1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) An Overview. Resources Policy Guidance NCLB Brochures
Advertisements

1 Title I Hiring Requirements for Paraeducators and Parental Notification of Teacher and Paraeducator Qualifications Regional Technical Assistance Sessions.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting West Navarre Primary School Sept. 17, 2013 Sandi Eubanks.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
Understanding Title I Programs: An Overview for Parents.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
Title I-A The “Basics” of the Basic Program Marcia Beckman, Director No Child Left Behind Programs Idaho State Department of Education September 15, 2008.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001 Public Law
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind  NCLB Overview  Assessment and Accountability Requirements  Educator Quality.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Title I Ozark East Ozark North Ozark South Ozark West.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS ADVISORY TEAM MEETING WELCOME Brenda B. Blackburn, Superintendent Berkeley County School District November 17, 2015, 5:30 pm.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
No Child Left Behind.
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
EDN Fall 2002.
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?

2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific education purposes Less than 6% of our budget is from NCLB funds

3 NCLB focuses on four principles: n Accountability for student achievement (annual assessments for students in grades 3-11) n Parental choice is increased n Instruction that is scientifically based n Flexibility of program dollars

4 Reading Instruction A key component of NCLB is a strong emphasis on reading, especially at the early grades.

5 What’s New? No Child Left Behind mandates: n Raising the educational performance of all children n Annual testing of students to measure progress in achieving the higher standards n Analysis of the test scores n Identification of schools that fail to make “Adequate Yearly Progress” (AYP)

6 Iowa “Proficiency” Goal = 41% Starting Point: 64% of students must be at/above 41% on ITBS/ITED Starting Point: 64% of students must be at/above 41% on ITBS/ITED “Perhaps 60% of all Iowa schools” will not meet goals at some point in time. T. Stilwill, Director, Iowa Dept. of Ed. Safety nets: “Confidence Interval” & “Safe Harbor” Safety nets: “Confidence Interval” & “Safe Harbor”

7 AYP Implementation Annual measurable objectives (AMO) and intermediate goals for the state

8 Additional AYP Provisions: n District must test not less than 95% of students n Graduation rate goal: 95% (current state percentage is 90%) n Attendance rate goal: 95% (current state percentage is 92%) n Test results are reported to the public on all students (“aggregate”) and certain sub-groups as well.

9 NCLB’s sanctions: “School in Need of Assistance” (SINA) (Iowa’s terminology) or “School in Need of Improvement” (SINI) (U.S. Dept. of Ed. terminology) Possible to be School in Need of Assistance even if most score exceptionally well! Possible to be School in Need of Assistance even if most score exceptionally well! Don’t jump to conclusions if school is identified Don’t jump to conclusions if school is identified

10 Failure to make Adequate Yearly Progress two years in a row n 1st year after identification as School In Need of Improvement: - school adopts improvement plan - technical assistance available - any student may transfer to another public school in the district (with transportation provided by district)

11 Above consequences continue PLUS district must offer supplemental educational services (tutoring) from outside providers to low-achieving kids at district expense Third year after identification as School In Need of Improvement:

12 Fourth year of School In Need of Improvement: Above consequences, plus at least one (but not all) of the following: n Replace school staff relevant to the “failure” n Institute a new curriculum, plus provide professional development for staff n Decrease management authority at the school level n Appoint outside expert for advice n Extend school day/year n Restructure the school n Reduce funds

13 “Highly Qualified Staff” n All teachers must be fully licensed by the state (no “emergency” license if that means the teacher doesn’t meet full license standards.) n All secondary (including middle school) teachers must have a major in the subject(s) they teach.

14 n All Paraprofessionals (teacher associates) must have minimum of a high school education or GED. In addition, paraprofessionals providing instructional assistance to students in Title 1 schools or programs must either: u pass a test covering instruction in reading, writing, and math, OR u have a two-year (“Associate”) degree (at a minimum), OR u have completed two full years of study at an institute of higher education, OR u obtain a voluntary Paraprofessional Certificate issued by the Iowa Board of Educational Examiners.

15 Paraprofessional employees hired before 1/02 have four years to meet requirements. New hires must meet the above requirements upon starting employment.

16 Report card to the public

17 NCLB success stories: We are learning more than ever about what works!

18 How are we doing in our community?

19