EMMA with 4 Modules: Commissioning Similar to Full Ring J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 11 March 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matching Injector To Linac. Caveats This is all loose and fuzzy – sort of religion We dont have real tight control over and knowledge of the machine –
Advertisements

Tools used for the beam commissioning of J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
Linear Least Squares Approximation Jami Durkee. Problem to be Solved Finding Ax=b where there are no solution y=x y=x+2 Interpolation of graphs where.
IK March 1st 2012 Slide 0 EMMA: Update on BPM modelling and mapping March 1 st 2012 Ian Kirkman.
University of Sheffield NLP Module 4: Machine Learning.
CHAPTER 14: Confidence Intervals: The Basics
We’ll be spending minutes talking about Quiz 1 that you’ll be taking at the next class session before you take the Gateway Quiz today.
Lirong Xia Reinforcement Learning (2) Tue, March 21, 2014.
We’ll be spending a few minutes talking about Quiz 2 on Sections that you’ll be taking the next class session, before you work on Practice Quiz.
EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
EMMA Upgrade: Slow Acceleration with Low-Frequency Cavity J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 12 March 2010.
5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
Issues in ILC Main Linac and Bunch Compressor from Beam dynamics N. Solyak, A. Latina, K.Kubo.
Ultra Low Vertical Emittance at the Australian Light Source Mark Boland on behalf of Rohan Dowd 1.
1 Latest CLIC FFS Tuning Results Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders Thanks to: Rogelio Tomas Garcia, Yngve Inntjore Levinsen, Andrea Latina, Oscar Roberto.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
1 CSI5388 Data Sets: Running Proper Comparative Studies with Large Data Repositories [Based on Salzberg, S.L., 1997 “On Comparing Classifiers: Pitfalls.
Bruno Muratori STFC, Daresbury Laboratory Commissioning EMMA 02/07/09 PRISM workshop – Imperial College.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University.
The EMMA Project Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory & Huddersfield University *BNL, CERN, CI, FNAL, JAI, LPSC Grenoble, STFC, TRIUMF.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
May 17, 2005Wednesday Experiment Meeting BNL, Upton Acceleration beyond 100 GeV  Goal To evaluate the spin dynamics beyond 100 GeV  What’s the impact.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
CLIC CTF3: Phase Feed Forward Comparing the effect of the phase feed forward system on beam phase stability with various theoretical predictions. CLIC.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Automatic Machine Review Dec 2015 MAX IV Storage Rings Automation Pedro F. Tavares.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
H. SAIBI November 25, Outline Generalities Superposition of waves Superposition of the wave equation Interference of harmonic waves.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Vector Control Algorithm for Efficient Fan-out RF Power Distribution Yoon W. Kang SNS/ORNL Fifth CW.
1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –
Hybrid Synchrotron Arc: 2 Dipoles per Half Cell J. Scott Berg Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting 28 July 2011.
Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
THE MAFF IH-RFQ TEST STAND AT THE IAP FRANKFURT A. Bechtold, J. Fischbach, D. Habs, O. Kester, M. Pasini, U. Ratzinger, J. Rehberg, M. Reichwein, A. Schempp,
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
HEP Christmas Meeting 2014 FFAG Accelerators at Manchester 18 th – 19 th December 2014 Jimmy Garland In collaboration with Rob Appleby, Hywel Owen and.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 13th International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment October 13-17, 2014, IHEP, Beijing, China Smoothing Based on Best-fit.
, UKNF Meetin, Imperial College J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
, IDS Meeting, Fermilab J. Pasternak Challenges of muon FFAG: injection/extraction, beam dynamics and injection/extraction hardware design studies.
RHIC Optics Status: Optics Measurements and Corrections M. Bai C-A Dept., BNL On behalf of RHIC Team.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
Nonscaling FFAG design and EMMA experiment
What Should We Do?.
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Presentation transcript:

EMMA with 4 Modules: Commissioning Similar to Full Ring J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 11 March 2010

Outline Experimental tasks – Injection – Closed orbit and tunes – Time of flight – Lattice correction – Cavity phasing Advantages and Disadvantages 2

Injection Same problem as full ring Can’t precisely determine closed orbit – More on next slide Don’t care if kicker pulse is too long – Allows more time to get right 3

Closed Orbit and Tunes Can’t find truly “closed” orbit – Pretend cells are identical – Pseudo-closed orbit minimizes cell-to-cell variation Tunes: again, pretend cells are identical – NAFF on cell-by-cell data (few cells) – Least squares to sinusoidal 4

Time of Flight Can’t do two passes by same object Could use BPMs – Systematic offset (small) since two different BPMs – Still get relative variation (vs. energy) – Accuracy may be challenging Would need two (preferably identical) scopes 5

Lattice Correction Could get rough idea of tune and time of flight vs. energy Could correct lattice to desired configuration using this Correction not precisely what we want: need to check against truly closed orbit Likely very close, however Maybe correct cell-to-cell variation? 6

Cavity Phasing Can’t set cavity frequencies: redundant with phase when only one pass Can attempt cavity phasing exercise – Power cavities, adjust phase to minimize orbit deviation downstream – Won’t give final settings: frequency must be set with closed ring – Probably waste of time, since real algorithm must do frequency and phase 7

Advantage: Get Started Sooner Can begin getting machine in shape now Major injection problems identical – Can wait for better solution for kicker supply – Finding closed orbit slightly different Find closed orbit parameters vs. energy – At least good guesses Bring lattice closer to desired state Experiments not possible in ring (Shinji’s talk) 8

Disadvantage: Delay Work needed for partial ring delays work needed for full ring. Only partial overlap. Algorithms and procedures similar but not identical to those for full ring – Repeat for full ring, but will start close Costs in time/money – Additional work in construction – Some repetition of experimental work – Time better spent preparing for full ring? 9

Disadvantage: Delay Do we demonstrate anything interesting? – No significant acceleration possible – At best almost get linear parameters vs. energy – Experiments that are not possible in full ring (Shinji’s talk) Could we realistically have anything for IPAC? 10

Summary Can begin work needed for full ring – Would be done imperfectly, some (maybe small) repetition needed in full ring There are costs associated with the delay Advantage of early start unclear (haven’t seen Rob’s talk at time of writing…) But partial ring may give additional experimental possibilities 11