The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: New Developments and Issues to Watch September 26, 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JCAHO –A HIPAA Business Associate National HIPAA Summit
Advertisements

© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Pharmaceutical Compliance Forum Clinical Trials Case Study Stephen J. Immelt Thursday, November 8, 2007.
The Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act Virginia State Bar Annual Meeting Corporate Counsel Section CLE Program June 18, 2004.
19 April 2012 The Office Agents Society Changes of Use from Commercial To Residential Michael Gallimore Hogan Lovells International LLP.
Art. 6 – 8 of the draft Unitary Patent Regulation Prof. Dr. Winfried Tilmann.
February 12, 2014 Life Sciences Enforcement Year in Review: Examining Hot Button Areas for FDA & Related Government Enforcement Peter Spivack, Hogan Lovells.
7 March 2014 International Arbitration, Paris 20 Years of the Energy Charter Treaty Jurisdiction and Admissibility under the Energy Charter Treaty Laurent.
NACARA Annual Conference Industry Perspectives Panel September 29,2014 Boise, Idaho Andy Madden Director State Government Affairs ACA International.
COLLECTION HOT TOPICS WV HMFA Winter Educational Conference January 15, 2015.
Texting & HIPAA Compliance in your practice
Wireless Access Code: Download the agenda PDF at:
16 July 2011 The Business Case for Mediation (for “ICC Arbitration & Amicable Dispute Resolution – Focus on India”) Jonathan Leach, partner, Hogan Lovells.
© 2013 Dechert LLP Defense Litigation Checklist September 26, 2013.
April 8, 2013 NPE litigation in Japan Activities and impact of FRAND commitments Eiichiro Kubota, Hogan Lovells Tokyo.
Understanding the GRAS Process Martin J. Hahn Hogan Lovells US LLP Date: July 16, 2013 Food and Agriculture Group.
© Allen & Overy 2013 Global reach and local depth – your perfect match Luxembourg-Russia Desk Jacques Wantz In charge of the Luxembourg-Russia Desk Allen.
January 2012 Workshop on competition law aspects International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Jacques Derenne.
Recent developments in aviation liability & insurance: The 1973 Hague Convention on the law applicable to products liability: choice of law issues in aviation.
Responsible Person v. Safety Assessor Sylvie Gallage-Alwis Avocat à la Cour / Solicitor in England & Wales ECORE ERPA Seminar – Tel Aviv – 16 June 2014.
Proactive Changes to the TCPA – It’s All about Communication Balaji “Raj” Rajan, Ceannate Corp James Schultz, The Sessions Firm Timothy Fitzgibbon, NCHER.
January 29-30, 2013 Tokyo, Japan Exportation of Knock-Down Kits: (Direct or Indirect) Infringement? AIPLA Mid-Winter 2013 Pre-Meeting Yusuke Inui, Attorney.
"The Role of Arbitration in the Dispensal of Justice" Does Arbitration Maintain the Advantages it Traditionally Enjoyed? Nathan Searle, Senior Associate.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Joseph A. Levitt Hogan & Hartson April 21, 2009 FDA Regulation of Bottled Water An Overview.
Unfulfilled Promises: Affordable Housing in Metropolitan Washington Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Mary Anne Sullivan,
Recent Developments and New Challenges Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act NCHER Winter Legal Meeting Mark W. Brennan January 24, 2014.
Food Safety Modernization Act: Are You Ready? March 27, 2012 Gary Jay Kushner NPA Annual Meeting La Playa, Florida.
Ethical Issues in Setting Litigation Reserves Clay James, Partner at Hogan Lovells Annie Kao, Senior Litigation Counsel at Vail Resorts December 8, 2010.
Chicago’s Global Status: Is Chicago a “global city”? GaWC: rates cities’ “global” status [Globalization and World Cities Study Group & Network: Loughborough.
Nicolas Pourbaix, Senior Associate
January 25, 2012 Regulatory Update Report to NCC Marketing Committee Robert O. Winters.
January 2012 Workshop on Radio Frequencies International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Gerry Oberst.
Protection of Intellectual Property in the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan By Natalia Gulyaeva.
27 October 2011 Competitive dialogue in UK PFI PPP Forum Perspective Andrew Briggs, Partner.
December 8, 2014 Healthcare/Privacy Current Law Affecting Uses of Health Data Melissa Bianchi Partner.
Hogan Lovells The solicitor's role Gathering the evidence –Disclosure in most cases: –Disclosure in most fraud cases: 1.
27 September 2013 Promoting Russia as a Seat of Arbitration: What Are the Best Ways Forward? Peter Pettibone.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Transatlantic merger enforcement Catriona Hatton November 28, 2007 Brussels.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Clinical Trials Track: Key Compliance Risks FDA Overview Meredith Manning November 8, 2007.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Alice Valder Curran, Partner Tuesday, October 17, 2006 Private Prices, Public Markets: The Evolution of Price.
Mutuals' Forum 2010 Regulators & Legislators: Appreciating the Mutual Difference John Gilbert, Consultant 4 November 2010.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. National Pharma Audioconference Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007 Settlement Stephen J. Immelt, Esq. November 26, 2007.
September 27, 2015 Denver, Colorado An Industry Perspective 2015 NACARA Annual Conference.
Russian response to US sanctions: what has been done and what to expect? 14 August 2014.
November 2015 Presentation to South African Diamond Producers Organisation on Legal Liability Awareness – Introduction to the Mine Health & Safety Act.
Us Legislative Day 2014 IRS Regulations on Charitable Care.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Catriona Hatton, Partner 26 May 2008 Medical Device Companies Antitrust Compliance Programmes.
Copyright © 2012, Big I Advantage®, Inc., and Swiss Re Corporate Solutions. All rights reserved. (Ed. 08/12 -1) E&O RISK MANAGEMENT: MEETING THE CHALLENGE.
The Current Telephone Consumer Protection Act Landscape & What You Need to Know to Avoid Liability National Bar Association Commercial Law Section Corporate.
Mark W. Brennan, Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP Update on The Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the FCC’s Rulemaking.
Turnaround Management Association of Southern Africa - presentation Panamo Properties (Pty) Ltd v Nel and Another NNO NUMSA v Wilro Supplies CC & Companies.
The Latest From the TCPA Legal Landscape Edward J. Mullins III Senior Associate Jeffrey A. Backman Shareholder.
Mark W. Brennan, Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Recent Developments and Key Compliance Challenges for Utilities.
6 October 2016 Social media: do you have the right social media strategy that will impact your business’ growth? - Legal and Regulatory Issues William.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT: 2015 UPDATES TO FCC REGULATIONS
AFTER 20 YEARS, IT’S TIME TO UPDATE THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA). Howard Waltzman Partner
SLSA Private Loan Committee Meeting: TCPA Developments
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
What Every Business Needs To Know about the TCPA
Working together to provide an enquiry service to Shell’s legal community A story of collaboration between client and law firm Miriam Davies Library &
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
FSMA Enforcement: Focus on Inspections
The Future of the TCPA After ACA International v
Current Privacy Issues That May Affect Your Credit Union
Single Firm Conduct: EU / US convergences and divergences
Hogan Lovells. Hogan Lovells TC Hogan Lovells.
What Every Business Needs To Know about the TCPA
RRA introduction 14th July 2016 Prepared by: Puneet Kalra.
SLSA Private Loan Committee Meeting: TCPA Update
Presentation transcript:

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: New Developments and Issues to Watch September 26, 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner

2 Overview Overview of the TCPA FCC Developments FCC Issues to Watch What You Can Do

3 Overview of the TCPA Congress enacted the TCPA in 1991 specifically to curb aggressive telemarketing practices: –Using automatic dialing equipment to make unsolicited calls to random or sequential telephone numbers –Calling sequential telephone numbers in a way that ties up a block of telephone numbers and creates public safety risks –Concerns about telemarketers shifting calling costs to wireless consumers

4 Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) Imposes a number of restrictions on telemarketing calls, faxes, and other outbound communications. –Some restrictions apply to non-telemarketing calls –Implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”)

5 Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) Two increasingly problematic provisions: 1) No autodialed or prerecorded or artificial voice calls to wireless telephone numbers, absent an emergency or “prior express consent.” –Applies regardless of content –The FCC and some courts have determined that this applies to text or short message service (“SMS”) messages –New FCC rules

6 Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) 2) No prerecorded or artificial voice calls to residential telephone numbers without “prior express written consent.” Exceptions: –Not a solicitation or telemarketing –Not made for a commercial purpose –Emergency calls –By or on behalf of a tax-exempt nonprofit organization –Healthcare calls subject to HIPAA

7 Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) The TCPA defines an autodialer (“automatic telephone dialing system”) as “equipment which has the capacity— –(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and –(B) to dial such numbers.” The application of this definition is a key unsettled issue in today’s TCPA landscape. The FCC has taken the position that (at least some) predictive dialers are autodialers (more on this later).

Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) 8 NOTE: Adults are aged 18 and over; children are under age 18. SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health Interview Survey. Percent Wireless rules increasingly important, particularly when serving younger Americans.

Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) TCPA Violations Can Be Costly Minimum statutory damages of $500 per call. Statutory damages of $1,500 per call for knowing or willful violations. Class actions allowed, with no cap on damages or de minimis exception: –1,000 calls = at least $500,000, potentially $1.5 million 9

Overview of the TCPA (cont’d) Hogan Lovells has been deeply engaged in this area: Cross-practice TCPA Working Group. Represent clients in court and before the FCC, Federal Trade Commission, Congress, and state agencies. Secured dismissals and nominal settlements for clients in TCPA actions. Worked with the FCC to clarify TCPA rules. 10

FCC Developments Recent decisions –GroupMe A consumer’s “prior express consent” may be obtained through and conveyed by an intermediary However, parties remain liable for TCPA violations if, in fact, intermediaries do not obtain “prior express consent” The burden remains on the caller if there is any dispute over whether consent was obtained –Cargo Airline Association First-of-its-kind exemption Free-to-end-user voice calls and text messages for non- telemarketing package delivery notifications 11

FCC Developments (cont’d) More than 45 parties have filed petitions asking the FCC to clarify issues: –Autodialer definition –Which party is the “caller” –Disclosure rules –The status of reassigned wireless numbers –Vicarious liability for TCPA violations –Applicability of fax opt-out notice requirements 12

Santander Consumer USA Filed: July 10, 2014 Issue: whether and how “prior express consent” for non-telemarketing calls can be revoked Proposals: –FCC should clarify that “prior express consent” to receive non-telemarketing calls and texts to cellular phones using ATDS and/or prerecorded voice messages cannot be revoked –If there is a right to revoke, the FCC should confirm that the caller may designate methods for consumers to revoke, including in writing, by , by text message, by fax, or as prescribed by the FCC 13

ACA International Filed: Jan. 31, 2014 Petition for Rulemaking asking the FCC to –confirm that not all predictive dialers are autodialers; –confirm that “capacity” under TCPA means present ability; –clarify that “prior express consent” attaches to the debtor, not the specific telephone number supplied by the debtor when the debt was incurred; and –establish a safe harbor for autodialed “wrong number” non-telemarketing calls to wireless phones 14

United Healthcare Services, Inc. Filed: Jan. 16, 2014 Issue: liability for calls to reassigned wireless telephone numbers for which the caller had obtained “prior express consent” Proposals: –“prior express consent of the called party” encompasses non-telemarketing, informational calls until the caller learns that the telephone number has been reassigned –“called party” encompasses both the consenting party and the new subscriber to a reassigned number –good faith exception 15

Professional Association for Customer Engagement Filed: Oct. 18, 2013 Preview dialing and autodialer definition –An autodialer must have the “capacity to dial numbers without human intervention” –The “capacity” of a system means what that system can do at the time the call is placed, without additional modification 16

FCC Issues to Watch What does “autodialer” mean? Will there be a TCPA rulemaking? Will there be more industry-specific exemptions? What rules will apply to “solicited” fax advertisements? To what extent does the TCPA apply to mobile device applications, mobile financial services, and other new technologies and services? How will the FCC apply its new “prior express written consent” requirements? 17

What You Can Do Assessing your existing data –What level of consent can you demonstrate? –Have you obtained additional consents under the new rules? Reviewing intake and account forms, calling scripts, and other consent channels –Are the disclosures adequate? –Are the telephone number types specified? –Is your privacy policy sufficient? Analyzing the available opt-out mechanisms Reviewing calling policies and manuals Preparing training modules for employees 18

What You Can Do (cont’d) Analyzing vendor agreements for TCPA compliance and adequate protection (including vicarious liability issues) Assessing call monitoring and recording compliance issues Evaluating management of customer number changes Ensuring adequate record retention Obtaining insurance Monitoring TCPA litigation developments and pending FCC proceedings for filings and decisions of interest Aggressively and intelligently defending against TCPA lawsuits 19

Hogan Lovells Hogan Lovells has offices in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Budapest* Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Jakarta* Jeddah* Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Mexico City Miami Milan Monterrey Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Rio de Janeiro Riyadh* Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Zagreb* "Hogan Lovells" or the "firm" is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses. The word "partner" is used to describe a partner or member of Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP or any of their affiliated entities or any employee or consultant with equivalent standing. Certain individuals, who are designated as partners, but who are not members of Hogan Lovells International LLP, do not hold qualifications equivalent to members. For more information about Hogan Lovells, the partners and their qualifications, see Where case studies are included, results achieved do not guarantee similar outcomes for other clients. Attorney Advertising. © Hogan Lovells All rights reserved. *Associated offices Mark Brennan Partner T