Daryl V. Atkinson, Esq. Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management of Human Resources
Advertisements

The Human Rights of Persons With Criminal Histories.
Considerations for Hiring Workers with Criminal Records A presentation for the 2013 DisAbility Jobs Summit October 9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio October 9, 2013.
18-11 Employment Discrimination and Affirmative Action.
EEOC Guidelines Presented by: Molly Powell Senior Trial Attorney.
Relieving Collateral Consequences Daniel Bowes Staff Attorney.
Mass Incarceration Meets the Information Age Vanessa Torres Hernandez Equal Justice Works Fellow
The War on Treatment. In 2005, 35 million Americans (age 12 or older) committed an illegal act. They used an illicit drug.
" The Impact of Criminal Justice Policies and Practices on Minorities" 2009.
PRIVATE EMPLOYER “BAN THE BOX” LEGISLATION Commissioner Kevin Lindsey Minnesota Department of Human Rights September, 2014.
Mass Imprisonment and the Life Course SOC 331 Population and Society
Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime.
Shared Prosperity Roundtable Criminal Records: From Barriers to Solutions Sharon M. Dietrich, Litigation Director Community Legal Services, Inc. Philadelphia,
Chapter 15 Collateral Consequences of Conviction, Pardon, and Restoration of Rights.
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
Race, Ethnicity, and Corrections
Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime.
Interviewing – Guidance on Appropriate Questions Reviewed April 2013.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 101 Jessica K. Larkin, Equal Opportunity Specialist U.S. Department of Labor Civil Rights Center Office of Compliance and Policy.
The City of Philadelphia Prison System John F. Street, Esq. Mayor Leon A. King, II, Esq. Commissioner.
1 Race Discrimination and Criminal Records Sharon M. Dietrich Managing Attorney Community Legal Services, Inc., Philadelphia, PA EEOC/FEPA Conference June.
Employee Law Challenge. Requires employers to pay men & women similar wage rates for similar work? Name the Act… 2 point question 1. Civil Rights Act.
Chapter 18-1 Chapter 18 BUSINESS & SOCIETY Ethics and Stakeholder Management Carroll & Buchholtz 6e Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management,
The Development of Ban The Box. Who came up with the term “Ban The Box”?
Changing Demographic Landscape National and North Carolina.
Chapter 15 Collateral Consequences of Conviction, Pardon, and Restoration of Rights.
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges Law enforcement agencies Serves the purposes of: Supporting a system for the trial and punishment of.
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
Unit 9 The Final Seminar Collateral Consequences of Conviction, Pardon, and Restoration of Rights.
Higher Education and Second Chances Center for Community Alternatives, Justice Strategies.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Judicial Branch and Courts Systems
Juvenile Expunction: Myths and Facts OFFICE OF THE JUVENILE DEFENDER 2015.
Perceived Criminality, Criminal Background Checks and the Racial Hiring Preferences of Employers Harry J. Holzer Georgetown University Steven Raphael UC.
Criminal History Records and Higher Education: Leveraging Second Chances Pathways of Possibility Conference February 27, 2013 New York, New York Marsha.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
Kristine E. Kwong, Esq. PITFALLS OF SETTING MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS.
Scarlet Letters and Recidivism: Does an Old Criminal Record Predict Future Criminal Behavior? Megan Kurlychek University of South Carolina Robert Brame.
1 Recruitment and Hiring Practices A commitment to diversity recruitment is grounded in the conviction that better learning, greater creativity, and best.
POLI 103A CALIFORNIA POLITICS CRIME AND PUNISHMENT II: RACE AND CRIME.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Chapter 28-2: Texas Courts Systems Guided Notes. Texas Judicial System A. Consists of : 1)Courts 2)Judges 3)Law enforcement agencies B. Serves the purposes.
On the Front Lines: Building Skills for Reentry and Diversion March 31,
BEYOND THE BOX 1 Beyond the Box in Education to Help Reduce Disparate Impact The Education Department's Guidance for Higher Education Reentry Initiatives.
Seminar 8 Tom Piotrowski. Seminar Topic Police departments have historically been dominated by working class, white males. We will discuss why police.
Relieving Collateral Consequences Daniel Bowes Staff Attorney.
SEEDCO Community Partner Training October 28, 2010 Kate Rubin, The Bronx Defenders Certificates of Relief from Disabilities & Good Conduct 1.
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN THE LAW Created by: Cathi, Nicole, Eunice and Jeanell.
Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice What is an appropriate punishment or response? What do you expect your response to do for the offender, potential.
Advancing Advocacy Marissa McCall Dodson Public Policy Director (404) June 15, 2016
Fair-Chance Employment : The Disparate Impact of Background Checks September 2016 Nayantara Mehta Senior Staff Attorney Berkeley, California
Reentry and Employment: An Overview Sherri Moses The Council of State Governments Justice Center Workforce Reintegration Employer Forum Kansas City, Missouri.
When Discrimination is Legal: The Social Costs of Felony Convictions
Catherine E. Ybarra, Esq Simone & Associates th Avenue
Criminal Background Checks & the 2016 HUD Guidance
Landlord’s can’t just say “no felons…”
Advancing the Employment Rights of Californians with Arrest and Conviction Records California Fair Employment and Housing Council Hearing Testimony August.
Racial injustice in the criminal justice system
Graduate School of Social Work
Discrimination In Employment
Prisoners: Characteristics of U.S. Inmate Populations
Delaware.
7. Develop a plan to strengthen employer relationships
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Chapter 24 Discrimination in Employment
SEALING & EXPUNGING.
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges
Changing Demographic Landscape
Presentation transcript:

Daryl V. Atkinson, Esq. Southern Coalition for Social Justice DMC with CJ System; Collateral Consequences; and Legal and Policy Relief Measures Daryl V. Atkinson, Esq. Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Roadmap for discussion Define and highlight DMC Nationally North Carolina Define and highlight collateral consequences Tour C-CAT Overview of SCSJ’s areas of advocacy

Racial/Ethnic Disparities Definition Racial disparity exists when the proportion of a racial/ethnic group within the control of the criminal justice system differs from the proportion of such groups in the general population. Illegitimate or unwarranted racial disparity results from the dissimilar treatment of similarly situated people based on race.

Mass Imprisonment Definition Mass imprisonment: refers to the high rate of imprisonment in the contemporary U.S. Two characteristics: A rate of imprisonment that is markedly above the historical and comparative norm for societies of this type. Produces both the incarceration of individuals, and becomes the systematic imprisonment of whole groups of the population.

Mass Imprisonment The Data 1,512,000 people in prison. 792,000 people in jail. Gross underestimate of the number of people that come in contact with the jail system. Yearly estimates range between 7-10 million people. 1 in 100 adults behind bars ~2.3 million adults prison or jail ~230 million adults in U.S.

Racial Disparities in Mass Imprisonment Men in prison or jail All men 18 and over 1 in 54 White men 18 and over 1 in 106 Latino men 18 and over 1 in 36 Black men 18 and over 1 in 15 Black men 20-34 1 in 9 Black men are ~6% of the U.S population but are ~39% of the male prison population Reference racial disparity definition on slide #12

Racial Disparities in Mass Imprisonment 2010 AA population– 38,929,319~3,892,931 current and former AA prisoners in the U.S.

Racial Disparities in Mass Imprisonment North Carolina NC prison population 2012—38,890 Male—36,294 Female—2,596 Black—23,038~57% White—14,222~35% American Indian—771~2% Other—2,590~6%

Racial Disparities in Mass Imprisonment NC Counties Halifax—Total population=54,691 Black—53.2% White—40% Prison population=321 Black—252~78.5% White—64~19.9% Ratio Black to White prison population—3.94:1 25.3% difference b/w Black prison and county population

Mass Criminalization Definition Mass criminalization: refers to the high rate of contact with the criminal justice system in the contemporary U.S. Two characteristics: A rate of contact with the criminal justice system that is markedly above the historical and comparative norm for societies of this type. Produces both the criminalization of individuals, and becomes the systematic criminalization of whole groups of the population.

Mass Criminalization The Data ~ 5 million people on probation or parole At least 65 million people with a criminal record ~ 230 million adults in the U.S. ~ 1 in 4 adults in the U.S. have a criminal record

Mass Criminalization The Data NC ~ 104,000 people on probation or parole At least 1.5 million people with a criminal record ~7.3 million adults in NC ~1 in 5 adults in NC have a criminal record

Mass Criminalization The Data 20 million current and former felons represents ~9% of the adult U.S. population 1980—5 million current and former felons; 2010—20 million current and former felons represents 400% increase

Racial Disparities in Mass Criminalization 2010 AA population 38,929,319—current and former AA felons ~9,732,329

Racial Disparities in Mass Criminalization North Carolina

Racial Disparities in Mass Criminalization North Carolina

Racial Disparities in Mass Criminalization North Carolina

Racial Disparities in Mass Criminalization North Carolina

Collateral Consequences, Social Stigma, and Defacto Discrimination Collateral consequences: are the indirect consequences that flow from federal and state criminal convictions. Over the past 30 years, collateral consequences have increased in variety and severity. They are excluded from the criminal justice process. Defendants often plead guilty without knowing about them. According to the ABA there 914 collateral consequence in NC.

Collateral Consequences Examples include: Felon disenfranchisement Deportation or removal from the country Loss of professional and occupational licenses Loss of public benefits Loss of federal financial aid Loss of public housing Mandatory registration for people convicted of predatory offenses Loss of driver’s license Termination of parental rights

Collateral Consequences In response to the concerns about collateral consequences NC IDS and NC SOG respond with the Collateral Consequence Assessment Tool (C-CAT) C-CAT is a web-based database that allows users to search the consequences associated with specific North Carolina criminal offenses. The tool allows indigent defenders to advise their clients about the full ramifications of a criminal conviction. Demonstrate C-CAT

SCSJ Areas of Advocacy Community outreach and education Direct services Public policy advocacy Impact litigation

Community Outreach and Education Every mass movement must be led by those most intimately affected by the oppressive system Advocates must engage and educate the community to ensure that the advocacy is always connected to the people. SCSJ provides information to communities impacted by mass criminalization.

Direct Services Reentry legal advocacy project– the goal is to provide services to low income people who have criminal records.  The project serves clients with all types of criminal backgrounds from simple arrests and misdemeanors to multiple felony convictions.  Legal assistance is offered in the following areas: Drivers license restoration Expunging of criminal records Certificates of relief Employment and occupational licensing opportunities Child support issues related to incarceration Obtaining public benefits.

Direct Services: Expungement Expungement: is the legal process of erasing a criminal record. NC does not have a blanket expungement provision. The state expunges specific crimes if you meet certain criteria. Expungement erases officical “state” records however criminal record information may still be available via private databases.

Expungement Examples of the categories of crimes NC will expunge Misdemeanors committed under the age of 18 Misdemeanor under age drinking Misdemeanor larceny conviction over 10 years old Charges that were dismissed or found NG Nonviolent felonies under 18 Cyberbullying

Direct Services: Certificates of Relief Certificates of Relief from Disabilities: allows sentencing courts to issue orders that will relieve an individual from one or more collateral consequences. 3 major benefits of certificates: Relieves most collateral sanctions Can be used as evidence of rehabilitation Protects employers from negligent hiring lawsuit

Public Policy Advocacy: Ban the Box Across the country advocates have been encouraging cities and counties to “ban the box.” The “box” is that place on many employment applications that asks whether the applicant has been convicted of a crime.

What would a “Ban the Box” ordinance accomplish? Remove criminal history questions from the initial employment application Create a level playing field so people with criminal records can be evaluated on their qualifications Facilitate more in-person interviews Give people with criminal records the opportunity to: Check the accuracy of the record Explain the nature of the crime Highlight any rehabilitative efforts

Impact Litigation Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII. Title VII prohibits both intentional discrimination and facially neutral policies and practices that have a disproportionate impact on certain groups. Using arrest and conviction records to screen for employment is an example of the type of neutral selection criteria that invites Title VII scrutiny.

Impact Litigation Title VII does not wholly bar the use of criminal records in employment decisions. Instead, the EEOC has provided a framework for assessing criminal records when making an employment decision. When making a decision an employer must consider: The nature and gravity of the offense The time that has passed since the conviction The nature of the job held or sought

Questions and contact information Daryl V. Atkinson Staff Attorney Southern Coalition for Social Justice Daryl@scsj.org 919-323-3380 ext.153