Planning for Mid-Year Reviews in Educator Effectiveness February 2014 Staff Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Continuing and Expanding Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools February, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.

Advertisements

Quality Liaisons April 10th, Every table needs representatives from each level. Elementary-Middle- High.

Assessment, Marking & Feedback

Year 2 Formative Progress Review

The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson

Reinventing Program and Services Review at Chaffey College Marie Boyd Giovanni Sosa Tom Vitzelio.

David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.

Acknowledging and Honoring Quality Performance.  The purpose of the EAS process is to provide teachers with the opportunity to reflect on professional.

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.

Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 2.

I. Confirm Implementation of the CIP II. Assess the Effectiveness of the Strategies, Action Steps, Benchmarks III. Provide Feedback to CIP Team and Faculty.

I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.

Is now accepting applications for the school year, for K-8 students living on Maui.

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :

Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.

Student Growth Measures Category “B” Teachers VENDOR (STAR)

IDEA Advisory Special Education Roland-Grise Middle School Auditorium August 21, 2009.

Peninsula School District

Student Learning Objectives Part 2: A Deeper Dive Leading Change 2014 Virginia Stodola Susan Poole Effective Teachers and Leaders Unit.

Support learning activities

Abstract While peer review and self evaluation concepts are not new, leveraging technology to support the process was a new venture for a large, inner.

Partnering to help all kids learn Wisconsin Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Principals and Assistant Principals.

National Quality Framework Self-assessment and Quality Improvement Planning Podcast Series: 2 April 2012 Draft and Confidential 1.

CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING

Early Release Professional Development NC FALCON Module 3: Collecting and Documenting Evidence February 16, 2011 Kathy Walker.

LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.

Student Learning Objectives A Guiding Framework for Selecting Student Assessments to Inform Educator Evaluation Student Learning Objectives Training Series.

Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.

Student/School Learning Objectives

Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.

Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.

Overall Teacher Judgements and

 Student Learning Objectives February 26, 2015 Work and Creation Session.

Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 4 Monitoring Progress and Refining.

POSITIVE BEHAVIOUR FOR LEARNING - website and toolkit 27 April 2012.

1 Performance Management Program SETTING OBJECTIVES COACHING EVALUATING GIVING & RECEIVING FEEDBACK.

CESA #4 EEL Meeting Thursday, December 4, o Evaluator Step 4 Deep Dive for Evaluators Evaluator Step 4 Deep Dive for Evaluators.

Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.

Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.

Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment – Feedback February 28,2012 Dr. Dorothea Shannon, Thomasyne Beverly, Dr.

SYLLABUS & LESSON PLAN EDU555 Curriculum and Instruction Encik Muhamad Furkan Mat Salleh Faculty of Education Universiti Teknologi MARA.

EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.

Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.

In this presentation you can: Clarify the purpose and value - Clarify the purpose and value of effective feedback to learners Identify strategies - Identify.

Documenting Completion of your PDP

Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.

Collaboration for Professional Learning SCCSD Leadership Academy 2010.

SLO Check-in December 2015 SLOs in LEAP Midyear Conversations.

EE Principal Update February 2015 ~Brought to you by Sherri Torkelson and Billie Finco~

Considering the Roles of Research and Evaluation in DR K-12 Projects December 3, 2010.

Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.

Teaching & Learning of RE Assessment Focus Levels of Attainment.

July 8, 2015 UMI Exemplars Fence Painting o Suggested Grade Span – Grades 3-5 o Grade(s) in Which Task was Piloted – Grade 4 Problem Solving.

Core Six Compare & Contrast. In a Nutshell  Compare & Contrast challenges students to think critically about similarities and differences while building.

 Morning Ice Breaker: › Only child, oldest child, middle child, or youngest child  What do you like best about your familial position? What drove or.

Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.

The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.

PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,

The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Two Mid-Course Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.

Recognize how SLOs align the teacher and principal evaluation Develop a shared understanding of the purpose for using SLOs Become familiar with the SLO.

Making a Better “Baby”…. Changing the Way We Communicate in Order to Increase Learning Opportunities Learning Community.

Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 4: Scoring an Individual SLO 1.

Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives Teamwork in Motion.

Teacher Evaluation Timeline

Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments

Understanding by Design

Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments

Using the Lesson Study model to develop guided reasoning with higher achieving pupils. St. Michael with St. John.

Presentation transcript:

Planning for Mid-Year Reviews in Educator Effectiveness February 2014 Staff Meeting

Objectives: ● Understand the purpose of a Mid-Year Review ● Understand the requirements of a Mid-Year Review

Preparing for mid-interval review: Is it just for summary year teachers?

Purpose of the Mid-Year Review…... ** Talk about the progress that has been made on SLOs & PPGs The meeting should be an opportunity to touch base with peers or evaluators who can: ● support educator’s learning ● help educators understand what their data is telling them ● assist educator’s progress toward meeting SLO goals and offer new perspectives (as identified in DPI Deep Dive Module-Mid Year & Teacher Process Manual)

Requirements for Mid-Year Review Educators: ● Complete the 8 tasks/activities identified for Mid-Year in Step 4: Educator Deep Dive Module (Middle of the Year)Step 4: Educator Deep Dive Module (Middle of the Year) Evaluators: ● Meet with the Summary Year educator for a Mid-Interval Review to discuss progress and adjustments to EEP * Request Revision” of SLO/PPG to reopen for the teacher to submit mid- interval data prior to Mid-Interval Review

Educator Practices to support Mid-year Review preparation: ● Review benchmark/formative SLO assessment data ● Develop key summary statements about what the SLO data is telling you ● Be able to state what work you have done on your PPG ● Think of questions you would like to ask your evaluator ● Prepare to suggest changes (if any) to your SLO/PPG and supporting reasons

SLO PPG