6/27/2008IFIS 20081 Elimination of ILS Navigational HMI in the Operational Environment By: Mickey Lindecker FAA, AJW143.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAASTeam CFI Workshop 8 Pilot Deviations Including Runway Incursions
Advertisements

Don Priebe - November New York and the 1099-R Everyone knows that... If its on a 1099-R NY doesnt tax it So where do I put it on the IT-201?
June 11, Florida Ready to Work Bayside High School
Course Schedule three Assessment Scenarios Discussion Groups Discussion Groups.
The LOSA Archive: The data and how it can be used
1 Air Traffic Quality Assurance Program The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary D. Romero.
Don Willis Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC March 30, 2004 There are no benefits to compromising safety…only dire consequences Assessment.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Estimating safe separations.
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight
Work load and responsibilit y npor. Ing. Miroslava Šimonová.
A brief history In line with the LRST Recommendation contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions, ENAV laid.
International Flight Inspection Symposium
10/04/20081 TWG of ESF Committee 10 April 2008 Franck Sébert Head of unit DG EMPL/I/1 Relations with Control Authorities Action plan to strengthen the.
International Flight Inspection Symposium
Instrument Approach Charts
Garmin SVT for Diamond DA40 April Crumlin Sideroad London ON N5V 1S2 KNOW NO BOUNDS Synthetic Vision – Real Safety Introducing.
Ken Jacobs Airport Planning & Environmental Division March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration 33.
1. Four LLs were published in February Transmission Relaying – Undesired Blocking 2.Lack of Separation for Critical Control Power Supply Leads.
1 PP 48 Use of GNSS distance instead of DME B. Rabiller CNS-ATM steering group meeting Gatwick February 2008.
1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport.
© IPC, IPC Initiative Future of Mail by Air; why we started.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
Flight Inspecting GBAS International Flight Inspection Symposium Oklahoma City, OK USA June 2008 Thorsten Heinke Aerodata AG Thomas Feuerle IFF TU Braunschweig.
Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan Airport Board Briefing May 21, 2012 YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL | McALLISTER FIELD | Yakima, WA 1.
Navigational Systems.
Part 4. ATC clearances and instructions
Instrument Ground Training Module 5
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Runway Incursion’s Affect on FAA Approved Pilot Training and Pilot and Flight Instructor Certification and Part 121 Pilot Checking – Andy Edwards – Manager.
1 MODIFICATIONS TO HSI ppt ON TD TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE: ACTION TEXT: Identify the major components, features, functions, and operational.
Approach Charts and Procedures
“Teaching the Science, Inspiring the Art, Producing Aviation Candidates!” Instrument Flying A Brief Overview Written for the Notre Dame Pilot Initiative.
IFR Emergencies.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Stabilized Constant Descent Angle NPA’s
This presentation contains notes in the notes sections for use by instructors when presenting to students.
Joint ACAC/ACI Seminar on Certification of Aerodromes Marrakech, 5–6 September 2003 David Gamper, Director, Technical/Safety Airports Council International.
Presented to: Instructors and Pilot Examiners By: The FAASTeam Date: July 1 to September 30, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from
Presented to: Orlando Florida Flying Community By: The FAASTeam - Dennis H. Whitley Date: December 9, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam Orlando.
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS.
Presented to: Instructors and Pilot Examiners By: The FAASTeam Date: July 1 to September 30, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Stick-n-Rudder Flight.
Returning to the Core Principles of Proactive Safety Management…
Levels of safety Priorities for eliminating hazards in the workplace Eliminate the hazard through the machine design stage Apply safeguarding technology.
Houston Flight Standards District Office Manager Holly W. Geiger
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Minimum Safe Altitude Warning November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael Air Traffic Manager, Boston ARTCC.
Airports Authorities of India Jaipur Airports Authorities of India Jaipur
Airport Markings & Signs
TW-4 Deliberate ORM Analysis COLLEGE STATION – EASTERWOOD FIELD (KCLL) NIGHT OPERATIONS TEAM VISIT 14 FEB 08.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
Wide Area Augmentation System Dan Hanlon WAAS Program Manager April 2, 2003.
Communications, Airspace and a bunch of other stuff ! Rick L. Crose Orlando International Tower.
1 ATM SEARAST Safety Enhancements 8 – 9 January 2007.
DME AST 241. DME Theory Most VOR’s in the US have DME- distance measuring equipment or are co- located with a military TACAN facility which provides the.
Review Chapter 4-8. Departure and Arrival Charts DPs, STARs and visual approaches are routinely assigned by ATC DPs and STARs are issued to simplify clearance.
Radio Aids & Navigational Systems – RAN 2204
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon.
Airport FAA 5010 Safety Inspections What does that mean???? Inspectors are responsible for reporting accurate information about all landing facilities.
LECTURE 7 AVIATION SAFETY & SECURITY
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM
Soaring Safety Foundation
Portland Tower/TRACON UAO Customer Briefing July 2010
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
DOES THE ATC HAVE A ROLE IN THE WILDLIFE STRIKE PREVENTION ?
Safety Self-Inspections
Supplier Corrective ACTION RESPONSE REVIEW TRAINING
Presentation transcript:

6/27/2008IFIS Elimination of ILS Navigational HMI in the Operational Environment By: Mickey Lindecker FAA, AJW143

6/27/2008IFIS Hazardously Misleading Information (HMI) Radiated HMI “Erroneous information that is sent by navigational aids to an aircraft instrument, and that is presented in a manner that could result in a significant reduction in terrain, obstacle, or object clearance.” (FAA Order ) Operational Environment HMI A perspective where a correctly adjusted and radiating ILS Signal-In-Space (SIS) may; “…result in a significant reduction in terrain, obstacle, or object clearance”; due to the operational environment.

6/27/2008IFIS ILS HMI Risk Mitigation There are many methods of mitigating ILS HMI risk. – Flight Inspection confirmation that ILS approaches are obstruction free. –Specific maintenance instructions during HMI procedures. –Risk/benefit consideration to leave an ILS “ON” during Abnormal Airport Environments (AAE). –NOTEMS issued alerting pilots to ILS condition. –Radar guidance for aircraft while operating under IMC and IFR conditions.

6/27/2008IFIS Mistakes Happen Much attention focused on minimizing the probability that a ILS maintenance HMI mistake will occur. –HMI warning statements in maintenance orders. –HMI maintenance procedures examined to reduce time or provide alternate procedures developed. –Cross-checks of NOTEM issuance. –IDENT removed. Pilot usage of ILS during maintenance HMI procedure addressed. –Associated facility turned “OFF” to help prevent auto- couple. –Associated facility “OFF” helps indicates that the ILS isn’t in a normal state.

6/27/2008IFIS An Overlooked ILS HMI Danger Approach to Flagstaff Pulliam Airport, Arizona, Runway 21 (FLG) ILS. –Radar service terminated. –Clearance by ZAB for ILS 21 approach. –IMC and IFR conditions. Interception of Prescott Ernest A. Love Field Airport, Arizona, Runway 21L (PRC) ILS? –Pilot mistake with radio’s? IDENT not verified? –Local controller ask “you are on the ILS, verify” pilot’s response; “that’s right I’m doing the ILS 21”. Subsequent aircraft collision into Mount Humphreys.

6/27/2008IFIS Investigation of PRC ILS SIS Around Mount Humphreys Engineering request for Flight Inspection check of PRC ILS Signal-In-Space (SIS) around and behind Mount Humphreys, approximately 65 NM. –Run Sheet developed. –Both PRC and FLG SIS examined. –PRC SIS examined along entire 65 NM path to Prescott. PRC ILS SIS found low but usable within 1° and 1.5° of centerline at 10,000 ft (3,048 m). PRC ILS centerline found flyable at 13,500 ft (4,115 m).

6/27/2008IFIS Prescott and Flagstaff Localizer Signal-In-Space

6/27/2008IFIS Conclusion PRC Runway 21L LOC SIS exist in the FLG Runway 21 approach area, around and in a direct path with Mount Humphreys. That the ILS “HMI” condition exist as a result of unanticipated ILS installation circumstances. If utilized by a pilot during IMC and IFR can lead to deadly consequences. The risk of this ILS HMI condition is considered low by this author - but not zero.

6/27/2008IFIS Flagstaff Runway 21 Approach Recommendations - Short Term: –ATC request verification of FLG 21 IDENT. –And/or verification of FLG ILS Frequency. Permanent: Elimination of PRC 21L ILS HMI. –Change PRC ILS Course (not recommended). –Reduce RF output power (not recommended). –Add Voice Warning to LOC signal (doesn’t get rid of the problem – not recommended). –Install “Clearance” transmitter (recommended). Possible use of unmodulated carrier 8KHz below PRC LOC.

6/27/2008IFIS Elimination of ILS HMI for Flagstaff Runway 21 Approach Addition of Proposed Clearance Transmitter

6/27/2008IFIS Identification of Similar ILS HMI Conditions Recommendations - Flight Inspection & International Organizations – Be aware of this type of ILS HMI danger and inspect for similar situations during ILS facility flight inspections. Installation Engineering Personnel - Brief on the possibility of this type of ILS HMI condition and check for similar conditions during ILS installation designs. For Benefit of All – Form teams of FI, Safety, and Engineering personnel to review existing approaches and installations for possible similar HMI conditions that is one-step-away from deadly consequences.