Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/16/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
Developed by Peg Henson /SDDOE Technology Standards Deb Fredrickson Peg Henson Martin Sieverding
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
According to the Texas Long-Range Technology Plan, every school should comply with the NCLF act, and integrate technology infrastructure such as audio,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
LEARNING FOR THE 21st CENTURY
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Chapter Twelve - 12 Preparing for Tomorrow’s Challenges Instructional Technology and Media for Learning Presented By: Ms. Yohana Lopez.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
National Secondary School Computer Fund (NSSCF)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
VIRTUAL monitoring What is Virtual Monitoring EXAMPLES:  STAR SYSTEM – Vehicles Cell Phones – I phones or Smart Phones used as a security system detector.
Made by: Mudassar Iqbal 1 INTEGRATION OF IT PLAN IN SCHOOL SYSTEM.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Technology Plan for E-Rate Year 2013 Liberty Hill ISD Presented by Bonnie Reichert EDLD 5362 Informational Systems Management Plan for Success.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
PrevNext | Slide 1 MANS 2006 Michigan Educational Technology Standards and Expectations METS - Students October 19, 2006 Ron Faulds Michigan Department.
NCCE 2009 Administrator/IT Summit Strategy Session: Leadership.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
PRESENTED BY DIANE DUGAS, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM JON LAMBERT, DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY GRANBY THREE YEAR TECHNOLOGY PLAN.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
8 th Grade Technology Competency Test Michelle Obert Instructional Technology Specialist
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Allegheny-Clarion Valley School District Comprehensive Planning Meeting January 13, 2013.
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology in elementary and secondary schools. The additional goals of this part are:...to help every student cross the digital divide by ensuring each is technologically literate by the time he or she finishes eighth grade, regardless of the student's race, ethnicity, gender, family income, geographic location, or disability. …to encourage the effective integration of technology resources and systems with teacher training and curriculum development to establish research-based instructional methods that can be widely implemented as best practices by state education agencies (SEAs) and local educational agencies (LEAs)....and that technology will be fully integrated into the curricula and instruction of the schools by December 31, 2006.

SETDA -Metiri Group-NCREL The Assessment Framework is based on a set of questions that provide important data for tracking states and districts’ progress with technology components of NCLB (Title II, Part D). This set of questions was drafted in February 2003 and revised in the summer of 2004.

Three Essential Conditions regarding the Impact on Learners Five Categories Key Questions

Impact on Learners: 1. Improvement of academic achievement through effective technology use. 2. Assurance that students acquire 21st century skills through effective technology use in the context of high standards and high quality learning. 3. Engagement of students in learning through effective technology use. Effective PracticeEducator Proficiency Robust Access, Anywhere, Anytime Digital Equity Vision, Systems and Leadership Is the vision being translated into practice through learning environments characterized by powerful, research- based strategies that effectively use technologies? Are educators proficient in implementing, assessing and supporting a variety of effective practices for teaching and learning? Do students and school staff have robust access to technology- anytime, anywhere to support effective designs for teaching and learning? Is the digital divide being addressed through resources and strategies that ensure that all students are engaging in an educational program aligned with the vision? Has the education system reengineered itself into a high- performance learning organization?

Impact on Learners 1. Is student academic achievement improving where technology is being used effectively? [In what academic areas? At what grade levels? For which student populations?] 2. Are students acquiring 21 st century skills where technology is being used effectively? [In what academic areas? At what grade levels? For which student populations?] 3. Are students more engaged in learning where technology is being used effectively? [In what academic areas? At what grade levels? For which student populations?] 4. Are students demonstrating proficiency in technological literacy (e.g. performance reviews, assessment of student products, observations)?

Effective Practice in Teaching and Learning with Technology 1. How and with what frequency are students using technology to advance academic achievement? Is this usage based on theory, research and best practices? 2. Are teachers/schools adopting technology uses systematically? 3.Are schools measuring student gains in technological literacy (esp. in 8 th grade) and the impacts on student achievement as a result of technology use? If so, are the measured gains in due to effective use of technology? 4. How are best practices with technology identified and shared? 5. Are teachers employing classroom management systems in which students access and use technology efficiently, with high degrees of self-direction? 6. How are best/effective practices with technology identified and shared?

Educator Proficiency in Effective Practice with Technology 1. Are teachers skilled in designing standards-based curricula that maximize the impact of technology on learning and promote the development of 21 st century skills? 2. Are teachers able to use technology to support student assessment? Do teachers have strategies for evaluating technology-supported student learning? 3. Do teachers use technology to informally and formally participate in professional development opportunities? 4. Are teachers suitably proficient and familiar with technology to strategically incorporate effective uses of technology into their classroom and professional practices? How are they acquiring such proficiencies?

Robust Access, Anywhere Anytime 1. Is the equipment available in the instructional setting sufficient and appropriately placed for students and teachers? 2. Is equipment available for use by administrators and support staff? 3. Does the infrastructure have the capacity to support the school ’s technology needs? 4. Does access extend beyond the school day and outside the school facility for both students and teachers? 5. Are software and online services strategically deployed and sufficient to address unmet needs of learners and educators both during and beyond the school day/environment? 6. Is virtual learning strategically available and sufficient to address needs of learners and educators both during and beyond the school day/environment? 7. Does the school/district provide adequate and timely support for hardware, software, and instructional application? 8. Is technology being used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the system (i.e., increased access to data for decision making by all educators)?

Digital Age Equity 1. Has the school/district ensured that socioeconomic status is not a barrier to readiness for the digital age? 2. Has the school/district ensured that gender is not a barrier to readiness for the digital age? 3. Has the school/district ensured that race is not a barrier to readiness for the digital age? 4. Has the school or district ensured that special needs populations have sufficient and appropriate access to technologies that will support their learning? 5. Do all students have access to a range of high-quality technology uses within the curriculum, regardless of the schools or classrooms they attend?

Vision, Systems Thinking, and Leadership with Technology Administrator Proficiency. Are administrators prepared to use technology effectively? Are administrators leading the school/district toward more effective uses of technology in teaching, learning, and managing? Professional Development. Does the school/district provide comprehensive professional growth opportunities for teachers, administrators, and other staff that build their capacity to advance the vision? Is professional development and the measure of its effectiveness closely linked to student performance? Data-Driven Decision Making and Accountability. Has the school/district established metrics and benchmarks for effective uses of technology at the student, educator, and system levels? Does the school/district collect and analyze data to track progress and correlate findings? Is decision making at all levels informed and influenced by the results of this data collection? Comprehensive, Prioritized Funding. Does the school/district address the full cost of technology as a regular part of its budget? Is funding prioritized to promote equity across and within schools to establish high-impact, student-centered uses of technology and to provide the support systems necessary to sustain them?

Vision, Systems Thinking, and Leadership with Technology Culture of Validated, Research-based Innovation. Are effective, research-based uses of technology supported, encouraged, and actively developed through policies, informal actions, and easy access to technology? Community Connections. Are there formal, technology-related structures and processes in the school/district that engage parents, community members, school faculty, and learners in meaningful exchanges, interactions, and partnerships to advance the vision? Systems Thinking. Is the school/district transforming itself into a high-performance system capable of achieving an equitable, 21 st century vision? Is the system formally adopting uses of technology to become more effective, efficient, and “real-time” in communication, management, and leadership? Digital Age Standards and Assessment. Do student standards reflect the 21 st century skills? Are curricula, instruction, and assessments aligned to these standards?

KCMSD Vision Statement The District will create equitable learning environments that will improve instruction and increase student achievement by developing technologically literate users prepared to contribute to the local community and global marketplace. Students and educators will incorporate instructional technology into curricular endeavors to support teaching and learning on a daily basis. Schools and district offices will have access to tools and applications to help meet the District’s educational goals and objectives. Staff and administration will be proficient in technology utilizing automated resources designed to focus on academic improvement. Students, staff, and parents will be able to utilize district technologies to access information and participate in the learning process. This technology access will promote life-long learners and technologically literate and functional citizens.