Descartes’ Meditations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ontological Argument
Advertisements

Michael Lacewing The Idea of God Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
How do we describe God? Howard Culbertson Southern Nazarene University.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to summarise the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain the Cosmological and Ontological.
The ontological argument
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ Meditations. Four bulldozers of doubt: –I can’t trust my senses –I could be crazy –I could be dreaming –A malicious demon could be out to fool.
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
The Ontological Argument
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
Bigquestions.co.uk1 meditation 3, the trademark argument perfection.
The first proof for God’s existence I have an idea of God (an infinite, perfect being. The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as objectively.
Why Study Early Modern Philosophy? a) academic--steppingstone for later phil. studies. Nec. niche in humanities degree. b) philosophically interesting—touch.
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
Meditation One What is the objective of the Meditations? Hint: look at second sentence of Med. I.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
Descartes on scepticism
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
Results from Meditation 2
The Ontological Proof (II) We have seen that, if someone wishes to challenge the soundness of the Modal Ontological, he denies the truth of the second.
Descartes’ Epistemology
PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy March 25 th Chapter Five, ‘God’
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
TA Q&A Sessions Tomorrow/Tuesday, February 26 th : 5:30-7pm – Randolph 120 (Ryan & Curtis) 7-8:30pm – Randolph 120 (David & Ashley) Anyone can go to either.
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
An analysis of Kant’s argument against the Cartesian skeptic in his ‘Refutation of Idealism” Note: Audio links to youtube are found on my blog at matthewnevius.wordpress.com.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
(not about ships this time)
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
Rene Descartes The Father of Modern Philosophy
Cartesian Circle General Meaning: The veil of ideas that separates us from the external world in the Mind’s Eye Model, the general difficulty of trying.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
The essence of material things and the ontological argument.
The Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
The Ontological Argument
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
A Mickey Mouse Guide to the Ontological Argument
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Descartes -- Meditations Three
The Ontological Argument
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error
Presentation transcript:

Descartes’ Meditations

Descartes’ Structure of Belief What does he know with absolute certainty? ? God exists I exist (as a thinking thing)

Why try to prove God exists? Intellectual interest. Divine Epistemological Certifier: Are any of my beliefs accurate? God wouldn’t let me be radically deceived.

Divine Epistemological Certifier If God wouldn’t let me be radically deceived, then how come I make mistakes in my perceptions? The mistakes are my fault, not God’s (p. 39). They are not mistakes of perception, but of jumping to a conclusion.

Divine Epistemological Certifier God certifies my perceptions when I don’t jump to conclusions: If I “clearly and distinctly perceive” that something is so, then it necessarily is so (pp. 46 & 24!). What does it mean to “clearly and distinctly perceive”?

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: Why a second proof? The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence.

The “Ontological” Argument St. Anselm (1033-1109)

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. Is this a good argument?

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. What does “perfections” mean? A positive quality to a maximal degree.

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. Is it a valid argument? Are the premisses both true?

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. The concept of God includes existence. = God exists?

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. Does the concept of God include all perfections? That’s what we mean by “God”.

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. Is existence a perfection? What does that mean?

Perfect Vacation Spot Warm, breezy Not crowded Inexpensive It exists!

Perfect Vacation Spot Does this prove the perfect vacation spot exists? No: Since the “perfect” vacation spot doesn’t have all perfections. Only God has all perfections, so this only works to prove that God exists. Rats!

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. A perfection is a positive quality to a maximal degree. But is existence a quality?

Perfect Vacation Spot What does that add to the picture? Warm, breezy Not crowded Inexpensive It exists What does that add to the picture?

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. Is existence a quality? Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) No!

Existence is not a quality: “There is a small, red ball.” In Logic: (x)(Sx & Rx & Bx). S (small), R (red), and B (being a ball) are all qualities, but not  (existence) is not.

Descartes’ Second Proof of God’s Existence: The concept of God includes all perfections. Existence is a perfection.  God has existence. Is this a good argument? Why did Descartes give this second proof? Doesn’t need the Adequacy Hypothesis.

Divine Epistemological Certifier Having established the existence of God, the divine epistemological certifier, we can then go on to establish the existence of other things that we clearly and distinctly perceive. Such as??? Perhaps mathematics? Logic? What about the proofs of God’s existence?

Can we be confident of the proofs of God’s existence? The Problem of Evil: God is all-powerful (Omnipotent) God is all-loving (Omnibenevolent) God is all-knowing (Omniscient) There is evil in the world. (Those can’t all be true at the same time.) A perfect (“Omni”) God does not exist!

Can we be confident of the proofs of God’s existence? Why should we be confident of the proofs? Because I can clearly and distinctly perceive that they are sound. But that is an assurance of their accuracy only once we’ve established that a perfect God exists. We don’t know that a perfect God exists until we’ve given the proof. The Cartesian Circle.

Can we be confident of the proofs of God’s existence? We can be sure of the accuracy of our clear and distinct perceptions once we’ve proven God exists. But we can’t prove that God exists without relying on the accuracy of our clear and distinct perceptions. Perhaps we really can’t get beyond our own existence as a thinking thing when we set such stringent requirements for ourselves.

Divine Epistemological Certifier You need a divine certifier to establish the proof that there is a divine certifier. It looks like we’re spinning our wheels!

Divine Epistemological Certifier If I “clearly and distinctly perceive” that something is so, then it necessarily is so (p. 46). More problems: Do I always know with absolute certainty when I have clearly and distinctly perceived something? Dow Financial Certifier: “Buy low and sell high!”

“Buy low and sell high!” Useless advice. But… How do I know when it’s low, and when it’s high? Useless advice.

Divine Epistemological Certifier If I “clearly and distinctly perceive” that something is so, then it necessarily is so (p. 46). More problems: Do I always know with absolute certainty when I have clearly and distinctly perceived something? No! Pp. 24-5, & 47.