Student Learning Data The Three R’s: Requirements, Recommendations & Resources 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR)
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Addition Facts
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
The SCPS Professional Growth System
ABC Technology Project
Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Making Data Work for Kids: EVAAS Teacher Reports October 2012 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
Addition 1’s to 20.
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO Dr. Scott Mendelsberg Executive Director, Colorado GEAR UP.
25 seconds left…...
The Design and Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems, Variability of Systems and the Role of a Theory of Action Rhode Island Lisa Foehr Rhode Island.
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Week 1.
Yukon-Koyukuk School District Kerry Boyd, Superintendent August 12 th, 2013.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness.
Compass: Module 3 Student Growth.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Teacher Evaluation Instructional Collaboration Day #2 January 3, 2014.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Instructional Hours Required Instructional Time / OAR
Professional Learning
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
Student Learning Objectives Overview. Defining SLOS A vital component of the Teacher Keys and Leader Keys Effectiveness System is Student Growth and Academic.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Considerations for Teachers of Career and Technical Education Courses Name Title Date 1 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015.
Designing Student Learning Objectives
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Student Learning Objectives. An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Data The Three R’s: Requirements, Recommendations & Resources 1

2

3

Objectives Understand the regulatory requirements applicable to the student learning data component Distinguish the recommendations concerning the student data component from the actual requirements Locate resources available for building awareness around the new requirements and developing a pilot for the student data component utilizing the recommendations 4

Requirements: Student Learning Data Supports the purpose of educator evaluation Educator evaluation must provide information and analysis that… Helps the educator grow professionally Improves the effectiveness of instruction Relates to the future employment of the educator 4 AAC (a) 5

Requirements: Educator Engagement  Educators subject to the evaluation system must be consulted when establishing performance standards for student growth 4 AAC (e)(1)  When selecting the measures in a particular subject and grade level, educators who teach the subject and grade level or a related subject and grade level must be consulted 4 AAC (d) 6

Requirements: Student Learning Data  Includes two to four measures of student growth per teacher or administrator 4 AAC (e)(2)  Uses data from the statewide, standard-based test as one measure, when and where appropriate 4 AAC (e)(3)  Insures students’ data are appropriately assigned to the educator 4 AAC (e)(5)  Required in administrator and teacher evaluations beginning in the school year 4 AAC (d) 7

Requirements: Student Learning Data Definition  Measurable gains  Knowledge, understanding, and skills  Objective, empirical, and valid  Standardized and non-standardized  Statewide tests, when approved 4 AAC (2-4,6 & 7) 4 AAC (e)(3) 8

Requirements: Overall Educator Rating Beginning in the school year, a district shall include student learning data in teacher and administrator’s overall rating according to the following schedule:  SY 2015 ‐ 16 & SY 2016 ‐ 17, at least 20%  SY 2017 ‐ 18, at least 35%  SY 2018 ‐ 19 and after, at least 50% 4 AAC (e)(2) 9

What approaches are being used to incorporate student learning data into an educators evaluation? Value-Added Measure (VAM) Student Growth Percentiles (SGP) Student Learning Objectives (SLO) 10 Student Learning Data

Recommendations: What was considered… Value-added & Student Growth Percentiles  Difficult to explain  Limited to tested grades and subjects  Limited to standardized assessments  Disconnected Student Learning Objectives  Understandable & values the educator’s knowledge & skill  Utilized by all teachers in all subjects and grades  Adaptable and collaborative  Connects teacher practice to student learning 11

Recommendations: Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) 12 An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning of the year for all students or for subgroups of students.

Recommendations : SLOs – When & How? 13 Source: Lachlan-Haché, L., Cushing, E., & Bivona, L. (2012). Student learning objectives as measures of educator effectiveness: The basics. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from

14 Student Population Interval of Instruction Standard Assessment Baseline/Trend Data Student Targets Recommendations : SLOs – What do they look like?

Recommendations : SLOs – Who will be responsible? 15 Increasing Teacher Agency Increasing SLO Comparability Type 1 Set by teacher or teacher team using available assessments Type 2 Set by teacher or teacher team using assessment list or ranking Type 3 Set by teacher or teacher team using common assessments Type 4 Set by local education agency using common assessments and common growth targets Image adapted from: Lachlan-Haché, L., Matlach, L., Cushing, E., Mean, M., & Reese, K. (2013). Student learning objectives: Early lessons from the Teacher Incentive Fund. Washington, DC: TIF TA Network.

16 Avoid the valid & reliable swamp Use existing assessments that educators already consider reasonable, creditable and consistent. Recommendations : Getting Started with SLOs

Recommendations: Getting Started 17 Engage educators at the beginning of the student data component development Whenever possible, use teams of educators to development SLOs (e.g. grade levels and subject areas) Use historical information and baseline data to establish rigorous, realistic targets One measure to pilot; two measures to start (version 1.0)

Recommendations : Pilot Year SY Build & pilot the student learning component of your evaluation system Present the pilot as a professional development opportunity for your teachers and administrators Take advantage of the school year’s no-stakes environment

19 Additional Recommendations: Frequently Asked Questions

Resources: District-Level  Culture of Collaboration  Access to Student Data  Assessment Inventory 20  SMART Goals  Assessment Literacy  Data Informed Decision Making

21 SLO Template SLO Class Roster Assessment Assurance Quality Checklist SLO Checklist Resources: Templates

EED Contact Information Sondra Meredith, Administrator (907)