SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms. Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Advertisements

Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
High Quality Child Outcomes Data in Early Childhood: More Important than Ever Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International Christina Kasprzak, Frank Porter Graham.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
Welcome! Review of the National Part C APR Indicator 4 Family Data FFY 2011 ( ) Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, DaSy Melissa Raspa, ECTA.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 3 (State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report – State Systemic Improvement Plan)
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report SPP/APR State Systemic Improvement Plan SSIP / Indicator 17.
SSIP Phase I: Data Analysis Part C/619 State Accountability Priority Area April 8, 2014.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Targets & Improvement Activities State Improvement Planning Carol Massanari, MPRRC Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
TIP Webinar Targeted Improvement Planning. ILCD EDN Guidance Document First document to review in preparation for your TIP development. The questions.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems What Practitioners Need to Know about Measuring EI and ECSE Outcomes Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International.
State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.
California Stakeholder Group State Performance and Personnel Development Plan Stakeholders January 29-30, 2007 Sacramento, California Radisson Hotel Welcome.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
SSIP Process A Suggested Pathway, Timeline and Gantt Chart WRRC Regional Forum Eugene October 31 and November 1, 2013.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 5. Agenda for Today Stakeholder involvement Review Draft SSIP –Baseline Data / Target setting –Introduction –Data.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
Arizona State Systemic Improvement Plan Update State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report  All indicators are still significant and will be.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
1 STATE SYSTEMIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN Early Intervention Colorado Technical Assistance Call April 3, 2014.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.
Infrastructure Analysis: Part C Christina Kasprzak, ECTA, DaSy Verna Thompson, Early Development and Learning Resources, Delaware Joicey Hurth, NERRC and.
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 2 (State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report – State Systemic Improvement Plan)
SPP/APR - SSIP Stakeholders Meeting # 4. Agenda for Today What’s New –OSEP Evaluation Tool –Updated timeline Workgroups Report Out –Data –Infrastructure.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
Region 1 PTAC Regional Conference
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
SPR&I Regional Training
Leveraging Evaluation Data: Leading Data-Informed Discussions to Guide SSIP Decisionmaking Welcome Mission of IDC- we provide technical assistance to build.
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Promoting Child & Family Outcomes through Partnerships between
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Using the Child and Family Outcomes Analysis Tools
Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.
Presentation transcript:

SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms

Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent –Parents (Yellow) –B23 Providers (Purple) –Education (Pink) –Health and Well-being (Blue) –Lead Agency (White) Who is NOT here? (Please pass the sign in sheet around)

What do you need? Group Rules? Breaks? Handouts? Web site? Summaries? Outside TA? ??? We can revisit this anytime.

We’ve learned a lot 2003-Present Focused Monitoring Stakeholders Focused Monitoring Stakeholders SPP/APP v1.0 NCSEAM COS SPP/APP v1.0 NCSEAM COS

Two Minute Overview General Supervision

Agenda for Today Work backwards from April 1, 2015 What is required? Broad infrastructure analysis Broad data analysis Move in on a SiMR How do you want to be involved? Create workgroups and deliverables? Plans for future meetings

By 4/1/15 Click Commit – using “Grads360” online format only… Finalize sections based on feedback Post draft sections for public comment Get final input from ALL stakeholders Complete “musts” for each section Coherent Improvement Strategies Finalize SiMR and Theory of Action Narrow data and infrastructure analysis Rough SiMR guides “drill down” Broad data and infrastructure analysis Mid March February 28 February January December October August

The Instructions Phase I: Analysis MUST include: –Data Analysis –Analysis of State Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity –State-identified Measurable Result(s) for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and their Families –Selection of Coherent Improvement Strategies –Theory of Action (graphic…)

Theory of Action Graphic A graphic illustration that shows the rationale of how implementing the coherent set of improvement strategies selected will increase the State’s capacity to lead meaningful change in EIS programs and/or EIS providers, and achieve improvement in the State-identified Measurable Result(s) for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and their Families.

Theory of Action Graphic If we implement a statewide initiative that focuses on… Build the capacity of providers to implement it with fidelity Then families will be more confident and gain new skills which, help their children develop and learn.

The Instructions Phase I: Analysis MUST include: –Data Analysis –Analysis of State Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity –State-identified Measurable Result(s) for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and their Families –Selection of Coherent Improvement Strategies –Theory of Action (graphic…)

Improvement Strategies The improvement strategies should include the strategies, identified through the Data and State Infrastructure Analyses, that are needed to improve the State infrastructure and to support EIS program and/or EIS provider implementation of evidence-based practices to improve the State- identified result(s) for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families.

Improvement Strategies The State MUST describe how –implementation of the improvement strategies will –address identified root causes for low performance and ultimately –build EIS program and/or EIS provider capacity –to achieve the SiMR.

The Instructions Phase I: Analysis MUST include: –Data Analysis –Analysis of State Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity –State-identified Measurable Result(s) for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and their Families –Selection of Coherent Improvement Strategies –Theory of Action (graphic…)

SiMR A statement of the result(s) the State intends to achieve through the implementation of the SSIP. …must be aligned to an SPP/APR indicator or a component of an SPP/APR indicator … must be a child- or family-level outcome in contrast to a process outcome

The Instructions Phase I: Analysis MUST include: –Data Analysis –Analysis of State Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity –State-identified Measurable Result(s) for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and their Families –Selection of Coherent Improvement Strategies –Theory of Action (graphic…)

Infrastructure Analysis MUST….at a minimum Governance Fiscal (LEANed) Quality standards Professional development Data Technical assistance Accountability/monitoring a) strengths of the systems b) the extent to which the systems are coordinated c) areas for improvement within and across the systems. a) strengths of the systems b) the extent to which the systems are coordinated c) areas for improvement within and across the systems.

Infrastructure Analysis The State MUST also identify… current State-level improvement plans and other early learning initiatives and describe…. the extent to which these initiatives are aligned, and… how they are, or could be, integrated with, the SSIP.

Infrastructure Analysis Lead Agency –Personnel and Practice Dathan Rush and M’Lisa Sheldon –Family Supports Social Emotional/DECA – TACSEI - IMH OEC –Home Visiting Triple P Circles of Security Strengthening Families

Infrastructure Analysis The State must also identify… current State-level improvement plans and other early learning initiatives

The Instructions Phase I: Analysis MUST include: –Data Analysis –Analysis of State Infrastructure to Support Improvement and Build Capacity –State-identified Measurable Result(s) for Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities and their Families –Selection of Coherent Improvement Strategies –Theory of Action (graphic…)

Data Analysis A description of how the State analyzed key data, (SPP, 618, other) as applicable, to: (1)select the SiMR, and (2)identify root causes contributing to low performance. The description MUST include information about how the data were disaggregated by multiple variables (e.g., EIS program, geographic region, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, etc.) These five examples may be “MUSTs”

Data Analysis Finally, if additional data are needed, the description should include the methods and timelines to collect and analyze the additional data. We have the option to collect better data and reset our baseline if needed.

Data Analysis

By 4/1/15 Click Commit – using “Grads360” online format only… Finalize sections based on feedback Post draft sections for public comment Get final input from ALL stakeholders Complete “musts” for each section Coherent Improvement Strategies Finalize SiMR and Theory of Action Narrow data and infrastructure analysis Rough SiMR guides “drill down” Broad data and infrastructure analysis Mid March February 28 February January December October August

Next Steps Workgroups? (Data, Infrastructure) Web conferences? SSIP Webpage? August 11 October 27 December 8 All here