Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Performance Assessment

Advertisements

Project-Based vs. Text-Based

How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.

Understanding by Design Stage 3

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.

Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.

TRADITIONAL TEACHING.

1 Project Citizen A program of the Center for Civic Education in cooperation with the National Conference of State Legislatures supported by the United.

Scholarship of Teaching & SCL/LCE (part II). Instructional Vs Learner Centered (1) Knowledge is transmitted from lecturer to students VS Students construct.

Iowa State University Teaching Seminar August, 2003 Center for Teaching Excellence and Graduate College Learning to Teach, Teaching to Learn

University of Delaware Comparison of Paradigms Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson

The Role of General Education in Developing Leadership for a Sustainable Future March 23, 2007 George Watson Sr. Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences.

Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson Courtesy of Deborah Allen and Hal White.

Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms George Watson Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education

University of Delaware Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs. Instructor-Centered Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George.

University of Delaware Workshop at Kutztown University January 6, 2003 Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for.

Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson Courtesy of Deborah Allen and Hal White.

University of Delaware Workshops on Problem-Based Learning International Islamic University Malaysia Comparison of Paradigms Institute.

University of Delaware The Power of Problem-Based Learning : Putting Students at the Center Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson.

Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms

University of Delaware Plenary Presentation at September Institute Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning University of Cincinnati September.

Meaningful Learning in an Information Age

University of Delaware Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson.

Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.

University of Delaware Workshop for Animal Science Education Consortium December 16-17, 2002 Experience It Yourself: An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning.

 Project-based learning is considered an alternative to teacher-led classrooms.  Project-based learning emphasises learning activities that are student-

Instructional Strategies

Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.

MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)

Now That My Marking’s Done, Now What??? Brent Galloway Lori Stuber.

9/12/2015 Kevin G. Tucker/University of Belize1 Meaningful Social Studies.

Critical Thinking and Knowledge of Subject Matter

Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address

Knowledge is communicated from teacher to student. Student passively receives information. Emphasis is on acquisition of knowledge outside the context.

Problem Based Learning (PBL) Using Case Studies to Teach Science Jane Indorf, PhD Department of Biology University of Miami.

“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them

Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.

Northern Illinois University March 2009 Susan Hatfield Winona State University Leave No Outcome Behind: Teaching, Learning & Assessment.

A. Erzberger, April, 2003 Inquiry & Scientific Research.

Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.

Learner-Centered Teaching In Engineering/Technology Classrooms Steven A. Freeman Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching.

PRESENTED BY KILA O’NEILL TECHNOLOGY AND THE STUDENT-CENTERED CLASSROOM.

STUDENT-CENTERED TEACHING & LEARNING METHODS Richard Lynch Graduate School of Education Assumption University.

Inquiry-based Learning Linking Teaching with Learning.

Project Based Learning

University of Delaware Asia-Pacific Conference on Education National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technogical University Singapore, June 4,

Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.

Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.

Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.

Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.

Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Evidence in Learning and Teaching.

CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.

The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.

University of Delaware How to get started with PBL: moving to a new paradigm Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education George Watson

Using simulations as tools to promote more powerful learning Instructor: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter: Yu-ting Tsai Roberta, L. (2005). Using simulations.

Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.

21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics

Project-Based Learning

Introductions George Watson

Project-Based Learning

Creating an Active Learning environment

Creating an Active Learning environment

Problem-Based Learning: Technology and Student-Centered Learning

MTT Competency 007-I Presented by Maribel Gracia

Jeopardy! Game Copyright © by Sarah Wood

Project–Based Learning

Comparison of Learning Paradigms: Learner-Centered vs

Problem-Based Learning by floating facilitation

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, 2000

…the individuals learning the most in the teacher-centered classrooms are the teachers there. They have reserved for themselves the very conditions that promote learning: What I know best I have taught… Page 35, Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, 2000 actively seeking new information, integrating it with what is known, organizing it in a meaningful way, and explaining it to others.

First, an exercise: 1.Individually, write down five words or short phrases that come to mind when you think of: Student-Centered Learning 2.In small groups, select three “most important”. 3.Finally, prepare to report out one choice.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Knowledge is transmitted from professor to student. Students construct knowledge through gathering and synthesizing information and integrating it with the general skills of inquiry, communication, critical thinking, and problem solving.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Students passively receive information. Students are actively involved.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Emphasis is on acquisition of knowledge outside the context in which it will be used. Emphasis is on using and communicating knowledge effectively to address enduring and emerging issues and problems in real-life contexts.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Instructor’s role is to be primary information giver and primary evaluator. Instructor’s role is to coach and facilitate. Instructor and students evaluate learning together.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Teaching and assessing are separate. Teaching and assessing are intertwined.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Assessment is used to monitor learning. Assessment is used to promote and diagnose learning.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Emphasis is on right answers. Emphasis is on generating better questions and learning from errors.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Desired learning is assessed indirectly through the use of objectively scored tests. Desired learning is assessed directly through papers, projects, performances, portfolios, and the like.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Focus is on a single discipline. Approach is compatible with interdisciplinary investigation.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Culture is competitive and individualistic. Culture is cooperative, collaborative, and supportive.

Comparison of Paradigms Teacher-Centered Learner-Centered Only students are viewed as learners. Professor and students learn together.

Outcomes? Moving away from: Are students getting the right answer?

Outcomes? Moving to: Can students demonstrate the qualities that we value in educated persons, the qualities we expect of college graduates?

Outcomes? Moving to: Can students gather and evaluate new information, think critically, reason effectively, and solve problems?

Outcomes? Moving to: Can [students] communicate clearly, drawing upon evidence to provide a basis for argumentation?

Outcomes? Moving to: Do [students’] decisions and judgments reflect understanding of universal truths[/concepts] in the humanities and arts [etc.]?

Outcomes? Moving to: Can [students] work respectfully and productively with others?

Outcomes? Moving to: Do [students] have self-regulating qualities like persistence and time management that will help them reach long-term goals?

Questions and Reflections