Professionalism Behaviors in Faculty: The Resident View Kim Ephgrave MD, Brent Stansfield PhD, Jerry Woodhead MD, Gwen Beck MD, John Sharp MD, Tom George.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medical Education Outcomes Research Frederick Chen, MD, MPH Center for Primary Care Research Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality June 26, 2003.
Advertisements

1 Assessing Outcomes After Theyre Gone – Measuring Preparedness and Quality in Practice Presented by: Mary Pat Wohlford-Wessels, Ph.D. Vice President for.
1 Relationship between hospital safety climate and outcomes Sara Singer, Alyson Falwell, Shoutzu Lin, Toby Rathgeb, Laurence Baker AcademyHealth Annual.
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Educating the Next Generation of Medical Professionals
School of Medicine FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH Does interprofessional education and working have any impact on perceptions of professional identity.
Discussion Discussion # 86 Moving from Criticism to Feedback
Introduction to Competency-Based Residency Education
The Physician-PA Team Improving Access to Patient Care.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 11-1 Chapter 11 Leadership in Teams and Decision Groups.
Department of Graduate Medical Education (GME) Overview of the ACGME Core Competencies.
Competency Management Defining McGill’s Competency Directory MANAGEMENT FORUM JUNE 7, 2005.
Integrating Ethics Into Your Compliance Program John A. Gallagher, Ph.D Center for Ethics in Health Care Atlanta, GA.
A Framework for Professionalism in Surgery: What is Important to Medical Students? Maura Sullivan, PhD, Janet Trial, EdD, Craig Baker,
AAP Department of Community Pediatrics Community Pediatrics Can it be taught, Can it be learned, Can it be practiced? “Caring, compassionate, and knowledgeable.
AECOM COGME Seminar Implementing the Competencies 360 Degree Evaluations Catherine C. Skae, MD Director, Pediatric Residency Program Children’s Hospital.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Grade % Managers and Supervisors 6.75% Remaining FH Employees 90.75% Florida Hospital Employees.
CBES Essentials for Residents, Fellows, and Faculty A 10-minute primer on student performance assessment in required clerkships Stanford School of Medicine.
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
Coaching Workshop.
National Food Service Management Institute
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
Communication. Levels of Communication 3 levels: Social,Therapeutic, Collegial – Social: interactions for the purpose of accomplishing tasks or building.
Hollis Day, MD, MS Susan Meyer, PhD.  Four domains for effective practice outlined in the Interprofessional Education Collaborative’s “Core Competencies.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
PROFESSIONALISM EDUCATION: POSSIBLE COMPETENCIES Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Co-Secretary APHC Conference May 3, 2013.
Leadership and Management Training for physicians Maria V. Gibson, MD, PhD Trident / MUSC Family Medicine Residency Program Background Practice Problem.
ACGME OUTCOME PROJECT : THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR’S ROLE Jim Kerwin, MD University of Arizona.
Unit 250 Developing Yourself as a Team Leader
Coaching and Providing Feedback for Improved Performance
Presented by Vicki M. Young, PhD October 19,
Teaching Quality Improvement: A Needs Assessment for OBGYN Resident Education Teaching Quality Improvement: A Needs Assessment for OBGYN Resident Education.
Core Competency Assessment in Emergency Medicine from Design to Implementation National Hispanic Medical Conference Christian Arbelaez, MD, MPH Associate.
PROFESSIONALISM IN MEDICAL EDUCATION. OBJECTIVES ● Define Professionalism. ● Identify some professional & unprofessional behaviors. ● Recognize as an.
Excellence in Clinical Teaching Your Name Here Your Organization.
Methods of Rewarding Teaching N. Kevin Krane, M.D., F.A.C.P. Tulane University School of Medicine Vice Dean for Academic Affairs Floyd C. Knoop, Ph.D.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
01-1-S230-EP Unit S230-EP S230-EP Unit 1 Objectives Describe the values and principles of operational leadership. Identify the qualities.
The New ACGME Competencies for Internal Medicine.
Technical Assistance and Consultation Team’s Approach to Enhancing Interprofessional Learner Experiences in Integrated Care Settings InterProfessional.
CBEI Essentials for Residents, Fellows, and Faculty A 10-minute primer on student performance assessment in required clerkships Stanford School of Medicine.
/0903 © 2003 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Coaching Techniques.
ASSESSMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT STUDY PATHWAY AT LECOM: STUDENT FEEDBACK Mark A.W. Andrews, Ph.D., Professor and Director, The Independent Study Pathway.
Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents’ Bedside Communication Skills: A Survey of Emergency Department Patients Amanda Keller York College of PA Biology.
Cultural Competency in an Osteopathic Curriculum Presented by: Mary Pat Wohlford-Wessels, Ph.D. Vice President for Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Outcomes Methods RRC-Internal Medicine Educational Innovations Project: Clinical Quality Improvement and Patient Safety- Deliverables to Healthcare from.
1ST CHOICE HOME HEALTH SERVICES NURSING ETHICS: PRESENTED BY: THE CLINICAL DEPARTMENT Doing the right thing for all involved.
What is “Competency” in the New Millennium? Shirley Schlessinger, MD, FACP Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education University of Mississippi Medical.
In order to improve the Family Medicine obstetrics (OB) rotation orientation and to encourage resident- resident teaching, we developed an orientation.
AN INTRODUCTION Managing Change in Healthcare IT Implementations Sherrilynne Fuller, Center for Public Health Informatics School of Public Health, University.
AN INNOVATIVE & INTEGRATED TESTING FORMAT COMBINING ANATOMY, PRIMARY CARE SKILLS, AND OMM IN A SIMULATED PATIENT ENCOUNTER Gail Dudley, DO, Francine Anderson,
A hidden curriculum? Possible to teach?. In the literature, a physician: Subordinates her/her own interest to those of others Adheres to high ethical.
MEDICAL STUDENT TRANSITION COURSE Professionalism in the Clinical Environment ANTHONY A. MEYER, MD, PHD CHAIRMAN, DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH.
CBEI Essentials for residents, fellows, and faculty A 10-minute primer on the Criterion-Based Evaluation Initiative and student performance assessment.
STACEY T. GRAY, MD PROGRAM DIRECTOR, HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL.
Assessing Learners The Teaching Center Department of Pediatrics UNC School of Medicine The Teaching Center.
Conscientious Refusal in Residency Training Jennifer Frank, MD, FAAFP Fox Valley FMR Program November 12, 2009.
1 Is Our Professionalism All It Should Be?. 2 Professionalism Implies: Commitment Training Competence (as with NBA, policemen, soldiers, etc.)
 Patient care  Medical knowledge  Interpersonal & communication skills  PROFESSIONALISM  Practice-based learning  Systems-based practice.
What is Good and What is Right: Ethics in Montana Municipal Government Betsy J. Webb Associate Director MSU Local Government Center December 2011.
Objectives Methods Introduction Results Conclusions To measure the self-reported competency of all EM residents with Level 1 milestones as they enter residency.
State University of New York at Buffalo Primary Care Master Educator Program David Newberger, M.D. Elie Akl, M.D., Ph.D. * Denise McGuigan, M.S. Ed. Andrew.
Henry M. Sondheimer, MD Association of American Medical Colleges 7 August 2013 A Common Taxonomy of Competency Domains for the Health Professions and Competencies.
Teaching, Promoting and Assessing Professionalism: Can The Physician Charter Help? Linda L. Blank Penn State College of Medicine July 21, 2003.
Conference on Practice Improvement December 3-5, 2015
Coaching.
CLICK TO GO BACK TO KIOSK MENU
Rank Ordered Items How do students, residents, and faculty define professionalism and rank order the items?
Presentation transcript:

Professionalism Behaviors in Faculty: The Resident View Kim Ephgrave MD, Brent Stansfield PhD, Jerry Woodhead MD, Gwen Beck MD, John Sharp MD, Tom George MD, Sandy Markham MD, Greg Skopec MD, John Lawrence MD, Mark C. Wilson MD University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine

The Working Group Four Core Clinical Disciplines: Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Obstetrics/Gynecology Educators/leaders in both medical student and residency programs Support from the Office for Consultation and Research in Medical Education (OCRME) Formed to respond to a call for proposals from the National Board of Medical Educators

Key Events in Professionalism Project December 2003: National Board of Medical Examiners put out call for proposals. Jan-March 2004: Team formed, proposal developed and submitted to test NBME form. May-Aug 2004: Team regroups, creates own tool aimed at residents and faculty. Fall 2004: Pilot testing of tool; data analysis; project redesigned/resubmitted. July 2005: Implementation in 5 departments

Why the concern about Professionalism? American Board of Internal Medicine launched Professionalism Project in 1990, in response to perceived erosion from market forces. Literature in ’90’s began discussion of the ‘hidden curriculum’ of academic medical centers, often undermining ethical instruction. Association of American Medical Colleges/National Board of Medical Examiners partner in hosting conference Professionalism in Medical Education: May 2002, focusing on students.

Residents Iowa: Change Professionalism Focus to Residents Feedback from students frequently included comments about disrespectful behaviors, questionable role modeling from some residents and faculty on clinical rotations. Graduate medical education in the past considered a hospital responsibility, an apprenticeship more than an educational program. Faculty have responsibility for students, but students spend more time with residents than faculty. Recognition of the key role of residents in our educational continuum seemed overdue.

Why Assess Professionalism at Iowa, specifically? Possible purposes proposed at AAMC/NBME conference were: Raising Institutional Awareness Improving Patient Care Improving Patient Perceptions Improving Perceptions of Students and Faculty (and residents?!) Identifying Role Models Rewarding Good Behavior Providing vocabulary for discussion of professionalism Continuous quality improvement of all individuals Identifying Offenders Punishing Unacceptable Behavior

What do we mean by “Professionalism”? American Board of Internal Medicine: 6 Categories for positive behaviors: Altruism Accountability Excellence Duty Honor and Integrity Respect for Others

Defining Professionalism, #2 ABIM ‘issues’ affecting professionalism Abuse of power Arrogance Greed Misrepresentation Impairment Lack of conscientiousness Conflict of Interest

AAMC/NBME May 2002: Eight Categories within Professionalism Altruism Honor and Integrity Caring, Compassion, Communication Respect Responsibility Accountability Excellence and Scholarship Leadership

Which categories to use? Leadership, Excellence and Scholarship felt to be difficult for residents to observe regarding faculty behavior. Two of the 8 categories were already combined in AAMC/NBME behavior list. Remaining 5 categories were used: Altruism Honor/Integrity Caring/Compassion/Communication Respect Responsibility/Accountability

Development of Pilot Items Team members submitted 20 items each. Primary Source: 180+ specific behaviors grouped into the 8 categories of professionalism from 2002 AAMC/NBME conference. Additional Sources: Specialty specific evaluation tools. Negatively worded items included. All items edited to describe behavior frequency.

TESTING the Items: Logistics Team members brought the 20 item pilot form to their own departments. Residents and team members were asked to rate an ‘Outstanding’ physician they knew reasonably well on the items On the back side, they rated another physician labeled ‘Not Outstanding” that they considered at the opposite end of the scale.

Results Residents from Surgery (n=16) and Pediatrics (n=19) answered the 20 items for an “outstanding” faculty member. All but one Pediatric resident also rated one ‘not outstanding’ faculty member. The total was thus 69 ratings.

Factor Analysis Reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) 0.97 Five categories from which questions originated did not emerge One factor with eigenvalue 11.47; explained 57% of the measured variance. Two additional factors together added ~ 13%

‘Outstanding’ vs. ‘not outstanding’ We used 7 point Likert scale, where ‘7’ was ‘always’ for desirable behaviors, and ‘never’ for undesirable behaviors; 4 was neutral. “Outstanding” item means ranged from 5.41 to 6.57, all substantially above 4. ‘Not outstanding’ means ranged from 2.47 to 4.64, with several also above 4. Group means for all items differed significantly.

Strengths for the Outstanding Is prepared for clinical responsibilities Answers questions directly and respectfully Is [not] unfair in decisions affecting co- workers Listens well & responds appropriately Demonstrates respect toward all others, both in direct interactions and indirect references.

Lows for the Outstanding [doesn’t] Promotes own interests over those of team or work group [doesn’t] Puts own needs ahead of patients’ Is [not] insensitive to patients’ values and beliefs Is aware of own limitations; seeks and accepts constructive feedback Tactfully offers assistance and support for team members.

Lows for the ‘Not Outstanding’ Tactfully offers assistance and support for team members Aware of own limitations; seeks and accepts constructive feedback Listens well and responds appropriately Gives colleagues due credit Inspires trust in patients, colleagues, co- workers and subordinates

Highs for the ‘Not Outstanding’ Is prepared for clinical responsibilities [doesn’t] put own needs ahead of patients [doesn’t] inappropriately cross personal boundaries with patients or co-workers

> 10% could not assess Aware of own limitations; seeks and accepts constructive feedback. Deals with confidential information discretely and appropriately. Demonstrates personal integrity and a willingness to stand on principle.

What are the biggest mean differences ? Listens well and responds appropriately (3.5) Tactfully offers assistance and support for team members (3.4) Demonstrates respect toward all, both in direct interactions and indirect reference (3.3) Gives colleagues due credit (3.3) Inspires trust in patients, colleagues, co- workers and subordinates (3.20)

Resident view of faculty Professionalism: Conclusions All 20 items differed between ‘outstanding’ and ‘not outstanding’ group’s behavior frequency ratings. Only one strong factor emerged.

Key Behaviors that distinguish outstanding professionals Listening well Offering assistance to team Demonstrating respect for all Giving others due credit