CAEP–State Partnerships: New Agreements, New Opportunities 2013 AACTE Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Mark Lacelle-Peterson, CAEP Senior Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Family Engagement Tool Orientation The Family Engagement Tool is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers - Dr. Dwight C. Watson - University of Northern.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
Connect with CAEP Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CAEP Update to OCTEO October 24, 2012 Mark.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Practitioner psychologist education seminar. Today Welcome Introduction to HPC Workshop 1: Working collaboratively Break Workshop 2: Working with the.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
The Department of Communications and Engagement Jimmy Lee Peterkin, Jr., MBA District Business and Community Partnership Coordinator
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
First Induction Meeting for Owners and Principals of Private Schools and Kindergartens. October 2009.
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
An Overview. HVAC Excellence was founded as a not for profit organization in 1994 to improve the technical workforce of the HVACR industry through quality.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
58 th SHEEO Annual Meeting Bolder, Colorado Thursday, July 14, 2011 Transforming Teacher Education Through Clinical Practice: A National Strategy to Prepare.
Independent School Process Agency of Education State Board of Education Presentation March 25, 2014.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Connect with CAEP Transformation Initiatives Respond to the Needs of the Profession James G. Cibulka, President,
Purpose of this webinar Orient NH institutions of higher education (IHEs) to the basics of state policy on teacher education program review and approval.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
March 15-16, Inquiry and Evidence An introduction to the TEAC system for accrediting educator preparation programs 3/15/12, 9:00-10:00a.m. CAEP.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
The Real Scoop. Initial Reactions The counseling staff in our building did not have any issues with having a new evaluation system. Developing measurable.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
State Plan of Action with Local Chapters Initiatives.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Preparing for your Site Visit
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Special Review Team Required Actions October 23, 2011
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
GETTING INVOLVED: VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES AT CAEP
Orientation for New Site Visitors
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
CAEP Orientation: Newcomers
TN: TEACH AACTE Grant TN TEACH: The TN EPP Assistive and Collaborative Help Network.
2013 update Mark Laursen MS, ATC President.
PROGRAM REVIEW AS PART OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION PROCESS
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
April 17, 2018 Gary Railsback, Vice President What’s new at CAEP.
Program Approval Overview Commission Meeting April 6, 2016
Professional Development Conference 2018
Presentation transcript:

CAEP–State Partnerships: New Agreements, New Opportunities 2013 AACTE Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Mark Lacelle-Peterson, CAEP Senior Vice President for Engagement, Research, and Development Melanie Biermann, TEAC Vice President, Member and State Relations Shari Francis, NCATE Vice President, State Relations

Connect with CAEP Goals Promote excellence and continuous improvement in educator preparation Fit with the policies and needs of the particular state in order to provide careful review against national standards and support for state program approval processes Align the work around state expectations and ensure thorough reviews Save both states and providers time and expense by eliminating duplication of effort Share evidence on candidate and program performance, as appropriate

Connect with CAEP CAEP–State Partnership Elements Partners CAEP (president responsible for accepting agreement) State Authority/Authorities for Educator Preparation Teams CAEP Team Joint CAEP–State Teams Concurrent Teams Program Standards Reviews CAEP Review with National Recognition CAEP Review with Feedback State Review

Connect with CAEP CAEP and State Roles States approve all programs offered by Educator Preparation Providers (EPPs) CAEP confers national professional accreditation status CAEP and State decisions are independent, but can be coordinated through a Partnership Agreement

Connect with CAEP Program Review Options Program Review with National Recognition Educator preparation provider submits program report forms for each CAEP program area and level (i.e., Undergraduate Secondary Biology, Reading Specialist Masters, etc.) Review is conducted by the appropriate Specialized Professional Association (SPA) Only program review option leading to national recognition (program level – not connected to national accreditation)

Connect with CAEP Program Review Options Program Review with Feedback Program report forms will be completed with links to information found in the Inquiry Brief or Institutional Report documents for three clusters of programs: – secondary content area programs; – cross-grade programs; and – other school personnel programs State selects program standards Providers may voluntarily submit programs they select for SPA National Recognition

Connect with CAEP Program Review Options State Program Review State conducts program reviews for purposes of CAEP accreditation if – state’s content standards are the same as or sufficiently aligned with CAEP content standards, and – program review process is the same as or sufficiently similar to that of CAEP’s national program review process

Connect with CAEP Program Review Options State Program Review CAEP and state staff will work together to ensure the close alignment of both the program standards and review process with the SPA standards and review process. Providers may voluntarily submit programs for SPA National Recognition.

Connect with CAEP Expectations EPP standards must be met on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence Candidate EPPs must: – Satisfy eligibility requirements; – Submit a self-study in CAEP-approved format – Respond to issues identified in an off-site review; – Facilitate the call for public comment and third party surveys; and – Host site visit CAEP must be informed of a change in an EPP’s state status

Connect with CAEP Expectations The partnerships will be renewed every seven years and may be modified during that time if necessary The state will receive accreditation and specialized program approval documents and reports Accreditation decisions will be posted on CAEP’s website; official letters will be sent to the CEO of the authority for EPP, the state CAEP contact, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation

Connect with CAEP Training Opportunities CAEP and the state will collaborate to plan, design and implement training opportunities for reviewers. Registration fees will be waived for state representatives who attend CAEP webinars, conferences and training. CAEP will assume all expenses for one state representative to attend the annual CAEP Clinic.

Connect with CAEP Training Opportunities State training involving CAEP staff will be negotiated according to CAEP’s policies on dues and expenses. The state will work with associations that represent P-12 educators, school administrators and EEP to establish credit toward continuing education units or professional development requirements at the local district level in return or the state’s P-12 educators professional contributions to the wok of CAEP.

Connect with CAEP Stakeholder Involvement Providers, practitioners, employers, other segments of the profession, and the public all have a stake in the effectiveness of educator preparation Post schedule and timeline for implementation of agreements Create opportunities for discussion and input during the process

Connect with CAEP Resources for States CAEP Webinars CAEP Conference Calls AACTE Annual Meeting CAEP Institutional Orientations Become a member of the CAEP onsite visiting team Communicate with other state CAEP contacts

Connect with CAEP EPP Advocacy

Q & A