National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RTI 2 ) for Alaska Schools: Scaling Practices to Meet Local Needs Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D. University of Southern.
Advertisements

Curriculum Based Measurements
Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Educational Consultant
1 1 S ession 3 How to Effectively Implement Learning Objectives.
Human Performance Improvement Process
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) High Growth, High Achieving Schools: Is It Possible? Fall, 2011 PVAAS Webinar.
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
A Process to Identify the Enduring Skills, Processes, & Concepts for your Content Area 1.
1 Developing Tests for Departmental Assessment Deborah Moore, Assessment Specialist Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness University of Kentucky.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Rigor Breakdown A Three Part Series.
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
1 The Florida Assessments for Instruction in Reading Overview.
Adapted with permission from Melanie Learoyd & Morag Kelley North Vancouver School Board May 9, 2009.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
How was your MAP ® experience?  As you get settled, tell us about your MAP experience.  Please add comments or questions to the graffiti wall. Use the.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI)
ABCs of CBMs Summary of A Practical Guide to
Teaching Adults to Read: Assessment Strategies and Reading Profiles 2011 ABE Statewide Summer Institute August 19,
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Summative Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Using RTI Data to Inform Eligibility
BEST PRACTICES in RtI to Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
PSSA Preparation.
Speaking and Listening Instruction: Identifying and Using Effective Approaches to Facilitating Classroom Discussions December 9, 2014 Katanna Conley Michelle.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
Cleveland County Schools
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention TRAINING OF TRAINERS Response to Intervention Implementer Series.
National Center on Response to Intervention Sara Prewett, The National Center on RTI The University of Kansas RTI Scheduling.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is Progress Monitoring?
Progress Monitoring Lynn S. Fuchs Vanderbilt University And Pamela M. Stecker Clemson University.
Curriculum Based Measures vs. Formal Assessment
CEDS 2005 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Educational Assessment: Looking Forward, Reaching Further November 17, 2005 When Assessment Isn’t Enough: Understanding Student.
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
Using CBM in a Response to Intervention Framework
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
LIGHTS, CAMERA …. ACADEMIC DATA at the Elementary Level Cammie Neal and Jennifer Schau Forsyth County Schools.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Types of Assessment: Curriculum Based Measurement Characteristics : Simple Accurate Efficient Generalizable Reliable and valid Predictive Sensitive Flexible.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
2008 Student Progress Monitoring & Data-Based Instruction in Special Education Introduction to Using CBM for Progress Monitoring.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
Department of Curriculum and Instruction Considerations for Choosing Mathematics Progress Monitoring Measures from K-12 Anne Foegen, Ph.D. Pursuing the.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk
Presentation transcript:

National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework

National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Series Overview 2 IntroductionScreeningProgress Monitoring Multi-level Prevention System Defining the Essential Components What Is RTI?What Is Screening? What Is Progress Monitoring? What Is a Multi- level Prevention System? Assessment and Data-based Decision Making Understanding Types of Assessment within an RTI Framework Using Screening Data for Decision Making Using Progress Monitoring Data for Decision Making IDEA and Multi- level Prevention System Establishing Processes Implementing RTIEstablishing a Screening Process Selecting Evidence-based Practices

National Center on Response to Intervention Upon Completion Participants Will Be Able To:  Identify when and why to use summative, formative, or diagnostic assessments  Understand the differences between norm- referenced and criterion-referenced assessments  Recognize the benefits and drawbacks to general outcome measures and mastery measures 3

National Center on Response to Intervention Vocabulary Handout WordPredictionFinal MeaningPicture/Sketch/Example Primary prevention level The bottom of the pyramid that represents instruction given to students without learning problems Instruction delivered to all students using research-based curricula and differentiation in the general education classroom. Incorporates universal screening, continuous progress monitoring, and outcome measures or summative assessments. 4 Primary prevention

National Center on Response to Intervention Types of Assessments 5 TypeWhen?Why? SummativeAfterAssessment of learning DiagnosticBeforeIdentify skill strengths and weakness FormativeDuringAssessment for learning

National Center on Response to Intervention Summative Assessments  PURPOSE: Tell us what students learned over a period of time (past tense) May tell us what to teach but not how to teach  Administered after instruction  Typically administered to all students  Educational Decisions: 6 Accountability Skill Mastery Assessment Resource Allocation (reactive)

National Center on Response to Intervention Summative Assessments Examples:  High-stakes tests  GRE, ACT, SAT, and GMAT  Praxis Tests  Final Exams 7

National Center on Response to Intervention Diagnostic Assessments  PURPOSE: Measures a student's current knowledge and skills for the purpose of identifying a suitable program of learning.  Administered before instruction  Typically administered to some students  Educational Decisions: What to Teach Intervention Selection 8

National Center on Response to Intervention Diagnostic Assessments Examples:  Qualitative Reading Inventory  Diagnostic Reading Assessment  Key Math  Running Records with Error Analysis 9

National Center on Response to Intervention Formative Assessments  PURPOSE: Tells us how well students are responding to instruction  Administered during instruction  Typically administered to all students during benchmarking and some students for progress monitoring  Informal and formal 10

National Center on Response to Intervention Formative Assessments Educational Decisions:  Identification of students who are nonresponsive to instruction or interventions  Curriculum and instructional decisions  Program evaluation  Resource allocation (proactive)  Comparison of instruction and intervention efficacy 11

National Center on Response to Intervention Formative Assessments  Mastery measures (e.g., intervention or curriculum dependent)  General Outcome Measures (e.g., CBM) AIMSweb – R-CBM, Early Literacy, Early Numeracy Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) – Early Literacy, Retell, and D-ORF iSTEEP – Oral Reading Fluency 12

National Center on Response to Intervention Summative or Formative? Educational researcher Robert Stake used the following analogy to explain the difference between formative and summative assessment: “ When the cook tastes the soup, that's formative. When the guests taste the soup, that's summative.” (Scriven, 1991, p. 169) 13

National Center on Response to Intervention Types of Assessments Handout 14

National Center on Response to Intervention 15 Types of Assessments Handout Answers

National Center on Response to Intervention Norm-Referenced Vs. Criterion- Referenced Tests  Norm referenced Students are compared with each other. Score is interpreted as the student’s abilities relative to other students. Percentile scores are used.  Criterion referenced Student’s performance compared to a criterion for mastery Score indicates whether the student met mastery criteria Pass/fail score 16

National Center on Response to Intervention Common Formative Assessments Mastery Measurement General Outcome Measures Vs. 17

National Center on Response to Intervention Mastery Measurement  Describes mastery of a series of short-term instructional objectives  To implement Mastery Measurement, typically the teacher: Determines a sensible instructional sequence for the school year Designs criterion-referenced testing procedures to match each step in that instructional sequence 18

National Center on Response to Intervention 1.Multidigit addition with regrouping 2.Multidigit subtraction with regrouping 3.Multiplication facts, factors to 9 4.Multiply 2-digit numbers by a 1-digit number 5.Multiply 2-digit numbers by a 2-digit number 6.Division facts, divisors to 9 7.Divide 2-digit numbers by a 1-digit number 8.Divide 3-digit numbers by a 1-digit number 9.Add/subtract simple fractions, like denominators 10.Add/subtract whole number and mixed number Fourth-Grade Math Computation Curriculum 19

National Center on Response to Intervention Mastery Measure: Multidigit Addition Assessment 20

National Center on Response to Intervention WEEKS Number of problems correct in 5 minutes Multidigit Addition Multidigit Subtraction Mastery Measure: Multidigit Addition Results 21

National Center on Response to Intervention 1.Multidigit addition with regrouping 2.Multidigit subtraction with regrouping 3.Multiplication facts, factors to 9 4.Multiply 2-digit numbers by a 1-digit number 5.Multiply 2-digit numbers by a 2-digit number 6.Division facts, divisors to 9 7.Divide 2-digit numbers by a 1-digit number 8.Divide 3-digit numbers by a 1-digit number 9.Add/subtract simple fractions, like denominators 10.Add/subtract whole number and mixed number Fourth-Grade Math Computation Curriculum 22

National Center on Response to Intervention Mastery Measure: Multidigit Subtraction Assessment 23

National Center on Response to Intervention Mastery Measure: Multidigit Subtraction Assessment 24

National Center on Response to Intervention Advantages of Mastery Measures  Skill and program specific  Progress monitoring data can assist in making changes to target skill instruction  Increasing research demonstrating validity and reliability of some tools 25

National Center on Response to Intervention Problems Associated With Mastery Measurement  Hierarchy of skills is logical, not empirical.  Assessment does not reflect maintenance or generalization.  Number of objectives mastered does not relate well to performance on criterion measures.  Measurement methods are often designed by teachers, with unknown reliability and validity.  Scores cannot be compared longitudinally. 26

National Center on Response to Intervention General Outcome Measure (GOM)  Reflects overall competence in the yearlong curriculum  Describes individual children’s growth and development over time (both “current status” and “rate of development”)  Provides a decision-making model for designing and evaluating interventions  Is used for individual children and for groups of children 27

National Center on Response to Intervention Common Characteristics of GOMs  Simple and efficient  Classification accuracy can be established  Sensitive to improvement  Provide performance data to guide and inform a variety of educational decisions  National/local norms allow for cross comparisons of data 28

National Center on Response to Intervention Advantages of GOMs  Focus is on repeated measures of performance  Makes no assumptions about instructional hierarchy for determining measurement  Curriculum independent  Incorporates automatic tests of retention and generalization 29

National Center on Response to Intervention GOM Example: CBM  Curriculum-Based Measure (CBM) A general outcome measure (GOM) of a student’s performance in either basic academic skills or content knowledge CBM tools available in basic skills and core subject areas grades K-8 (e.g., DIBELS, AIMSweb) 30

National Center on Response to Intervention Student copy CBM Passage Reading Fluency 31

National Center on Response to Intervention 32 Common Formative Assessments Mastery Measurement General Outcome Measures Vs.

National Center on Response to Intervention 33 National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Action Network IDEA Partnership Need More Information?

National Center on Response to Intervention 34 This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Grant No. H326E Grace Zamora Durán and Tina Diamond served as the OSEP project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred. This product is public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: National Center on Response to Intervention