School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Providing State-Wide Leadership Rob HornerBarbara Kelley University of OregonRoger Titgemeyer Orange County George.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
Advertisements

Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
SWPBIS and the Changing Role of the Clinician
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Implementing Tier Two in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)
SISEP Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai
SWPBS Implementation Blueprint - revised George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Mar
The Role of Wraparound within School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Moving School-wide PBIS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 Tennessee School-wide PBIS State Conf Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
1 Implementing a Three-Tiered State Evaluation Structure Bob Putnam The May Institute Karen Childs University of South Florida 2009 National PBIS Leadership.
Coaching PBIS Implementation Coaching PBIS Implementation Rob Horner org.
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3 Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
The Importance of Coaching in Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon
San Jose Unified School District School-wide PBS Initiative Leadership Team Rob Horner Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Pbis.org.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Rob Horner, and George Sugai University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill University of Oregon University of Connecticut Scaling.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Current assumptions/research about coaching Define the experience with coaching in SWPBS implementation.
Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Securing Sustainable Funding, Political Support, & Visibility Barbara Sims & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 30, 2008.
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Renee Bradley, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs.
Youth Forum Cities Implementation of School-wide PBIS Rob Horner, University of Oregon Rebecca Mendiola, Santa Clara County Office of Education.
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Moving PBS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 APBS Conference Rob Horner, University of Oregon
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Tier 3 Systems for Sustainable Success WI RtI Center WI PBIS Network Rachel Saladis.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Sustaining and Improving Implementation of SWPBS Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on Positive Behavior Support
VTPBiS Coordinators as Coaches Learning and Networking Workshop Presented by VTPBiS State Team.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Linking Social and Academic Gains Washington Association of School Administrators Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.orgwww.pbis.org OSEP TA-Center on PBS.
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
District Leadership SCCOE October,  How are things going with this first SW-PBIS cohort? What has worked? What are challenges? What tangible outcomes.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
Making SWPBIS Work for All Students
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
District Leadership SCCOE
Presentation transcript:

School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Providing State-Wide Leadership Rob HornerBarbara Kelley University of OregonRoger Titgemeyer Orange County George Sugai University of Connecticut

Goals Define core features of SWPBS Define Role of a Leadership Team Provide examples from other states Planning for Desert Mountain SELPA

School-wide PBS Build a continuum of supports that begins with the whole school and extends to intensive, wraparound support for individual students and their families.

What is School-wide Positive Behavior Support? School-wide PBS is:  A systems approach for establishing the social culture and individualized behavioral supports needed for schools to achieve both social and academic success for all students while preventing problem behavior Evidence-based features of SW-PBS  Prevention  Define and teach positive social expectations  Acknowledge (reward) positive behavior  Arrange consistent consequences for problem behavior  On-going collection and use of data for decision-making  Continuum of intensive, individual interventions.  Administrative leadership – Team-based implementation (Systems that support effective practices)

Establishing a Social Culture Common Vision/Values Common Language Common Experience MEMBERSHIP

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

Classroom SWPBS Practices Non-classroom Family Student School-wide Smallest change Evidence-based Biggest, durable effect

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence, Academic Achievement and Safety Supporting Decision Making School-wide PBS

Define School-wide Expectations for Social Behavior Identify 3-5 Expectations Short statements Positive Statements (what to do, not what to avoid doing) Memorable Examples:  Be Respectful, Be Responsible, Be Safe, Be Kind, Be a Friend, Be-there-be-ready, Hands and feet to self, Respect self, others, property, Do your best, Follow directions of adults

States Implementing SWPBS schools in 44 states States Number of Schools CaliforniaIllinois

Scott Spaulding, Claudia Vincent, et al Pbis.org / evaluation/ evaluation briefs California Hawaii

Leadership Team Funding Visibility Political Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Local Demonstration Schools Active Coordination Behavioral Expertise

Leadership Team Political authority  Families  School Administrators  State Department of Education (Gen Ed-SPED?)  Union/ Staff Technical Expertise  Behavioral expertise  Implementation and training expertise  University and Personnel Prep positions Coordination  Experience, skill, social competence, time

Leadership Team Meet Regularly  Minimal: Quarterly  Preferred: Monthly  Once established (as needed) Meet Functionally  Action planning (schools, districts, evaluation)  Conduct: Review, input, guidance Funding  Three years of funding Visibility  Political, community, professional Political Support  State policy  At least annual (prefer twice a year) presentation to board/superintendent/governor.

Core Functions of Leadership Team Trainers  State and regional access to training at all three tiers of PBIS  Build capacity for every district to conduct annual training orientation  State-wide annual forum Coaching Cadre  Coaches training, state forum  Define job description of coach Behavioral Expertise  School –psychologist, counselor, social worker, administrator  Skills in FBA, Behavior Support development, data collection and use. Evaluation Plan  Fidelity data  Student behavioral data  Student academic data

Coaching Defined Coaching is the active and iterative delivery of: ◦ (a) prompts that increase successful behavior, and ◦ (b) corrections that decrease unsuccessful behavior. ◦ Coaching is done by someone with credibility and experience with the target skill(s) ◦ Coaching is done on-site, in real time ◦ Coaching is done after initial training ◦ Coaching is done repeatedly (e.g. monthly) ◦ Coaching intensity is adjusted to need

Outcomes of Coaching Fluency with trained skills Adaptation of trained concepts/skills to local contexts and challenges  And new challenges that arise Rapid redirection from miss-applications Increased fidelity of overall implementation Improved sustainability  Most often due to ability to increase coaching intensity at critical points in time.

Training Outcomes Related to Training Components Training Outcomes Training Components Knowledge of Content Skill Implementation Classroom Application Presentation/ Lecture Plus Demonstration Plus Practice Plus Coaching/ Admin Support Data Feedback 10% 5% 0% 30% 20% 0% 60% 60% 5% 95% 95% 95% Joyce & Showers, 2002

Example of the Impact of Coaching on Student Outcomes: Average Major Discipline Referrals per Day per Month Coach returns from leave Coach goes on leave

Demonstrations Initial demonstrations  Fidelity is possible  Outcomes are desired and useful Pockets of supported demonstrations  Located where there is training expertise or money Building regional capacity

PBIS in Illinois July 17, 2008 Developing Local Systems of Care for Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Needs and their Families Training Institutes Nashville, TN Lucille Eber Ed.D. IL PBIS Network

PBIS Schools Over Ten Years: Trained & Partially or Fully Implementing

# External Coaches

# IL PBIS Schools & # External Coaches June 30, 2008

# IL PBIS Schools & # Ext. & Int. Coaches June 30, 2008

Steve Goodman

Participating Schools 2004 Schools (21) 2005 Schools (31) 2006 Schools (50) 2000 Model Demonstration Schools (5) 2009 Shifting to Regional Training Model

DIBELS Instructional Recommendations and Major Discipline Referral per Cohort per Year DIBELS Benchmark Major Discipline Referrals

Participating School Example: Fourth Grade Reading MEAP Results Began MiBLSi Implementation

North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative Partners’ Update February 2009 Heather R. Reynolds NC Department of Public Instruction Bob Algozzine Behavior and Reading Improvement Center

State PBS Coordinator Heather R Reynolds

North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative Dr. Bob Algozzine Schools with Low ODRs and High Academic Outcomes

Stages of Implementation Exploration Installation Initial Implementation Full Implementation Innovation Sustainability Implementation occurs in stages: Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, – 4 Years

Valued Outcomes Practice Implementation Identifying & Modifying Practices Efficiency EffectivenessPriority Continuous Regeneration Continuous Measurement Data- Based Prob. Solving Capacity Building

Considerations for Next Steps Build Political Commitment ◦ Policy recommendations  Send to every district  Send to state department ◦ Administrator Academy ◦ Summer institute for coaches/trainers

Considerations for Next Steps Leadership Team  Do we have the right people on the team?  Do we have the administrative representatives we need?  Do we have the FTE for “coordination” that will allow leadership team decisions to produce action?

Considerations for Next Steps Trainer Capacity  What is needed to build trainer capacity at district/regional level?  Consider both initial training, and on-going training  Do districts/ regions have the capacity for annual training as part of Fall orientation?  Do districts/ regions have the capacity for advanced training in behavior support and data-based decision- making.

Considerations for Next Steps Coaching Capacity  Build coaching job description  Build coaching expectations/ ratio recommendation  Annual trainer/coaching training (forum)

Considerations for Next Steps Behavioral Expertise  State- very strong  District/ Region: unclear  School building:  Is there someone who can do a simple FBA?  Do schools have team structure to use FBA info for BIP design and implementation?  Do schools have information system needed to manage BIP?

Considerations for Next Steps Evaluation  State/ District/ School evaluation plan  Measures of fidelity  Measures of student behavior outcomes  SWIS  CICO-SWIS  ISIS  Academic behavior  District Level Capacity Evaluation  DSSP

Considerations for Next Steps Funding  ARRA  SPDG  Safe & Drug Free  State IDEA  Mental Health  Title I

Considerations for Next Steps Demonstrations  Schools using PBS  Districts with Capacity  Building sustainability at district, region, state

Considerations for Next Steps Linking RtI and PBIS efforts.  Core features  Common assessment, organization and evaluation