T-76.4115 Iteration Demo Tempus PP-Iteration 17.10.2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
© Copyright 2006 FPT Software 1 © FPT SOFTWARE – TRAINING MATERIAL – Internal use 04e-BM/NS/HDCV/FSOFT v2/3 How to work in Fsoft project Authors: KienNT.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Objectives To introduce software project management and to describe its distinctive characteristics To discuss project planning and the planning process.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
Micro Focus Research 1 As far as youre aware, how does your organization plan to drive business growth over the next three years? (Respondents' first choices)
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 5 Slide 1 Project management.
1 4 Square Questions B A D C Look carefully to the diagram Now I will ask you 4 questions about this square. Are you ready?
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
T Project Review Sotanorsu PP Iteration
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
PSSA Preparation.
VirtuCo Implementation 1 Project Review
T Project Review VirtuCo PP Iteration
T Project Review Groupname [PP|…|DE] Iteration
T Iteration Demo BaseByters [I1] Iteration
T Project Review Magnificent Seven Project planning iteration
T Iteration Demo BetaTeam PP Iteration
T Project Review ITSUPS Implementation
T Project Review TeXlipse [I2] Iteration
T Project Review eGo I3 Iteration
T Project Review X-tremeIT I1 Iteration
T Final demo I2 Iteration Agenda  Product presentation (20 min) ‏  Project close-up (20 min) ‏ Evaluation of the results  Questions.
T Project Review WellIT PP Iteration
T Iteration Demo Group name [PP|I1|I2] Iteration
T Project Review Tetrastone Projext Planning Iteration
T Iteration demo T Iteration Demo Team Balboa I1 - Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team DTT I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team 13 I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Hermes Team [I1] Iteration
T Iteration Demo Apollo Crew PP Iteration
T Sprint Demo Team Tarantino Iteration 1 / Sprint
T Project Review RoadRunners [IM3] Iteration
T Final Demo BaseByters T Final demo 2 Agenda  Project introduction (5 min)  Project status (5 min)  achieving the goals.
T Project Review eGo I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Team DTT Project planning (PP) Iteration
T Project Review WellIT I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Group 1 Project Planning Iteration
T Iteration Demo Vitamin B I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Tikkaajat [PP] Iteration
T Project Review ITSUPS Implementation
T Project Review RoadMappers I2 Iteration
T Project Review Rajoitteiset I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo Tempus I1 Iteration
T Iteration Demo BitPlayers PP Iteration
T Project Review BigBrother PP Iteration
T Project Review MTS [PP] Iteration
T Project Review Wellit I1 Iteration
T Project Review Sotanorsu I2 Iteration
T Iteration Demo LicenseChecker I2 Iteration
T Project Review MalliPerhe PP Iteration
Groupname [PP|…|FD] Iteration
T Project Review Group: pdm I2 Iteration
Implementation 3 Project Review
Presentation transcript:

T Iteration Demo Tempus PP-Iteration

T Iteration demo 2 Agenda  Project status (15 min)  achieving the goals of the iteration  Timeline mostly met  Core use cases defined  Documentation available  Tools in use (Wiki, Dotproject)  Project group formed and responsibilities and main roles defined  Project architechture  Development environment mostly defined  project metrics  Timeline  Reported working hours  Work results (10 min)  presenting the iteration’s results  Documentation  Use cases  Research  Technologies  Used work practices (10 min)

T Iteration demo 3 Introduction to the project  What is this project about?  The main goal of this project is to develop, test, document and deliver a SIP- based calendar solution for the customer, Nokia Research Center.  Developed by extending the open source Mozilla Calendar Project  Design is based on IEFT SIP calendaring event draft, which will most likely be revised as the project progresses.

T Iteration demo 4 Status of the iteration’s goals  Define the main roles of the project group  ok  Understand the domain, especially SIP and network calendaring  ok  Understand the goals of the project  ok  Define the core requirements on a high level  ok  Perform as much additional requirements work as possible  Not much achieved  Plan and set up the process infrastructure such as working and communication methods  Mostly ok  Set up the technical infrastructure such as servers and software tools  ok

T Iteration demo 5 Status of the iteration’s deliverables  Project plan  OK  Requirements document  Only contains proposed core requirements  Quality handbook  Ok for this iteration, still needs work  Risk Management Plan  Ok for this iteration, ongoing process

T Iteration demo 6 Realization of the tasks Team StatusRealPlanDiff(Left) Project planLauri Pitkänen, Juha Vuojärvi and Janne Koilo OK Requirements specificationAllOK Risk management planLauri Pitkänen, Juha Vuojärvi and Janne Koilo OK Course lecturesAllOK Personal SEPA practicesAllOn-going or not started Progress reportLauri PitkänenOK 23 Reporting and correspondence AllOngoing Meetings and meeting kick off AllOK, not yet held Project infrastructure set- up Sakari LaitinenOK Quality handbookJuha Vuojärvi, Lauri PitkänenOK ResearchJanne Koilo and developersOK Total

T Iteration demo 7 Working hours by person  Reporting problems with the Dotproject system may have lost hours. This is being worked on. Person RealPlanDiff Sakari Laitinen Lauri Pitkänen Janne Koilo 50 0 Juha Vuojärvi Annu Myllyniemi Anu Markkola Herman-Filip Björklund Juha Koponen Paula Hellemaa Total Realized hours in this iteration

T Iteration demo 8 Quality assessment Functional areaCoverageQualityComments Project Plan2 Reviewed and accepted Requirements1  Not reviewed properly SEPA1  Not really started Quality Handbook1  Still needs work Legend Coverage: 0 = nothing 1 = we looked at it 2 = we checked all functions 3 = it’s tested Quality:  = quality is good  = not sure  = quality is bad