It’s All Bull Seminars UW Extension Livestock Focus Team March 23 rd, 2004-----Elk Mound March 25 th, 2004-----Almond March 26 th, 2004-----Platteville.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effect of Age at Weaning and Post-Weaning Management on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Angus and Charolais-Angus Steers John F. Grimes County.
Advertisements

Reproduction on the Ranch Clay Lents 1, Kraig Peel 2, George Seidel Jr. 1,and Gordon Niswender 1 Colorado State University 1 Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.
Selection and Judging of Beef
Selection For Carcass Marbling and Muscling-- Benefits and Pitfalls Jim Gosey University of Nebraska.
Genetic improvement of Brahman in Southern Africa Prof Norman Maiwashe (PhD, Pri Sci Nat) Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X2, Irene 0062 University.
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Selection Decisions Using Economically Relevant Traits: The Pathway to Indexes B. L. Golden 1 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.
Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Applied Beef Cattle Breeding and Selection Composite Populations Larry V. Cundiff ARS-USDA-U.S. Meat Animal Research Center 2008 Beef Cattle Production.
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Principles of Livestock Judging University of Florida H/FFA Livestock Judging Clinic Full presentation online at
Beef Production. Terms to Know Polled –born naturally without horns Horned –Born naturally with the ability to grow horns….may never grow though Marbling.
From Conception to Carcass 2006 National Angus Conference Mike Kasten.
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
Bull Care Seminar Cow Calf Seminar-UW Extension Livestock Team Elk Mound- March 23 Almond-March 25 Platteville-March 26 Prepared by Keith Vander Velde,
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Beef Cattle Production
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
Introduction to Breeding Livestock Judging and Evaluation
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Genetics for Producing Profitable and Sustainable Grass-Fed Beef Dr. Scott M. Barao Executive Director The Jorgensen Family Foundation Hedgeapple Farm.
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
Selection Decision Tools Revisited Economically Relevant Traits vs. Indicator Traits B. L. Golden California Polytechnic State University, SLO.
National Beef Cattle Evaluation Consortium Brown Bagger Seminar Carcass EPDs Integrating Carcass and Ultrasound October 22, 2008 Sally L. Northcutt Genetic.
Advanced Animal Breeding
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Crossbreeding in Beef Cattle Susan Keene A portion of these slides work of: Matthew I. Miller Extension Agent Animal Science This presentation is from.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Sustainable Agriculture
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
Quiz for Beef Cattle EPDs.ppt
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Definition of EBVs of Economically Relevant Traits in Sheep Production
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

It’s All Bull Seminars UW Extension Livestock Focus Team March 23 rd, Elk Mound March 25 th, Almond March 26 th, Platteville By: Keith Vander Velde, Marquette County Agriculture Agent

It’s All Bull Seminars What’s In the Toolbox Overview –History of Selection Tools –Performance Data –Expected Progeny Differences –Selection Indexes – Gene Marker Assisted Selection

It’s All Bull The Herd Impact of Three Generations

It’s All Bull Lets compare dollars invested 30 cows at $800= $24,000 1 bull at $1,800= $1,800 Each contribute 50% of the genetics

Beef Producers’ Motivation Hobby Property tax reduction Profit

Genetic Merit of Breeds Van Vleck and Cundiff, 2003

Breed Differences Van Vleck and Cundiff, 2003

Genetic Merit of Breeds Breeds differ for: –Maintenance –Reproduction –Carcass Genetic merit must match production environment. Some economically relevant traits go unmeasured.

Evolution of Seedstock Production Visual selection Performance Testing Expected Progeny Differences Ultra-Sound Measurements DNA Marker Assistance

It’s All Bull From PerformanceTesting Calves were weighed at: Birth Weaning Yearling Calves were compared within herd A ratio of 100 was herd average 50% of herd above average 50% below average

It’s All Bull Sire Summaries Began in 1968 –American Simmental Produced first sire summary using herd performance data and reference sires –All breeds followed this example –Allowed bulls and cows to be compared to the entire population in the breed –Expected Progeny Difference were born

Heritability Makes It All Possible Portion of a trait’s variation attributable to genetics In general, heritability is: –High for carcass traits and mature size –Moderate for growth rate and milk production –Low for reproductive traits

Heritability Highly heritable traits are the easiest to change with selection Traits that are low in heritability can be changed with selection, but change is slower Heritability of a trait is reflected in the range of EPD across a population

Heritability of Production Traits about 30 to 35% Birth, Wean, Year. Wts. Feed Intake Feed Conversion Mature Wt. ~ 50%

Weaning Weight Genetic Trend

Maternal Milk Genetic Trend

Heritability of Product Traits about 40% Fat REA Cutabilty Marbling Shear ?

Heritability of Reproduction Traits about 20% Conception rate Calving rate Calving ease

Carcass Traits can be changed Rapidly Using Genetics!!!!!!!!! Angus genetic trends for slaughter and ultrasound data indicate breeders have changed carcass traits in a very short time interval

It’s All Bull It is Important to Remember – Highly to moderately heritable traits are usually best changed by direct selection –Traits with low heritability can be changed faster by crossbreeding and taking advantage of heterosis

It’s All Bull-Bulls are Different You Decide Which One Matches the Job Do You Have Particular Job in Mind for Your Bull??

It’s All Bull-Job Description Bull Needs vary with uses: –Yearling Heifers –Sell calves at weaning –Retain Replacements –Sell as yearlings –Sell as finished Cattle –Sell grade and yield –Sell on the Grid –Sell beef direct to customer

BW=+1.3 WW=+68 YR=+116 Milk=+27 It’s All Bull EPD’s==A Look Inside

Typical Genetic Evaluation Birth Weight Weaning Weight Milk Total Maternal Yearling Weight Carcass Traits Calving Ease Mix of others…

Sire Summary of the Future? Birth direct Birth maternal Weaning direct Weaning maternal Total maternal Yearling direct 600 d direct Calving direct Calving maternal Carcass wt Rib fat Rump fat LMA Marb score Quality grade % Retail yield Lbs (kg) retail yield Yield grade Us LMA US rib fat Us % IMF Fat percentage Condition score Gestation length Days to calving Calving interval Stayability Heifer pregnancy rate Rebreeding rate Calf weaned/cow exposed Scrotal circumference Pelvic area Frame score Muscle score Udder score Docility Tick score Parasite egg count Mature weight Maintenance energy Feed efficiency Drop weight Type score Uterine score Tooth score Precocity score Feedlot feed consumption Feedlot surv. Pre-wean surv. Serving capacity Serving proportion Semen volume Hip height Leg score Length productive life Doing ability Grand-maternal weaning Twinning rate Days to 11mm BF Days to 75% Choice Days to carc wt. Hair whorl score Average daily gain Wt. /day of age Liver weight Resting heart rate Pulmonary arteriole pressure Brisket disease rate Bravery Aggression

Sire Summary of the Future? Birth direct Birth maternal Weaning direct Weaning maternal Total maternal Yearling direct 600 d direct Calving direct Calving maternal Carcass wt Rib fat Rump fat LMA Marb score Quality grade % Retail yield Lbs (kg) retail yield Yield grade Us LMA US rib fat Us % IMF Fat percentage Condition score Gestation length Days to calving Calving interval Stayability Heifer pregnancy rate Rebreeding rate Calf weaned/cow exposed Scrotal circumference Pelvic area Frame score Muscle score Udder score Docility Tick score Parasite egg count Mature weight Maintenance energy Feed efficiency Drop weight Type score Uterine score Tooth score Precocity score Feedlot feed consumption Feedlot surv. Pre-wean surv. Serving capacity Serving proportion Semen volume Hip height Leg score Length productive life Doing ability Grand-maternal weaning Twinning rate Days to 11mm BF Days to 75% Choice Days to carc wt. Hair whorl score Average daily gain Wt. /day of age Liver weight Resting heart rate Pulmonary arteriole pressure Brisket disease rate Bravery Aggression

It’s All Bull New Carcass Index Traits in Angus in 2004

It’s All Bull Feedlot Value ($F) –Uses Weaning and Yearling Weight EPD’s along with trait interrelationships –Uses typical feedlot gain value,days on feed, feed consumption and cost differences –Trait range -$43 to +$67

It’s All Bull Grid Value ($G) –Combines quality grade and yield grade –Gives premiums for Prime,CAB and Choice –Yield grade premiums for YG1and YG2 and discounts YG4 and YG5 –Range -$20 to +$43

It’s All Bull Beef Value ($B) –Represents the expected average dollar per head difference in progeny post weaning performance and carcass value –Calculated from the Feedlot Value ($F) and the Grid Value ($G) –Designed to be a reflection of feedlot and carcass merit –Value Range -$36 to +$61

It’s All Bull Tenderness: Warner Bratzler Shear Force(WBSF) Calpain-enzyme increases tenderness Calpastatin-enzyme inhibits calpain TenderGENE- a DNA marker test for Calpain genes Gene Star Tenderness I-DNA test for less Calpastatin

Typical Genetic Evaluation Today EPD’s are: –Proven –Accepted –Well-used In the Future will: –More EPD allow us to better characterize the genetic potential of animals –They be designed for more profitable selection decisions What does the future hold

Combining EPD for financially sound selection decisions Selection index (Hazel, 1943) Has been successfully implemented in other livestock species

Methods of Multiple-Trait Selection Independent Culling Levels-Sire Search –Most commonly used –Set min/max levels for each trait (EPD) Selection Index- –Most effective for overcoming antagonisms –Weight traits (EPD) on economic importance

Selection Index Selection Index is fairly aggressive Most producers will be able to design a simple index using a spreadsheet such as Microsoft Excel Many breed association and university personnel are working on an index Bull test stations have used indexes for years to determine which bulls qualify for the sale.

It’ All Bull What is the value difference in the following two bulls: –Bull AWW EPD = +16 –Bull BWW EPD = +32 –Difference = 16 pounds in EPD Price is $1.05 per pound –16 * 1.05 = $16.80 Assume we will keep replacements for a 400 cow herd

Our desire is that producers use EPDs to build indexes that are consistant with their business goal(s) Profit = Income – Expense

It’s All Bull How Do Our Bull Measure Up –Reviewed the Angus Sold in at Platteville WBIA Bull Sales Fourteen(14 Bulls) had progeny data with accuracies above.75 for birth and weaning weight Used in Registered herds where AI sires were available for comparison EPD’s from Sale Catalog compared to Current EPD values(Spring 2004 Angus Sire Summary

It’s All Bull-----Platteville Catalog EPD values of 14 bulls Sale catalog BW WW YR Milk Current Value

It’s All Bull-----Platteville No Difference in the group average As Individuals most changed two lbs or less in growth traits More change in Milk EPD up to 14 lbs –Why—Bulls sires had no daughter history when used and when proven the values reflect it –These bulls have no daughter data in summary, they are their parent averages

Top Use Bull in 2002

Top Use Bull in 2001

It’s All Bull Summary –Bulls play large role in herd genetics –Many tools are now available to decide –Producers must decide what traits are important to them, visual & $$$ –Indexes will play a role in the future as we have more traits to evaluate and use to sort bulls

It’s All Bull Thanks for your attendance Have a safe trip home