ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE LocalAssessmentGuidance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Instructional Decision Making
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
{ Assessment Guidance Use Cristen McLean, Policy Analyst Derek Brown, Director of Assessment.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
“Data Walk” Faculty Orientation
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Differentiated Supervision
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Looking At Your Assessment System: A Graphical Perspective Michigan Educational Research Association Fall Conference 2012 Monday, November 19, 2012.
S TUDENT G ROWTH G OALS Fall A GENDA /T ARGETS 1. I will reflect on the Student Growth Goal (SGG) process from last year. 2. I will identify the.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
COMMON CORE ASSESSMENT SELECTION WORK GROUP MAY 3, 2013 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Idaho State Department of Education Accessing Your ISAT by Smarter Balanced Data Using the Online Reporting System (ORS) Angela Hemingway Director, Assessment.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
1 Board “Leanings” on State Assessment System David T. Conley, Ph.D. Professor, University of Oregon Director, Center for Educational Policy Research CEO,
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Implementing SBAC Pilot Items Rowland Unified School District Leadership Meeting November 6, 2013 Brian Huff.
Master Teacher Program Fall House Bill 1 Changes to Master Teacher Program –Eliminates EMIS report until 2011 Form I deleted Removes December timeline.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Five Required Elements
Shasta County Curriculum Leads November 14, 2014 Mary Tribbey Senior Assessment Fellow Interim Assessments Welcome and thank you for your interest.
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Presentation transcript:

ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE LocalAssessmentGuidance

ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE INCLUDING OREGON CRITERIA FOR HIGH QUALITY ASSESSMENTS Cristen McLean, Policy Analyst Brian Putnam, Education Specialist JUNE 24, 2014 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

PURPOSE Introduce Assessment Guidance, which was developed to assist districts in the evaluation of assessment options (commercial or locally developed). Developed through collaboration with other State Departments of Education and researchers, including Rick Stiggins.

AGENDA 1.Introduce Assessment Guidance 2.Answer, “How can the Assessment Guidance be used?” 3.Answer, “What is included in the Assessment Guidance?” 4.Provide time to review Assessment Guidance and ask questions.

ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE CONTENTS Assessment considerations related to whether to develop or obtain assessments Assessment vocabulary Oregon Criteria for High Quality Assessments

HOW CAN THE ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE BE USED?

TWO IMMEDIATE APPLICATIONS Educators at all levels of leadership are faced with many complex decisions around assessment planning, including two immediate planning needs: Category 2 Assessments for Student Learning and Growth Goals for Educator Effectiveness matrix Use of funds for Formative and Interim Common Core Assessments

STUDENT LEARNING AND GROWTH GOALS Category 1 Statewide test OAKS Smarter Balanced Extended Assessment

STUDENT LEARNING AND GROWTH GOALS Category 2 Locally developed test Commercially developed test Results from proficiency-based assessment system Locally developed collections of evidence For educators in tested grades, must be used for at least one student learning and growth goal

STUDENT LEARNING AND GROWTH GOALS Teachers in Tested Grades Student Learning and Growth Goal 1: Category 1 Student Learning and Growth Goal 2: Category 1 OR Category 2

STUDENT LEARNING AND GROWTH GOALS Teachers in Non-Tested Grades Student Learning and Growth Goal 1: Category 2 Student Learning and Growth Goal 2: Category 2 OR Category 1

Types of MeasuresGuidance 1  Oregon’s state assessments o SMARTER Balanced (formerly OAKS) o Extended Assessments  Same assessment and administration guidelines are used statewide 2  Commercially developed assessments that include pre- and post-measures  Locally developed assessments that include pre- and post- measures  Results from proficiency-based assessment systems  Locally-developed collections of evidence, i.e. portfolios of student work that include multiple types of performance  Same assessment and administration guidelines are used district-wide or school-wide  Assessments meet state criteria

Take 5 minutes… 1.Think of an example of how your district is planning for Category 2 assessments in non-tested subjects. 2.Discuss at your table. Then we’ll popcorn around the room and ask for tables to share out. CATEGORY 2

COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS 1.State Board approved Smarter Balanced Assessment 2.Ways and Means Joint Committee (i.e., legislative budget committee) provided additional funding for assessments, but divided the budget authority. 1.For the summative assessment, ODE has the budget authority (in order to purchase Smarter Balanced). 2.For the formative and interim assessment, districts have the budget authority.

INTERIM AND FORMATIVE COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS Monies provided to school districts to secure formative and interim assessment tools aligned to the Common Core State Standards. Districts received a letter with amount of funding and assessment tool guidelines.

INTERIM AND FORMATIVE COMMON CORE ASSESSMENTS Options for how to spend monies: Develop assessments locally Obtain assessments from outside source (commercially developed or open educational resource) Combined approach (develop some and obtain some; pilot multiple approaches within a district)

To get a sense of what people are planning, please… Raise your hand if you will be using purchasing an assessment. INTERIM AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

To get a sense of what people are planning, please… Raise your hand if you will be using developing the assessments. INTERIM AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

To get a sense of what people are planning, please… Raise your hand if you are not yet sure what you will do for these assessments. INTERIM AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE?

ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE CONTENTS Assessment considerations related to whether to develop or obtain assessments Assessment vocabulary Oregon Criteria for High Quality Assessments

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT Questions for test developers about how test questions or tasks are created and then evaluated for quality. Questions that educators could ask themselves across a series of steps as they locally develop an assessment. Information about sources for assessments (commercial and open education resources) to support districts in their procurement decisions.

CONSIDERATIONS: TRANSPARENT ASSESSMENTS Transparent assessments means that educators know: Purpose of the assessment What is covered on the assessment (standards) How the assessment was developed (alignment of items to standards, etc.)

NON-TRANSPARENT ASSESSMENTS Example Scenario Assessment was obtained from an outside source and dropped into the class Training was not provided related to purpose, contents of assessment (and/or information was not accessible) Students completed the assessments without educators knowing anything about the questions Educators have to trust that questions are aligned to standards but do not have any way to confirm Results came back without them being tied to standards or useable by educators

Take 5 minutes… 1.Think of an example of non-transparent assessment that you have used in your district. 2.Discuss at your table. Then we’ll popcorn around the room and ask for tables to share out. NON-TRANSPARENT ASSESSMENTS

TRANSPARENT ASSESSMENTS Example Scenario Assessment was developed locally (or obtained from outside source) and reflects same standards that drive local curriculum Training was provided related to purpose, contents of assessment (and accompanying information is accessible) Educators are familiar with questions or types of questions and can confirm the alignment of the questions to the standards. Results are tied to standards and useable by educators.

Take 5 minutes… 1.Think of an example of transparent assessment that you have used in your district. 2.Discuss at your table. Then we’ll popcorn around the room and ask for tables to share out. TRANSPARENT ASSESSMENTS

TYPEPURPOSE TYPES OF DECISIONS TO BE INFORMED Summative Used to provide culminating evidence of performance against a defined learning target  What standards has each student mastered?  What grade does each student receive? Interim Mid-cycle Results can be meaningfully aggregated and reported alongside summative  Predictive: What performance can be anticipated on the summative assessment?  Evaluative: Is the curricular program or strategy effective?  Instructional: How should the instruction and curriculum be adapted to better meet student needs? Formative Used to identify how teachers can adjust instruction to increase learning  Where can we improve instruction right away?  Which students need specific help?

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA USE Flexibly developed so that it can be used to evaluate specific assessments, including: Locally developed assessments Commercially developed assessments Assessments from outside resources, including open educational resources

Criteria 1. Clear Purpose Why am I assessing? 2. Clear Learning Target(s) What am I assessing? 3. Quality Assessment How can I assess it well? 4. Proper Test Administration How will I ensure test conditions do not interfere with a student’s ability to perform well on a test? 5. Effective Communication of Results How will I share results for maximum impact? CRITERIA

HOW TO READ THE CRITERIA TABLES

ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE REVIEW Page through the Assessment Guidance document and discuss it at your table. Write down any questions or feedback you have, then we’ll go around the room to answer questions.

FEEDBACK Feedback on the Assessment Guidance is welcomed and will be collected through the Summer Assessment Institute: summer-assessment-institute summer-assessment-institute Please send suggestions to Cristen McLean