Presenters Marshall A. Hill Executive Director National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rhode Island Board of Governors for Higher Education
Advertisements

Policies for Nonprofit Boards Dan Rollman August 18, 2011.
Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
1 Higher Education Opportunity Act: Implications for the PRR Ellie A. Fogarty – Vice President Barbara Samuel Loftus – Vice President MSCHE PRR Workshop.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
International Telecommuniction Regulations 1 WG-ITR Council Working Group on ITRs General Overview Alaa M. Fahmy Chairman.
CRI- Common Review Initiative Reducing Lender Review Redundancy.
Credit When Its Due February 7, 2013 Webinar Hosted by:
1 September 27 and October 1, Introduction Jenny Hartfelder– Speaker, Rocky Mountain WEA Janet Hurley Cann– Speaker-Elect, WEA of South Carolina.
Banking Union and the single supervisory mechanism (SSM) Meeting of the ad-hoc working party on the banking supervision mechanism, September 2012.
William H. Bowen School of Law. service – learning program of two schools UALR Bowen School of Law University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service.
Electronic Campus The Approval Process April 24, 2013.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
REL Appalachia and the Virginia Middle School Research Alliance Justin Baer, Director, REL Appalachia Virginia School-University Partnership Steering Committee.
Pennsylvania Association of School Business Officials Smart Business + Informed Decisions = Great Schools CAREER DAY 1 Careers in School Business Management.
Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
UPDATE ON STATE AUTHORIZATION FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION: REGULATIONS & RECIPROCITY Legal Issues in Higher Education December 12, 2013 WICHE Cooperative for.
Today’s Speakers The State of State Authorization: Regulations and Reciprocity Council of College and Military Educators January 29, 2015.
2012 State Board of Directors Orientation “Its good business to do business with an AGC member”
Making Opportunity Affordable Grant
Trustees Academy August 30, 2010 Indiana Commission for Higher Education HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING IN INDIANA: THE ROLE OF THE INDIANA COMMISSION FOR HIGHER.
Credentialing, Accreditation, Certification, Registration, and Licensure: What does it all mean? Donna Nowakowski, MS, RN Associate Executive Director.
SREB State Authorization Advisory Committee Meeting April 30-May 1, 2013 Atlanta.
Southern Regional Education Board Cheryl Blanco, Vice President, Special Projects Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)
Southern Regional Education Board Corpus Christi, Texas April 3, 2014 State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) A Regional and National View Texas.
State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement - What Now? - Why Now? - How? Now? David Longanecker, WICHE President Jere Mock, Vice President of Programs &
Presenters Marshall A. Hill Executive Director National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder,
Surviving the State Authorization Roller Coaster Ride DETC Fall Workshop October 16, 2012.
Tracking SARA: An Update on the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement November 14, 2012.
SARA: New Jersey Update. What is SARA  A uniform method across the nation which establishes a state-level reciprocity process to serve all interested.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Past, Present & Likely Future of State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) March 2, 2015.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Session #34 Program Integrity: Institutional and Program Eligibility: State Authorization Sophia McArdle Fred Sellers U.S. Department of Education Note:
Emerging Policy Issues in Distance Learning SHEEO Annual Meeting July, Seattle, Washington Marshall A. Hill Executive Director, Nebraska Coordinating.
Today’s Speakers The State of State Authorization: Regulations and Reciprocity OCICU Conference March 2015.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
THE ROLE OF EDUCATIONAL ACCREDITATION IN LICENSURE MOBILITY Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards Atlanta, Georgia May 2, 2008 Joseph Brimhall, D.C.
Who is SARA? And should I know her?. SARA  S tate A uthorization R eciprocity A greement  Establishes comparable national standards for interstate offering.
July 18, 2014 Jenny Parks, Director, M-SARA, Midwestern Higher Education Compact (MHEC) 1.
Establishing SARA, the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement WCET State Authorization Network November 13-14, 2013 Denver, CO.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
“SARA:” State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement A Process To Make State Authorization More Uniform, Effective and Efficient April, 2012.
The State of State Authorization: Results of a National Inventory Marianne Boeke National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS) DETC.
“State Authorization” of Distance Education Challenges/Barriers/Opportunities Shellie L. Haut September 16, 2015.
October 14, 2015 Michigan Workshop on the Midwestern State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (M-SARA) University Club, Michigan State University 1.
October 14, 2015 Michigan Workshop on the Midwestern State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (M-SARA) University Club, Michigan State University 1.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
SREB Educational Technology Cooperative 2015 Spring Workshop Series State Authorization Update Wanda Barker – Director Educational Technology Cooperative.
An Overview of State Authorization and SARA An MCCA Webinar Wednesday, November 4, 2015.
CONNECT Events and Groups LEARN News and Views ADVANCE Policies and Practices New Federal Regulations on State Authorization of Distance Education Distance.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Todd Digby Minnesota State Colleges & Universities.
SECRRA and SARA Updates March 4,
North Carolina Community College System 2016 DL Directors Institute March 14, 2016.
Pennsylvania SARA Meeting
SARA Gets You Out of Jeopardy!
SARA: Past, Present, and Future
Private Institution Regulation by SCHEV
SARA State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement for Distance Education
State Authorization and SARA: How Did We Get Here?
Jacek Gdański Accounting Department
DE Coordinator’s November 2012 Telephone Meeting
MoKanSAN Summit Kansas City, Missouri January 8, 2018.
Legal Issues in Higher Education December 12, 2013 Russ Poulin
Florida Association of Veteran Education Specialists (FAVES 2016)
Mary Larson Director, Student Access Programs and Services
Welcome to the NC-SARA Webcast SARA Notification Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Presenters Marshall A. Hill Executive Director National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder, Colorado Mary A. Larson Director, S-SARA Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) th Street N.W. Atlanta, GA ext

Acknowledgement Funding for design and national and regional implementation provided by Lumina Foundation. 3

What’s the problem? States and territories regulate higher education within their borders, with varying requirements for out-of-state institutions that want to do business in the state. Cross-state online education offered by colleges and universities is expanding dramatically. At present there is no alternative to each institution separately pursuing any needed approvals (state authorization) in each state and territory where it enrolls students. Consequently, thousands of institutions are required to contact and work through as many as 54 states and territories, and, sometimes, with multiple regulatory agencies in those states. That process is inefficient, costly, and not effective in supporting access to high quality distance education throughout the country. 4

Goals SARA establishes a state-level reciprocity process that will support the nation in its efforts to increase the educational attainment of its people by making state authorization: more efficient, effective, and uniform in regard to necessary and reasonable standards of practice that could span states; more effective in dealing with quality and integrity issues that have arisen in some online/distance education offerings; and less costly for states and institutions and, thereby, the students they serve. 5

The Solution A nation-wide system of reciprocity administered by the four existing regional compacts. 6 MHEC NEBHE SREB WICHE

National Council for SARA (NC-SARA) Purposes – coordination, appeals, financing, data. 21 members – regional compact presidents, accreditors, regulators, state government, SHEEO, various higher education sectors. First meeting November 1, Consideration of by-laws. Financial overview for SARA. Establish fees for institutional participation in SARA. –$2,000/year for institutions with fewer than 2,500 FTE students –$4,000/year for institutions between 2,500-9,999 FTE students –$6,000/year for institutions with 10,000 or more FTE students Review and endorse regional SARA documents. Regional status reports. 7

National Council for SARA (NC-SARA) NC-SARA meeting May 14, 2014 Proposed agenda: Progress report on the SARA initiative Adopt by-laws. Elect executive committee. Set policies for: data collection, complaint tracking, distribution of institutional fee revenue, and institutions found in violation of state and/or federal laws. Legal status of NC-SARA (501c3). 8

Essential principles of SARA Voluntary for states and institutions. Acknowledges the traditional roles within higher education’s “accountability triad”: federal government, states, and accrediting bodies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Lays out a framework for state-level reciprocity, including a governance structure, implementation by the four regional higher education compacts (MHEC, NEBHE, SREB, WICHE), a National Council for SARA to ensure comprehensive national coverage, and a financial plan to support operations. Requires states to approve their in-state institutions for SARA participation (based upon institutional accreditation and financial stability) and resolve student complaints. SARA states agree to impose no additional (non-SARA) fees or requirements on institutions from other SARA states. 9

Essential principles of SARA Open to degree-granting postsecondary institutions from all sectors: public colleges and universities; independent institutions, both non-profit and for-profit. Sets forth a reasonable, uniform set of triggers of “physical presence”. Preserves state approval and oversight of on-the-ground campuses. Shifts principal oversight responsibilities from the state in which the distance education is being received to the “home state” of the institution offering the instruction. (Host state can also work to resolve problems.) Initial funding from Lumina Foundation, eventual reliance on institutional fees paid to the National Council for SARA. 10

Issues SARA does not resolve Professional licensing board approvals needed for distance education programs intended to lead to licensure: nursing, teacher education, psychology, etc. Online offerings provided free and beyond the scope of current regulation of the degree programs of accredited academic institutions (free, non-credit MOOCs, etc.). 11

Who has been involved in crafting SARA? SARA was developed with input from: A broad advisory committee. Regional higher education compacts (MHEC, NEBHE, SREB, WICHE). State regulators of postsecondary education. State Higher Education Executive Officers. Accrediting organizations. U.S. Department of Education. Institutional leaders representing all sectors of higher education. 12

The evolution of SARA Lumina Foundation provided funding to the Presidents’ Forum, working with the Council of State Governments (CSG), to develop a Model State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) that states could adopt to acknowledge other states’ work and decisions in regard to institutional authorization. Building upon the work of the Presidents’ Forum and CSG, the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE) advanced “W-SARA” in collaboration with the other regional higher education compacts (SREB, MHEC, NEBHE). Combining all prior efforts and input from all stakeholders, the Commission on the Regulation of Postsecondary Distance Education, founded by SHEEO and APLU, and chaired by former Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley, issued its report: “Advancing Access through Regulatory Reform: Findings, Principles, and Recommendations for the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA).” Implementation funding provided by Lumina Foundation NC-SARA established fall

What do states need to do to join SARA? Determine if the state wants to participate. Make any needed changes to statutes or rules. Identify in-state entity to solicit and approve participation of in- state institutions and resolve complaints (SARA “portal agency”) Adopt in-state funding model (if needed). Develop and submit SARA application to the state’s regional compact. Ensure ability to carry out SARA responsibilities: approving institutions to participate, respond to complaints, etc. 14

Benefits to states Expands educational offerings to state residents. Allows SARA states to focus on their home-state institutions, rather than on institutions from other SARA states. Maintains state regulation of on-the-ground instruction offered by out-of-state institutions. Other SARA states will help resolve complaints. (SARA states commit to resolving complaints stemming from distance education offered by their institutions.) Reduces costs for institutions, lessening this particular need to raise fees and thereby supporting affordability. No fees charged to states to participate in SARA. 15

Benefits to institutions Enables more efficient provision of distance education to a broader market. Reduces number of applications to other states. Reduces number of other-state regulations to monitor for changes. Reduces costs. Applications, surety bonds, agent licenses, etc. Staff (payroll and time). Reduced costs = potentially lower fees for students. 16

Benefits to students Expands access to educational offerings. Should lead to better resolution of complaints from students in SARA states. Reduces a rapidly growing institutional cost that is in one way or another passed along to students. Should enhance overall quality of distance education 17

18

Learn more about SARA NC-SARA website: To receive our newsletter, sign up at: Regional Education Compacts: MHEC – NEBHE – SREB – WICHE – 19

Learn more about SARA Marshall A. Hill, Ph.D. Executive Director National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder, CO l Sandra J. Doran, Esq. ​ Director, N-SARA New England Board of Higher Education 45 Temple Place Boston, MA ​ l ​ Rhonda M. Epper, Ph.D. Director, W-SARA Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE) 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder, CO l Mary A. Larson, M.Ed. Director, S-SARA Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) th Street N.W. Atlanta, GA ext. 219 l Jennifer L. Parks, M.A. Director, M-SARA Midwestern Higher Education Compact (MHEC) 105 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN l 20