Key Principles and Practices for Providing Early Intervention Services in Natural Environments: Reaching Consensus Joicey Hurth & Lynda Pletcher; National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
1 The Massachusetts Early Learning Guidelines for Infants and Toddlers.
LESSON 2: COLLABORATION FOR IEP DEVELOPMENT Module 2: Creating Quality IEPs for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute American Institutes for Research PACER Center University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Disabilities Presentation.
A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department of Education/Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services/Early.
Coaching in Early Childhood
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Provider Onboarding Series 1 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto
Team Meetings in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 4 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto.
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Tying it All Together Understanding and Utilizing the Seven Key Principles and the Agreed Upon Practices to Provide Early Intervention Services.
Part C Service Delivery Approaches: Working with Families and Infants and Toddlers Lynda Pletcher Little bit of history Conceptual frame work.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Meaningful Interventions: Strategies for Effective Home Visiting Bonnie Keilty, Ed.D. University of North Carolina, Charlotte South Carolina Early Intervention.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Components of Quality Program Assessment Tools.  “Inclusion has legal status in legislation mandating educational services for all children with disabilities.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
March 24, 2011 Council Bluffs, Iowa
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
A Forum on Comprehensive Community Initiatives How Federal Agencies Can Foster Systems Change to Improve the Lives of Youth and Families Welcome to.
Resources to Support the Use of DEC’s Recommended Practices This presentation and handout were developed by Camille Catlett.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Teaming and Team Meetings. Objectives To understand the characteristics of team based early intervention To understand who is on the early intervention.
Lynda Cook Pletcher 14 th National Early Childhood Inclusion Institute May 21 st, 2014 Building a Neighborhood Called Quality Early Intervention Services.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
KEY ASPECTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION STEFANIJA ALIŠAUSKIENĖ 2009Budapest.
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Introduction to the Framework Unit 1 - Getting Ready for the Unit
Family & Professional Networks in Disability Policy: A Qualitative Inquiry.
Integrated Specialized Services 2005 Inclusion Institute Chapel Hill, NC Peggy Freund, Ph.D. National Individualizing Preschool Inclusion Project Center.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Children Learn through Incredible Amounts of Practice! The amount of a toddler’s experience with walking is the only predictor of improved proficiency.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Session 9 Communicating with Parents: Parent-Teacher Conferencing.
Using Family-Centered Practices to Promote Family Outcomes Don Bailey Melissa Raspa ECO Annual Conference July 30, 2010.
Presented in collaboration with Developing High-Quality, Functional IFSP Outcomes and IEP Goals.
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Introduction to the Framework: Unit 1, Getting Readyhttp://
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
1 Setting the Stage Carl Dunst, Robin McWilliam,Mary Beth Bruder, Julianne Woods, Pip Campbell, Dathan Rush, M’lissa Sheldon, Jack Neisworth, Stephen Bagnato,
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Section 4 Family Assessment for a Child Determined Eligible.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Team Meetings in Early Intervention
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Service Coordinator TA Call
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Philadelphia Infant Toddler Early Intervention
Partnership Collections
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Recommended Practices for Engaging Families
Presentation transcript:

Key Principles and Practices for Providing Early Intervention Services in Natural Environments: Reaching Consensus Joicey Hurth & Lynda Pletcher; National Early Childhood TA Center Grace Kelley; South East Regional Resource Center December 3, 2007

Today’s Purpose Share and review work completed by CoP Work group Compare participants current practices in their state’s to the agreed upon principles and practices Discuss how this work could assist their state to enhance services Discuss strategies and next steps

Introduction OSEP sponsored TA Community of Practice-Part C Settings: www.TACommunities.org Sponsored by the Office of Special Education Programs, US Dept. of Ed. This community facilitated by: National Early Childhood TA Center (NECTAC); Southeast Regional Resource Center (SERRC) and Region 6 Parent Information and Training Center (PTI)

The Identified Need Examine the various “models” of providing services in natural environments- how are they the same? Reach consensus on key principles (foundations) Identify the research-base on effective practices Identify common practices and leanings that the research , model development projects and the “wisdom ”from the field suggest Describe the agreed upon practices that are “model neutral” Describe some examples of how would you know this practices is being implemented

Community Of Practice Workgroup On Principles and Practices In Natural Environments Group of volunteers came together after national meeting in 2006 to form workgroup: Susan Addision, Betsy Ayankoya, Mary Beth Bruder, Carl Dunst, Larry Edelman,Andy Gomm, Barbara Hanft, John Hoffman, Cori Hill, Joicey Hurth, Grace Kelley, Anne Lucas, Robin McWilliam, Stephanie Moss, Lynda Pletcher, Dathan Rush, M’Lisa Shelden, Mary Steenberg, Judy Swett, Nora Thompson, Julianne Woods, and Naomi Younggren Conference calls “Think Tank” working meeting in July 2006 Provided input and edits on the various documents

Work still to be completed: Determine various uses of the current materials and develop some written guidance Identify the skill sets necessary to implement practices Review existing training and or other resources for “matches”- what's already out there in states? Find a grant to pull together existing (or write) training resources Work with state’s systems through a variety of methods to address policy/procedures and training issues for overcome barriers to implementation

Four Documents and the Status Mission and Key Principles of Early Intervention Services ( 5th and Final Draft) Seven Key Principles & Looks Like/Doesn’t Look Like (3nd Draft) Agreed Upon Practices For Providing Early Intervention Services In Natural Environments (5th and Final Draft) Research that Support Key Principles (2nd Draft)

Mission and 7 Key Principles of Early Intervention Services MISSION- The overarching reason for an early intervention system of services PRINCIPLES- the foundations or beliefs which support all our work with children and families

Looks/Like Doesn’t Look like Key concepts behind the principle Examples of what the principle might look like in practice Provides descriptions of what it “doesn’t look like” because too often such practices are still being used Can be use as a training tool This is not a consensus document but workgroup members provided many of the examples

Example of A Principle & Key Concepts 5. IFSP outcomes must be functional and based on child and family needs and priorities Key Concepts: Functional outcomes improve participation in meaningful activities Functional outcomes build on natural motivations to learn and do; fit what’s important to families; strengthen naturally occurring routines; enhance natural learning opportunities. The family understands that strategies are worth working on because they lead to practical improvements in child & family life

Looks Like Doesn’t Look Like Example: III. The primary role of the service provider in early intervention is to work with and support the family members and caregivers in a child’s life. Looks Like Using professional behaviors that build trust and rapport and establish a working partnership with families. Providing information, materials and emotional support to enhance family’s natural role as the people who foster their child’s learning and development. Doesn’t Look Like Being nice to families and becoming their “friend” Training families to be “mini” therapist or interventionist See Hand-out

Agreed Upon Practices Intended for any service provider to use from the beginning of their involvement with child/family Reflects Consensus of Group Model neutral Reflective of research, practice and “wisdom from the field and families (evidence based practices) Includes legal requirements Document is divided into three sections of Service delivery

Agreed Upon Practices, (cont) Numbered statements are what a provider “should” do The first numbered statement in each section sets the stage for the more detailed, bulleted statements that follow Bulleted statements are examples of the behaviors- how you would see this practice being implemented? This is NOT a checklist of everything, but there is a “flow”.

Sample First Contacts with Families from Referral to the IFSP Meeting 1. Become acquainted and establish rapport Use social behaviors that are warm and welcoming and respectful of family culture and circumstances. Balance the time listening to the family with sharing information. Ask what language the family usually speaks (mode of communication) and if any family members may want an interpreter. Explore their level of comfort with written documents. Express willingness to explore family concerns and work with them to find solutions.

Research that Support Key Principles Very much a draft document Citations suggested by work group Needs verification Currently available: A searchable annotated bibliography on the NECTAC Inclusion Web page A compilation of the “top 10” articles recommended by the Researchers/Trainers on the Natural Environments Call Series

Instructions: Group work on Practices: Look over your assigned section Use worksheet to jot down practices and behaviors you do, or think your providers do, now. Rate Note links to training materials, guidance documents policies procedures you already have in place that would support these practices. Discuss at the table

Report Out Of the practices,which are happening well in your state or local program? Which of the practices are not happening? If Not/ Why not?

Discussion Potential use of these Documents in current form/changes? Further development? For what purpose? How do we build on this work?

Documents available for dissemination Located on: www.nectac.org/topics/families/families.asp Feedback or comments: Lynda_pletcher@unc.edu Please let us know how you are using documents

Resources Link to annotated bibliography http://www.nectac.org/inclusion/search/inclubibintro.asp Link to state documents (guidelines and Policies) http://www.nectac.org/inclusion/legis/stlegis.asp Link to National Conference Call series http://www.nectac.org/~calls/2004/partcsettings/partcsettings.asp