Our Vision – Healthier Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

Interdisciplinary approach to health promotion Marek Jankowski Amsterdam, 2010 Polish Society for Health Programs 1.
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina Overview.
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina Obesity in Adults.
Citations Source: BRFSS, CDC.
DIVERSE COMMUNITIES, COMMON CONCERNS: ASSESSING HEALTH CARE QUALITY FOR MINORITY AMERICANS FINDINGS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 2001 HEALTH CARE QUALITY.
CLOSING THE DIVIDE: HOW MEDICAL HOMES PROMOTE EQUITY IN HEALTH CARE Results from the Commonwealth Fund 2006 Health Care Quality Survey THE COMMONWEALTH.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
2004 Fannin County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
1 Health Surveys User Group July 20, :30-2:30.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Diabetes in Idaho BRFSS 2009 Data collected from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of.
Trend and change analysis in an Australian surveillance system Associate Professor Anne Taylor South Australian Department of Health University of Adelaide.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
ABC Technology Project
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
VOORBLAD.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Asthma in Minnesota Slide Set Asthma Program Minnesota Department of Health January 2013.
KANSAS STATE GENETICS PLAN - AN OVERVIEW Presented by Linda Williams MT(ASCP) Newborn Screening Follow-up Coordinator Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
7/16/08 1 New Mexico’s Indicator-based Information System for Public Health Data (NM-IBIS) Community Health Assessment Training July 16, 2008.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Indicator 1 – Number of Older Americans Indicator 2 – Racial and Ethnic Composition.
Week 1.
Obesity Trends - U.S. Adults (1985 – 2009) Definitions: Obesity: having a very high amount of body fat in relation to lean body mass, or Body Mass Index.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
PSSA Preparation.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Healthy Communities: Healthy.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Childhood Obesity Landscape. Objectives for This Session  Define childhood obesity (CHO) and understand its scope and effects  Share who some of the.
By Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence Spring
CLAY COUNTY 2005 COUNTY ADULT HEALTH SURVEY.  The BRFSS is the world’s largest continuously conducted telephone survey.  It covers issues surrounding.
Chronic Disease in Missouri: Progress and Challenges Shumei Yun, MD, PhD Public Health Epidemiologist and Team Leader Chronic Disease and Nutritional Epidemiology.
Dallas Dooley Dana Hogan.   Topeka’s Population in 2009= 124,331  Increase of 1.6% from 2000  Female= 64,634  Male= 59,697  Median Age= 36.5 years.
A Profile of Health among Massachusetts Adults: Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Health Survey.
Cardiovascular Disease Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting April 22, 2005.
2004 Falls County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans Living in Safe and Sustainable Environments.
Our Vision – Healthier Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments. Disability Surveillance Lori Haskett, BS; Jamie Simpson, MS Ed; Dan Dao, MPH;
Mississippi Chronic Illness Coalition Mary Helen Conner BSN, MPH, CHES March 23, 2006.
Community Health Needs Assessment Introduction and Overview Berwood Yost Franklin & Marshall College.
Availability of Local Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Data for Public Health Use – Navigation of the website Ghazala Perveen, MBBS,
Cardiovascular Disease Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting April 22, 2005.
Improving the Health of All Kansans. 3/4/50 Rule That Contribute to 50% of all US Deaths Contribute to Four Chronic Diseases Cardiovascular Disease DiabetesLung.
RANDOLPH COUNTY 2005 COUNTY ADULT HEALTH SURVEY.  The BRFSS is the world’s largest continuously conducted telephone survey.  It covers issues surrounding.
Early Disease Prevention Women, Children and Adolescents Healthy Kansans 2010 Reducing/Eliminating Health & Disease Disparities Systems Interventions to.
John Rule Senior Research Analyst Kansas Health Institute
Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) in Texas
1994 Methodology The percent of U.S. adults who are obese or who have diagnosed diabetes was determined by using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance.
Presentation transcript:

Our Vision – Healthier Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.

The Health of People with Disabilities in Kansas Dan Dao, MPH Program Epidemiologist Disability and Health Program Bureau of Health Promotion KDHE Our Vision – Healthier Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.

Outline Introduction to the disability program The disparities that persons with disability face Why do these disparities exist? Next Steps Conclusion

The Disability Program The mission of the Disability and Health Program is to increase the quality of life for Kansans with disabilities through promoting health and reducing secondary conditions.

Kansans with a disability According to the 2009 BRFSS, 21% of all Kansans 18 years and older have a disability. This means 433,328 adult Kansans ages 18 years and older live with disabilities.

The Disparities All these data refer to Kansans 18 years and older in the year Data were obtained from the Kansas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Kansas BRFSS is a population based telephone survey system that provides scientific information assessing and monitoring health related issues in Kansas.

Diabetes 18.3% of Kansas adults living with disabilities have been diagnosed with diabetes in This is 3X higher than those living without disabilities (6.1%).

Heart Attack 10.3% of Kansas adults living with disabilities have had a heart attack in This is 5X higher than those living without disabilities (2.1%).

High Cholesterol 50.8% of Kansas adults living with disabilities who were tested for blood cholesterol have been diagnosed with high cholesterol in In contrast only 35.1% of Kansas adults living without disabilities who were tested for blood cholesterol have been diagnosed with high cholesterol, in This is a difference of 15.7 %.

Hypertension 48% of Kansas adults living with disabilities have been diagnosed with hypertension in This is 2X higher than those living without disabilities (23.8%).

Physical Activity 65.6% of Kansas adults living with disabilities do not participate in recommended amount of physical activity in In contrast only 47.9% of Kansas adults living without do not participate in recommended amount of physical activity in This is a difference of 17.7 %.

Smoking 22.9% of Kansas adults living with disabilities currently smoke in In contrast only 16.5% of Kansas adults living without disabilities currently smoke in This is a difference of 13.8 %.

Obesity Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m % of Kansas adults living with disabilities are obese in In contrast 26% of Kansas adults living without disabilities are obese in This is a difference of 14.2%.

Cancer 19% of Kansas adults living with disabilities have been diagnosed with cancer in This is 2.5X higher than those living without disabilities (7.6%).

Why the Difference? We wanted to determine what were the barriers people living with disabilities faced when they went to seek care. In 2009 we asked people living with disabilities what barriers they faced when seeking care.

Results 1 out of every 10 individuals living with a disability was restricted in a way from receiving health care 14% of those with restriction said that this restriction was due to physical access 6% of those with restriction said it was due to a lack of communication 10% of those with restriction said it was due to a another person 27% of those with restriction said they had been treated unfairly due to their disability 18% of those living with disabilities said they had not seen a doctor in the past year due to cost. Almost twice as high as compared to those living without disabilities.

Conclusion The long-term goals of our program are the same as the other chronic disease long-term goals. The way we make a difference on these long-term goals for Kansans with disabilities is through increasing access to healthcare and physical activity for Kansans living with disabilities. We can do this by working toward removal of common barriers to these fundamental preventive health behaviors.

Contact Dan Dao Program Epidemiologist Disability and Health Program Bureau of Health and Environment Kansas Department of Public Health 1000 Southwest Jackson STE 230 Topeka, KS (785)