PRECISION SIDEDRESS UAN APPLICATION FOR CORN PRODUCTION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Soybean Iron Chlorosis Project 2001 Summary Report AGVISE Laboratories Benson, MN & Northwood, ND.
ax2 + bx + c 2x2 + 11x + 5 ac 2(5) = b =11 ( ) 2x2 + 10x + 1x
Rate: 1.3 lbs. / Bu. of yield goal Timing 1/3 or planting 2/3 or sidedress Source/Application method Urea sources may volatilize on surface.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Manure Side-Dress Nitrogen Corn and Wheat Plots Glen Arnold, OSU Extension Educator Jon Rausch, OSUE State Extension Associate.
Unit F: Soil Fertility and Moisture Management
Combining Like Terms. Only combine terms that are exactly the same!! Whats the same mean? –If numbers have a variable, then you can combine only ones.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
CS4026 Formal Models of Computation Running Haskell Programs – power.
1 From the analytical uncertainty to uncertainty in data interpretation D. Concordet, J.P. Braun
Fixed and Variable Costs. Median income per household member in the U.S. in 2006 was in the range from: 1)$15,000-20,000 2)$20,000-25,000 3)$25,000-30,000.
Nitrogen Loss Research
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Factoring Grouping (Bust-the-b) Ex. 3x2 + 14x Ex. 6x2 + 7x + 2.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Equations of Circles. Equation of a Circle The center of a circle is given by (h, k) The radius of a circle is given by r The equation of a circle in.
By-Plant N Management Oklahoma State University.
1992, At What resolution are there real biological differences.
Week 1.
Soybean Plant Population. How Low Can We Go?. Introduction  Recent research indicates we may be planting higher populations then necessary Improved varieties.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Rationale N. Macnack¹, J. Kelly², J. Mullock¹, I. Ortiz-Monasterio 3, and W. Raun¹. ¹Plant and Soil Sciences,
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Soil N Monitoring, Fall 2012 Webinar October 19, 2012 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois
Corn (Zea mays L.) Leaf Angle and Emergence as Affected by Seed Orientation at Planting Guilherme Torres, Jacob Vossenkemper, William Raun, John Solie.
Jacob P. Vossenkemper Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Nitrogen Loss from Urea.
Corn Growth and Development
Virginia Tech – Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences Manure Management for the 21 st Century Rory Maguire Marlin Burcham, Mark Alley Wade Thomason, Chris.
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
Precision Planting of Corn (Zea mays L.) to Manipulate Leaf Geometry Guilherme Torres Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Remote sensing of canopy reflectance on a field scale has been proposed as a useful tool for diagnosing nitrogen (N) deficiency of corn plants. Differences.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
 Part of › Amino Acids: Building blocks of proteins › Enzymes: responsible for all biological process › Nucleic Acids › Cholorphyll  Needed for Carbohydrate.
Delineating Zones for Variable rate Seeding a Fertility Mgt. Chad Godsey Godsey Precision Ag.
Jac J. Varco1, Robert E. Earnest1, and Jimmy D. Johnson2
Plant-to-Plant Variability in Corn Production K.L. Martin, P.J. Hodgen, K.W. Freeman, Ricardo Melchiori, D.B. Arnall, R.K. Teal, R.W. Mullen, K. Desta,
Introduction Efficient use of nitrogen is becoming important due to increasing N fertilizer prices and the growing concerns about NO 3 - contamination.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Corn Nitrogen Management: Progress in Missouri Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth, and John Hummel USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO Peter.
Effect of Preplant/Early Irrigation, Nitrogen and Population Rate on Winter Wheat Grain Yield Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University,
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Enhancing Continuous Corn Production Under High-Residue Conditions with Starter Fluid Fertilizer Combinations and Placements Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota,
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Corn Production
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
John Kovar & Doug Karlen USDA-ARS
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017
Responsible Nitrogen Management in 2018: Rates, Treatments and Timing IFCA Webinar February 9, 2018 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois.
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
EFFECT OF DELAYED EMERGENCE ON CORN GRAIN YIELDS
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
Third World Hand Planter
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

PRECISION SIDEDRESS UAN APPLICATION FOR CORN PRODUCTION O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Kefyalew Girma Oklahoma State University

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Introduction O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Nitrogen Leak

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Introduction O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Coulter UAN application in corn (Ames, IA). UAN surface application is made within the center of the row, 15 inches away from the base of each stalk. The common use of UAN for sidedress N application in corn is to apply this liquid fertilizer in the middle of rows using either dribble surface bands, or rolling coulter injection.

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Introduction O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Excavated corn plants showing no overlapping of nodal root systems when corn plants were more than 10” apart, at silking growth stage

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Objective to compare three sidedress N placement methods on corn grain yield/where Evaluate sidedress N rates O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Sense by plant and treat based on yield potential

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Treatment structure of precision sidedress UAN experiment, Haskell and Lake Carl Blackwell, 2005-2006. Trt Pre Side d. Placement method 1 40 20 Directed stream application at the base of each plant (1) 2 Directed stream application at the base of a row (2) 3 Dribble surface bands applied in the middle of two rows (3) 4 5 6 7 80 8 9 10 160 11 12 13 NA 14 Broadcast 15 200 O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y By-row By-plant O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Between rows

Directed Stream Applicator O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Directed stream application of UAN in corn applied at the base of stalk of the plant

Design and Field Layout W E N S Location: Haskell-2005 4 5 2 9 10 15 7 8 3 13 12 11 14 6 1 III 1 14 15 6 5 7 13 9 4 3 8 10 11 2 12 II O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y 13 5 10 4 15 12 8 9 7 2 3 6 14 11 1 I Plot size 10’ x 20’ with 5’ alley By plant N rate was determined as: Calculate UAN/row Divide the above by number of plants/row

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Between row and within row by plant corn grain weight variability at Haskell (Hask) and Lake Carl Blackwell (LC), OK, 2005. Row Mean dry grain weight, lb/plant Percent of no. of plants with yield > mean Range, lb/plant Standard deviation lb/plant Hask LC Haskl 1 0.20 0.38 50 53 0.31 0.35 0.09 2 0.19 47 0.34 Pro ns O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Between row and within row by plant corn grain weight variability at Haskell (Hask) and Lake Carl Blackwell (LC), OK, 2006. Row Mean dry grain weight, lb/plant Percent of no. of plants with yield > mean Range, lb/plant Standard deviation lb/plant Hask LC Haskl 1 0.21 0.20 45 41 0.41 0.53 0.12 0.11 2 0.19 46 40 0.43 0.55 0.13 Pro ns O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

Martin et al. (2005) Agron. J. 97:1603-1611 Regardless of yield level, plant-to-plant variability in corn grain yield can be expected and averaged more than 2765 kg ha-1 (44 bu/ac) over 46 sites (Ohio, Iowa, Nebraska, Virginia, Mexico, Argentina)

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Effect of UAN sidedress placement method on corn grain yield O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

Effect of sidedress N rates on corn grain yield O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Summary Within row variability in grain yield was very high By plant sidedress application of N according to individual plant yield potential would result in improved efficiency and reduced cost to producers The gain in yields from the three methods ranged from 7 to 25% more than the broadcast treatment in three location-years O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Summary Under normal growing conditions, N should be sidedressed by plant at a rate of 20-40 lb/A to maintain yield level and decrease loss in fertilizer N concurrent with within row plant to plant variability Results are not conclusive as the 2006 corn growing season was extremely dry/hot The experiment will be continued for 1 more year O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y Summary Additional measurements such as ears per plant, 100-seed weight, ear size, plant spacing, and grain N concentration O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y

O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y THANK YOU! O k l a h o m a S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y