Prof. Matt McCormick Department of Philosophy California State University, Sacramento

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why We Are Supposed to Learn the Things We Learn in School.
Advertisements

Philosophy of Religion Lecturer: Dr Victoria Harrison Department of Philosophy University of Glasgow.
Information in this PPT is from:
Believing Where We Cannot Prove Philip Kitcher
It Takes More Faith to be an Atheist.
E THICS Chapter 2 Relativism. C ULTURAL R ELATIVISM 1. Different societies have different moral codes. 2. The moral code of a society determines what.
The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
Self-compassion: Basic ideas Kristin Neff, PhD University of Texas at Austin.
DETERMINISM VS. FREE WILL
Authority and Democracy
Notes on Spinoza on Rights (TTP, chapters 16 and 20)
 Imposition  Some people don’t practice evangelism because they feel they are imposing their beliefs on others.  But when you understand what the Bible.
‘Skill Focus: Self Confidence & Fulfilling your Potential’ Sonia Bate, Director & Executive Coach, Edit Development.
Deism Flourished especially from 1690s-1740s Seems to die out by 1800, but many of its ideas live on in Unitarianism belief that reason and observation.
Chapter 25 Romanticism’s response to Enlightenment theology.
Why Philosophy? Myron A. Penner. Overview I.How + What = Why II.Scholarship: Research Areas III.Scholarship: Teaching.
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 1
Introduction to Philosophy
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
Two objections to non- cognitivism Michael Lacewing
Angry Atheists and Soulless Scientists: Stereotypes of nonbelief in the era of the 'New Atheism' Taner Edis Department of Physics, Truman State University.
© Michael Lacewing Faith without reason? Michael Lacewing
Critical Analysis and Problem Solving Merging Critical Thought and Assessments in Modern Maritime Education IMLA 19 Conference 2011 Captain Gregory Hanchrow.
Political Culture “General political attitudes and orientations of a population” “Patterned set of beliefs and assumptions about how the political process.
Conclusion Chapter 14 TOK II. 3 Theories Regarding Truth (1) Correspondence Theory – truth is as it appears to be – facts are facts. (1) Correspondence.
HZB301 Philosophy Room 158 Mr. Baker.
Emotion A QUOTE [Emotion] has the advantage of being open to all, the weak and the lowly, the illiterate and the scholar. It is seen to be as efficacious.
Apologetics Give a defense. What Apologetics is not The art of getting really good at sayin “I’m sorry over and over again.” The art of intellectually.
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
Fr. Veras Religion 9 Notes & Vocabulary Our Lady of Lourdes High School.
Philosophy 2803 – Health Ethics Andrew Latus. Introduction Ethics Study of right and wrong/good and bad A Branch of Philosophy Central Question = “How.
Welcome to Ethics Ethics and citizens rights DR. BURTON A. AGGABAO Professorial lecturer
Introduction That error exists in religion today no one can deny. That man is responsible for such error must be admitted by all. Some might want to blame.
Mormons do not feel threatened by science. They are not enemies of the rational world. They are not creationist. On human conduct, they tend to stress.
Between Realities Dawkins vs. Voegelin (Coestier) By: Meins M.S. Coetsier.
Chapter 6 Medieval Philosophy. What is a covenant and how it is important to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam? What sorts of philosophy do we find in.
Evidential Challenge: Kierkegaard and Adams
Philosophy.
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION  Preliminary Issues:  Agreement vs. Tolerance  Different Religions ARE Incompatible  Religious Claims Aren’t True FOR Individuals.
John Wisdom’s Parable of the Gardener AS Philosophy God and the World – Seeing as hns adapted from richmond.
Imagine if this were real… xlK5lpB-HZ4.
PROPAGANDA. Word Games Name Calling Links person or idea to negative symbol Seeks to make audience reject and condemn person or idea based on symbol.
Philosophy An introduction. What is philosophy? Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle said that philosophy is ‘the science which considers truth’
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
MORALITY AND GOD Can you have a morality without a deity?
The Argument  In modern times Philosophy has shifted from an interest in God to an interest in religion (from “Philosophical Theology” to “Philosophy.
World Philosophy Mr. Zuercher. What is philosophy? ▪ Philosophy is critical and creative thinking about fundamental questions. – What is a person – What.
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
Lecture 1 What is metaphysics?
PHI 208 Course Extraordinary Success tutorialrank.com
The evidential problem of evil
Facing Tough Questions
Donovan – Overview Philosophy A2.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Ethics and the Examined Life
POST MODERNISM& ROLE OF EDUCATION
The Value of Philosophy
Bellwork In two large groups, analyze the post-it notes for ABSTRACT or CONCRETE concepts Does the example fit the description of ABSTRACT or CONCRETE?
Dawkins’ The God Delusion: A Public Debate
Christianity Theme 3 E Specification Content
Recap Key-Terms Cognitivism Non-Cognitivism Realism Anti-Realism
Conscience F Murphy.
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
DETERMINISM VS. FREE WILL
Outline the naturalistic fallacy
Philosophy A Brief Introduction.
How do secularists think about decisions?
Twelve Points That Show Christianity is True
Religion and Science What is truth?
Presentation transcript:

Prof. Matt McCormick Department of Philosophy California State University, Sacramento

I propose to turn that argument around completely. Not only is it possible to be a moral person without a belief in God, there are some very good reasons for thinking that in many cases believing in God is itself actually immoral.

 Step 1: Admit you have a problem.  Step 2: Identify the Problem

It should be noted, of course, that it’s not just religious beliefs that have the problem where wishing something is true interferes with our ability to think clearly about whether or not it actually is true. We have this problem for all sorts of beliefs--even atheists have it.

 you know are false,  contribute to the confusion or false beliefs of others,  encourage supernatural, spooky, non-critical, fuzzy- headed thinking,  foster fear and anxiety.

 encourage complacency about social problems and the future of humanity on this planet. Rapture Index The prophetic speedometer of end-time activity Today’s Rapture Index is 159 Net change: +1

 stall our progress in dealing with new, complicated and important moral issues.

encourage cultural and ethnic strife.

 Foster social injustice, hatred, cruelty, and intolerance.

 undermine the advancement of science.  encourage a historically outdated, over-simplified worldview.  contribute to the stagnation of human progress.  have no compelling evidence in their favor.  give people false hopes.  are self-deluding.  foster fear, confusion, and fuzzy, magical thinking in children.  foster false beliefs in children.  impede children’s acquisition of our most important, modern advancements in knowledge.

Wouldn’t it be ironic if you have more to fear from the corruption of religion on your reason than what many religions would have you think: Satan seeks to corrupt your religious faith.

“No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered as patriots. This is one nation under God.” George Bush, senior.No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered as patriots. This is one nation under God.

 The ancient Greek’s had a concept of akrasia which is acting against one’s better judgment or having a weakness of will.

 Isn’t it true that your belief in God fits many, most, or all of the conditions we considered before?  We’ve elevated the abdication of reason in matters of religion to a noble virtue instead rejecting it for the dangerous and demeaning practice that it is.

 So they permit themselves to "believe” in the God idea in the "hope" sense of "believe." ("I believe that my husband will make it home safely from Iraq.")  Then we find ourselves surrounded by like- minded people who feel the need to believe(hope).  We rationalize, we blur, and we feel more and more strongly that this thing that we want to believe really isn't just a hope, it's correct, it's the truth.

 It exploits weakness of the will because we want the God idea to be true.  We find a way to get what we want and to satisfy our reason: we believe at first because we hope it is true, and we enslave our reason to making it seem like the hope has a legitimate claim to the truth.

The Problem: 1. We have a powerful God urge. 2. Many of us indulge that urge by believing even when we know better. 3. That ill-gotten belief can lead to many awful actions and effects. 4. Akratic beliefs are bad. The Solution: 1. Recognize the urge for what it is. 2. Take steps in our minds and lives to contain it.

 What we need is a twelve step program for God beliefs and religiousness.  "Hi, I'm Matt and I've been clean since 1982."