The Event The Fort Collins flood was the biggest natural disaster to ever affect the city (in 130 years of record). Largest 24-hour rainfall ever to fall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report to TACIR on Underground Utility Damage Prevention in Tennessee
Advertisements

Addition Facts
Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
Golf Course Construction Planning TRF 250 Golf/Sports Field Construction.
Library System Funding & Capital Projects Budget Issues Workshop February 21, 2012.
Agent Breakout What You and Your Clients Need to Know about Rising Risks, Rising Rates, and Their Effects on Rebuilding Decisions.
Changes Coming to the National Flood Insurance Program – What to Expect Impact of changes to the NFIP under Section 205 of the Biggert-Waters Act.
Still River Study Sponsored by Friends of the Lake Presented by Curtis Read November 17th, 2005.
3.2.3 Coping with the Effects of Disaster: The Bulaon Resettlement Project in Pampanga, Philippines 1 UPA Package 3, Module 2 COPING WITH THE EFFECTS OF.
Floodplain Management in the Post Disaster Environment
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
A Watershed Approach to Environmental Restoration in Mecklenburg County David A. Woodie, PE, CPSWQ Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services.
Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Master Program Update: Process Overview City of Benton City August 30,
Local Policy I Session Name: Local Policy I Coastal Hazards Management Course I. Introduction What Do We Mean By “Local Policy” General Police Power Session.
Hazard Mitigation Planning I Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning I Coastal Hazards Management Course Signed by the President on October 30, 2000 Amends.
FEMA PROGRAMS II Session Name: FEMA Programs II Coastal Hazards Management Course Amends the Stafford Act Establishes a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program.
IV. 1 IV. Overview Of State Standards A.SS1-97: Requirement for Flood Study Technical Documentation.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Individual Assistance Preliminary Damage Assessment Preliminary Damage AssessmentTrain-the-Trainer 1Train-the-Trainer 2011.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1 No Adverse Impact presented by Larry Larson, CFM Executive Director Association of State Floodplain Managers A Common Sense Strategy for Floodplain Management.
“Not your parents flood program “.  – information for the National Flood Program.  – digital flood.
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.  Legal means for communities to set standards for regulating floodplain development  Dependent upon type of mapping.
Sandy: Building Back Stronger, Safer & More Resilient Tim Crowley, Director, Mitigation Division, FEMA Region II December 2012.
May 22, 2012 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Flood Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Plan ASFPM 2012 Annual Conference Timothy J. Trautman, P.E., CFM Flood Mitigation.
William Solecki City University of New York – Hunter College
FEMA NFIP Community Rating System and Crediting Tsunami Mitigation Mike Mahoney, FEMA Mitigation.
The Risk is Real… Be PREPARED! Robert Billings, PE, PH, CFM Flood Mitigation Project Manager Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services May 18, 2011 Briar.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
Flood Risk Mapping Project Identifying the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [COMMUNITY NAME] Flood Risk Mapping Project.
Understanding Advisory Base Flood Elevations (ABFEs) Understanding Advisory Information and the Implications for Your Home December 2012.
FEMA’s Role in National Water Policy Supporting National Water Resource Policy Introduction Sandra K. Knight National Waterways Conference September 22-24,
Cedar Falls home in the floodway. Brand new homes built in the floodplain by current rules, all had 4 feet of water in their living rooms.
New Directions in Water Policy: Environmental Perspectives on NFIP, Floodplain Mapping and Federal Water Resource Policies David R. Conrad Sr. Water Resources.
Osceola County Floodplain Program
How to Use This Presentation Sharing the benefits of flood insurance to both current and potential clients will help you grow your book of business. Use.
Flooding & Drainage Committee May 16,  Participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)  Participate in the Community Rating System.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Unit 1 Community Capabilities
Higher Regulatory Standards Series 430. Higher Regulatory Standards 432 Elements Dougherty County (2007 Manual) – Total Points: 2740 – Activity 430.
Advisory Base Flood Elevations: What Your Community Needs to Know Information for Floodplain Managers and Local Officials.
FEMA Region VIII Reducing Losses through Higher Regulatory Standards 2013 Colorado Floods Case Study May 2015 HMTAP HSFEHQ-09-D-1129 / 14-J-0003.
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Central Valley Flood Protection Board August 9, 2013 Presented by: Michael Mierzwa California Department of Water Resources DWR’s Involvement in Flood.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting October 2005 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION V
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [date] V [COMMUNITY NAME] FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
Risk MAP and Resilience Mari Radford, CFM, Mitigation Planner Alison Kearns, CFM, Community Planner FEMA Region III.
Planning under the Growth Management Act
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
The July 28,1997 Fort Collins Flood: Putting the Stormwater System to the Test How Did it Serve to Minimize Societal Impact? Matt Kelsch Hydrometeorologist.
ASFPM Conference – May Shifting Our Focus from Maps to Risk William L. Coulbourne, P.E. Applied Technology Council (ATC)
Larimer County Floodplain Regulation Summary and History Board of County Commissioners Worksession January 12, 2015.
Board of County Commissioners October 14, 2008 Vinzant Landing Swallet Santa Fe River.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Preliminary Engineering Analysis and Design Foxcroft Colony and Mosby Woods Condominiums Prepared for: City Council Work Session November 3, 2015.
City Council Workshop March 27, 2014 Debbie Vascik, CFM Cahoon Consulting.
Osceola County Floodplain Program Jennifer Nicholson, CFM Picture credit: Osceola Historical Society.
City of Fort Collins REGULATORY CHANGES AFTER A NATURAL DISASTER Susan L. Duba Hayes, PE, CFM CASFM 2005.
2017 HAMPTON ROADS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE BRIEFING
What is TFMA? Organization of professionals with a wide range of experience and expertise. Our Purpose, Mission, and Goals: Facilitate sound floodplain.
Flood Damage Prevention Code Update
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Oklahoma CRS Workgroup and CRS Program Update
Water Quality Protection Zones
One Company. Unlimited Potential.
Presentation transcript:

City of Fort Collins REGULATORY CHANGES AFTER A NATURAL DISASTER Susan L. Duba Hayes, PE, CFM

The Event The Fort Collins flood was the biggest natural disaster to ever affect the city (in 130 years of record). Largest 24-hour rainfall ever to fall on a Colorado urban area. (Total rainfall: 14.5” in 31 hours) $250m in total damage. Flow on Spring Creek exceeded the 500-year event.

The Day After

Ft. Collins Floodplain Facts: Before the Flood Approximately 3,280 acres of floodplain and 1,828 structures located in the 100-year floodplain. Four FEMA designated floodplains and three locally designated floodplains. Regulated to a higher standard than FEMA. Rated as a Class 6 by CRS. Capital Project program to fund drainage projects. EXISTING HIGH CALIBER PROGRAM

WE WERE STILL CRITICIZED Citizens asked: Why did you let us (or them) build there? Why didn’t you tell us we were at risk? Why didn’t the irrigation canals capture all the water? How could you let this happen to us? Why didn’t you plan for bigger storms? We’re in a “preferred storm track”. REGULATION CHANGES WERE DRIVEN BY CITIZENS

Regulatory Changes Two Major Initiatives Rainfall Higher 100-year rainfall adopted in 1999 (less than 2 years from flood) 2007 – rainfall standard re-visited and upheld. Floodplain Regulations Poudre River – adopted in 2000 (three years from flood) Remainder of City – adopted in 2005 (almost 8 years from the flood, 3 years of outreach!) Poudre River – revised downward in 2007 (10 years later)

Rainfall (Round One) January 1998, Utilities began reevaluation of rainfall. Task Force guided the study. Could not wait for NOAA’s revised study to be completed in 3-5 years, (still not started). City embarked on own study.

Variety of Opinions Regulatory agencies: Technical Experts: Federal Emergency Mgmt. Agency Colorado Water Conservation Board Larimer County City of Fort Collins Utilities Colorado State University Facilities Fort Collins Water Board Technical Experts: Colorado State University: Atmospheric Science Department Engineering Department Statistics Department Local Consultant Interested Citizens: Planning and Zoning Board member Citizen flooded in 1997

FINAL RECOMMENDATION Increased 100-year design storm by 27%. Minority group within the Task Force wanted an even higher rainfall. Had regional effect: adopted by Wellington, Larimer County, and Windsor. Placed added responsibility on the City to update all floodplains except the Poudre River.

Floodplain Regulation Revisions: Round One Poudre River was first. Discharge wouldn’t change because of new rainfall values Perceived as greatest flood threat to the community Potential for “lost opportunities” Strong push by environmentalists to reevaluate regulations (citizen initiated).

Task Force Members City Advisory Boards Business Interests Environmental and Recreation Interests Technical Experts Real Estate Interests Floodplain Property Owner Emergency Response

DIFFICULT TO CONVEY COMPLEX TECHNICAL ISSUES TO LAY PEOPLE Complex Issues Floodway Width Floodway Modification Flood Protection Projects Property Purchase Notification Fill Removal from Floodplain New Development Mobile Home Parks Residential/ Commercial Development Remodels Additions Redevelopment Critical Facilities Riparian Areas Dry Land Access Floatable Materials Variances Lowest Floor Elevation DIFFICULT TO CONVEY COMPLEX TECHNICAL ISSUES TO LAY PEOPLE

Result: More Restrictive Regulations Product Corridor ( 500 year Depth x Velocity > 6) One-tenth foot floodway Higher Freeboard – 2 feet More restrictions on uses in floodway and Product Corridor Dryland access required Floatable materials restricted

Floodplain Regulations: Round 2 Started in 2002, after new floodplains mapped. Now had 3600 acres of floodplain with 3300 structures at risk. No Task Force. Recommended changes generated by City staff.

Staff’s Approach to Floodplain Regulations Balance risk with regulation Map a floodway where practical More restrictive regulations in the floodway area, less restrictive in the flood fringe More restrictive for new development, less restrictive for existing development More restrictive for residential, less restrictive for nonresidential

Result: Some Regulations Are More Restrictive No new residential in floodway. No new mobile home parks in floodplain. Non-residential: no new basements in floodway.

Result: Most Changes Less Restrictive Changed No-Rise floodplains to FW/FF. Reduced freeboard to 6” for remodel/additions to existing structures. Critical facilities allowed in 100-year Moderate Risk. General Manager can waive regulations in city floodplains if a capital project is underway. Substantial Improvement: No longer cumulative over lifetime of structure, tracked for 1 year. Improvements above flood level not counted (less than FEMA minimum): city floodplains only.

Impact on Community Rating System Classification Currently a Class 4 (scale of 1 to 10 with 1 the best). 30% discount on flood insurance. New regulations will move Fort Collins to Class 5 because of pre-requisite requirements. 25% discount on flood insurance.

Floodplain Regulations – Round 3 Poudre River Started in 2006 (nine years after flood). Initiated by policy makers. Changes in 2000 were an “over-reaction” to the flood. Problem defined as “the City and Larimer County regulations need to match”. Good outcomes: removed Product Corridor and Dryland Access. Reduced regulations: narrower floodway, allows floodway modifications, hazardous materials in 500-year FP

2007 – Rainfall Revisited (Round Two) Focus shifted back to rainfall as the “source” of our program’s “problems”. A specific capital project was being criticized for being over-sized, too expensive and adversely impacting a natural area. City Council re-affirmed the rainfall criteria after our August 2007 storm.

Conclusions Process takes a long time. Take advantage of community’s initial awareness to make changes. Excellent opportunity to verify with community the validity of regulations. Excellent opportunity to modify code for easier use. Over time, memories will fade and initial objectors may return to roll back changes. Don’t count on the initial supporters to return. Hope for another big storm to prove your point.

Summary in Quotes “I’ll never brag about the City’s stormwater program again.” Ann Azari, Fort Collins Mayor November, 1997 “ I think we might have a program on steroids.” Kelly Ohlson, City Councilman July, 2007 “Floods are merely a hazard… Mankind is the disaster.” Gilbert White Natural Hazards Research Center

Floodplain Statistics Floodway Flood Fringe Moderate Risk Area (acres) 1,900 1,300 400 Number of Structures 700 1,700 900