Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

The people Look for some people. Write it down. By the water
KEY TERMS Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it. Premise: A reason offered as support for another claim. Conclusion: A claim.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Deduction and Induction Elementary deduction, my dear Watson…
Lecture 2: Deduction, Induction, Validity, Soundness.
Elementary Logic PHIL Intersession 2013 MTWHF 10:00 – 12:00 ASA0118C Steven A. Miller Day 3.
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength and Cogency Goal: Learn the terms used to evaluate inductive and deductive arguments.
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
LESSON 3: PRACTICE WITH VALID/INVALID; MORE ON INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS Logic.
Other Info on Making Arguments
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Logos Formal Logic.
 Monty Python – Argument Clinic video  Monty Python Monty Python.
III. Some Basic Concepts of Logic Clarity  Definition -- lexical and stipulative -- ostensive -- definition by examples -- definition by a synonym --
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning A Framework for Audience Analysis.
How to Argue Successfully Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Basic Argumentation.
Section 2 Logic.
Continuing types of arguments and evaluating arguments
Reasoning!? What’s that???  Reasoning is the act of drawing a conclusion.  You use premises to help you draw a conclusion. Some conclusions are more.
Why did the young man name his puppies Biology, Chemistry and Physics?
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
FALSE PREMISE.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
10/20/09 BR- Who are the three “brothers” of Argument? Today: Constructing A Logical Argument – Deductive and Inductive Reasoning -Hand in “facts” -MIKVA.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
Sight Word List.
Study Questions for Quiz 1 1. The Concept of Validity (20 points) a. You will be asked to give the two different definitions of validity given in the lecture.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Reasoning To understand and analyse how basic philosophical arguments work. Understand basic philosophical terms. Use the terms to identify key features.
The construction of a formal argument
Do Now  What does logos appeal to in an advertisement?  Give three examples.
Sight Words.
Understanding the Persuasive Techniques in Developing Arguments How a speech can soothe and inspire a grieving population.
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Validity & soundness Validity = it cannot be the case that the premises are true and yet the conclusion is false; Soundness = validity + truth of all premises.
3.1 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Warm-up (IN) Learning Objective: to use deductive reasoning to reach conclusions, make a convincing argument, and.
Induction vs. Deduction. Induction From a set of specific observation to a general conclusion. Uses no distinct form and conclusions are less definitive.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
ARGUMENTS.
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
FALSE PREMISE.
What makes a Good Argument?
A Crash Course in Logic : Introduction to Philosophy
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
The Ontological Argument
Validity and Soundness
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
The Ontological Argument
TRUTH TABLE TO DETERMINE
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Logical Fallacies.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Validity.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness Recitation Meeting 3 Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness

Exercise Identify the premises and conclusion of each argument. Some of these can be done in more than one way. 1. John has brown hair. John is not blond. 2. Mary had a little lamb. Mary had five lambs. 3. I still have five tin cans. I received three cans when I was younger. I received two cans when I was older. I did not throw any cans away. 4. Mary is shorter than John. John is the tallest person in the world. 5. Susan is taller than John. Susan is taller than Mary. John is taller than Mary. 6. John likes broccoli or cabbage, but not both. John does not like broccoli. John likes cabbage. 7. Mary is not at home. If she were home, she would answer her door. She isn't answering her door. 8. My dog is better than your cat. Any dog is better than any cat. 9. All the ravens I’ve seen so far are black. All ravens are black.

Deductive and Inductive There are two ways in which the premises of an argument might support the conclusion. Inductively: The premises provide reliable evidence for the likelihood of the conclusion. Example: 1. The postman has always come by at 2pm before. 2. The postman will come by at 2pm today. Deductively: The premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion. 1. Judy either is at the store or at home. 2. Judy isn’t at home. 3. Judy is at the store.

Exercise State whether each of the following arguments is deductive or inductive. 1. The plaque on the leaning tower of Pisa says that Galileo performed experiments there. 2. Galileo did indeed perform experiments there. 1. There were pry marks around the lock on the rear door. 2. There were deposits of mud near the rear threshold. 3. The burglar entered through the rear door. 1. Either global warming will be arrested, or hurricanes will become more intense. 2. Global warming will not be arrested. 3. Hurricanes will become more intense.

Validity Deductive arguments are valid in the following sense. An argument is invalid = there is a conceivable scenario in which the premises are true and the conclusion is false. If an argument is not invalid, then it is valid.

Valid and Invalid Arguments Examples: 1. If Socrates was a philosopher, then he wasn’t a historian. 2. Socrates wasn’t a historian. 3. Socrates was a philosopher. 1. All men are mortal. 2. Socrates is a man. 3. Socrates is mortal. 1. If Col. Mustard is the murderer, then the murder weapon is the wrench. 2. The murder weapon is not the wrench. 3. Col. Mustard is not the murderer. 1. Every plant has nine toes. 2. President Obama is a plant. 3. President Obama has nine toes.

Soundness As the Obama-is-a-plant example shows, an argument can be valid without being successful. In order to be successful, an argument must be sound. And argument is sound = its premises are true and it is valid.

Exercise State whether each of the following arguments is or isn’t valid and/or sound. 1. If she studies hard, she will do well. She studied hard. Therefore she will do well. 2. If I leave home early enough, I will get to school on time. I got to school on time. Therefore, I must have left home early enough. 3. People that smoke raise their chances of getting cancer. Alice died from cancer. She must have been smoking too much. 4. Bob has five kids. So, he has three kids. 5. All dogs are cats. All cats are terrible. Therefore, all dogs are terrible. 6. Mammals nurse their young with milk. Tigers are mammals. So, tigers nurse their young with milk.

Exercise 3 1. Come up with 2 valid arguments. 2. Come up with 2 invalid arguments. 3. Come up with 2 sound arguments. 4. come up with 2 unsound arguments. Answers to 3 and 4 should be different from answers to 1 and 2.