EScholarship: Publishing the work of UC Catherine Mitchell Director, eScholarship Publishing Services California Digital Library University of California.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COUNTER: improving usage statistics Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER December 2006.
Advertisements

Leiden University. The university to discover. Recent developments in Academic Publishing Open Access e-books and Enhanced Publications Janneke Adema Book.
1 OER Africa Seminar on Open Learning in South African Universities ( Department of Higher Education & Training, South Africa, Tuesday 23 rd July 2013.
Open Access at the World Bank OA Policy and Open Knowledge Repository (OKR) Interoperability Jose de Buerba, Sr. Publishing Officer Paschal Ssemaganda,
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Knock, Knock!: Are Institutional Repositories a Home for Grey Literature? By Julia Gelfand University of California, Irvine Paper presented.
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
UCL LIBRARY SERVICES LERU and Open Access and E-Presses Dr Paul Ayris Director of UCL Library Services and UCL Copyright Officer President of LIBER (Association.
The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Let’s Stop Talking about Repositories: Remaking eScholarship as an Open Access Publisher Catherine Mitchell Director, eScholarship Publishing Services.
1 Scholarly Publishing Initiatives in ARL Libraries: a Penn State Perspective Nancy L. Eaton, Dean University Libraries and Scholarly Communications The.
June 4, Archives on Flickr Commons (Its not your mothers audience anymore) Society of American Archivists August 13, 2009 Deborah Wythe.
ENGAGING FACULTY AROUND NEW MODELS Sarah Shreeves & Joy Kirchner ACRL Workshop: Scholarly Communication 101.
Reusability of University Digital Archives: Meeting the Needs of K-12 Teachers Felicia Poe, Assessment Coordinator California Digital Library, University.
Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives California Digital Library Scholarly Publishing at University of California ———— An.
The Library as Publisher: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J How can a Repository Contribute to University Success? APSR - The Successful Repository June 29,
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository ASIST DASER Summit November 2003 Suzanne Samuel California Digital Library.
Publishing through UC’s eScholarship Insert Name/Title date The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA Library Scholarly Communications Steering.
SC in UC July Cynthia Shelton UCLA’s Scholarly Communication Program Talk at One; Walk at Two.
California Digital Library eScholarship Update Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly Communication University.
Scholarly Communication: Responses at the University of California A “Systemwide” Overview This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs.
Challenges & New Opportunities Laurel Haycock, U Libraries February 2007 Author’s Rights:
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository Int’l Conference on Digital Institutional Repositories 9-10 December 2004, Hong Kong Catherine H.Candee.
UC’s Systemwide Library Planning Some background & current information.
The Open Education Initiative At UMass Amherst Taking a Bite Out of High Cost Textbooks Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of.
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk Twitter: #or2012 OR 2012: Working With Text Workshop Can We Mine JISCMail Lists?
From Berlin back to Business OPEN Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service Mimi Seyffert Manager: Digitisation and Digital Services.
15 July 2015 Peter Berkery Executive Director.  139 Members ◦ 95 US, with university affiliation ◦ 19 US, with other institutional affiliation ◦ 10 Canadian.
Free e-journal publishing services Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
Open Journal Systems Project or The UB Libraries as Publisher: Information and Roles for Liaison Librarians Charles Lyons Library Liaison Summit December.
Libraries and the Communication of Scholarship: Changing Times, Changing Roles David Ruddy.
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco October 2004 Scholarly Communication – Impact on Libraries.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The “Toddler Years” for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories The University of Pennsylvania.
California Digital Library Stewardship of Scholarly and Cultural Assets at the University of California Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic.
Engaging Faculty with New Models: Openness in Practice Presenter Host Institution Date ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow: From Understanding to Engagement.
1 Open Access & Shades of Gre Open Access & Shades of Grey Open Access Increases Visibility of Grey Literature Providing an Essential Complement to Peer-Reviewed.
California Digital Library eScholarship Publishing Services CDL Users Council Meeting, May 9, 2008 Catherine Mitchell Acting Director, Publishing Group.
Justin Gonder eScholarship Operations Coordinator California Digital Library University of California Office of the President Sustaining.
Amy Jackson UNM Technology Days July 22,  An institutional repository (IR) is a web-based database of scholarly material which is institutionally.
University of Huddersfield Press Scholarly publishing in the library Graham Stone.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
University of California Irvine Libraries & UC System Lorelei Tanji Associate University Librarian, Collections CARL Conference 2008.
Selection Strategies for Digital Institutional Repositories Kent Woynowski 30 September 2004.
Institutional Repositories GIL Users Group Meeting (GUGM) May 19, 2005 Macon State College Tim Daniels - Digital Technologies Librarian Georgia State University.
ENGAGEMENT: TO ACTION ADA EMMETT AUSTIN, TEXAS JUNE 21, 2013 ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow.
Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
MAKERERE UNIVERSITY Developing and Nurturing the Next Generation of Academics: Focus on emerging scholars A presentation BY` Prof. Lillian Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza.
California Digital Library Managing and Federating e-Print Repositories: UC’s eScholarship Initiatives CNI Fall Task Force Meeting December 1999 John Ober.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Library/Press/University Collaborations The Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia.
Open Access and Institutional Repositories. Accra, June 2007 Institutional repositories in SA research institutions: the DISA experience Dr D Peters.
California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly.
Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.
The R EPOSITORY AS P UBLISHER OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN A DUAL ROLE BEN HOCKENBERRY SYSTEMS LIBRARIAN | ST. JOHN FISHER COLLEGE.
Sarah Beaubien Scholarly Communications Outreach Coordinator Grand Valley State University Libraries Open Education Materials: Collecting,
Just in Time Digital Southern Offers a Suite of Services for the Entire Campus Zach S. Henderson Library.
Developing Effective Scholarly Communication Advocates: The Experience at Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia XXVII Annual Charleston ConferenceNovember.
Jefferson Digital Commons: An Institutional Repository for TJU February 2005.
Ina Smith Open Access Africa November 2010 Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Scholarly Communication Services: Repository-based Library Publishing OLA Preconference Feb. 2, 2011 Adrian K. Ho The University of Western Ontario.
Promoting and Preserving FIU Research and Scholarship
Copyright Policy & Education Officer
What Are Institutional Repositories?
SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.
Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner Sarah E. Thomas University Librarian Cornell University Ithaca, NY.
University presses in the international environment
Presentation transcript:

eScholarship: Publishing the work of UC Catherine Mitchell Director, eScholarship Publishing Services California Digital Library University of California This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

eScholarship Publishing History Successes and challenges New directions: a services model Emerging policy questions…

University as Publisher SLASIAC Task Force Candee, C. and Withey,L., “Publishing Needs and Opportunities at the University of California,” 2007: “The University faces continuing erosion of its ability to purchase the resources necessary to support its research and teaching enterprise and should take a direct approach to combating the problem. The University should play a greater role in publishing scholarly work, but it is not clear how it might most effectively do so.”

Beginnings… The eScholarship program was launched by the CDL in 2000 “to foster faculty-led innovation in scholarly publishing.”

Early efforts… Alternative journal publishing models (DOJ) Support for independent monographic publishing programs (UCIAS/GAIA) Discrete collaborative projects w/ UC Press (eScholarship Editions, Monographic Series, Mark Twain Project Online)

2002: eScholarship Repository launched in its present state Goal: to provide an alternative, digital publishing platform for the dissemination of UC faculty research Open Access Multiple content types Distributed administrative structure Building infrastructure

Since then… ~30,000 scholarly works voluntarily deposited into the repository (postprints, working papers, conference materials, journals, books, etc.) ~8.5 million full-text downloads of repository content at a rate of 35-45K downloads per week. ~200 academic units represented across UC 25 peer-reviewed journals

Cumulative Increase in Papers Posted, July 2006 to December 2008

University of California faculty (systemwide) generate ~26,000 scholarly publications each year, not to mention all the working papers, field notes, seminar series, journals, etc. A drop in the ocean

Lack of visibility 70% of faculty surveyed have never heard of the eScholarship Repository Only 13% actively use the service Unclear value proposition What will I gain by posting/publishing my work in a repository? Disincentives Extant disciplinary repositories Scholarly legitimacy of Open Access publishing? The server under my desk Why the gap?

Low-budget journals Small-scale monograph publishing Conference proposals, proceedings Working papers, post-prints Disciplinary/departmental collections Innovative digital scholarly publications And yet… UC publishing needs abound

Let’s stop talking about “the repository” Focus instead on the publishing services supported by the eScholarship program and the relevance of these services to the UC community’s publishing needs A new message

IR deposit: a by-product of services rendered, rather than an end in itself.

Beyond the Repository eScholarship supports the University of California scholarly community with innovative digital publication and distribution services through the development of advanced technologies and creative partnerships.

Emphasis on services model – publishing support where/when you need it Marketing and outreach campaign to the campuses Access interface redesign – contextualizing research UC Press publishing collaboration Remaking eScholarship

Marketing Campaign

Our Services = Our Message Traditional Repository Services Postprints Digital Publishing Services Journals Monographs Conference Schedules & Proceedings Working Papers Seminar Series UCPubS – in conjunction with UC Press

Responding to cultural differences among disciplines Addressing the incentives/risks for ladder rank faculty at different career stages Considering the unique challenges around interdisciplinary/disciplinary formation Customizing the Message

Making the Case to Faculty Open Access: significantly increased citations Priority ranking in Google and other search engines Proven visibility: more than 8 million full-text downloads of UC scholarship since 2002 Author retention of copyright Perpetual access to and preservation of publications Comprehensive usage data Free (free!) setup, training, and publishing support

Interface Redesign

Contextualization of content Enhanced search/display functionality Emphasis on services suite Redesign Goals

A joint effort to respond to substantial and often unmet publishing needs and opportunities within the UC community by combining the open access digital publishing services provided by the CDL through eScholarship with the more traditional production, distribution and marketing services offered by UC Press. UC Publishing Services (UCPubS)

Betwixt and between Deposit ↔ Publishing Service ↔ Authority Inclusiveness ↔ Sustainability

Formalizing implicit policies Need to scope boundaries of the service to attend to deposit needs while still protecting the eScholarship “imprint” for original publications Defining the author/content community Drawing the line at what is both feasible and beneficial to the long-term health of the service

Sampling of policy issues Degree of UC affiliation What is the status of publications that continue to exist but move away from any kind of UC affiliation? Should there be affiliation exceptions for strategic acquisitions efforts? Academic rank Should undergraduate work be included in eScholarship or supported elsewhere? Should work from different communities have different requirements? Content type What kind of academic work belongs in eScholarship and what should live elsewhere? Should eScholarship support metadata-only deposit for embargoed materials?

Moving forward… An external body to work with the CDL on these policy issues Significant faculty representation (primary constituents) Process in place and policy issues addressed by September 2009

Catherine Mitchell Director, eScholarship Publishing Services California Digital Library