.1.pdf

Create a RTN Rover Check-in Mark

Questions For further reading see the ‘NGS Real Time Network Guidelines’ and NGS User Guidelines for Single Base RT GNSS Positioning