Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Advertisements

Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
Supporting Students with Challenging Behavior in the Classroom
Positive Behavior Support
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Cedarmere Elementary School. Positive Behavior Intervention Supports (PBIS)- An Overview August 2006.
The Road Less Traveled: Making a Difference in Students Lives Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Active Supervision Center on Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports 8.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Keeping the Momentum Going Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Effective Behavior Management in the Classroom Setting
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Positive Behavior Support in the Classroom Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Improving School Climate and Student Behavior Through Positive Behavior Supports Doug Maraffa.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
PBiS Overview Positive Behavior Interventions and Support.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Name of School Date.
Tier II Supports: Teaming Structures Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
Building School-Based Systems to Support Small Group/ Targeted Interventions for At-risk Students Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on.
Skill Building for Small Group / Targeted Interventions Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports.
Building a Tier II/III School Wide PBS System Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
“Instead of calling my mom, how would you feel about exploring a more positive and preventive strategy?”
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
“Tiering” It Up Tier 2 & 3 Supports Lauren Feigel & LaThomas Willis The Lincoln Center Wyandotte, MI 1/17/2013.
Classroom Instruction and Management: The Connect Point Across Universal and Tier II Supports within the School-wide Positive Behavior Support Continuum.
Advanced Teams Action Planning: Setting the Stage for a Productive Summer Institute Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Module 2: Schoolwide/Classroom Interventions
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Building School-based Systems to Support Small Group / Targeted Interventions for At-risk Students Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center.
Moving Toward Small Group/ Targeted and Individual Supports: Building Efficient and Effective Systems Janice Morris and Barbara Mitchell Columbia Public.
Growing the Green: Focusing on Universal Interventions Joan Ledvina Parr PBIS Team Leaders and Coaches Meeting November 13, 2008.
ESMS New Teacher Orientation Our Mission is to maximize student learning and personal responsibility through a rigorous standards-based curriculum, a safe.
Charting the Course for a Complete Continuum: Part One Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
10/8/2015 Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports (PBIS) Walking with “PV Pride” Pleasant View Elementary School
Are we There Yet? Mapping the SW-PBS Course for the Long Haul Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
The Essential Feature of Individual Supports: Systems, Systems, Systems Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri Barbara Mitchell Columbia Public Schools.
Are we There Yet? Mapping the SW-PBS Course for the Long Haul Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Strengthening Positive Classroom Management in Elementary Schools Judy Arthur, First Steps to Success Coordinator, Tigard Tualatin School District Sally.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
FPS – What is RTI? FPS RTI wiki:
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Top Ten Things I Wish I Knew About SW-PBS 20 Years Ago Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports.
MO SW Positive Behavior Support MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri.
Charting a New Course for Student Behavior through School-wide Positive Behavior Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive.
Spartan Expectations Be Responsible  Return promptly from breaks  Be an active participant  Use the law of two feet Be Respectful  Maintain cell phone.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Principles of Behavior Basic Overview for Tier 1 Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module P DC Name and Date Here.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Implementing PBIS in the Classroom Chapter 4 –Classroom Management: Systems & Practices.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
PBIS PRACTICES.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Moving up the Continuum: Building Systems to Support Tier II and III Interventions   Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org

Starting Point…. We can’t “make” students learn or behave We can create environments to increase the likelihood students learn and behave Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity

Positive Behavior Support Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior SYSTEMS DATA PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures 1-5% 1-5% Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 5-10% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive 80-90% Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive 80-90%

Across the Continuum Teams - Administrator Social behavior curriculum developed / adapted Data-based decision making Problem solving logic Access to Technical Assistance Working toward district/regional support SW-PBS is a Marathon, not a sprint Focus across is on what students should be learning versus what they should not be doing

Creating Environments Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity

Creating Environments to Increase the Likelihood: Universals Annually: Revisit your set of expectations and teaching activities Assess and address “problem spots” across school environments Assess effective instruction and management in each classroom High Rates of Positive Feedback

Teach & Practice……..

Post expectations across school settings…

4:1 Positive Ratio?

Creating Environments to Increase the Likelihood: Classrooms Keep in mind: Most problem behaviors occur in the classroom Effective social and academic instruction is essential for ALL classrooms Classrooms are “personal”

Inverse relationship between increased probability of compliance induced by effective teaching on the rate of disruptive behavior (Gunter, Shores, Jack, Denny, & DePaepe, 1994)

Importance of Effective Instruction (Sanders, 1999) The single biggest factor affecting academic growth of any population of youngsters is the effectiveness of the classroom. The answer to why children learn well or not isn't race, it isn't poverty, it isn't even per-pupil expenditure at the elementary level. The classroom's effect on academic growth dwarfs and nearly renders trivial all these other factors that people have historically worried about.  

So one of our own is now blaming everything on the teacher!! If classroom teachers are struggling, it is a systems issue NOT an individual teacher issues

Creating Effective Classroom Environments Insuring ALL faculty and staff engaging in effective instruction and classroom management Align resources to challenges Work within existing organization structure Raze and rebuild Must build an environment that simultaneously supports student and adult behavior

Top Eight Classroom expectations/rules defined and taught Classroom routines defined and taught “4:1” positive feedback Active supervision Students actively engaged Multiple opportunities to respond Minors are addressed quickly and quietly/privately School wide procedures for majors are followed

Creating Environments Focus on socially important behaviors Inviting atmosphere / Friendly & Helpful Connections / relationships between: Staff-staff Staff-students Students- adults Is your school a place where you would want your own child to attend?

Core Curriculum Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity

Core Curriculum Based on local issues/problems – “What do you want them to do instead” Clear goal/purpose Matched to student need Research-based Accompanying training and support for all staff to implement Mini-modules + “tip sheets” Performance feedback

Meaningful PD Outcomes Staff Development Change in Teacher Practice Change in Student Outcomes Change in Teacher Beliefs A Model of the Process of Teacher Change Guskey, 1986

Peer Coaching with Performance Feedback 2 schools – one high SES, one low SES 4 teacher “cool tools” on instructional talk, prompts, feedback, and wait time Implemented school-wide; provided a tip sheet and mini in-service on each, weekly email reminders from administrators Each cool tool 4 weeks long - cumulative

Consistency and Fidelity Environments that increase the likelihood are guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity

Consistency & Fidelity On-going, sustained, and purposeful training On-going access to technical assistance Periodic checks Student outcomes Student perceptions Adult perceptions Working toward a District-Wide PBS initiative that will sustain over time

Assess for Fidelity of Implementation

Consistency & Fidelity Boosters based on data Apply logic of SW-PBS to adult learners Tell-show-practice Data / Feedback Data Decisions Align Initiatives to SW-PBS work Eliminate competing initiatives that do not produce measurable outcomes

Aligning Initiatives

Tier II & III Essential Features Emphasis is on continuum and interrelated components of data, practices, systems

Are School Teams Ready? Universals in place (80% or better on SET) Action plan to maintain Universals Use data in team meetings Create a decision rule to identify students in need Assessment to identify what supports students need Strategy to implement classroom-based supports Equal emphasis on practices, data and system supports

Tier II & III Basics Teach/build pro-social replacement behaviors Attend to possible function of the problem behavior Build maintenance and generalization strategies to promote use Connect points to universals

Tier II & III Interventions Consider Not fixed group of students Student’s needs vary across continuum over time and within academic/social area Least intrusive but matched to student need Response may be environmental changes without direct student intervention

Structural Analysis Setting Factors Assessment Tool Level 1: Classroom Set-up and Structure Level 2: Context Specific Activities Level 3: Instructional Delivery and Tasks Level 4: Student Behavior Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 25-40.

When Implementing Tier II & III Supports Common misperception is that these strategies will “fix” the student and the classroom teacher does not need to be an active participant since “specialists” or outside staff are often involved in the intervention – Important to stress that these interventions will require high level of involvement among ALL staff within the school building 35

Critical Points for Success Part of a continuum – must link to school-wide PBS system Efficient and effective way to identify students Intervention matched to presenting problem but not highly individualized Staff implementing interventions have skills and support ALL staff aware of interventions and their part in promoting generalization

Function-based Intervention Analysis and/or Full Assessment Phase 4: Evaluate Outcomes & Make Decisions Academic Support(s) Check In/ Check Out Mentoring Social Skill Club Avoid Tasks? Obtain Attention? Obtain Attention? Skill Deficit? Phase 3: Function-based Intervention Targeted Environmental Interventions Step 2: Teacher & Team synthesize data to 1) Define Problem 2) Develop Hypothesis 3) Identify Replacement 4) Select Intervention Step 1: Teacher and Team Partner collect data. Nonresponder as compared to typical peer? Full access to Tier 1 supports? Is Identification process accurate and durable? Phase 2: Identification Process Teacher/Parent Nomination Data Decision Rules Universal Screening Instrument Tier 1 implemented with fidelity? If Yes, then Phase 1: Provide Adequate Instruction Classroom System Nonclassroom System Schoolwide System

Process for Accessing Support Gentry Middle School

Process for Disseminating Practice SAT Process Teacher Training and Support Targeted Interventions Individual Student Plans SAT Team Administrator Counselor Behavior Specialist STAT Team Core Team/Classrooms Implement AIS Monitor Progress Refer to SAT Core Team Representative SAT Partner Core Team Teachers *Meets Weekly RRKS Team School-Wide Systems Matrix Lesson Plans School-Wide Data Acknowledgement Communication Core Team Representative District PBS Support Building Administrator and Counselors *Meets Monthly

Provide Skills-Based Training Training Model SAT members with behavior specialist Behavior basics and management SAT process Function-linked strategies SAT members with STAT team representative SAT and STAT with core team teachers

Provide Tools Tools for Teachers SAT flowchart Pyramid to Success RRKS TOC AIS guide (Alternative Intervention Strategies)

Pyramid to Success for All Office Issues Bus referrals, Truancy, Chronic offender, Threatening student or adult, Fighting, Refusal to go to or Disruptive in Buddy Room, Sexual harassment, Weapons, Drug/cigarettes/ tobacco/alcohol, Assault – physical or verbal Teacher Method for handling student behaviors Referral Form – send student to office with completed form Process with student before re-entry Office Method for handling student behaviors Proactive: RRKS Review, Parent Contact Corrective: Loss of Privilege, Saturday detention, Opportunity Center, Suspension, etc. Team Issues Repeated minor & major disruptions in multiple classrooms, Throwing things, Hallway/Lockers problems, Attendance, Repeated disrespect to peers or adults, Cheating, Inappropriate to substitute, Insubordination, Chronic Disruptions Method for handling student behaviors Proactive: Parent contact (mandatory), RRKS review, Team conference, Team conference with student, Team conference with Parents, Team conference with Administrator/Counselor, Triage in the AM with the student, Triage at lunch with the student, Team Focus, etc. Corrective: Removal of privilege on team, Recovery Study Hall, Buddy Room, etc. Classroom Teacher Issues Out of seat, Talking to classmates, Talking out, Off-task, Violation of class rules, Inappropriate language, Lack of materials, Gum, Disrespect, Cheating, Tardies, Minor destruction of property Method for handling student behaviors Proactive: Positive call to parents, Use praise, Use Rewards, Daily/Weekly Goal sheets, Proximity to instructor, Provide choices, One-to-One assistance, Pre-correct for transitions/trouble situations, Regular breaks for exercise, Give a job, RRKS Review, Reward lunch with teacher, etc. Corrective: One and only one REDIRECT, RRKS Review, Safe-seat, Buddy Room, Think Sheet, Parent Phone call, Lunch Detention, Recovery Study Hall, Removal of privilege in classroom, etc.

On Building a Continuum of Supports Some Final Thoughts On Building a Continuum of Supports

Remember, Building a Complete Continuum is a Marathon not a Sprint

All of us will have set-backs on the journey

Allow yourself plenty of time to get there

Remember to bring the kids along

No matter how tempting….. Stay Positive!

Teach & Practice, Teach & Practice, Teach & Practice……

Big Ideas Understand interaction between behavior and the teaching environment Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment Build Positive Behavior Support Plans that teach pro-social “replacement” behaviors Create environments to support the use of pro-social behaviors (practice, practice, practice) Around individual student need / self-management Classroom School-wide 52

Moving up the Continuum: Building Systems to Support Tier II and III Interventions   Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org