ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 15

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-measurement class I.
Advertisements

S. Ghosh, M. Muste, M. Marquardt, F. Stern
Ideal Monatomic Gas C v = 3/2R C p = C v + R = 5/2 R Polyatomic Gas C v > 3/2R C p > 5/2 R All Ideal Gases  E = q + w w = -P ext  V (for now)  E = nC.
Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 35 April 18, 2014 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 33 April 14, 2014 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 32 April 10, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 17
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 40 April 29, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Review Labs 10 and 11.
Design of Systems with INTERNAL CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi An Essential Part of Exchanging.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 17 – INTERNAL FORCED CONVECTION FUNDAMENTALS.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics LECTURE 18 – FLOW IN TUBES.
Wind Instrument Testing Apparatus Project WITAP Team: Rob Koch Andy Lawrence.
Implementation of Vortex Cavities in a Turbojet Diffuser Sponsor: Williams International Progress Report 5 December 5, 2006 TEAM CRUISE CONTROL Michael.
Reynolds Experiment Laminar Turbulent Reynolds Number
Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Jan. 22, Today’s Lecture Lab Teams and Schedules Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.
California State University, Chico
Thermal Development of Internal Flows P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Concept for Precise Design ……
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 20 March 6, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner myDAQ A/D converter, temperature uncertainty, First-order, centered numerical.
Correlations for INTERNAL CONVECTION P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi An Essential Part of Exchanging Heat……..
 Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis.
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 6 January 30, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Review Calibration, Lab 3 Calculations, Plots and Tables.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 12
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 5 January 28, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Lab 3, transmitter characteristics, least-squares, standard error of the estimate.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 16 February 25, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Lab 6 calculations (Excel demo)
Copyright: Prof S.A. Kinnas
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 23 March 13, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Transient TC response, Modeling, Expected and observed behaviors, Lab 9, Plot.
Practical Aspects of using Pitot Tube
Measurement of Pressure Distribution and Lift for an Airfoil  Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Instrumentation  Data reduction.
 Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 11 February 11, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Pitot probe operation, non-linear transfer function, fluid density, uncertainty,
Copyright: Prof S.A. Kinnas
Drag and Lift E80 Fluid Measurements Spring 2009.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 13: Exam Review February 18, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 4 January 26, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Had extra time, could add a few more slides next year Lab Guidelines and grading,
Measurement of Pressure Distribution and Lift for an Airfoil  Purpose  Test design  Measurement system and Procedures  Uncertainty Analysis  Data.
Lab 3 Static Calibration of Manometers Using Electronic Pressure Transmitters Lab Instructor: A. Sunkara Performed: January 27, 2005, 10 AM Miles Greiner.
Introduction to Temperature Lecture Notes. Schedule for the Week  Monday- Notes over Temperature  Tuesday- Notes over Air Pressure  Wednesday- Notes.
Lab 3 Static Calibration of Electronic Pressure Transmitters using Manometers February 1, 2013 Group 0 Miles Greiner Lab Instructors: Michael Goodrick.
Lecture #6 Ehsan Roohi Sharif University of Technology Aerospace Engineering Department 1.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 10 February 9, Professor Miles Greiner Lab 5 Summary and Calculations.
CFD Lab 1 Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow Seong Mo Yeon, Timur Dogan, and Michael Conger 10/07/2015.
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 8 February 3, 2016 Professor Miles Greiner Lab 4, Propagation of Uncertainty, Maximum and likely, Power Product, Examples.
MECH 322 Instrumentation Lab 6 Fluid Speed and Volume Flow Rate Performed: February 27, 2007 Group 0 Miles Greiner Lab Instructors: Mithun Gudipati, Venkata.
ME 391 Instrumentation LAB #6 Volume Flow Rate and Centerline Speed in a Tube Wind Tunnel Performed: 03/05/2004 Soma: I believe I performed 50% of this.
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
SUGGESTED MINIMUM KNOWLEDGE OF FLUID MECHANICS AND FOR FE EXAM
UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENT
Internal Flow: General Considerations. Entrance Conditions Must distinguish between entrance and fully developed regions. Hydrodynamic Effects: Assume.
INTRODUCTION TO ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 13
Spring Lab Series ME 3264 Eng D -Tom Mealy
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 4
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 41
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 34
Process Variables, Elements and Instruments – Flow - Agenda
Internal Incompressible
Energy Loss in Valves Function of valve type and valve position
ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 16
Aerodynamic Force Measurement
ME 391 Instrumentation Lab 10 Calibration of a Hot-Film Anemometer
LAB #6 Volume Flow Rate and Centerline Speed in a Tube Wind Tunnel
Air Volume Flow Rate and Centerline Velocity in a Tube Wind Tunnel
Slides for ME 115 Laboratory
S. Ghosh, M. Muste, M. Marquardt, F. Stern
Thursday, May 21, 2015 Castle Learning Week # 38
Internal Flow: General Considerations
Introduction to Fluid Mechanics
Presentation transcript:

ME 322: Instrumentation Lecture 15 February 23, 2015 Professor Miles Greiner Relating speed and flowrate, Lab 6 equipment, Presso flow coefficient, linear sum uncertainty

Announcements/Reminders HW 6 due Friday Lab today (Lab 5) but not the rest of this week Career Fair, Thursday, February 26, 2015 Internships Prepare for permanent employment next year www.unr.edu/engineering/careerfair

Pipe Speed and Volume Flow Rate Centerline speed increases in the entrance region In fully-developed flow, speed profile V(r) is Parabolic in laminar flow (Re <~2000), and develops slowly Flatter in Turbulent flow (Re > 104), and develops rapidly

Speed and Flow Rate Consistency Does the centerline speed increase with flow rate? Is there a unique centerline speed for every volume flow rate and every location? What does this relationship dependent on? For a given volume flow rate, what is the range of centerline speeds in which we expect VC to be?

Possible Centerline Speeds At the pipe entrance and for fully-developed turbulent flow, the velocity profile is relatively flat compared to fully-developed laminar flow VC >~ VSlug = Q/A For fully-developed laminar flow, we expect the velocity profile to be parabolic 𝑉 𝑉 𝑃 = 𝑟 0 2 − 𝑟 2 𝑟 0 2 , where 𝑟 0 is the pipe inner radius, and 𝑉 𝑃 is the centerline velocity (for a parabolic profile). Relationship between speed and volume flow rate 𝑄= 𝐴 𝑉𝑑𝐴 = 0 𝑟 0 𝑉 𝑝 𝑟 0 2 𝑟 0 2 − 𝑟 2 2𝜋𝑟𝑑𝑟 In HW find that VP = 2VSlug It’s reasonable to expect (VSlug = Q/A) < VC < (VP = 2VSlug) In Lab 6 measure Q and VC in a small wind tunnel

Lab 6 Air Volume Flow Rate and Centerline Speed in a Wind Tunnel Plexiglas Tube and Schedule-40 Pipe have different diameters Control flow rate using a variable-speed blower Cover blower exit for very low speeds For a range of flow rates, measure Volume flow Q rate using a Presso Venturi Tube (in pipe) Centerline speed VC using a Pitot-Static Tube (in Plexiglas tube) For both measure pressures difference using calibrated transmitters/digital multimeters Both VC and Q increase with blower flow rate Check to see if VS < VC < VP

Venturi Tube Inverted transfer function: 𝑄= 𝐶 𝐴 2 1− 𝛽 4 2∆𝑃 𝜌 Need 𝛽= 𝑑 𝐷 , 𝐴 2 = 𝜋 4 𝑑 2 (throat), 𝐶=𝑓 𝑅𝑒 𝐷 = 4𝜌𝑄 𝜋𝐷𝜇 These are all characteristics of the venturi. But 𝐶=𝑓 𝑅𝑒 𝐷 is based on knowing d and D. Presso Formulation: 𝑄= 𝐴 1 𝐴 2 𝐴 1 𝐶 1− 𝛽 4 2∆𝑃 𝜌 = 𝐴 1 𝐶 𝛽 2 1− 𝛽 4 2∆𝑃 𝜌 = 𝜋 4 𝐷 2 𝐾 Presso 2∆𝑃 𝜌 𝐾 Presso = 𝐶 𝐷 𝛽 2 1− 𝛽 4 =𝑓𝑛 𝑅𝑒 𝐷 : Given by manufacturer Only need D (pipe) and KPresso (not ~1, but don’t need to find 𝛽 or 𝐴 2 )

In Lab 6 use a Presso Venturi Tube In Lab 6 use 2-inch schedule 40 Pipe, ID = 2.067 inch Presso Data Sheet – Page 10, Venturi # 38 http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/greiner/teaching/MECH322Instrumentation/Labs/Lab%2006%20Fluid%20Flow/Lab%20Index.htm 𝐾 𝑝 = 0.3810 ± 2% ( 𝑝 𝑝 =?; b = 0.6652, but don’t need to this) Valid for 54,000 < 𝑅𝑒 < 137,000 (ReD or Red?) 𝑄= 𝜋 4 𝐷 𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 2 𝐾 𝑝 2∆𝑃 𝜌 Easier to use than 𝑄= 𝐶 𝐴 2 1− 𝛽 4 2∆𝑃 𝜌

How to find VC and Q (and uncertainties)? Pitot-Static Probe 𝑉 𝑐 =𝐶 2 𝑃 𝑃 𝜌 Air (power product?) Presso Venturi Tube 𝑄= 𝜋 4 𝐷 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 2 𝐾 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 2 𝑃 𝑣 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 (power product?) Both need air-density 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 = 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝑅 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝑇 (power product?) RAir = 0.2870 kPa-m3/kg-K Need to measure Pressure differences PP, PV, and PStat Air Temperature, T

Instrument Schematic To measure PATM and TATM Variable Speed Blower Plexiglas Tube Pitot-Static Probe VC Venturi Tube Q Barometer PATM TATM Pipe DPipe DTube PV - + Static 40 in WC Total PP PG IV - Atm + - + 3 in WC IP IG 40 in WC To measure PATM and TATM Use hand-held digital-barometer Is PStat <, = or > than PATM? Use 40-in-WC transmitter to find Gage Pressure PG = PATM – PS PS = PATM - PG To measure PP Use 3-in-WC transmitter To measure PV Use 40-in-WC transmitter

Inlet Pressure and Temperature Fisher Scientific™ Traceable™ Hand-Held Digital Barometer Barometric pressure, PATM Uncertainty: 𝑤 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 = 5 mbar = 0.5 kPa = 500 Pa (95%?) Units: 1 bar = 105 Pa; so 1 mbar = 100 Pa = 0.1 kPa Atmospheric Temperature, TATM Assume: 𝑤 𝑇 = 1°C (95%?) T[K] = T[°C] + 273.15 Assume tunnel and atmospheric temperatures are the same

Pressure Transmitter Uncertainty 𝑃= 𝜌 𝑊 𝑔ℎ= 𝜌 𝑊 𝑔(𝐹𝑆) 𝐼−4 𝑚𝐴 16 𝑚𝐴 𝜌 𝑊 = 998.7 kg/m3, g = 9.82 m/s2 FS = (3 or 40 inch) 2.54 𝑐𝑚 1 𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ 1 𝑚 100 𝑐𝑚 =0.0762 𝑜𝑟 1.016 𝑚 Manufacturer stated uncertainty: 0.25% Full Scale (68%?) For FS = 3 inch WC PFS = rWghFS = (998.7 kg/m3)(9.81 m/s2) (3 inch) 2.54 𝑐𝑚 1 𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ 1 𝑚 100 𝑐𝑚 = 746.6 Pa wP = 0.0025 PFS = 1.9 Pa For FS = 40 inch WC (998.7 kg/m3)(9.81 m/s2) (40 inch) 2.54 𝑐𝑚 1 𝑖𝑛𝑐ℎ 1 𝑚 100 𝑐𝑚 = 9954 Pa wP = 0.0025 PFS = 25 Pa

Static Pressure PStat = PATM – PG Inputs Use for 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 = 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝑅 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝑇 , RAir = 0.2870 kPa-m3/kg-K Want kPa Inputs PATM Measure using barometer 𝑤 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 = 500 Pa = 0.5 kPa (68%) PGAGE Measure using 40 inch WC gage 𝑤 𝑃 𝐺𝐴𝐺𝐸 = 25 Pa = 0.025 kPa (68%)

Static Pressure Uncertainty PStat = PATM – PG (power product?) Need to use general formula for likely uncertainty: 𝑤 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 2 = 𝑖=1 2 𝛿 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝛿 𝑥 𝑖 𝑤 𝑖 2 = 𝛿 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝛿 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 𝑤 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 2 + 𝛿 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝛿 𝑃 𝐺 𝑤 𝑃 𝐺 2 = 1 𝑤 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 2 + −1 𝑤 𝑃 𝐺 2 = 1 0.5kPa 2 + −1 0.025kPa 2 𝑊 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 =0.5006 𝑘𝑃𝑎 Square of absolute uncertainty in result is sum of squares of absolute uncertainty in inputs times coefficient.

General Expression Likely Error of “Linear Sums” 𝑅=𝑎𝑋+𝑏𝑌+𝑐𝑍+…+= 𝑐 𝑖 𝑋 𝑖 𝑤 𝑅 2 = 𝜕𝑅 𝜕 𝑋 𝑖 𝑤 𝑖 2 = 𝜕𝑅 𝜕𝑋 𝑤 𝑋 2 + 𝜕𝑅 𝜕𝑌 𝑤 𝑌 2 + 𝜕𝑅 𝜕𝑍 𝑤 𝑍 2 +… 𝑤 𝑅 2 = 𝑎 𝑤 𝑋 2 + 𝑏 𝑤 𝑌 2 + 𝑐 𝑤 𝑍 2 +… 𝑤 𝑅 2 = 𝑐 𝑖 𝑤 𝑖 2

Summary Before Experiment Use hand held barometer to measure PATM TATM 𝑊 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 =0.5 𝑘𝑃𝑎 TATM 𝑊 𝑇 𝐴𝑇𝑀 =1°C

During Experiment For each blower setting find the value and uncertainty of the Static Pressure, PStat = Work on Board (WOB) 𝑊 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 2 = WOB 𝑊 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 = WOB Air density 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 = WOB 𝑊 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 2 = WOB Centerline speed 𝑉 𝑐 = WOB 𝑊 𝑉 𝑐 𝑉 𝑐 2 = WOB Volume flow rate 𝑄= WOB 𝑊 𝑄 𝑄 2 = WOB

Consistency Check For a given volume flow rate Q VS = Q/A VP = 2VS What area should we use APipe or ATube ?

Measured Results Determine speed and flow rate uncertainty for a range of blower speeds

Wind Tunnel Schematic Variable Speed Blower Plexiglas Tube Pitot-Static Probe, VC Venturi Tube, Q Pipe DPipe DTube PV - + Static 40 in WC Total PP PG IV - - Atm + + 3 in WC IP IG 40 in WC

During Experiment For each blower setting find the value and uncertainty of the Static Pressure, PStat = PATM – Pgage 𝑊 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 2 = 1 𝑊 𝑃 𝐴𝑇𝑀 2 + −1 𝑊 𝑃 𝐺 2 = 1 0.5kPa 2 + −1 0.025kPa 2 𝑊 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 =0.5006 𝑘𝑃𝑎 Air density 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 = 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝑅 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝑇 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝑊 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 2 = 1 𝑊 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 𝑃 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡 2 + −1 𝑊 𝑇 𝐴𝑇𝑀 𝑇 𝐴𝑇𝑀 2 Centerline speed 𝑉 𝑐 =𝐶 2 𝑃 𝑝 𝜌 Air 𝑊 𝑉 𝑐 𝑉 𝑐 2 = 1 𝑊 𝐶 𝐶 2 + 1 2 𝑊 𝑃 𝑝 𝑃 𝑝 2 + − 1 2 𝑊 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 2 Volume flow rate 𝑄= 𝜋 4 𝐷 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 2 𝐾 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 2 𝑃 𝑣 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝑊 𝑄 𝑄 2 = 2 𝑊 𝐷 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝐷 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 2 + 1 𝑊 𝐾 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝐾 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 2 + 1 2 𝑊 𝜌 𝑣 𝜌 𝑣 2 + − 1 2 𝑊 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 𝜌 𝐴𝑖𝑟 2