Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
Advertisements

Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Salmonid Natural Production Monitoring & Evaluation Project Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation BPA Project #
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Assessment of Bull Trout Populations in the Yakima River Watershed.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
BPA Christina Luzier USFWS
1 Measuring Progress: Monitoring and Evaluation in WRIA 8 WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 19, 2009 Scott Stolnack WRIA 8 Technical Coordinator.
Ranking Brook Trout Habitat Patches for Resiliency to Climate Change Brad Trumbo And Mark Hudy USDA Forest Service Fish and Aquatic Ecology Unit James.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
Monitoring of Great Basin Redband Trout 6 Year Pilot Study ODFW Native Fish Investigations Project.
Wild Salmon Policy Update Yukon River Panel March 23, 2011.
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
Non-native fish monitoring activities in Glen and Grand Canyons during 2000 Dave Speas, AGFD Carl Walters, UBC Scott Rogers, AGFD Bill Persons, AGFD.
Watershed Watch Protocols Level I. Goals for this module Understand how biomonitoring is used to evaluate the health of a stream Understand how biomonitoring.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
Salmon recovery does not just mean more fish Management decisions are driven by politics & logistics—science can only contribute if we provide technically.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Advantages of Monitoring Vegetation Restoration With the Carolina Vegetation Survey Protocol M. Forbes Boyle, Robert K. Peet, Thomas R. Wentworth, and.
Habitat Assessment Modeling: Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
SFCC Walkover Habitat Survey Training Course July 2015.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
WRIA 8 Status and Trends Monitoring ( ) Hans B. Berge, Dan Lantz, Scott Stolnack, and Curtis DeGasperi King County Department of Natural Resources.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Fish and Wildlife Department.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Biological Assessment REFORM Summer School, Wageningen (NL), 28 June 2015 Christian Wolter Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Habitat Status and Trend in the Upper Columbia ESU Chapter 3 John Arterburn.
State of the Forest: Data harmonization and management Helping us to know whether we are getting the job done.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
Climate Change Impacts in the Interior Columbia Basin.
Principal funding: Bonneville Power Administration, NOAA-Fisheries Principal Investigator: Dr. Chris Jordan, NOAA-Fisheries Actual work on the project.
What have we learned from the John Day protocol comparison test? Brett Roper John Buffington.
Biological Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
John Lake – Marine Biologist RIDFW-Marine Fisheries Section 3 Ft. Wetherill Road Jamestown, RI Young-of-the-Year Survey in RI.
The management of small pelagics. Comprise the 1/3 of the total world landings Comprise more than 50% of the total Mediterranean landings, while Two species,
SUMMARY. Summary Instructions After the checklist is filled out and rationale documented, the ID Team discusses the responses, reads the category definitions.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Nehalem River Basin: Technical Assistance for Watershed Data Synthesis, Restoration, and Outreach Priorities 4/16/2008.
Lake Roosevelt Rainbow Trout Habitat/Passage Improvement Project No Jason McLellan Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation January.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
ISEMP Data Management System. Support entire workflow Based on required functions Based on understanding of the data ISEMP Data Management System.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
SFS Sacramento May 23, 2016 Special Session Introduction: Traits-Based Vulnerability Assessment and Monitoring Under Climate Change Britta Bierwagen (EPA/ORD),
Biological structure of Fisheries Resources In Space And Time.
Five basic objectives of ISTM
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework

Project Goals The goal of the Yakama Nation is to restore natural production of Pacific lamprey to a level that will provide robust species abundance, significant ecological contributions and meaningful harvest within the Yakama Nations Ceded Lands and in the Usual and Accustomed areas. Implement habitat restoration, Implement supplementation and associated research, Monitor long-term Status and Trend.

Focus of Presentation Status and Trend Monitoring Measure benefits from supplementation Monitor natural production Associated data collection

Bottom Line Need a method to measure Relative Abundance with some: – level of accuracy, and – Comparability over time and space. AND – Contributes to Status and Trend, and – Measures progress of supplementation. AND Consistent and coordinated between tribes, states and USFWS Interested in accuracy – recognize problems with precision (to many variables that cannot be measured with high confidence).

Premises Yakima population is functionally extirpated Provides clean slate – rational for supplementation Art prop allows us to put fish where we know they “will” be – measure growth, other attributes. Our objective is to have many, many 100’s of thousands of juveniles in the Yakima – measuring to a high level of precision is not important towards interest in measuring sharply increasing trend of juvenile production. Genetics issues are being built into this effort in terms of risk management – not a part of this discussion.

Data Outputs Geographic Scales Data collected for several objectives – at several geographic scales. 10 M: density, habitat preference, habitat composition 100 M: relative abundance, status and trend (building block to reach scale population estimates) 1000 M: abundance estimates, status and trend, identification / actions addressing limiting factors

Data Outputs XXX Exploratory Survey – Presence or Not Found – Fish numbers / size estimated; “quick survey” Index Survey – Relative abundance – Annual variation Extensive Surveys – Seasonal variation – art- prop monitoring – Growth, distribution, habitat preference / use

Analysis Unit 2 Analysis Unit 1 Analysis Unit 3 Lamprey River 3 Analysis Units 6 Reaches 11 Index Sites 3 Extensive Sites Multiple Exploratory Sites Reach A Reach B Reach D Reach C Reach E Reach F

Index Sites Objective is to obtain (1) Relative Abundance over a specific area and to obtain (2) density measurements over several habitat types (representative of Site) meters +/- Fixed sites over long time period 3-5 plots, fixed and mapped Each Plot = X amount of area surveyed over Y amount of time (5 – 25 meters depending on stream size) Intensive Site Objective is to measure growth, survival and habitat preference of released propagated juveniles/larvae. Site mapped 75 – 150 metes +/-. Location may vary over time. “Substantial” area surveyed. Invertebrates – detritus Area supplemented

Sampling Strategy Objective is to have a few measuring tools / protocols that can be applied widely to indicate significant changes in population numbers, length frequencies, species abundance and habitat preferences. We also will estimate habitat quantity and quality in specific reaches to estimate changes in abundance / density over several geographic scales. Three geographic scales “established” because types of information / mgt. questions unique for each scale. 10m 100m 1,000m

Key Data Collected Reach-scale (1000m) HUC 5-6 Watershed Stream Name Annual Hydrograph Annual Temps Land Use Channel Condition Channel Characteristic Sinuosity

Key Data Collected Index Site (100m) Location (RM) Lat-Lon Elevation Stream Width (BF) Gradient Depositional Feature Channel Type Riparian Veg (general) Estimated Useable Habitat (Type I-II) Seasonal Temperatures Map is created

Key Data Collected Survey Plot (10m) Plot Name Plot Size Survey time Channel Type (P:R:G:etc) Habitat Type Time of Day Turbidity DO / pH / air-water temp / flow Substrate Characteristics Structural Characteristics Aquatic Veg Characteristics Weather Sunlight Exposure Protocol used Shocker settings

Key Data Collected Biological – Juvenile (each Plot) Date – Location - Plot Species Number Lengths Weights (subsample) Condition Life State (ammo- macro) Notes: Specific habitats where fish were found – and not. Invertebrates – detritus