Www.era.int Financial support and the new programming period 2014-2020 Breakout group 2A: Priorities of future EU funding – What to fund by the EU? Dr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Cost Management ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL
A Guide to Localizing the Hyogo Framework for Action
1 Requirements and needs of East and South East Asian countries in the context of EAM Ingrid Belčáková, Faculty of Architecture, STU, EIA Centre TwoEA-M.
Using public procurement to foster research and innovation More Research and Innovation COM(2005) 488 of 12 October 2005 Commission communication to the.
1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 DISSEMINATION AND VALORISATION PLAN First transnational workshop Manchester,
Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January Erasmus Mundus Information Day 20 January ERASMUS MUNDUS PREPARING YOUR APPLICATION.
The vision for Sri Lanka’s Tertiary and Vocational Education
Inter American Children´s Institute Specialized organization of the OAS Programme Budget 2013 CAAP Working Group October 2012.
1 Supreme Court of Albania 1 The Presentation of Albania.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
2013 ACADEMY WORK PROGRAM Hugues BELLO.
ACADEMY INITIATIVES 2013 Juan SUAREZ 23-24/04/2103.
Reducing administrative burden in Bulgaria: Single Entry Point for Reporting Fiscal and Statistical Information Dr.Mariana Kotzeva President of National.
What is valorisation ? Growth €
1 The role of macro- regional strategies after 2013 The Commissions view (or rather the view of one official) David Sweet, DG Regional Policy, European.
The LAZIO 2020 White Paper Regional Strategic Plan for the strengthening of local labour markets. Speaker: Mariella Zezza Councillor of Training and Labour.
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
1 SG C Smart Regulation: Regulatory Fitness High Level Group on Administrative Burden 17 October 2013 Elizabeth Golberg, Secretariat-General, European.
DG Education and Culture New generation of programmes Marco DI MARTINO Information officer Athens, 7 December 2006.
WP4 – 4.1 and 4.2 Preparatory activities for the creation of the WATERMODE permanent network 1 Technical Committee Meeting Venice, June 24-25, 2010 VENETO.
1 Lessons learned – success factors for biodiversity projects Peter Tramberend Environment Agency Austria.
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INNOVATION CENTER WIPO/INN/MCT/04/3 WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT Muscat, April 20, 2004.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
1 NECOBELAC Project WORK PACKAGE 3 Cross-national advocacy infrastructure.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
1 The European Union. 2 Some basic information The EU currently includes 27 states It has 23 official languages The EU has a population of over 500 million.
Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC) Intellectual Property and Clean Technology in the context of the European Legal Framework Marisa Aranda.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
AUDIT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Assoc. Prof. Dr. Recai AKYEL President of the TCA 04 JUNE 2013 TIRANA/ALBANIA.
1 EC Ports Policy Consultation II ‘Port Service Enhancement’ ESPO General Assembly Hotel Amigo, Brussels – 7 November 2012.
Their relationship and attendant issues 1. Shareholders are the owners, but directors’ duties are to the company – not to any particular class of stakeholders.
Building up capacity for Roma inclusion at local level Kosice, November 6 th, 2013.
1 Part I The Vocational Education and Training From the agenda for 2020 to its implementation DG Education and Culture Directorate B Head of Unit B4 –
A COLLECTIVE INITIATIVE FOR A NEW CULTURE OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT IN EUROPE
1 The Data Protection Officer at work Experience, good practices and lessons learnt Pierre Vernhes – former DPO at the Council of the EU Workshop on Data.
1 The Don Calabria social services to people with disabilities Marina Dello Russo - Verona, 15 May 2008.
25 seconds left…...
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 ENOC 18 th Annual Conference Rights of the child and child poverty October 2014, Edinburgh Lara Blake European Commission DG JUST Unit C1 Fundamental.
NORMAPME ISO User Guide for European SMEs The essence of.
Dorotea Daniele, Facilitator. The members Polish Ministry of Regional Development ESF Council in Sweden Lombardy Region Ministry of Labour and Social.
European Commission Conference on Stimulating European Judicial training Fátima Adélia Martins Secretary to the European Judicial Network (EJN) in Criminal.
Justice Programme Judicial training DG JUSTICE.
Training of National Judges INFO DAY Introduction to the new Call for Proposals 2014 Raffaella Battella - DG Competition.
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
UNITS 1 and 2: THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS. THE JUDGE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA Joaquín Delgado.
Human Resource Development for the Central Pollution Control Board National Comprehensive Training Needs Assessment CPCB-InWEnt-GTZ/ASEM Concept for the.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Implementation of the European Statistics Code of Practice Yalta September 2009 Pieter Everaers, Eurostat.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT AND CITIZENSHIP
Why Universities Should be Teaching EU Law - and How Siniša Rodin Judge, Court of Justice of the European Union.
European Migration Network National Contact Point Finland.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Commission Staff Working Document Free Movement of Workers in the Public Sector 18 January 2011 Ursula Scheuer European Commission DG Employment, Social.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE PRESENT GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES Klaus Haupt, Head of Tempus Unit Education,
European judicial training
A "Jean Monnet" project in terms of Erasmus + programme
Mediation Law in Austria
UNODC and CYBERCRIME October 2009.
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Financial support and the new programming period Breakout group 2A: Priorities of future EU funding – What to fund by the EU? Dr. Wolfgang Heusel Stimulating European Judicial Training 1

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? A. Approach and stakeholders I.Overarching targets: 1.more effective EU integration 2.more efficient enforcement of EU law (“European area of justice”) 3.stimulating mutual trust and business (“promoting effective justice & growth”) 2

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? A. Approach and stakeholders II. Stakeholders 1.EU institutions: EP, COM, ECJ 2.Member states (judicial authorities – courts, judicial councils or administrations, minis-tries; bars; professional associations) 3.Target groups (recipients of training) 4.Training providers 3

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? A. Approach and stakeholders III. Suggested methodology: 1.Defining needs (incl. what cannot be /is not done at national level) 2.Defining objectives (cf. Stockholm context) 3.Considering means and tools 4.Choosing perspective and setting priorities 4

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? B. Determining training needs – driven by supply or demand? I.Starting point: decentralised appli- cation of EU law; every judge an EU judge, every law practitioner an EU lawyer II.Needs defined at ground level vs. needs defined at top level – Needs awareness vs. objective needs 5

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? B. Determining training needs – driven by supply or demand? III. Needs indicators 1.Studies (Wallis 2008; EP 2011; Pilot project to come) 2.EU law implementation reports 3.Feedback from practice 4.Monitoring new legislation and case law 5.Justice scoreboard 6

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? C. Target groups of EU-funded training 1.Judges and prosecutors 2.Lawyers in private practice and notaries 3.Court clerks and bailiffs (Rechtspfleger and Gerichtsvollzieher?) 4.Trainers (multipliers) or end-users » Needs vary according to target group 7

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining needs (1): Target groups of EU-funded training 1.Judges and lawyers in private practice All areas of EU law, depending on specialisation 2.Prosecutors and notaries Special areas of EU law (crim.; family; PIL; …) 3.Court clerks and bailiffs Limited areas related to their competence 4.Trainers (multipliers) or end-users All areas of EU law; training methodologies 8

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? D. Factors determining participation in EU training 1.Practical relevance 2.Accessibility (timing, place, language, costs) 3.Time available (workload, authorisation and appreciation by superiors) 9

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining objectives (1): Factors determining participation Training offered must be - practice-oriented (motivation of trainees) - accessible in time (early warning) and place - accessible in language (active command) - accessible cost-wise (free for judicial staff) - short-time (lawyers: time as cost-factor; judicial staff: workload and backlogs) - recognised as professional task and duty 10

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? E. Contents and level of EU-funded training 1.Fundamentals of EU law: General principles, legal acts, fundamental rights, fundamental freedoms, non- discrimination, identification of applicable EU law (sources and interpretation) 2.Fundamental EU judicial procedures: Preliminary rulings, judicial cooperation acquis (civil, criminal, other), mediation, use of European judicial networks 11

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? E. Contents and level of EU-funded training 3.(Any) specific area of substantive EU law: Competition, environment, tax, trademarks and IP, asylum, telecommunications, labour, consumer, company, data protection, CFR, … 4.Member states’ law: - Legal and judicial order - Procedural law 12

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? E. Contents and level of EU-funded training 5.(Legal) language training and other skills (one? several? all official languages?) 6.Non-legal topics (e.g. ethics) 7.Training methodologies 8.Basic training / Initial training 9.Advanced / continuous/ expert training 13

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining needs(2): Contents of EU-funded training 1.No need for fundamental EU law training at EU level (national priority) 2.High need for cross-border training on judicial cooperation acquis 3.On-going need for continuous updating in all specific areas of EU law 4.Limited need for training in member states’ law (little practical relevance) 14

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining needs(3): Level of EU-funded training 5.Objective need for fluency in one common language 6.Arguably, limited need for EU training on other skills or non-legal topics 7.Limited need for EU support for basic train- ing (national priority; exception new M St) 8.Obvious need for EU support for cross- border elements in initial and joint training activities for expert practitioners 15

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining objectives (2): European added value European added value may be achieved - Within a national context: to provide basic or advanced knowledge, or skills, in applying EU law where national training is not available - In a cross-border context: to promote networking, to build trust, to exchange pro- fessional experience, to learn from each other N.B. European added value does not depend on the number of member states involved. 16

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? F. Size of EU funding for training 1.Small-scale projects 2.Large-scale projects G. Innovation and sustainability 1.Innovation vs. repetition of good practice 2.Dissemination of results 3.Sustainability at the level of (a) trainees (b) trainers (c) training providers 17

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Considering means & tools (1): - Size of EU funding Small-scale projects increase administrative burden of COM, but likely to be more targeted and possibly more committed - Innovation and sustainability - Insisting on innovative projects limits scope of training activities: innovation no per se value - Dissemination and sustainability depending on form of training 18

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? H. Forms of EU-funded training 1.Exchanges 2.Curricula 3.Training modules (for trainers and end-users) 4.Face-to-face (lectures, workshops, role plays, etc.) 5.Distance learning (e-learning courses, podcasts, webinars) 6.Regular conferences to identify needs and best practice 19

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Considering means & tools (2): Forms of EU-funded training 1.Exchanges excellent for building trust, for knowing each other’s system and forming a common spirit 2.Curricula and training modules only useful - if regularly updated - as far as taken up by target groups 20

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Considering means & tools (3): Forms of EU-funded training 3.On-going relevance of face-to-face because of direct exchange; but need for more interactivity 4.Webinars =face-to-face on distance, with quantity advantage and quality disadvantage 5.Relevance and uptake of e-learning courses and podcasts still being explored; unlimited multiplicability, but need for updates 21

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? I. Suggestions from the EP study 1.Provide newsletter with regular updates on developments in EU legislation and case-law 2.Promote use of European Judicial Networks 3.Provide funding for language training 4.Provide funding for multilingual training 5.Invite stakeholders to regular forums to highlight best practice in judicial training 6.Provide funding for decentralised training 22

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? I. Suggestions from the EP study 7.Provide funding for training for hitherto neglected professional groups 8.Provide for a scholarship fund to attend European trainings when national funds are unavailable 9.Provide funding for distance learning 10.Provide funding for training materials that can be re-used at local or national level 23

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? I. Suggestions from the EP study 11.Provide funding for projects that promote more active and practical forms of training 12.Update the EP study on judicial training at regular intervals 24

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? J. Choosing perspectives and setting priorities 1.Funder’s perspective (EU actors) prevails: fair enough 2.Effectiveness of funding however only guaranteed if based on end-user perspective 3.Setting funding priorities – a moving target Many thanks for your attention! 25