Maura Bidinost User Experience Designer Omnyx LLC Usability: A Critical Factor in the Successful Adoption of Digital Pathology for Routine Sign-out.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

©2011 1www.id-book.com Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings Chapter 14.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
© 2008 The MathWorks, Inc. ® ® Using Instant Messaging to Usability Test an API Rachel Cobleigh Donna Cooper.
1 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Technology Initiative Grant Program Developing and Submitting TIG Project Evaluation Plans Bristow Hardin, LSC,
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 1: Usability Testing.
Knowledge Dietary Managers Association 1 DMA Certification Exam Blueprint and Curriculum Development.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
International Telecommunication Union Workshop on Standardization in E-health Geneva, May 2003 Digital Imaging in Pathology for Standardization Yukako.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Introduction Lesson 1 Microsoft Office 2010 and the Internet
Steve Fuller InforMedix Marketing Research, Inc. Medical-Surgical Market Research Group April 3, 2008.
Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Session 19: Individual Presentations. TimeFriday Day fives objectives Individual Presentations Individual.
Discussion Discussion # 86 Moving from Criticism to Feedback
Program Update and Site Redesign Program Update and Site Redesign | Aug 2013.
Session # 2 SWE 211 – Introduction to Software Engineering Lect. Amanullah Quadri 2. Fact Finding & Techniques.
1 Overview Background Goals Methodology Participants Findings Recommendations.
Smarter Balanced Field Test MARCH 2014 WHITTIER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
ABC Technology Project
MARKETING INFORMATION AND RESEARCH
© S Haughton more than 3?
2 1.Client protection principles 2.Principle #6 in practice 3.The client perspective 4.Participant feedback 5.Tools for improving practice 6.Conclusion.
Success Planner KNOW YOURSELF Student Wall Planner and Study Guide.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
What Is The User Interface Design Lecture # 2 Gabriel Spitz 1.
Questionnaires contain closed questions (attitude scales) and open questions pre- and post questionnaires obtain ratings on an issue before and after an.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 1 Process Improvement 1.
Developing a Global Vision Through Marketing Research
Global Analysis and Distributed Systems Software Architecture Lecture # 5-6.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
Participants will be able to:  Interpret data generated from the Child Observation Record. 2.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Design, Prototyping, and Evaluation in Developing Countries Jen Mankoff, Assistant Professor EECS.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Virtual University - Human Computer Interaction 1 © Imran Hussain | UMT Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lecture 20 User Research.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
14-1 © Prentice Hall, 2004 Chapter 14: OOSAD Implementation and Operation (Adapted) Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design Joey F. George, Dinesh.
1 of 20 Running a Usability Study Considering a Museum website from the perspective of usability Figuring out what needs fixing and how to fix it.
UPortal 3 User Experience A Designer’s Perspective.
Chapter 12 User Interface Design
Asper School of Business University of Manitoba Systems Analysis & Design Instructor: Bob Travica User interface Updated: December 2014.
User Research Findings. 1 Overview Background Study goals Methodology Participants Findings Recommendations.
MIS (Management Information System)
Copyright 1999 all rights reserved The HCI Design Process n User Interfaces are not just built by sitting down and drawing up designs for them n Just like.
Digital Pathology for Improved Patient Care
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Course Wrap-Up IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher. 2 C.J. Minard ( )
Joy Hamerman Matsumoto.  St Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division manufactures implantable cardiac devices ◦ Pacemakers ◦ Implanted defibrillators.
S556 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS & DESIGN Week 11. Creating a Vision (Solution) SLIS S556 2  Visioning:  Encourages you to think more systemically about your redesign.
Chapter 8 Usability Specification Techniques Hix & Hartson.
Evaluation / Usability. ImplementDesignAnalysisEvaluateDevelop ADDIE.
Day 8 Usability testing.
Presentation transcript:

Maura Bidinost User Experience Designer Omnyx LLC Usability: A Critical Factor in the Successful Adoption of Digital Pathology for Routine Sign-out

Primary Uses of Digital Pathology Today 2 Turn Around Time Volume NON-CRITICAL CRITICAL LOW HIGH Research Frozen Sections 2 nd Opinions Routine Sign-out Education Digital Pathology Rarely used

FDA CE Mark Provincial Regulations CAP Regulatory 3 What Hinders Adoption for Routine Sign-out?

Image Quality Time to Image Scalability FDA CE Mark Provincial Regulations CAP Technology Regulatory 4 What Hinders Adoption for Routine Sign-out? Quality Team

Image Quality Time to Image Scalability “I don’t have time to learn a new system.” “Computers make things complicated.” “It doesn’t accommodate my workflow.” “I can’t afford to be slowed down.” “I like my microscope.” “I need to be able to trust the system.” FDA CE Mark Provincial Regulations CAP Technology System Interaction Regulatory 5 What Hinders Adoption for Routine Sign-out? Quality Team Engineering

User-Centered Design (UCD) 6 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Development Analysis & Research Evaluation

User-Centered Design (UCD) 7 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Development Analysis & Research Evaluation

Design Development Evaluation User-Centered Design (UCD) 8 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Analysis & Research Site Visits Contextual Inquiry & Design Competitive Analysis Heuristic Evaluation Affinity Diagramming Analysis & Research Site Visits Contextual Inquiry & Design Competitive Analysis Heuristic Evaluation Affinity Diagramming

User-Centered Design (UCD) 9 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Development Analysis & Research Evaluation

Development Analysis & Research Evaluation User-Centered Design (UCD) 10 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Persona’s Storyboarding Needs Validation Wireframes Participatory Design Design Persona’s Storyboarding Needs Validation Wireframes Participatory Design

User-Centered Design (UCD) 11 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Development Analysis & Research Evaluation

User-Centered Design (UCD) 12 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Development Analysis & Research Evaluation

Development Evaluation User-Centered Design (UCD) 13 UCD is a philosophy in which the end user is placed at the center of the process and given extensive attention at each stage. Design Analysis & Research Evaluation Heuristic Evaluation Performance Testing Think-Aloud Usability Testing Evaluation Heuristic Evaluation Performance Testing Think-Aloud Usability Testing

Participants are presented with a realistic set of tasks Participants are asked to say whatever they are seeing, thinking, doing, and feeling, as they go about their task. Participant’s actions on the screen and facial expressions are generally recorded as well as observed first hand by a usability specialists. Upon completion of each task, participants are generally presented with a brief questionnaire that provides more quantitative feedback. What is Think-Aloud Usability Testing? 14

Think-Aloud Testing Conducted (so far) 15 Study #1 2 Institutions * 10 Subspecialties 1 Fellows 2 Residents 8 Pathologists * Study #2 2 Institution * 10 Subspecialties 2 Fellows 6 Residents 10 Pathologists * * Same institutions and many of the same pathologists used in both studies.

Date Collected 16 Participant Demographics Task completion rates Time on Task User subjective difficulty ratings Verbal and written feedback Professional observations

How Did We Ensure Data Accuracy? 17 Every pathologist is unique from the way they navigate within a case and between slides to how they organize their day and the tools they use. Creating a realistic environment in order to obtain accurate data is much more difficult than imagined.  Everything was set up to be as realistic as possible  Datasets included participants real cases  Testing was conducted in participants normal working environment  Testing was customized for each participant to match their individual workflow – including other software and devices typically used.

Analyzing the Findings 18 Usability Severity Rating Scale 4 Critical usability problem. Could lead to patient care issues or seriously affect the adoption of our system. No workaround exists. 3 Major usability problem. Could severely affect Pathologist efficiency and workaround is cumbersome. 2 Minor usability problem. Could moderately affect Pathologist efficiency, but easy workaround exists. 1Cosmetic or training issue Frequency Difficulty to Overcome Persistence Market Impact

The Results Enhancements 2 Studies 2 Institutions 10 Subspecialties 3 Fellows 8 Residents 10 Pathologists

“I don’t have time to learn a new system.” “Computers make things complicated.” “It doesn’t accommodate my workflow.” “I can’t afford to be slowed down.” “I like my microscope.” “I need to be able to trust the system.” Before UCD 20 What are they saying now? “I went through a series of prostate cores and found that using the this system was faster than with a microscope.” “Faster, workflow is smoother than with glass. Toggling back and forth between slides is much easier.” “Capturing images for the tumor board is much more efficient than using a camera connected to the microscope.” “If I was trying to do the same case digital with another system, it would have been frustrating.” “Thrilled with the way this works, it’s fantastic.” “I think it’s brilliant to be quite honest.” After UCD

Q&A 21