Financial support and the new programming period Breakout group 2A: Priorities of future EU funding – What to fund by the EU? Dr. Wolfgang Heusel Stimulating European Judicial Training 1

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? A. Approach and stakeholders I.Overarching targets: 1.more effective EU integration 2.more efficient enforcement of EU law (“European area of justice”) 3.stimulating mutual trust and business (“promoting effective justice & growth”) 2

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? A. Approach and stakeholders II. Stakeholders 1.EU institutions: EP, COM, ECJ 2.Member states (judicial authorities – courts, judicial councils or administrations, minis-tries; bars; professional associations) 3.Target groups (recipients of training) 4.Training providers 3

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? A. Approach and stakeholders III. Suggested methodology: 1.Defining needs (incl. what cannot be /is not done at national level) 2.Defining objectives (cf. Stockholm context) 3.Considering means and tools 4.Choosing perspective and setting priorities 4

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? B. Determining training needs – driven by supply or demand? I.Starting point: decentralised appli- cation of EU law; every judge an EU judge, every law practitioner an EU lawyer II.Needs defined at ground level vs. needs defined at top level – Needs awareness vs. objective needs 5

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? B. Determining training needs – driven by supply or demand? III. Needs indicators 1.Studies (Wallis 2008; EP 2011; Pilot project to come) 2.EU law implementation reports 3.Feedback from practice 4.Monitoring new legislation and case law 5.Justice scoreboard 6

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? C. Target groups of EU-funded training 1.Judges and prosecutors 2.Lawyers in private practice and notaries 3.Court clerks and bailiffs (Rechtspfleger and Gerichtsvollzieher?) 4.Trainers (multipliers) or end-users » Needs vary according to target group 7

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining needs (1): Target groups of EU-funded training 1.Judges and lawyers in private practice All areas of EU law, depending on specialisation 2.Prosecutors and notaries Special areas of EU law (crim.; family; PIL; …) 3.Court clerks and bailiffs Limited areas related to their competence 4.Trainers (multipliers) or end-users All areas of EU law; training methodologies 8

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? D. Factors determining participation in EU training 1.Practical relevance 2.Accessibility (timing, place, language, costs) 3.Time available (workload, authorisation and appreciation by superiors) 9

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining objectives (1): Factors determining participation Training offered must be - practice-oriented (motivation of trainees) - accessible in time (early warning) and place - accessible in language (active command) - accessible cost-wise (free for judicial staff) - short-time (lawyers: time as cost-factor; judicial staff: workload and backlogs) - recognised as professional task and duty 10

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? E. Contents and level of EU-funded training 1.Fundamentals of EU law: General principles, legal acts, fundamental rights, fundamental freedoms, non- discrimination, identification of applicable EU law (sources and interpretation) 2.Fundamental EU judicial procedures: Preliminary rulings, judicial cooperation acquis (civil, criminal, other), mediation, use of European judicial networks 11

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? E. Contents and level of EU-funded training 3.(Any) specific area of substantive EU law: Competition, environment, tax, trademarks and IP, asylum, telecommunications, labour, consumer, company, data protection, CFR, … 4.Member states’ law: - Legal and judicial order - Procedural law 12

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? E. Contents and level of EU-funded training 5.(Legal) language training and other skills (one? several? all official languages?) 6.Non-legal topics (e.g. ethics) 7.Training methodologies 8.Basic training / Initial training 9.Advanced / continuous/ expert training 13

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining needs(2): Contents of EU-funded training 1.No need for fundamental EU law training at EU level (national priority) 2.High need for cross-border training on judicial cooperation acquis 3.On-going need for continuous updating in all specific areas of EU law 4.Limited need for training in member states’ law (little practical relevance) 14

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining needs(3): Level of EU-funded training 5.Objective need for fluency in one common language 6.Arguably, limited need for EU training on other skills or non-legal topics 7.Limited need for EU support for basic train- ing (national priority; exception new M St) 8.Obvious need for EU support for cross- border elements in initial and joint training activities for expert practitioners 15

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Defining objectives (2): European added value European added value may be achieved - Within a national context: to provide basic or advanced knowledge, or skills, in applying EU law where national training is not available - In a cross-border context: to promote networking, to build trust, to exchange pro- fessional experience, to learn from each other N.B. European added value does not depend on the number of member states involved. 16

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? F. Size of EU funding for training 1.Small-scale projects 2.Large-scale projects G. Innovation and sustainability 1.Innovation vs. repetition of good practice 2.Dissemination of results 3.Sustainability at the level of (a) trainees (b) trainers (c) training providers 17

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Considering means & tools (1): - Size of EU funding Small-scale projects increase administrative burden of COM, but likely to be more targeted and possibly more committed - Innovation and sustainability - Insisting on innovative projects limits scope of training activities: innovation no per se value - Dissemination and sustainability depending on form of training 18

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? H. Forms of EU-funded training 1.Exchanges 2.Curricula 3.Training modules (for trainers and end-users) 4.Face-to-face (lectures, workshops, role plays, etc.) 5.Distance learning (e-learning courses, podcasts, webinars) 6.Regular conferences to identify needs and best practice 19

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Considering means & tools (2): Forms of EU-funded training 1.Exchanges excellent for building trust, for knowing each other’s system and forming a common spirit 2.Curricula and training modules only useful - if regularly updated - as far as taken up by target groups 20

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? Considering means & tools (3): Forms of EU-funded training 3.On-going relevance of face-to-face because of direct exchange; but need for more interactivity 4.Webinars =face-to-face on distance, with quantity advantage and quality disadvantage 5.Relevance and uptake of e-learning courses and podcasts still being explored; unlimited multiplicability, but need for updates 21

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? I. Suggestions from the EP study 1.Provide newsletter with regular updates on developments in EU legislation and case-law 2.Promote use of European Judicial Networks 3.Provide funding for language training 4.Provide funding for multilingual training 5.Invite stakeholders to regular forums to highlight best practice in judicial training 6.Provide funding for decentralised training 22

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? I. Suggestions from the EP study 7.Provide funding for training for hitherto neglected professional groups 8.Provide for a scholarship fund to attend European trainings when national funds are unavailable 9.Provide funding for distance learning 10.Provide funding for training materials that can be re-used at local or national level 23

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? I. Suggestions from the EP study 11.Provide funding for projects that promote more active and practical forms of training 12.Update the EP study on judicial training at regular intervals 24

Judicial Training: What to fund by the EU? J. Choosing perspectives and setting priorities 1.Funder’s perspective (EU actors) prevails: fair enough 2.Effectiveness of funding however only guaranteed if based on end-user perspective 3.Setting funding priorities – a moving target Many thanks for your attention! 25