Session 6: What do I include in my PM 2.5 conformity analysis? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

Lesson 10.9 AIM: The and and or Rules of Probability.
Academic Industry Interactions - workshop. Motivations and Challenges Many research intensive universities have research budgets where
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Board Four Year Transportation Plan 2012 to 2015 Board Transportation Committee November 29, 2011.
Revision of Korean Romanization and Word Division Guidelines Progress Report Young Ki Lee Library of Congress.
Fine Particle Health Impacts and the Need for Control Measures in New Jersey Kenneth Fradkin, US EPA Region 2 Air Programs Branch Hearing of the New Jersey.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.
SIP Development Process Overview For Hickory Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
Overview of the Mountain Area Transportation Conformity Process.
Overview of the Transportation Conformity Process.
Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
L EARNING B EYOND THE C LASSROOM T HE S CIENCE L EARNING C ENTER Rebecca Moden Stark State College North Canton, OH 2YC 3 Conference – May 20th/21st.
My Holiday Economic Choices! Using your budget, choose an item to buy for each significant person in your life. Explain any opportunity costs.
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Session 7: Other Conformity Rule Changes FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Ann-Marie Day Carlos Gonzalez GAMPO ANNUAL WORK SESSION July 29, 2011.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit Urban Roundtable September 30,
Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments Net Conference June 23, 2004 Hosted by the Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment.
Computer Organization TI1400 Alexandru Iosup (lecturer) Henk Sips (original slides) Parallel and Distributed Systems
Aim: How to test a hypothesis and design an experiment Do Now: 1) What do you need to know in order to test your hypothesis? 2)Take out your homework.
Duties and Responsibilities of Budget Managers and Budget Analyst Duties and Responsibilities of Budget Managers and Budget Analyst.
The Basics of Hiring Student Employees The steps and rules for hiring student employees are slightly different in the summer. One difference is the number.
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
October 21, 2014 Ontario Ministry of Transportation Rob Tardif Ontario Update on Border Traffic for FHWA Planning Initiative TBWG - Trade and Traffic Data.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Conformity Determination Graciela Lubertino, PhD November 7, 2012.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
Fine Particulate Matter SIP for Washington DC Special Stakeholder Meeting February 20, 2008.
Timely Implementation of TCMs. History  RACM developed for Severe Ozone Rate of Progress (ROP) Plan  2003 Incorporated in 2003 PM-10 Plan.
Truck Stop Electrification And Air Quality Conformity Presented by Bob Dickinson South East Texas Regional Planning Commission Air Innovation Conference.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS Update on Exceptional Events and MAG Five Percent Plan for PM-10 MAG Regional Council July 28, 2010.
Budget Office Communications Financial Area Representatives Meeting February 18 th, 2008.
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
NARRATIVES - STORIES A narrative can be written in the first or the third person and describes a series of events, either imaginary or based on your own.
FTIP/FSTIP Amendment Caltrans Checklist LILIBETH GREEN CALTRANS, OFFICE OF FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (916) OR
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Online Registration ends
How to Travel on a Shoestring Budget Student Financial Services
Supplemental Instruction October 9th – exam 2 review
Issaquah-Fall City Road
Cardinal Langley Extended Project…
NEW! Student Organization Database
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit
Summer Training Program
The Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) & New Freedom Programs
Implementation of New Source Review Changes
Workshop overview Kickoff – goals
City Council approved $750,000 “transform” design option
Master of Chemistry Education
4 + (-5) = A. Start at zero B. Move ______ spaces ___________ to get to the first number. C. From there, move _____ spaces __________ D. My final answer.
Performance-Based Federal Highway Program Implementation Update
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
WESTAR Planning Committee Report
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Defining “Significant Impact” from Mobile Sources and Road Dust
Emissions Discussion Group November 6, 2003
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

Session 6: What do I include in my PM 2.5 conformity analysis? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004

2 Tests for PM 2.5 Areas l Final rule is generally consistent with requirements in PM 10 areas without adequate or approved SIP budgets l Final rule allows all PM 2.5 areas to choose either the: »build<no-build, OR »no-greater-than-2002 baseline year test l A regional emissions analysis is done for direct PM 2.5 emissions and any applicable PM 2.5 precursors »discussed further in Session 6

3 l Gasoline and diesel on-road vehicles emit: »direct PM 2.5 –exhaust –brake and tire wear –re-entrained dust from paved and unpaved roads –construction dust from highway and transit construction »PM 2.5 precursors from vehicles: –NOx, VOCs, SOx –ammonia (primarily emitted by gasoline vehicles) –will be addressed in separate final rule to be completed before PM 2.5 designations are effective Transportation PM 2.5 Emissions

4 Direct PM 2.5 in Regional Analyses (93.102(b)(1)) l All PM 2.5 regional emissions analyses address direct PM 2.5 including: »tailpipe and brake and tire wear emissions l MOBILE6.2 and EMFAC2002(CA only) generate PM 2.5 emissions factors

5 Road Dust in PM 2.5 Regional Analyses (93.102(b)(3) and (f)) l Before PM 2.5 SIP budgets are adequate or approved, road dust is not included in regional analyses unless found to be a significant contributor by: »EPA Regional Administrator, or »state air agency l Road dust is included in regional analyses if adequate or approved SIP budgets include road dust emissions

6 What is Considered in Significance Findings? l A finding of significance would be based on: »the contribution of road dust to current and future PM 2.5 nonattainment »the area’s current design value for the PM 2.5 standard »whether control of road dust appears necessary to reach attainment, and »whether increases in road dust emissions may interfere with attainment l A finding of significance should be made: »only after discussions within the consultation process »through a letter to state and local air quality agencies, MPO(s), DOT and EPA (if a state air agency finding)

7 Calculating Road Dust Emissions l Road dust emissions can be calculated using methods described in: »AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 13, Miscellaneous Sources (US EPA, December 2003; l Or, areas may develop local calculation methods, through interagency consultation »must be approved by EPA l By effective date of PM 2.5 designations, guidance will be issued on adjusting road dust emissions for SIPs and conformity to reflect true impact on regional air quality

8 Construction Dust in PM 2.5 Regional Analyses (93.122(f)) l Fugitive dust from construction of transportation projects is only included in regional emissions analyses if: »the SIP identifies these emissions as significant contributors to the regional PM 2.5 problem l Construction emissions would be included in the area’s direct PM 2.5 SIP budgets, where significant »consultation must be used

9 Calculating Construction Dust Emissions l Construction dust emissions can be calculated using methods described in: »AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 13, Miscellaneous Sources (US EPA, December 2003; l Or, areas may develop local calculation methods, through interagency consultation l By effective date of PM 2.5 designations, guidance will be issued on adjusting dust emissions in SIPs and conformity to reflect true impact on regional air quality

10 PM 2.5 Precursors in Regional Analyses l EPA is not finalizing any PM 2.5 precursor requirements at this time l Requirements for PM 2.5 precursors will be finalized before PM 2.5 designations are effective l However, June 2004 final rule provides sufficient information for potential areas to begin preparing for PM 2.5 conformity, if desired

11 PM 2.5 Precursors in Regional Analyses l The November 2003 NPRM identified: »NOx »VOCs »sulfur oxides (SOx); and »ammonia (NH 3 ) as potential transportation-related PM 2.5 precursors

12 PM 2.5 Precursors in Regional Analyses l The NPRM also proposed that a regional emissions analysis would be required for a precursor once »a SIP emissions budget for that precursor was found adequate or approved l NPRM included two options for PM 2.5 precursors in regional analyses before SIP budgets are adequate or approved

13 PM 2.5 Precursors in Regional Analyses l Option1: »Include NOx and VOCs unless the EPA RA or state air agency finds that one or both precursors is not a significant contributor »Only include SOx or NH 3 if the EPA RA or state air agency finds that one or both is a significant contributor l Option 2: »Only include NOx, VOCs, SOx or NH 3 if the EPA RA or state air agency finds that one or more is a significant contributor

14 PM 2.5 and PM 10 Hot-Spots l EPA proposed several options in the November 5, 2003 NPRM for PM 2.5 and PM 10 hot-spot requirements l Supplemental proposal to be published: Summer 2004 to propose additional options for: »new PM 2.5 hot-spot requirements »changes to existing PM 10 requirements Continued

15 Project-level Requirements in PM 2.5 Areas l Rule to be finalized before PM 2.5 designations are effective l Current PM 10 hot-spot analyses requirements continue to apply as under current practice